The impact of physical activity and exercise on aerobic capacity in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Background A low level of cardiorespiratory fitness [CRF; typically defined as peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) or peak power output (PPO)] is a widely reported consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI). This systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression aimed to assess whether certain SCI characteristics and specific exercise considerations are moderators of changes in CRF. Methods Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and pre-post studies that conducted an exercise intervention lasting >2 weeks. The outcome measures of interest were absolute (AVO2peak) or relative VO2peak (RVO2peak), and/or PPO. Four databases were searched up to July 2021. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool were used to assess bias/quality. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted. Results Ninety studies (110 independent exercise interventions) with a total of 1,191 participants were included in our primary meta-analysis. There were significant improvements in AVO2peak [0.22 (0.17, 0.26) L/min, p<0.001)], RVO2peak [2.8 (2.2, 3.4) mL/kg/min, p<0.001)], and PPO [11 (8, 13) W, p<0.001]. There were no subgroup differences in AVO2peak or RVO2peak. There were subgroup differences (p<0.008) for changes in PPO based on time since injury, neurological level of injury, exercise modality, relative exercise intensity, method of exercise intensity prescription, and frequency. The meta-regression found that increased age was associated with increases in AVO2peak and RVO2peak, and exercise intensity prescription and volume were associated with increases in PPO (p<0.05). GRADE assessments indicated a low level of certainty in the estimated effects due to study design, risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Conclusion The pooled analysis indicates that performing exercise >2 weeks results in significant improvements in AVO2peak, RVO2peak and PPO in individuals with SCI. Subgroup comparisons identify that upper-body aerobic exercise and resistance training appear the most effective at improving PPO. Furthermore, acutely-injured, individuals with paraplegia, exercising at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity, prescribed via a percentage of oxygen consumption or heart rate, for more than 3 sessions/week will likely experience the greatest change in PPO. Registration PROSPERO CRD42018104342


121
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex neurological condition, caused by trauma, disease or degeneration, 122 which results in sensory-motor deficits (i.e., paralysis or paresis) below the level of lesion and autonomic 123 dysfunctions. Progressive physical deconditioning following injury results in increased health care 124 utilisation, reliance on personal assistance services and a greater predisposition towards developing 125 chronic diseases [1,2]. Individuals with SCI are at an increased risk of stroke, cardiovascular disease 126 (CVD), and type-2 diabetes mellitus compared to non-injured counterparts [3][4][5]. The elevated incidence 127 of these conditions in people with SCI emphasises the need for targeted interventions to address 128 modifiable risk factors for these chronic diseases, such as cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). In clinical 1) Do injury-specific characteristics (e.g., tetraplegia vs. paraplegia, acute vs. chronic injuries, motor-180 complete vs. incomplete) mediate CRF responses to exercise? 181 2) What is the best intensity, frequency, and volume of weekly exercise? To address these questions, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression 186 to investigate the impact of different exercise interventions on changes in CRF in individuals with SCI.

187
Moreover, we gathered evidence to determine whether key moderators (e.g., participant/injury 188 characteristics, intervention/study characteristics and risk of bias) influence these intervention effects.   sectional studies: self-reported or objectively measured habitual physical activity level) and; 5) report case series with a number (n) of participants <5 (to increase the robustness of our findings given the 210 inclusion of smaller sample sizes in previous reviews [21,38,39]); 4) non-peer reviewed (i.e., conference 211 proceeding/abstracts/posters); 5) children or adolescents (<18 years) ; 6) non-SCI (non-injured 212 participants or other neurological conditions); 7) does not report a CRF-specific outcome; 8) single 213 exercise sessions or an intervention <2 weeks; 9) no suitable comparison (i.e., control group or baseline 214 data pre-intervention) or exposure variable measured; 10) no full text; and 11) not written in English.  a progression in intensity that spanned the moderate and vigorous-intensity categories (e.g., 60-65% 260 V O2peak), it was classified as 'moderate-to-vigorous'. If insufficient data were provided, studies were 261 classified as 'mixed-intensity/cannot determine'. Furthermore, where a study reported frequency of 262 sessions or length of interventions as a range (e.g., 6-8 weeks), the midpoint was extracted and if a study 263 reported duration as a range (e.g., 40-45 min), the greater value was extracted. Descriptions of adverse 264 events in the included studies were also collated. These were categorised into the following subgroups:  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint Means ± SD were estimated from median and interquartile range (IQR) [41] or median and range [42], 269 where required. Where CRF data was only presented in figures, data were extrapolated using Photoshop 270 (Adobe Inc). To combine within-study subgroups and to estimate SD of the delta (Δ) change in CRF 271 using correlation factors, we followed guidance from the Cochrane handbook [41]. Correlation factors 272 were calculated for AV O2peak , RV O2peak and PPO using studies that reported pre-post SD and SD of the

285
Since AV O2peak, RV O2peak, and PPO are continuous variables, expressed using the same units across 286 studies, we utilised weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as summary 287 statistics. A primary meta-analysis was carried out in R (Version 3.5.1, R Foundation for Statistical 288 Computing, Vienna, Austria) describing Δ in CRF outcomes in response to prospective, well-289 characterised exercise interventions lasting >2 weeks (e.g., combining exercise intervention-arms from 290 RCTs and pre-post studies). Nine separate primary meta-analyses were performed to describe Δ in each 291 CRF outcome with studies categorised into subgroups based on the following: 1) time since injury [(TSI), 292 e.g., Acute (<1-year), chronic (≥1-year)]; 2) neurological level of injury (e.g., tetraplegia, paraplegia); 3) 293 injury severity [e.g., grading in accordance with the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment

298
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  where studies were removed, and pooled WMD recalculated, when their CIs did not overlap with the CIs 313 of the pooled effect. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted by comparing the WMDs of low and high 314 risk of bias studies, as well as studies with and without imputed data (i.e., extracted from figures or where 315 mean ± SD were calculated from median, IQR or range), to confirm the robustness of our findings.

316
Potential publication bias in the dataset was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's tests in R. Data is 317 visualised in R (see Github for scripts: https://github.com/jutzca/Exercise-and-fitness-in-SCI). A 2.7 318 mL/kg/min, and thus 1 metabolic equivalent in SCI (1 SCI-MET) [43], change in RV O2peak was 319 considered clinically meaningful.

321
To explore potential sources of heterogeneity, a random-effects meta-regression was performed using 322 preselected moderator variables in Stata (Version 13, StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA), 323 adjusted for multiple testing. As per Cochrane recommendations [44], for each included covariate in the 324 model a minimum of 10 studies were required. To achieve this, and to also overcome the issue of 325 collinearity between moderators, some moderators were not included in the analysis. Moderators were 326 selected a priori, based on their potential to influence CRF responses. Exercise intensity prescription was 327 later added as a moderator in the meta-regression in light of a recent study challenging strategies for 328 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint 'Low' or 'Very Low'. GRADE certainty in the evidence was downgraded if one or more of the following 359 criteria were present: 1) risk of bias, 2) inconsistency in the results for a given outcome, 3) indirectness, 360 4) imprecision, and 5) publication bias.

363
The initial database search identified 12,885 articles after removal of duplicates. Further, 11,029 studies 364 were removed following the screening of titles and abstracts. The remaining 1,856 articles were selected 365 for full-text review based on inclusion and exclusion criteria (S1). Of these, a total of 110 eligible studies,   is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint    is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint     is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint   The removal of potential outliers resulted in no meaningful changes to the overall pooled effects for any 459 outcome. A sensitivity analysis for risk of bias revealed no differences in the pooled effects for low and 460 high risk of bias studies (S11). A sensitivity analysis for imputed data revealed a greater RV O2peak in 461 studies with imputed data (3.9 mL/kg/min) compared to studies without (2.5 mL/kg/min). Yet, there were 462 no differences in the pooled effects for AV O2peak or PPO (S11). An additional analysis grouped 463 interventions into those that matched the CPET modality to the exercise intervention and those that did 464 not. Following the adjustment for subgroup comparisons, there was a significantly greater RV O2peak in 465 studies with matched CPET and intervention modalities (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences 466 in AV O2peak or PPO (S12). A sub-analysis on gait training CPETs alone also revealed no subgroup 467 differences in any outcome (S13).  were also no associations between PPO and the other moderator variables (Table 5). is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint There was no evidence that the exercise intervention and study characteristics included in model 2 were 477 associated with increases in AV O2peak or RV O2peak. However, there was evidence for an association 478 between the method of exercise intensity prescription and increases in PPO (p<0.01). Additionally, there 479 was evidence for an association between exercise volume and increases in PPO (p = 0.04) ( Table 5).

500
Six studies (n=380 participants) included cross-sectional data and assessed associations between habitual 501 physical activity level (as a continuous variable) and CRF outcomes. Five studies assessed physical 502 activity exposure using self-report methods [82-86], whereas one study used a validated wearable device 503 [87]. The measurement period used to capture physical activity dimensions ranged from 3 to 7 days.

504
There was considerable variability across studies with regards to the physical activity dimensions 505 captured: hours per week of exercise/sport, minutes per day or week of mild, moderate, heavy-intensity 506 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint for the subcategories of leisure time physical activity (LTPA), lifestyle or household activity or 507 cumulative activity (S6). Collectively, data indicates significant positive correlations of a larger 508 magnitude between CRF/PPO outcomes and the volume of sport, exercise or LTPA rather than 509 household activity. The only study to use a validated wearable device indicated that participants 510 performing ≥150 min/wk of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) had a significantly higher 511 CRF relative to a low activity group (performing <40 min/wk). Whereas, there was no significant 512 difference in CRF between the low activity group and participants achieving the SCI fitness specific   is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint Seven RCTs compared changes in CRF outcomes between moderate (n=52 participants) and vigorous 537 (n=51 participants) exercise intensity groups. These studies utilised upper-body aerobic exercise and gait 538 training. A meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between moderate and vigorous-intensity 539 in AV O2peak (p=0.67), RV O2peak (p=0.88) or PPO (p=0.62) (S9). There were also no significant subgroup 540 differences between studies that matched exercise volume between intensity groups and those that did

555
Overall, the GRADE assessment revealed a 'Low' certainty in the body of evidence for improvements 556 in all CRF outcomes ( Table 6). The certainty rating for AV O2peak was downgraded due to imprecision 557 and a lack of high quality study designs, whereas RV O2peak was downgraded as a result of imprecision 558 and a high risk of bias in the RCTs. The confidence rating for PPO was downgraded due to imprecision 559 and inconsistency, resulting from considerable heterogeneity in the included exercise interventions. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022.     is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint   is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022.   is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022.   is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint greater changes in RV O2peak are likely achieved when the CPET modality is matched to the intervention 686 (S12). Therefore, researchers should endeavour to match the CPET modality to their exercise 687 intervention, or at the very least be careful when interpreting changes in CRF when using different  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

718
This review reveals that V O2peak improves regardless of the method used to prescribe exercise intensity.

719
With regards to PPO, the subgroup difference indicates that the magnitude of change is greater when  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint Given that prescribing exercise intensity via HR and V O2 can typically be resource and cost-intensive, 744 there is some scope for using RPE as a cheaper and more practical method for community-based exercise 745 prescription. However, this may not be as effective as other objective methods. Future research should 746 aim to identify the optimal methods of exercise intensity prescription, as well as consider revisiting the 747 current "moderate-to-vigorous intensity" recommendations.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint intervention arms would be the best way to explore dose-response changes with regards to differing 774 volumes of exercise, as has been done in the non-injured population [129-132].

777
Adverse events were reported for 4.1% of the total included participants, with the majority of events 778 related to skin sores, pressure sores or ulcers. Qualitatively, there was no particular exercise modality 779 that suggested an increased risk for an adverse event, but higher-intensity exercise appeared to reveal   is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint sustain the integrity and transparency of reporting in this field, researchers are encouraged to 803 prospectively register any planned clinical trials using publicly available repositories.

805
The risk of bias assessments on pre-post studies revealed that no study conducted multiple baseline or 806 follow-up assessments. Whilst often time-consuming and impractical with larger sample sizes, multiple is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

835
As there were not enough RCTs to perform a meta-regression on this study design specifically, we pooled

849
Despite reporting some significant subgroup differences across dichotomised studies, these variables 850 were not identified as significant moderator variables in the random-effects meta-regression, meaning 851 these findings should be viewed with caution. It is perhaps more of a limitation of the evidence-base per 852 se, rather than our meta-analysis, in that more studies should be conducted to increase the power of these 853 subgroups and to ascertain whether there would be any significant improvements with a greater study 854 sample size.

856
Another limitation is that despite our comprehensive search strategy we may have missed relevant studies 857 as we did not search the grey literature and abstracts were not included. Finally, this review excluded 858 studies that were not published in English, introducing a source of language bias. However, of the full 859 texts screened for eligibility only 0.6% were excluded for being unavailable in English and is therefore  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint

863
Our results support the current guidelines regarding the minimal weekly volume of exercise necessary to

881
The current review shows that individuals meeting the SCI-specific guidelines for cardiometabolic health

882
[24] can improve RV O2peak to a similar magnitude to the overall pooled effect (~1 MET-SCI), 883 highlighting that these guidelines may offer a reduction in CVD risk, and therefore mortality.

884
Nonetheless, an association between an improvement in CRF and a reduction in mortality is yet to be 885 established specifically in the SCI population, and remains an important avenue of research for the future. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint appear the most effective at improving PPO. Furthermore, acutely-injured, paraplegic individuals, 893 exercising at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity, prescribed via V O2 or HR, for more than 3 sessions/week 894 will likely experience the greatest change in PPO. Importantly, there is an ever-growing need for studies 895 to establish a dose-response relationship between exercise and CRF in the SCI population to determine 896 the most optimal form of exercise prescription to reduce the wide-ranging consequences typically 897 associated with SCI. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint    is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint

RCT
Randomised-controlled trial

RoB 2
The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool

RV O2peak
Relative peak oxygen uptake

Standard deviation
TIDieR

V O2
Oxygen uptake

V O2peak
Peak oxygen uptake

V O2reserve
Reserve oxygen uptake is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022.          is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint 1383 Table 2. Exercise intervention parameters reported within the included studies of the primary meta-1384 analysis.
1385 Table 3. Summary statistics of the three subgroup analyses on injury characteristics describing Δ in CRF 1386 outcomes.
1387 Table 4. Summary statistics of the three subgroup analyses on exercise parameters describing Δ in CRF 1388 outcomes.
1389 Table 5. Meta-regression models with adjusted values for each cardiorespiratory fitness outcome.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint Total number of studies (N) and participants (Σ), along with descriptive characteristics for the primary meta-analysis included in this systematic review that describes Δ in CRF outcomes in response to prospective, well-characterised exercise interventions lasting >2 weeks (e.g., combining exercise intervention-arms from RCTs and pre-post studies). Continuous variables are displayed as weighted means (range: lowest -highest mean values reported from studies). Categorical variables are displayed as n (%). Weighted means were calculated to account for differences in sample size between studies using the following formula: Σn*x ̅ /Σn, where Σ = the sum of, n = number of participants in each study, and x ̅ = mean CRF outcome of each study. AIS, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale; F, females; M, males; NR, not reported; PARA, paraplegia; PPO, peak power output; TETRA, tetraplegia; V O2peak, peak oxygen consumption; W, watts. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  (N) and participants, (Σ) along with descriptive characteristics for the primary meta-analysis included in this systematic review that describes Δ in CRF outcomes in response to prospective, well-characterised exercise interventions lasting >2 weeks (e.g., combining exercise intervention-arms from RCTs and pre-post studies). Continuous variables are displayed as weighted means (range: lowest -highest mean values reported from studies). Categorical variables are displayed as n (%). Weighted means were calculated to account for differences in sample size between studies using the following formula: Σn*x ̅ /Σn, where Σ = the sum of, n = number of participants in each study, and x ̅ = mean CRF outcome of each study. F, females; HR max, maximal heart rate; HR peak, peak heart rate; HRR, heart rate reserve; 1RM, one repetition maximum; M, males; MTP, maximal tolerated power; NR, not reported; PPO, peak power output; V O2 peak, peak oxygen consumption; W, watts. a Beillot et al.
[68] (pre-post intervention study) reported n=10 suffered major complications including spontaneous fractures of lower limbs, occurrence of syringomyelia and pressure sores but did not specify the sum of participants for each adverse event. b Gibbons et al. [81] reported that some individuals experienced autonomic dysreflexia during the FES response test but did not quantify further. c Sum of participants experiencing adverse events were not reported by Janssen  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint .574 to 0.140 0.041 * Permutations = 10,000 1 tau 2 = 0.02339; I 2 res = 98.61%; Adj R 2 = 13.00%; Model F (5,63) = 2.77; Prob > F = 0.0252 2 tau 2 = 0.2932; I 2 res = 98.52%; Adj R 2 = -9.04%; Model F (7,61) = 0.31; Prob > F = 0.9446 3 tau 2 = 3.639; I 2 res = 97.98%; Adj R 2 = 11.98%; Model F (5,68) = 2.89; Prob > F = 0.0201 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 8, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397 doi: medRxiv preprint Table 6. Grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation analysis for each cardiorespiratory fitness outcome. Study design, imprecision, an unclear dose response and residual confounding reduced the Grade to Low.
The evidence supporting improvements in AV O2peak is predominantly in young and middleaged males that had been injured for >1-year (chronic TSI). Participants were mostly paraplegic (70%) but there were a mixture of injury severities (AIS A-D).
There were no subgroup differences in exercise intervention characteristics to suggest the optimal training parameters.
Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
High risk of bias, imprecision, an unclear dose response and residual confounding reduced the Grade to Low.
The evidence supporting improvements in RV O2peak is predominantly in young and middleaged males that had been injured for >1-year (chronic TSI). Participants were mostly paraplegic (70.5%) but there were a mixture of injury severities (AIS A-D).
There were no subgroup differences in exercise intervention characteristics to suggest the optimal training parameters.
Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Inconsistency, imprecision, an unclear dose response and residual confounding reduced the Grade to Moderate.
The evidence supporting improvements in PPO is predominantly in young and middle-aged males that had been injured for >1-year (chronic TSI). Participants were mostly paraplegic (76%) but there were a mixture of injury severities (AIS A-D).
Subgroup differences suggest that upper-body aerobic exercise and resistance training appear the most effective at improving PPO. Furthermore, acutely-injured, individuals with paraplegia, exercising for >3 sessions/week at a moderate-to-vigorous-intensity, prescribed via V O2 or heart rate, will likely experience the greatest change in PPO. Lower quality criteria Study design Mixture of RCTs and pre-post studies with no control groups.
Mixture of RCTs and pre-post studies with no control groups.
Mixture of RCTs and pre-post studies with no control groups.
Overall WMDs for RCT interventions relative to controls and pre-post interventions only: RCTs (0.15 L/min) and pre-post studies (0.23 L/min). DOWNGRADE Overall WMDs for RCT interventions relative to controls and pre-post interventions only: RCTs (2.9 mL/kg/min) and pre-post studies (2.9 mL/kg/min).

NO DOWNGRADE
Overall WMDs for RCT interventions relative to controls and pre-post interventions only: RCTs (10 W) and pre-post studies (11 W).

Risk of bias (RoB)
28% of pre-post studies were rated as good, 56% as fair, and 16% as poor. 31% of RCTs had low RoB, 23% had some concerns, and 46% had high RoB. NO DOWNGRADE 38% of pre-post studies were rated as good, 48% as fair, and 14% as poor. 15% of RCTs had low RoB, 25% had some concerns, and 60% had high RoB. DOWNGRADE 26% of pre-post studies were rated as good, 59% as fair, and 15% as poor. 23% of RCTs had low RoB, 38.5% had some concerns, and 38.5% had high RoB.

Inconsistency of results
Effect estimates were consistent, with 91% of the included exercise interventions favouring an increase in AV O2peak, but most had a low effect estimate.