Central desks as an approach for health governance in 2 conflict settings – case studies from northwest Syria

Background : The conflict in Syria affected severely the health sector; health infrastructure was damaged, the Damascus ministry of health withdrew from opposition held areas, health workers fled 24 the country, and there has been always a shortage of funding and medical supplies. To address these 25 needs, Syrian NGOs, INGOs, donors, and UN Agencies have been providing health interventions 26 through humanitarian channels. However, many of these interventions were short termed, and there 27 was no governance framework to guide the newly introduced parallel system, leaving it subject to 28 individual organizations’ strategies and approaches. 29 To counter these challenges, local communities and Syrian NGOs established new platforms to govern 30 and coordinate certain aspects of the health sector. These platforms are called “central desks”, which 31 are perceived to be independent and neutral structures and can coordinate services between all 32 actors. Examples of these structures are Syrian Immunization Group (SIG), Health Information System 33 (HIS), the Infection Protection and Control initiative (IPC), and the Referral System network. Methods : The research was based on an institutional approach to governance as presented by 35 (Abimbola et. Al, 2017) and (Baez-Carmago and Jacobs, 2011) of health governance. We have investigated the central desks across the main themes; governance inputs of these central desks, such as strategic vision and legitimacy; governance processes, such as accountability and transparency, and governance outcomes, such as effectiveness and efficiency. Further to intensive literature review, eight focus group discussion were conducted, average pf 12 participants. Key themes then were deducted and coded. The qualitative analysis was done using NVIVO 12 software. Conclusion: Central desks, that are not part of national ministries of health, are new innovative approaches that can increase the efficiency of health interventions in conflict settings. The detailed features of such desks should be context specific and locally informed and led.

Introduction Historically, global health can be rooted in the period of European colonialism, when health 48 interventions were merely focused on securing colonizers from locally prevalent diseases. This is when 49 western institutions studying "tropical diseases" flourished. However, gradually there were concerns 50 that health threats can cross national borders, and if a harmful pathogen was left to spread in a low-51 income country, this pathogen can threaten the whole world. Throughout the years, therefore, the 52 mission of global health expanded from focusing on tropical medicine to improving health equity 53 worldwide and even strengthening local systems to fight diseases before it spread [1].

54
However, some could argue that the unequal balance of power in times of colonialism, when global 55 health emerged, was having, and still having, great impact on unequal relations and inequalities in 56 global health until today. Additionally, the various local political systems sometimes interfere with 57 these efforts of global health in a way that can paralyse these efforts [2]. These political interferences 58 can be very profound in times of conflict and political instability. Local governments, non-state armed 59 groups, and other warrying parties usually interfere with provision of health services, which result in 60 severe disruption of health governance in such settings. This pushed various actors to think of other 61 ways and approaches to deliver health services and implement local health system strengthening 62 interventions without being paralysed with such interferences.

63
Although several frameworks for health governance were developed [3], all of these frameworks were 64 developed for stable settings with very limited applicability in armed conflict settings. For example the 65 institutional analysis framework developed by Abimbola 2017 assumes the existence of functioning 66 institutions to explore health governance [4]. Similarly, the World Health Organization (WHO) 67 frameworks for health governance do have this underlying assumption [5]. When approaching health 68 governance in conflict settings, therefore, it is important to use combinations of these frameworks 69 and think of innovative solutions for how to navigate through conflict sensitivities and geopolitics.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 27, 2022. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2022  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 27, 2022. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2022  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 27, 2022. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2022 Later, the District Health Information System DHIS was established and supported by NGOs and WHO 246 for health programs in NWS [24].

247
The is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 27, 2022. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2022 challenge to the HIS Unit to approach trustable and high-quality methods of data collection and 270 analysis.".

271
The legitimacy of the HIS unit can be improved by several context-specific factors. The top two factors 272 were quality of data products and the ability to cover wide geographical areas. 33% of the participants 273 said that increasing the quality of the HIS reports and data products is the main source of legitimacy.

274
17% of them believed that the NGOs cooperation which is closely linked to extending the geographical is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 27, 2022. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2022 mechanisms or procedures for transparency within the unit in relation to their ways of working, 294 finance and resources, and implementation activities. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 27, 2022. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2022