The Managerial Role and Psychosocial Factors of Job Satisfaction

The influence of the managerial role on job satisfaction have been very poorly studied, as well as the psychosocial factors of the job satisfaction. This article aims to highlight many of the psychosocial and sociodemographic factors of job satisfaction in managers and employees. Objective Job satisfaction is an emerging indicator for measuring workers’ occupational well-being; however, this has been poorly studied in managers. We aimed to explore job satisfaction between managers and employees and assess its factors. Methods Data from Wittyfit’s users were collected between January 2018 and February 2020. Volunteers anonymously provided their sociodemographic profile, their sense of job satisfaction, and their psychosocial feelings (ambiance, meaning, organization, recognition, values, work-life balance). Results Data of 10,484 employees and 836 managers were collected. Job satisfaction was higher in managers than employees. All psychosocial factors had an impact on job satisfaction in workers. There was a higher prevalence of satisfied managers than employees. Managerial position and other sociodemographic variables influenced this prevalence. Conclusions Managers seem to be more satisfied than employees. Psychosocial and sociodemographic factors can influence workers’ job satisfaction.

2][3][4][5] It is a major and increasingly used indicator to assess occupational health of different aspects of work, making it a global importance at the workplace. 6One possible definition of job satisfaction is "a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one's job or job experiences." 7In addition to common models used to assess occupational well-being of workers, [8][9][10][11][12] job satisfaction is an important attribute in measuring quality of life and stress at work. 1,6Therefore, understanding the predictors of job satisfaction allows for the development of effective strategies to improve occupational well-being and business performance. 13Numerous studies have examined the determinants of job satisfaction, emphasizing the importance of psychosocial factors that can significantly impact an individual's overall satisfaction with their job.5][16] However, there is a gap in the literature when it comes to understanding the differences in job satisfaction between managers and employees, and how common psychosocial factors uniquely impact these two distinct job positions.Although some studies have assessed differences in job satisfaction between managerial positions, they were limited to a specific working population, and not to the general population. 14,17While managers are indeed employees within an organization, their job satisfaction can vary compared with their subordinates due to distinctions in their roles and responsibilities.One notable distinction is that managers often possess greater decision-making authority and autonomy, factors that can contribute to elevated levels of job satisfaction. 18,19However, this decision-making ability can backfire, leading to lower levels of satisfaction. 20It is therefore essential for the organization to look after job satisfaction of managers, especially as it is reflected in that of employees. 21lthough there may be differences in the factors influencing job satisfaction between managers and employees, the literature has identified a number of common factors, particularly those referred to as psychosocial factors.Such factors include support and team cohesion, 16,22 recognition, 23,24 work-life balance, 23,[25][26][27] role meaningfulness, 13,28,29 organizational support, 13,30,31 or professional values. 19,32To the best of our knowledge, to date, there are no comparative studies in the general population of the influence of these six dimensions on job satisfaction by position.It remains necessary to carry out a comprehensive analysis that directly measures workers' feelings and the importance they attach to these different dimensions of work in their overall satisfaction, depending on their position.
Thus, the main objective of our study was to explore the influence of the job position (manager or employee) on job satisfaction.The secondary objectives were to assess the other psychosocial factors in relation to the job position and their influence on job satisfaction, as well as the putative influence of sociodemographic factors, such as age, seniority, and sex.

Recruitment
This cross-sectional study was conducted among Wittyfit's users.Wittyfit is an online platform 33 designed by the Cegid company (Lyon, France) in partnership with the CHU of Clermont-Ferrand to improve the professional well-being of workers. 34Through different questionnaires, volunteers are invited to anonymously report how they feel in several health-related areas when logging into the platform.The platform provides workers with individualized feedback, and managers with a report of their team's average health status and the issues affecting them.Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, data collection for this study was limited to the period between January 2018 and February 2020.All workers who completely or partially answered the Wittyfit's "job satisfaction" questionnaire at least once during this period were included in the study.Workers who did not fill in their personal information (age, seniority, sex, or position in the company) were excluded.Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.This information is set out in Wittyfit's terms and conditions of use.This study was approved by the National Commission for Data Protection and Liberties and the South-East VI ethics committee (clinicaltrials.gov identification number NCT02596737).This study was designed as a combined cross-sectional study, so the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist was followed to ensure the quality of the study reporting (see Supplementary Table 1, http:// links.lww.com/JOM/B459).

OUTCOMES Primary Outcome
Job satisfaction of workers was assessed via the "job satisfaction" questionnaire of the platform by using the visual analogical scale (VAS; score range from 0 to 100).6][37] Workers could estimate their job satisfaction as many times as they wanted.For each indicator (job satisfaction and psychosocial feelings), we used the average score to evaluate the feeling of a worker.We considered a worker to be satisfied when their score was higher than 50 and dissatisfied less than 50.

Secondary Outcomes
Psychosocial indicators included workers feelings of ambiance, work-life balance (or simply balance), meaning, organization, recognition, and values.Ambiance at work assesses the relationship with the manager and colleagues, the quality of the work environment, and the social support at work.Work-life balance measures the prioritization of personal and professional activities by the worker, meaning it evaluated the interest, usefulness, fulfillment, and motivation of the worker.Organization assessed the definition of worker's job description, resources, level of worker responsibility, their confidence in management and colleagues, and satisfaction with their salary.Recognition investigated the respect between management and colleagues and the appreciation and acknowledgment of the contributions of the individ-ual to the company.Finally, values explored the balance between corporate and personal values.Similar to job satisfaction, all psychosocial indicators were evaluated using the associated VAS in the questionnaire.Workers could estimate their feeling in each category as many times as they wanted, and their average score was retained.Wittyfit's clients provided the age, seniority, sex, and position (manager or employee) of their workers who use the product.Workers were then divided into two age categories (older or younger than 45 years) and two seniority classes (more or less than 10 years of service).

STATISTICS
Quantitative data (job satisfaction and psychosocial feelings) were expressed in terms of mean ± SD.In absence of data, assumed to be missing completely at random, 38 a mean imputation by client was applied to avoid complete-cases analysis bias. 39Qualitative data (worker's job satisfaction/dissatisfaction) were expressed using number of participants and associated percentage.First, comparisons between groups (e.g., by sex, by job position) were performed with analysis of variance for continuous variables (job satisfaction and psychosocial feelings) and χ 2 tests for categorical variables (satisfied/ dissatisfied workers).Then, associations between endogenous variables (job satisfaction) and exogenous variables (psychosocial and sociodemographic factors) were assessed with linear and logistic mixed regressions, respectively.The company to which the worker belongs was considered a random effect.Variance influence factor values of exogenous variables were assessed and revealed no serious multicollinearity (a value less than 4 was considered acceptable).Coefficients of linear regression models have been expressed as effect sizes (ESs) and confidence intervals (95% CI) using a "refit" method 40 and interpreted according to Funder and Ozer. 41Coefficients of logistic regression models are expressed as standardized odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI and interpreted according to Chen et al. 42 Subgroup analyses were conducted by job position to compare the primary drivers of satisfaction in workers.Statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.1.1)(R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) 43 in the RStudio (version 1.3.1056)(R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Boston, MA) platform.Unless specified, we considered a P value less than 0.05 as statistically significant.

Participants
Of the 41,856 workers using Wittyfit in 2019, 11,320 answered the "job satisfaction" questionnaire at least once during the period.We obtained the data from 6753 men and 4567 women, separated as 10,484 employees and 836 managers, with 49.6% of the population younger than 45 and 56.0% with less than 10 years of service, distributed across 17 French companies (Fig. 1).

Job Satisfaction Among Managers
Managers reported having a higher job satisfaction than employees (68.1 ± 20.4 vs. 57.8± 24.2, P < 0.001).Indeed, the position within the company had an influence on job satisfaction (ES = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.53, P < 0.001).Managers also tended to be more satisfied with their jobs, with a higher prevalence of managers highly satisfied with their jobs than employees (84.7 vs. 68.8%,P < 0.001) (Fig. 2).Managers were twice as likely to be more satisfied than employees (OR = 2.65, 95% CI: 2.18 to 3.23, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3).

The Job Satisfaction and the Sociodemographics of Workers
In addition to the major effect of the managerial position, some sociodemographic variables have been revealed as factors of job satisfaction, although their effect was much smaller than that of the job position.Workers older than 45 years (ES = −0.09,95% CI: −0.13 to −0.05) and those with more than 10 years of seniority (−0.23, −0.27 to −0.18) reported having a lower level of job satisfaction ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 3).Being older than 45 years old decreases the chances of being satisfied at work by 13% (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.95, P = 0.002) and having 10 or more years of seniority by 19% (0.71, 0.65 to 0.79, P < 0.001).Finally, both job satisfaction level (−0.02, −0.06 to 0.02, P = 0.97) and prevalence of workers with a high job satisfaction (0.97, 0.88 to 1.06, P = 0.5) did not seem to differ by sex (Fig. 3).

DISCUSSION
The main results show that in terms of job satisfaction and psychosocial feelings, the position within the company plays a crucial role.Psychosocial factors can influence the job satisfaction of managers and employees differently.Other sociodemographic factors were also found to have an impact on job satisfaction among workers.

The Influence of the Manager's Role on Job Satisfaction
The role of the manager is crucial in the professional environment.Indeed, the manager has a heavy responsibility to achieve successful outcomes while ensuring that the expectations of their staff are met, both human and organizational. 44,45Therefore, the benefits of good leadership are numerous. 3,46,47Thus, if the role of the manager is to ensure the well-being and job satisfaction of their employees, 48 it is also essential to ensure that they are satisfied themselves.In this study, we aimed to assess the influence of the managerial position on both job satisfaction and psychosocial feelings.Our results show that on average, managers have higher levels of job satisfaction and are more satisfied with their job than employees.Previously,  differences in perceived job satisfaction according to in a healthcare environment have shown that physicians had the highest job satisfaction, 14 with registered nurses the lowest 49 among several healthcare professions.This may suggest that greater responsibilities attributed to managers, often associated with greater latitude in decision making, make them more satisfied than employees, who are themselves often the subject of management policies. 50,51And yet, it remains important to note that these same responsibilities are likely to turn against managers, and so on employees. 20,52Knowing that job satisfaction is linked to health benefits, 1,2,4,5 organizations should strive to improve the job satisfaction of employees, who seem to be less satisfied than managers.

Psychosocial Feelings as Factors of Job Satisfaction
All considered psychosocial factors were found to influence job satisfaction for both employees and managers.Our findings show that job satisfaction is positively influenced by ambiance at work, which is in line with literature that found that it can be improved by encouraging social support and team cohesion. 49Recognition at work can take several forms including notably recognition by patients or clients, by colleagues, or by management.A study among doctors in China found that doctors with higher patient recognition presented higher level of job satisfaction, 53 as observed in our study, with managers/ employees reporting higher recognition having greater job satisfaction.While it may seem obvious that recognition is essential to employee satisfaction, it is just as much for managers. 23Work-life balance was also found to be a factor of job satisfaction, which is in line with literature. 26,54Even if it emerged as the least important dimension, as previously found, 23 ensuring a safe balance between professional and private life for managers (but also for employees) remains essential to protect from dissatisfaction.Meaning at work is defined as "the discovery of existential meaning from work experience, work itself and work purpose/goals." 55Thus, it is not surprising to find a direct link between meaning and job satisfaction as it translates among other things the motivation and the fulfillment of the worker.Organization commitment, known for being related to job satisfaction among nurses, 13,56 was also found to be positively related to job satisfaction.
Lastly, work values were positively related to job satisfaction, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies on the subject. 19,57It has also been highlighted among doctors that those with higher work values scores presented higher job satisfaction. 53Recommendations should be made for organizations to strive for improvement of workers' psychosocial feelings, to consequently improve their job satisfaction.

The Sociodemographic Factors of Job Satisfaction
Age and seniority also emerged as factors that could affect job satisfaction, with lower levels on average and even a lower prevalence of satisfied workers among the older workers (45 years or older) and more senior workers (10 years of service or more).The link between age and job satisfaction has already been demonstrated, but the results are equivocal.Sometimes job satisfaction increased with age, 58 sometimes it decreased 59 or presented a U-shape effect. 60For the seniority, its negative influence on job satisfaction has already been reported in the literature. 58No sex differences could be found in our study, although previous studies have shown that women pharmacists were more satisfied than men at work, 61 while the opposite relationship has been found in physicians. 62,63Therefore, an absence of effect may not seem so surprising and suggests that, among Wittyfit's users, the drivers of job satisfaction are the same for both men and women.Organizations must be aware that sociodemographic characteristics can influence job satisfaction to ensure that policies to improve well-being in the workplace are effective.

LIMITATIONS
We acknowledge some limitations in our study.Self-reported feelings of workers (job satisfaction and psychosocial factors) were assessed using a single VAS instead of complete questionnaire as often used. 64This may lead to overestimated or underestimated measurements that may cause a measurement bias as well as an affective bias. 65evertheless, with a Cronbach's α of 0.84, we can assume that our questionnaire is reliable.Because of its size, our sample might not be representative of French workers.Indeed, it is not possible to state that it is representative in terms of jobs, nor even in terms of sectors of activity, as this information is not by Wittyfit's clients.However, on the one hand, with the inclusion of 17 different companies, it can be assumed that numerous jobs were represented.On the other hand, the inclusion of a random effect in our regression models, namely, the "company" effect, allowed us to measure the influence of the company on the outcome independently of the fixed effects, namely, the psychosocial and sociodemographic factors, including the influence of the position held by the employee.Even taking these considerations into account, we believe generalizability of the findings from our study is possible.Age and seniority were also available only as categorical data, precluding further analyses.

CONCLUSIONS
Managers have higher job satisfaction and psychosocial feelings at work than employees.Several psychosocial factors can influence workers' job satisfaction.Associated ESs may vary according to the level of position within the company.Sociodemographic factors, such as age and seniority, may influence job satisfaction as well.Companies should implement policies aimed at improving the well-being of their employees to improve their job satisfaction, regardless of their position.

FIGURE 3 .
FIGURE 3. Influence of sociodemographic factors of job satisfaction.A colored circle means that the measured effect is significant, an empty circle means no effect.The reference classes of the different parameters are the following: age: workers younger than 45 years; seniority: workers with less than 10 years of service; sex: male; and job position: employee.