The influence of social capital in the utilisation of sexual reproductive health services among the youth in Ghana. A community-based cross-sectional study

Social capital, often seen as the resources accessed through social connections, is currently gaining much attention in public health. However, limited studies have focused on the relationship between social capital and reproductive health services. Besides, while the factors associated with the use of reproductive health services among the youth are well documented in the literature, most studies have focused on narrowed perspective failing to take cognisance of the role of social capital. Yet, it is known that these behaviours can be influenced by social factors, which may be beyond the individual’s control partly because the youth are embedded in social organisations. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between social capital and the youth’s utilisation of reproductive health services.The study population comprised adolescents and young adults aged 15–24 years who were both in and out of school at the time of the survey. The study used a cross-sectional quantitative design involving a community-based household survey method to sample 792 respondents through multi-stage cluster sampling. The chi-square test examined the relationship between sociodemographic, social capital variables and reproductive health services. To account for potential confounding factors, a multivariable logistic regression model included variables from the binary logistic regression analysis with a p-value less than 0.05. In general, access to higher social capital was observed among 493 (62.2%). Almost half, 385 (48.6%) of the respondents have ever used at least one of the reproductive services examined in this study. After controlling all other significant predictors, the following social capital variables remained associated with increased utilisation of SRH services: higher trust in neighbourhood (AOR = 1.8; CI = 1.22–2.66), higher trust in people/institutions (AOR = 2.66; CI = 1.82–3.99), higher social cohesion (AOR = 3.35; CI = 2.21–5.08), stronger network (AOR = 7.55; CI = 4.43–12.87).Access to some social capital dimensions is associated with increased use of reproductive health services. However, any intervention such as mentoring including peer support programs, meant to address social capital needs in sexual and reproductive health should consider the efficacy of each social capital dimension and the intervention’s environment.


Introduction
Young people in Sub-Saharan Africa confront numerous sexual and reproductive health challenges, minimal access to and utilisation of sexual and reproductive health services and education on sexuality and family planning (FP). This has led to high rates of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and HIV prevalence among young people, early pregnancy, and vulnerability to delivery problems, all of which have resulted in high rates of death and disability [1]. However, using sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services is not as prevalent as one might assume, given the efforts made in Africa. The utilisation of SRH services varies greatly, from as low as 7.9% for adolescent and youth-friendly services in Ghana [2] to 96.1% for SRH services in general in Ethiopia [3], indicating that different socio-environmental and contextual factors influence utilisation differently in other parts of the continent. Currently, most of the Ghana Health Service's public health facilities around the nation include Adolescent/Youth Health corners that provide sexual and reproductive services tailored to the unique requirements of adolescents/youth. In addition, several Non-Governmental Organisations are also active in delivering comprehensive adolescent health services, such as SRH information and the development of Adolescent/Youth Health Corners in health institutions and schools. Nonetheless, young people continue to underutilise sexual and reproductive healthcare resources [2]. Factors associated with utilisation of reproductive health services such as age, educational level, schooling status, good Knowledge of SRH services, discussion about SRH services, and educational status of partner have all been documented [4][5][6].
The concept of social capital has been used differently in economics, sociology and political science [7]. It has recently been an essential concept in public health [8]. Scholars have described social capital as social ties that may give people and communities access to resources and support in networks that are available in the local community [9]. The exchange of favours, the maintenance of group standards, trust towards individuals or organisations, and the provision of support to members of social groups are all examples of social reciprocity [9]. Many theories of social capital have their roots in individual and family property, but they are also growing to include ideas like communities and nations. [10][11][12]. Both a structural and a cognitive form of explanation are viable options for social capital theory. In its structural form, it focuses on the aspects of social organisations that are visible from the outside and refers to the intensity of an individual's participation in community networks as measured in terms of objective criteria. This portion of the theory is observable from the outside [13]. Subjective factors such as norms and values are encompassed in the cognitive form; these subjective aspects can be measured subjectively [14,15]. Not mutually exclusive, structural and cognitive types of social capital are characterised in terms of social interactions as what people "do" and what they "feel," respectively [14,15]. Some scholars in the field of public health have focused their attention on the differentiation of social capital into "bonding," and "bridging," all of which are closely related to structural social capital [15,16]. Establishing strong intra-group links that connect family members, neighbours, and close friends is an example of bonding capital. Bonding capital consists of relations inside groups of people who are similar to one another. The term "bridging capital" refers to connections that are not very strong between persons or organisations with low levels of social participation.
Even though the evidence on social capital and health outcomes is growing, very little is known concerning the link between social capital and utilisation of sexual and reproductive health service in developing countries. Studies of how social capital influences knowledge and the use of sexual and reproductive healthcare services among the youth are scant. Few studies [17][18][19] conducted on social capital and utilisation of reproductive health services are limited to general populations and done outside sub-Saharan Africa. These studies indicate that bridging social capital was predominantly associated with promoting knowledge about available sexual and reproductive healthcare services [19]. In addition, having low trust in others has been identified as a precursor for poor knowledge and, ultimately, poor service utilisation. It has also been noted that lack of social support was associated with low HIV knowledge and not knowing where to seek HIV counselling and testing [18]. Having a cohesive family, a strong social network, and peers who encourage healthy behaviours and discussions of sexual heath help adolescents has also been noted to achieve a higher level of HIV knowledge among Vietnamese adolescents [17]. Available literature reveals that social capital is essential for improving health in settings with limited resources; nevertheless, additional study is required to discover the most appropriate ways to quantify social capital [20]. The current study took a comprehensive conceptualisation of social capital to understand the relationship between social capital and the youth's utilisation of sexual and reproductive health services.

Study design and settings
The study employed a cross-sectional quantitative community-based household survey design. The study was conducted in the South Tongu District of the Volta region of Ghana. South Tongu district, with Sogakope as its capital, is located in the southern part of the Lower Volta Basin and bounded to the north by the Central and North Tongu Districts, to the east by the Akatsi South District, to the west by the Ada East District of the Greater Accra Region and to the south by the Keta Municipality. The District occupies a total land area of 643.57 square kilometres, representing 3.1% of the total land area of the Volta Region. The District has a population of 87,950 and this represent 4.1% of the total population of the Volta Region [21]. The district is mainly rural: 87.1% of the population resides in rural communities. The sex ratio, defined as the number of males to 100 females, is about 84 [21]. The population is generally very youthful, depicting a broad base pyramid with a small number of elderly people (60 years and above) 7.8%. According to the Ghana Statistical Service, with increasing age, the structure looks slightly thinner for the males than for the females, indicating that at older ages, the proportion of males is lower than that of females. At age 20-24 years, the proportion of males to females is the same. According to the District's Analytical Report, there is one Government District Hospital, one Catholic Mission hospital (Comboni Catholic Hospital), 13 Community Based Health Planning Zones, Four Health Centres, one Planned Parenthood Association of Ghana's (PPAG) Clinic and two private facilities [21].

Study population
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The study population comprised adolescents and young adults aged 15 -24 years who were both in and out of school. This age group was chosen because most youth within this group are currently sexually active.

Eligibility Criteria
All persons between the ages of 15-24-year-olds were eligible. Participants must have lived in South Tongu District within the last twelve (12) months prior to the study. Before the research, participants must have been sexually active and should have given consent or assent to participate and acquired parental consent, if needed. All teens and young adults who met all inclusion criteria but had mental or psychological problems that prevented them from making an informed decision to participate in the study were excluded.

Sample Size Determination and Sampling Procedures
This study was part of a larger Doctoral Thesis on both risky sexual behaviours and utilisation of SRH services and thus sample size was derived from studies of two outcome variables: multiple sexual partners [22] and current contraceptive use [23]. Based on the calculations and assumptions below, the outcome variable (multiple sexual partners) that yielded the largest sample size estimated was used as the final sample size for the study. The assumptions and calculations is as follows: a) 95% confidence level with an alpha value of 0.05 (α = 0.05 value) yielding a Z α/2 = 1.96 on a normal distribution curve. Prevalence of multiple sexual partners obtained in Ghana from a previous study was 33.5% [22]. Based on this assumption, the minimum sample size for the study was computed using the single population proportion formula as indicated below: n = A design effect size of 2 was taken into consideration in order to compensate the loss of sampling efficiency and enhance the variance of the parameter estimations, and therefore precision. In addition, a 15% non-response rate was assumed, taking into consideration the sensitive nature of the topic. Hence the final sample sizes were as follows: Household-based survey was used as the main data collection method. The 2010 population and housing census document provided a list of twenty (20) communities that were included in the study. From these 20 communities, two (2) were classified as Urban whilst the rest were rural. The two urban communities were purposively selected and included in the study. A simple random sampling (by balloting) was used to select an additional eight rural communities from the rest to be included in the study. Based on the number of households per each community as provided by the 2010 population and housing census, sample size for each community was calculated proportional to the size of households in each community.
The next stage entailed selection of participants from households through a modified random walk [24]. The random walk method was the most appropriate because the research team could not get access to the household listing from the district statistical service and therefore random route walk was done using the housing units available.
Based on the modified random walk method, households were selected from housing units within the selected communities. In each community, a random starting point and the direction of travel was chosen. After determining a random starting point, Research Assistants entered the nearest house and all young people aged 15-24 years were identified. In each of the houses, only one household was selected. For this purpose, all selected single-household houses with one eligible young person automatically qualified for interview. In houses with multiple households, however, a simple random balloting method was used to randomly select the household. Additionally, in households with more than one eligible person, one person was randomly selecting using the same simple balloting method.

Study Variables
The outcome variable utilisation of reproductive health services was defined as using any of the minimum packages offered at the service delivery point, whether in a government or commercial facility, within the last year prior to the study. Measures of use included the use of the following: Family Planning and Counselling Services, Information and Contraceptives, testing and counselling for STIs and HIV, treatment and management of STIs and HIV, testing for pregnancy, women's pre-and post-abortion counselling.
The predictor variables for the study include the following social capital domains.

Groups and networks
Groups and networks were assessed using eight Likert scale questions. The study aimed to determine the nature and extent of youth participation in social organisations and informal networks. Bonding and binding ties were also obtained from this section.

Trust and Solidarity
This section contained five (5) items that sought to obtain data on general trust, trust towards key service providers such as reproductive healthcare providers, and how these perceptions have changed over time. The section was assessed using a Likert Scale.

Information and Communication
This component of social capital explored how individuals and households receive information about public services, reproductive health services, and communication infrastructure. Access to information is seen as crucial to helping poorer communities have a stronger voice. This questionnaire section had six Likert-scale items.

Social Cohesion and Inclusion
This component of social capital assesses the nature and extent of divisions and differences in the community that can lead to conflict, mechanisms through which they are managed, and . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. ; groups that are excluded from key public services. This section was also meant to assess everyday social interactions. The section contained eight (8) items measured on a Likert Scale.

Empowerment
The objective of this section was to obtain data on the extent to which individuals have a measure of control over decisions, institutions and processes that directly affect their health and wellbeing. It contained 5 item questions that explored sense of personal efficacy and capacity to influence decisions. The items were assessed on a Likert Scale

Data Collection Tool and Procedure
An interviewer-administered questionnaire collected data on the Open Data Kit (ODK) platform containing sociodemographic data, social capital questions which were adapted from Social Capital Integrated Questionnaire (SC-IQ) for measuring social capital in low-income countries and questions on SRH services adapted from 2014 GDHS and 2017 GMHS. The data was collected by eight undergraduate students of public health (equal number of males and females who worked in pairs) and supervised by a public health nurse.

Data Quality Control
Training was provided to data collectors and supervisors about the purpose of the study, the questionnaire in detail, the procedure for collecting the data, the setting in which the data was collected, and the rights of study participants in order to guarantee the quality of the data. In order to conduct a pilot study of the questionnaire, thirty young people from Adidome, the capital of the Central Tongu District, were chosen at random. These thirty youths were not part of the actual research sample that was conducted. The modifications were made in response to the weakness that were discovered. During the entire process of data collection, supervisors and principal investigators checked the collected data for completeness, accuracy, and consistency. This was done both before and after each data collection session.

Data Analysis and Presentation
Data was extracted from the ODK and imported into Stata version 16 for analysis. Frequencies and percentages were used to describe the distribution of research participants. At the bivariate level, chi square test was used to examine the relationship between the various sociodemographic as well as social capital variables and use of SRH services. Finally, in order to account for the influence of any potential confounding factors, the variables from the binary logistic regression analysis that demonstrate an association and have a p-value that is either less than or equal to 0.05 were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. P-value less than or equal to 0.05 is considered as the level of significance.

Results
A total 792 respondents were involved in the study yielding a 100% response rate

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Respondents
The mean age was 20.05 (± 2.49) years with age range between 15 and 24 years. Of the 972 respondents 464 (58.59%) were males, 531 (67.05%) came from rural area, 707 (89.30%) were . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. ; never married. Almost two-thirds of the respondents 515 (65.0%) were out of school at the time of the study, 199 (25.1%) lived with both parents, 187 (23.6%) lived with mother alone or lived on their own 154 (19.4%). Of all the respondents almost 60% possess a valid National Health Insurance card (see Table 1). Step Parents 4 0.5 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Access and distribution of Social Capital
In general, access to higher social capital was observed among 493 (62.2%) of the respondents. In terms of distribution, a significant difference was observed between those in rural and urban areas {X 2 (1) =11.21, p<0.001}. The majority of respondents, 634(80.1%), reported having access to large networks; 601 (75.9%) and 517 (65.3%) respondents reported access to a strong bonding and bridging ties, respectively. Almost two-thirds of the respondents 499 (63.0%), reported higher trust in their neighbourhood, whilst over half 466 (58.8%) reported high trust in people and institutions, including health service providers. In general, more increased access to information and communication was reported among 478 (60.4%) of the respondents. However, 652 (82.3%) of the respondents said that social inclusion in their neighbourhood was low. In addition, a higher level of social cohesiveness in the neighbourhood was reported among 560 (70.7%) respondents. Finally, findings indicate that a higher level of empowerment was reported among 477 (60.2%) of the respondents (see Table 2). . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.07.22280832 doi: medRxiv preprint Almost half 385 (48.6%) of the respondents have ever used at least one of the reproductive services examined in this study. Majority 283 (73.5%) reported using a condom. Whilst most of these services were obtained from pharmacies and chemical shops 227 (59%), participants also mentioned private health facilities 58 (15.1%), government health facilities 47 (12.2%), outreaches programmes in schools 37 (9.61%) and from friends 16 (4.1%) as the source of reproductive health services (see Fig. 1).
When respondents were asked if they were aware of the existence of adolescent/youth corners in the district, only 144 (18.2%) responded in the affirmative. Out of the 144 respondents who were aware of the existence of adolescent/youth corners, 51.4 % (74) used the facility.

Fig.1: Sources of SRH services among the youth (n = 385)
Significantly higher levels of awareness about AYFC was observed in urban areas than in rural areas {X 2 (1) =11.82, p<0.001}. Out of the 144 respondents who were aware of the existence of adolescent/youth corners, 51.4 % (74) actually made use of the facility. Higher utilisation was observed among urban dwellers in terms of use of adolescent/youth corners Source SRH services . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Fig. 2. Reasons for non-utilisation of AYFC among the youth (n = 70)
Reasons for non-utilisation of adolescent/youth comers ranged from fear of parents 28(40%) to feeling too young for the services 17 (24%), perceived lack of privacy at the adolescent corners 11 (16%), not knowing the actual location of service providers 10 (14%), and perceived long waiting time 4 (6%) (see Fig. 2 is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.07.22280832 doi: medRxiv preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. ; a adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, father's education, marital status, age, distance to facility, valid health insurance, trust in neighbourhood, trust in institution/people, information and communication, bridging ties, social cohesion and overall social capital. b adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, father's education, marital status, age, distance to facility, valid health insurance, network of connection, trust in institution/people, information and communication, bridging ties, empowerment, social cohesion and overall social capital. c adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, father's education, marital status, age, distance to facility, valid health insurance, network of connection, trust in neighbourhood, information and communication, empowerment, bridging ties, social cohesion and overall social capital. d adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, father's education, marital status, age, distance to facility, valid health insurance, network of connection, trust in institution/people trust in neighbourhood, information and communication, bridging ties, social cohesion and overall social capital. e adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, father's education, marital status, age, distance to facility, valid health insurance, network of connection, trust in neighbourhood, trust in institution/people, information and communication, empowerment, social cohesion and overall social capital. f adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, father's education, marital status, age, distance to facility, valid health insurance, trust in neighbourhood, trust in institution/people, information and communication, empowerment, bridging ties, network of connection and overall social capital. g adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, father's education, marital status, age, distance to facility, valid health insurance, network of connection, trust in neighbourhood, trust in institution/people, information and communication, empowerment, bridging ties, social cohesion At the bivariate level, the overall level of social capital, together with seven social capital variables, were significantly associated with utilising sexual and reproductive health services (See Table 4). After controlling for the confounding effects of area of residence, schooling status, father's education, marital status, age, distance to the facility and possessing valid health insurance, the following social capital variables remained statistically significant. Specifically, the odds of utilising SRH services significantly reduced among participants who reported being highly empowered (AOR =0.65; 95% CI = 0.45 -0.95; p=0.026) compared to those who reported low empowerment. Similarly, respondents who reported stronger bridging ties reported reduced odds of using SRH services (AOR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.24 -0.75; p = 0.003) compared to respondents who reported weak bridging ties. However, reporting a stronger network of connection was associated with a higher likelihood of using SRH services (AOR = 7.55; 95% CI = 4.43 -12.87; p<0.001) than reports of a weak network. Higher trust in the neighbourhood among respondents increased the odds of using SRH services by 1.8 (AOR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.22 -2.66; p <0.001) compared to lower trust in the neighbourhood. Similarly, participants who reported higher trust in people/institution were 2.66 times more likely to utilise SRH services (AOR = 2.66; 95% CI = 1.82 -3.89; p <0.001) compared to those who reported lower trust in people/institutions. The odds of using SRH services were 3.35 times higher among participants who reported living in areas higher in social cohesion (AOR= 3.35; 95% CI = 2.21 -5.08; p<0.001) than those who reported living in areas lower in social cohesion. In general, the odds of using SRH services were significantly increased by more than two times among respondents who reported higher overall social capital (AOR= 2.83; 95% CI = 2.02 -3.96; p<0.001) compared to those who reported low overall social capital. Table 5 shows both bivariate and multivariate analyses investigating the association between social capital and use of Adolescent and Youth Friendly Corners (AYFC). At the bivariate level, three social capital variables were significantly associated with use of AYFC. Specifically, participants who reported access to stronger bridging ties had 1.98 times the odds of visiting the adolescent/youth corner compared to those who reported weak bridging ties (OR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.00 -3.90; p-value = 0.049). There was significantly higher utilisation of AYFC among respondents who reported strong social network of connection (OR =2.29; 95% CI = 1.12 -16.45; p = 0.026) compared to those who reported weak networks. When compared with respondents who reported low access to information and communication, the odds of utilising AYFC were 2.05 times higher among respondents who reported higher access to information and communication (OR = 2.05; 95% CI = 1.01 -4.15; p = 0.044).
All social capital variables that were significantly associated with use of AYFC were further examined, controlling for the confounding effect of area of residence, schooling status, and distance to the facility in a multivariate logistic regression analysis (see Table 5). The results show that the association between bridging ties and use of AYFC was no longer significant. However, respondents who reported stronger networks were more than four times more likely to use AYFC (AOR = 4.08; 95% CI = 1.36 -12.28; p = 0.012) than those who reported weak networks. Additionally, the odds of AYFC use were almost two times higher among respondents who had high access to information and communication (AOR = 1.97; 95% CI= 1.04 -4.78; p = 0.036) compared to those who reported low access. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. ; ****** All respondents in the category reported low social inclusion a adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, distance to facility, information and communication, and bridging ties b adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, distance to facility, network of connection, bridging ties c adjusted for area of residence, schooling status, distance to facility, information and communication and network of connection

Discussion
In the current study, less than half of the respondents had used any reproductive health services offered to young people. The rate of utilisation of sexual and reproductive health services found in the current study is lower than the almost 70% among young people in Ghana [25] and 54% utilisation rate in Kumbungu District in Northern Ghana [26]. Other findings from Oromia, Amhara and the Northeast regions of Ethiopia reported higher utilisation of SRH services among young people than in the current study [3,27,28]. Differences in the populations involved could explain the lower utilisation rate found in the present study. Whilst most previous studies were mainly school-based, the current research involved in-school and out-of-school young people. Whilst in-school adolescents are likely to benefit from the various life skills training available through the school curriculum, that may not be available to out-of-school research participants.
Although the participants mentioned condoms, the rate of family planning and VCT utilisation were alarmingly low. The use of family planning is essential to avoiding unintentional pregnancy and hence decreasing unsafe abortion. The low utilisation of family planning in the current research could thus lead to increase rates of unsafe abortions because most participants in the present study were unmarried, albeit sexually active. Teenagers and young people, especially those in school, are at greater risk of the effect that inadequate sexual and reproductive health services can have on their reproductive health, including STIs, unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion.
While inadequate use of services may be a sign of young people's poor knowledge about sexual and reproductive health services, the fact that utilisation of AYFCs was very low calls into question the effectiveness of the adolescent corners concept and adolescent health policy more generally. In this study, many young people referred to the fear of parents, age inappropriateness, and lack of privacy at the youth-friendly facilities as their reasons for not using these services. Although these reasons are consistent with findings from a school-based cross-sectional study among Ethiopian youth [3], the results are concerning. For instance, fear of parental reproach concerning the use of youth corners noted in the current study is a cause for concern. Parents should therefore be made aware of the SRH needs of their adolescents and the services available to support them.
Findings from the current study indicate that the use of SRH services is positively associated with the following social capital variables in adjusted models: a stronger social network of connections in the community, trust in the neighbourhood, trust in people and institutions, higher bonding relationships and higher levels of social cohesion in the neighbourhood. In addition, the influence of social networks on reproductive health services was consistent with findings from is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. ; earlier studies [17,18,29]. The finding from the current study is not surprising since social networks enable sharing of information on sexual and reproductive health services. Such information becomes vital in young people's decisions concerning the use of sexual and reproductive services. For young people in rural communities, social networks are considered the primary source of information as they are severely disadvantaged in several aspects of their lives [30]. Higher trust in people/institutions and neighbourhoods was also associated with utilising reproductive health services in the current study. This finding is consistent with results from previous studies [18,29,31]. The findings also support the argument that trust in healthcare providers is critical in explaining healthcare usage [32].
These findings have policy implications for promoting healthy sexual and reproductive health development in more rural communities. Promoting diverse and more robust networks, including those that involve decision-makers, can provide adolescents better access and more opportunity to articulate their reproductive and sexual health needs and negotiate support for such services. Establishing and extending these various networks will benefit, most importantly, underprivileged young people and adolescents with little assets and limited access to these services, thereby promoting equitable access to sexual and reproductive health services.
The findings suggest a need for health policymakers, community health organisations, and health administrators to consider the issue of trust when designing reproductive health-related interventions for vulnerable populations such as adolescents and young adults.
In the current study, higher bonding ties were associated with the use of sexual and reproductive health services. This finding is not consistent with previous studies [20,33]. Research has shown that communities with higher bonding ties can have negative health consequences, particularly for poorer communities [33]. Therefore if the existing norms and values discourage reproductive health services, more impoverished communities with higher bonding ties may have lower utilisation of services. The difference in findings between the current and previous studies could be attributed to the population of interest and the norms and values shared within these groups. Therefore, it will be safe to say that the finding in the current study may be related to the spread of positive norms and values among the younger generation concerning the use of reproductive health services within their groups.
This suggests that involvement in groups, such as religious, social or school clubs, could encourage the youth to use SRH services. The findings would mean that building on social clubs associated with reproductive health could be critical in improving adolescents' and young adults' reproductive health beliefs and health information to encourage SRH service utilisation. There is also a need to collaborate with these social clubs since they benefit health beliefs and health information, which are essential in utilisation of health services.

Strength and Limitations
Given that the concept of social capital is relatively new in public health, this study contributes to the literature on social capital and how it relates to young people's sexual and reproductive health. This research utilised modified versions of conventional questionnaires on social capital and reproductive health services, contributing to the study's high validity. The study employed a sufficient sample size and achieved a reasonable response rate. The investigators put in a lot of work to ensure that the data remained accurate, primarily by administering a pretest, conducting numerous field supervisions, and providing training to the data collectors. Nevertheless, there are likely some limitations in the study. Social desirability and recollection bias may be introduced . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.07.22280832 doi: medRxiv preprint during the data collection process. In addition, the research did not provide any qualitative data as a supplement of any kind. Finally, since this study was cross-sectional, it did not demonstrate any cause-effect linkages.

Conclusion
Whilst social capital could provide an essential resource for meeting adolescents sexual and reproductive health needs in Ghana, an understanding of which form of social capital has potential benefit for a particular aspect of sexual and reproductive health is very important.

Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request

Ethical Approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (GHS-ERC019/05/19). In addition, administrative permissions were also obtained from the Regional and District Directorates of Ghana Health Service in the Volta region and the South Tongu District before the commencement of the study.

Consent
For participants who were youngsters under 18, the participant's parent or legal guardian gave their written informed consent in addition to the adolescents' assent for their participation in the study. The participants in the study were explained the study's purpose, and data were collected only after obtaining their full informed written consent. Additionally, the participants' names and other personal identification information were removed to ensure the information remained confidential.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors' Contributions
MKA developed the study design and protocol, literature review, selection of studies, quality assessment, statistical analysis, and interpretation of the data. MKA and RKA develop the initial drafts of the manuscript. MKA, RKA, PND, AM, DOA and JKG prepared the final draft of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 10, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.07.22280832 doi: medRxiv preprint