Patient satisfaction in the use of non-pharmacological therapies in the management of postoperative pain: a study in a tertiary hospital, Ghana Patient satisfaction and non-pharmacological therapies in postoperative pain management

44 Background: Non-pharmacological therapies are the non-medicinal methods used in 45 postoperative pain (POP) management by health care practitioners such as massage, positioning, 46 breathing exercise, music therapy, and distraction. It has been discovered that therapies that are 47 non-pharmacological for the relief of pain are effective with minimal side effects. Studies have 48 also revealed that non-pharmacological interventions in the management of pain lessen or alter 49 pain perception by decreasing intensity and intensifying the tolerance of pain. This study, 50 therefore, seeks to determine how frequently non-pharmacological methods (NPMs) are used in 51 the management of POP and the influence of these NPMs on patient satisfaction 52 Methods: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional design. A quantitative approach was 53 utilized with a structured questionnaire to obtain responses from patients from October to 54 December 2019. The study was conducted in the female and male surgical wards of Komfo 55 Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) in Kumasi, Ghana. 138 patients within the first 72 hours 56 post-operative period who consented and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the 57 study. A convenience sampling method was used to collect the data. Inferential and descriptive 58 statistics were used in analyzing the data. 59 Results: The majority of the patients, 52.2% responded to using some form of (NPMs) for pain 60 relief. The most widely used non-pharmacological method of pain relief was walking 61 representing 79.2%, followed by relaxation 5 (6.8%), distraction 4 (5.6%), listening to music 3 62 (4.2%), deep breathing 2 (2.8%), and meditation 1 (1.4%). The male participants were observed 63 to use more NPMs of pain relief as compared to the females. Most of the patients (51.4%) who used NPMs for their pain relief reported having their pain not relieved. A majority (90.6%) of the participants desired for more pain treatment. The type of surgery the patients underwent had a statistically significant negative correlation with the use of NPMs of pain relief (Spearman 67 Correlation Coefficien t = -0.233, p-value <0.05). A higher percentage (71%) of participants were 68 highly satisfied with the overall pain treatment received. Conclusion: Non-pharmacological management of POP have been proven to be efficient, inexpensive, and have little or no side effect on patients. There should be continuous education on non-pharmacological management of POP to nurses and other healthcare professionals to help promote the efficiency of intervening in postoperative pain with these methods.

participants desired for more pain treatment. The type of surgery the patients underwent had a Introduction has been discovered that therapies that are not pharmacological for the relief of pain are effective 105 with minimized side effects and complications [6]. 106 Studies have shown that health care practitioners' attitude and lack of knowledge on the different 107 types of non-pharmacological pain management makes the efficacious use of these measures 108 questionable [6,16]. Previous studies also reveal that non-medicine interventions in the 109 management of pain lessen or alter pain perception by decreasing intensity and intensifying the 110 tolerance of pain, decreasing pain-related stress, changing pain behavior, reinforcing coping 111 skills, and giving patient and relatives the feeling of control over the pain [17,18,19,20] 112 Non-pharmacological therapies can complement pharmacological therapies and present another 113 treatment in post-operative pain management but such interventions are under-utilized [14,21]. 114 Using NPMs aids in the reduction of the intake of opioids and its possibly damaging 115 physiological and psychological reactions to the pain [19]. 116 When NPMs are employed as adjuvant treatment, they decrease the anxiety of the patient and 117 increase patient satisfaction with POP management. Several studies on surgical procedures 118 reported that these techniques led to a decreased analgesic use post-operatively, or a reduced 119 pain intensity on Day 2 or 3 of post-operation [22]. 120 NPMs of pain relief can be classified as; 121 1. Physical activities such as deep breathing, walking, or light to moderate sportive activities. 122 2. Psychological/spiritual interventions like meditation or relaxation, distraction such as listening 123 to music or talking to people, praying, watching TV, stress management, visualization, hypnosis, 124 and imagery.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022. In addition to patient-reported pain outcomes, socio-demographic data (gender, age, marital 160 status, religion, educational level), as well as the type of surgery, duration of surgery, type of 161 anesthesia, type of analgesics given, was obtained through the structured questionnaire.

DATA ANALYSIS
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274426 doi: medRxiv preprint Inferential statistics, as well as descriptive analysis, were used in the analysis of data which was 164 done using SPSS version 25. In analyzing categorical variables, frequencies and percentages 165 were used. 166 Pearson's correlation was employed to determine the correlation strength between the variables.

167
The relationships between demographic variables and NPM used were analyzed by Pearson's 168 correlation and Spearman Correlation. All tests were conducted at a level of significance of 169 P<0.05.   Table 1, the most widely used NPM of pain relief was walking 57 (79.2%), followed by 182 relaxation 5 (6.8%), distraction 4 (5.6%), listening to music 3 (4.2%), deep breathing 2 (2.8%), . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022.  (Table 3).  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022. A substantial majority 125 (90.6%) of the participants in this present study desired for more pain 214 treatment whereas only 13 (9.4%) did not wish for more pain treatment (Table 5).   were highly satisfied were seen to have used some form of NPMs of pain relief. There was no 228 significant association for satisfaction with pain treatment between the use and non-use of NPMs 229 of pain relief (p-value > 0.05) ( Table 7). is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022.   is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274426 doi: medRxiv preprint p-value = 0.027). Meanwhile, the use of NPMs of pain relief did not have a significant 247 association with over-satisfaction with pain treatment received (p-value > 0.05) (Table 8). . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274426 doi: medRxiv preprint The male participants were observed to use more NPMs of pain relief as compared to the females 281 in our study which disagrees with other studies where women used more NPMs but with a 282 comparatively insignificant difference. [28]. 283 The majority of the participants representing 51.4% were encouraged by nurses to use NPMs for 284 their pain relief (Table 2)

293
The difference may be because pharmacologic pain treatment was started effectively 294 postoperatively before NPMs were initiated after the first 24 hours or after patients gained pain 295 control.

296
Moreover, in a systematic review by Ay 2018, it was reported that sociodemographic 297 characteristics which include sex, age, weight, height, duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery, 298 experience, and smoking influence pain severity but are different amongst children and adults. In 299 our current findings, the type of surgery the patients underwent had a statistically significant 300 negative correlation with the use of NPMs for pain relief (Table 4) which is similar to a study by . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022. There was no statistically significant relation to the use of NPMs of pain relief and patients' 308 desire for more pain treatment (Table 6).

309
This similarity may be due to more workload on nurses and other healthcare professionals which 310 gives them less time to practice NPMs with the patients and so more attention is given to 311 administering pharmacological treatments.

312
However, the majority of the participants (71%) were highly satisfied with the overall pain 313 treatment received. Meanwhile, most patients who were highly satisfied were seen to have used 314 some form of NPMs of pain relief. This finding is in contrast to a study done in Nigeria [35].

315
There was a significant negative correlation between the type of non-pharmacological treatment 316 received and satisfaction with pain treatment (Spearman coefficient = -0.231, p-value = 0.027).

317
However, the use of NPMs for pain relief did not have a significant association with over-318 satisfaction with pain treatment received (p-value > 0.05) (Table 8) 319 Patients are generally satisfied with POP management but the use of NPMs should be 320 complimented with pharmacologic treatments to affect overall satisfaction with POP.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022.       . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022.   CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 28, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274426 doi: medRxiv preprint