Health facility assessments of cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment services in Gulu, Uganda

BackgroundCervical cancer is ranked globally in the top 3 cancers for women younger than 45 years, with the average age of death at 59 years of age. The highest burden of disease is in low- and low-to-middle income countries (LLMICs), responsible for 90% of the 311,000 cervical cancer deaths in 2018. This growing health disparity is due to the lack of quality screening and treatment programs, low human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates, and high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection rates. To address these gaps in care, we need to develop a clear understanding of the resources and capability of LLMICs health care facilities to provide prevention, screening, and treatment for cervical cancer.

ObjectivesThis project aimed to (1) develop a health facility assessment (HFA) to assess available cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment resources and (2) implement the HFA to determine the cervical cancer resources available in Gulu, Uganda.

MethodsWe adapted the World Health Organizations Harmonized Health Facility Assessment for our own HFA and grading scale, deploying it in October 2021 to analyze 21 health centers in Gulu.

ResultsGrading of Health Center IIIs (n=16) concluded that 37% had "excellent" or "good" resources available, and 63% of facilities had "poor" or "fair" resources available. Grading of Health Center IVs and above (n=5) concluded that 60% of facilities had "excellent" or "good" resources, and 40% had "fair" resources available.

DiscussionThe analysis of health facilities in Gulu demonstrated subpar resources available for cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment. Focused efforts are needed to expand health centers resources and capability to address rising cervical cancer rates and related health disparities in LLMICs. The development process for the study HFA can be applied to global cervical cancer programming to determine gaps in resources and indicate areas to target improved health equity.

Harmonized Health Facility Assessment for our own HFA and grading scale, deploying it in 37 October 2021 to analyze 21 health centers in Gulu. Results. Grading of Health Center IIIs 38 (n=16) concluded that 37% had "excellent" or "good" resources available, and 63% of facilities 39 had "poor" or "fair" resources available. Grading of Health Center IVs and above (n=5) 40 concluded that 60% of facilities had "excellent" or "good" resources, and 40% had "fair" 41 resources available. Discussion. The analysis of health facilities in Gulu demonstrated subpar 42 resources available for cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment. Focused efforts are 43 needed to expand health centers' resources and capability to address rising cervical cancer rates 44 and related health disparities in LLMICs. The development process for the study HFA can be 45 applied to global cervical cancer programming to determine gaps in resources and indicate areas 46 to target improved health equity.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 27, 2022. 48 Globally, cervical cancer is one of the top 3 cancers in women younger than 45 years, 49 with an average age of death at 59 years of age. The greatest disease burden is in low-and low-50 to-middle-income countries (LLMICs), contributing to 90% of the 341,000 cervical cancer 51 deaths globally in 2020 [1]. About 12% of new cases occur in African women, yet 85% of deaths 52 occur in Sub-Saharan Africa [2]. 53 Uganda has one of the largest documented cervical cancer disease burdens in Africa, with 54 an incidence rate of 47.5 out of 100,000 women and a mortality rate of 40 out of 100,000 women  Despite many national health systems prioritizing quality cervical cancer screening 67 programming, these expanded services are significantly underutilized. In Uganda, the health 68 system was decentralized with the intent to improve access and the quality of health services.

69
While this has led to increased utilization of health facilities, it has divided the system into . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (levels I to IV, with village health teams designed as level I and serving the smallest target 80 population size) or hospital (general, regional, or national level). In the Strategic Plan, Health 81 Center IIIs (H/C IIIs) and above are expected to provide HPV vaccination and screening by VIA.

82
In addition to vaccination and screening services, Health Center IVs (H/C IVs) and hospitals are 83 expected to provide treatment for early cervical dysplasia [9].

84
Improving quality services in Northern Uganda for cervical cancer prevention, screening, 85 and treatment is essential. The purpose of this study is to develop and conduct a health facility 86 assessment (HFA) to evaluate the cervical cancer resources of Health Centers III and above in 87 Gulu, Uganda. HFAs are often used to gather large-scale data on a country's health service 88 availability and quality, generally administered by trained facilitators and may include materials 89 inventory, interviews with patients and staff, and service observation [10]. Results from this 90 assessment in Gulu will inform potential targeted interventions to fill the gaps in cervical cancer 91 prevention, screening, and treatment. Moreover, our HFA development process may inform . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.24.22276873 doi: medRxiv preprint 5 92 similar processes for global cervical cancer programming to ultimately counteract the increasing 93 disparities in morbidity and mortality experienced by women in LLMICs.

95
The study was conducted in Gulu, the second-largest city in Uganda, located in the 96 Northern region. The city has 23 health facilities designated as H/C III and above.  The HFA used in this study scored each section with points given for available resources.  (Table 1)    (H/C IVs and above) and 2 H/C IIIs. Only 1 facility was able to provide excisional treatment 150 through LEEP and reported functioning equipment except for a smoke evacuator. Since the . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 27, 2022. Grading of H/C III facilities (Figure 1) concluded that 37% had "excellent" or "good" 155 resources available, and 63% of facilities had "fair" or "poor" resources available. Grading of 156 facilities H/C IV and above (Figure 2) concluded that 60% had "excellent" or "good" resources, 157 and 40% of facilities had "fair" resources available.  facilities. Due to these differing expectations, grading proved to be more nuanced than the 208 calculated score. For example, a hospital with an assessment score of 26 points may score "poor" 209 overall due to mismatch between available and expected treatment services, while a health center 210 with an "excellent" score may receive an assessment score of 19 points for providing all basic  Uganda found that only 18% reported being able to conduct screening, and 57% reported relying