Epidemiology of adverse events attributed to airway management in pediatric anesthesia: A protocol for a Japan Pediatric Difficult Airway in Anesthesia study

Introduction Failure to secure an airway during general anesthesia is a major cause of adverse events (AEs) in children. The safety of peddiatric anesthesia may be improved by identifying the incidence of AEs and their attributed risk factors. However, previous large cohort studies have not been appropriately designed to explore such aspects. Thus, this study aims to deternine the incidence of AEs and the risk factors attributed to airway management under general anesthesia in children. Methods and design This prospective, multi-center, registry-based, observational study will be conducted in four tertiary care hospitals in Japan from June 2022 to May 2025. Children younger than 18 years of age undergoing surgical and/or diagnostic test procedures under general anesthesia or sedation by anesthesiologists will be enrolled in this study. Data on patient characteristics, discipline of anesthesia providers, and methodology of airway management will be collected through a standardized verification system under monitoring by institutional research leaders among the recruited institutions to minimize the loss of collected data. The primary outcome and exposure are AEs and presence of difficult airway features with potential confounders, which are related to the failure to secure the airway, and the variability in the anesthesia providers levels, adjusted using hierarchical multivariable regression models with mixed effects. Discussion This study will determine the incidence of AEs and the risk factors related to airway management under general anesthesia in children. Trial registration This study is registered as a prospective observational study in the University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) (registration number UMIN000047351, April 1, 2022).


35
Failure to secure an airway during general anesthesia is a major cause of adverse events 36 (AEs) in children. The safety of peddiatric anesthesia may be improved by identifying the 37 incidence of AEs and their attributed risk factors. However, previous large cohort studies 38 have not been appropriately designed to explore such aspects. Thus, this study aims to 39 deternine the incidence of AEs and the risk factors attributed to airway management under 40 general anesthesia in children. 42 This prospective, multi-center, registry-based, observational study will be conducted in 43 four tertiary care hospitals in Japan from June 2022 to May 2025. Children younger 44 than 18 years of age undergoing surgical and/or diagnostic test procedures under general 45 anesthesia or sedation by anesthesiologists will be enrolled in this study. Data on patient 46 characteristics, discipline of anesthesia providers, and methodology of airway 47 management will be collected through a standardized verification system under 48 monitoring by institutional research leaders among the recruited institutions to minimize 49 the loss of collected data. The primary outcome and exposure are AEs and presence of 50 difficult airway features with potential confounders, which are related to the failure to . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 27, 2022. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2022 4 51 secure the airway, and the variability in the anesthesia providers' levels, adjusted using 52 hierarchical multivariable regression models with mixed effects.

54
This study will determine the incidence of AEs and the risk factors related to airway 55 management under general anesthesia in children.

57
This study is registered as a prospective observational study in the University hospital  CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 27, 2022.

62
The incidence of perioperative life-threatening adverse events (AEs) in children is 63 higher than that in adults due to their unique physiological and anatomical 64 characteristics [1]. These AEs are related to hypoxia in children commonly occur 65 following failure to secure the airway since children are less tolerant to apnea [1][2][3][4].

66
Therefore, identifying the incidence of AEs and the risk factors in securing the airway is 67 desired for safe and strategic airway management in pediatric anesthesia.

68
Epidemiological data on AEs during general anesthesia in children have been 69 reported in previous large prospective cohort studies. The APRICOT study, which was 70 the largest multi-center prospective study conducted in Europe, reported an incidence 71 rate of 5.2% for severe perioperative events in children [5]. In addition, Subramanyam 72 reported prediction models for perioperative respiratory adverse events based on 73 preoperative patient comorbidities [6]. However, the APRICOT study was not designed 74 to explore AEs specifically attributed to airway management during general anesthesia.

75
Therefore, it did not include detailed information regarding the difficult airway features 76 of patients, anesthesia methods, devices utilized for securing the airway, and disciplines 77 of anesthesia providers. The PeDI registry study, a multi-center cohort study conducted 78 in children's hospitals in the US, reported that the incidence rate of intraoperative AEs . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) the study cohort were patients with difficult airway features; therefore, the results did 81 not represent the entire pediatric population. In addition, these major studies did not 82 adjust for the variability in the techniques and skill level of anesthesia providers (e.g., 83 each anesthesia provider could have a specific methodology for securing the airway and 84 anesthesia). Therefore, the incidence of AEs and the related risk factors in securing the 85 airway under general anesthesia in children remain unclear. In addition, to our 86 knowledge, there is a lack of well-designed pediatric prospective studies using registry-87 based, real-world data in the Asian region regarding the incidence of AEs and the risk 88 factors attributed to airway management.

89
This study aims to investigate the incidence of AEs attributed to airway 90 management during general anesthesia in children and to identify their risk factors.

94
This is a prospective, registry-based, real-world, multicenter, observational study that 95 will initiate data registration from June 1, 2022, to May 31, 2025, in five tertiary care 96 hospitals in Japan: Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center (Aichi), National Center . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 27, 2022. Inclusion criteria. We will enroll cases that meet all of the following criteria.

103
-Children younger than 18 years of age who receive advanced airway management 104 under general anesthesia or sedation for surgical and/or test procedures conducted by 105 anesthesiologists or anesthesia providers under the supervision of anesthesiologists.

106
-General anesthesia or sedation is performed in operating suites, catheterization 107 laboratory rooms, rooms for radiological imaging and procedures (e.g., computed 108 tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, radiation therapy), or general ward. 109 110 Exclusion criteria. We will exclude cases that meet at least one of the following 111 criteria.

112
-Cases outside operating suites where anesthesiologists are consulted for airway 113 management.

114
-Cases where airway management is performed in the emergency department and . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) This registry-based observational study will prospectively collect data regarding the 121 characteristics of patients and surgery, disciplines of anesthesia providers, practice of 122 airway management, occurrence of AEs, and treatments for AEs.

123
Data quality control. Data will be initially collected by anesthesia providers for each 124 attempt to secure the airway with paper-based data collection forms. The collected 125 initial paper-form-based data will be verified by each site-specific research leader 126 through a standardized process among the four recruited institutions. Site-specific 127 research leaders will confirm that the capture rate is ≥95% of cases at each institution.

128
To standardize the definitions of the terms for data collection, they are predetermined 129 and described in the operational research manual created by the primary investigator 130 (TK). The research operational committee will be convened regularly to confirm the 131 definitions of the terms used in the data collection process. Site-specific research leaders 132 instructed the anesthesia providers to increase the accuracy of the collected data at each . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 27, 2022. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2022 head circumference) that were predetermined based on previous studies [9]. Potential  Sample size estimation. The reported incidence rate of critical events occurring 181 during general anesthesia induction in children was 5.2%, including an incidence of 182 1.9% for cardiovascular instability in the general pediatric population who received 183 general anesthesia [5]. Therefore, we estimated the sample size with the assumption of 184 the lowest incidence of critical adverse events during general anesthesia in children as 185 2.0%. The estimated sample size was approximately 16,000 assuming a 99% probability 186 of obtaining a 95% Wilson CI with ± 0.3% of the half-width for the incidence of critical . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.  The results of this study will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal and a relevant 222 cademic conference.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) No harmful events will occur during data collection because of the nature of an 226 observational study without interventions.

229
This is a prospective, registry-based, multicenter, observational study that aims to 230 describe real-world data on the incidence of AEs and the risk factors attributed to 231 securing the airway in children under general anesthesia. Investigating real-world data 232 regarding patient characteristics (including the prevalence of difficult airway features) 233 and characteristics of pediatric anesthesia practice can provide anesthesia providers with 234 useful information to improve the safety and effectiveness of airway management.

235
This study has several important limitations owing to its observational nature 236 of the study. First, unmeasured confounders could remain unadjusted owing to the 237 observational nature of the study. Second, there might be a selection bias due to the 238 sampling method. Third, reporting bias (i.e., misclassification bias) can occur due to 239 incorrect reports during data collection. To address these potential limitations, we 240 carefully designed this study to collect detailed information regarding the exposure . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 27, 2022. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2022