"Populist Attitude and Conspiracist beliefs contribution to the overconfidence about the risk of Covid-19: implications for Preventive Health Behaviors"

Populism and Conspiracy beliefs seem to represent the zeitgeist of people depending on fast and simple information retrieved through social media. The Covid-19 emergency has simply catalyzed this process, not without consequences. Supported by literature review, we hypothesize that the higher the populist attitude the higher the tendency in believing in conspiracies, and that both higher populist attitudes and conspiracist beliefs may induce people in underestimating health related risks that may be reflected in a lowered tendency in adopting preventive health behaviors against Covid-19 spread. Data collected during the quarantine (December 2020, March 2021) mainly supported our hypotheses. Results are discussed in accord with the dramatic consequences it may have overconfidence in undermining the adoption of preventive health behaviors.

this process, not without consequences. Supported by literature review, we hypothesize that the 23 higher the populist attitude the higher the tendency in believing in conspiracies, and that both higher 24 populist attitudes and conspiracist beliefs may induce people in underestimating health related risks 25 that may be reflected in a lowered tendency in adopting preventive health behaviors against Covid- CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.30.22269992 doi: medRxiv preprint belief in conspiracy theories may have contributed to undermine the risk of the deceased and may 48 have ultimately interfered with the adoption of safety prescriptions by lay people. Consequently, 49 people may decide to not comply with preventive behaviors, deeming them unnecessary, given their 50 overconfidence about the risk of Covid-19. 51

The relation between Populism and Conspiracy Beliefs 52
Not rarely, the rising of populism rates among the population and the spread of conspiracy theories 53 seem to go hand in hand. From previous definitions it emerges how populists see the élites as "one 54 homogeneous corrupt group that works against the 'general will' of the people [...] some shadowy 55 forces that continued to hold on to illegitimate powers to undermine the voice of the people" [1]. 56 Interestingly, this narrative is also typical of many conspiracy theories. As Sutton and Douglas [2] 57 argued " [t]o believe in any conspiracy theory is to believe that authorities can be malevolent, that 58 they can conceal their evildoing, and that official explanations for major events may be lies". 59 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.30.22269992 doi: medRxiv preprint Scholars have hypothesized that populist people are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories 124 and are therefore less motivated to respect preventive rules and experts' recommendations. The 125 study revealed a significant and positive correlation between populism and conspiracy beliefs, 126 which in turn was negatively correlated with individuals' adherence to preventive behaviors. 127 Although the authors seem to suggest the existence of a mediation effect of populism on preventive 128 behaviors through the effect of conspiracy beliefs, they did not test a mediation model to investigate 129 this hypothesis. Moreover, as far as we know, there does not seem to be any previous study which 130 has explored a possible direct relation between populism and compliance with preventive rules, just 131 as there do not appear to be studies that have hypothesized a positive effect of populism on the 132 increase of overconfidence about the risk of Covid-19 disease. For these reasons, these two possible 133 relations are advanced and tested in a mediation model in the current study. 134

Main Hypotheses 135
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022.  items, e.g. "Groups of scientists manipulate, fabricate, or suppress evidence in order to deceive the 229 public''). However, the use of these 5 dimensions is unclear as in Brotherton et al [34] authors 230 develop and refine the 5 factors structure in the first 2 studies, but then in study 3 and 4 (concerning 231 respectively criterion-related and discriminant validity aspects of GCB) the same authors use the 232 GCB as uni-dimensional, leaving the reader a little disappointed on how to use the scale. In any 233 case, we did not find a validation study providing psychometric properties of the GCB in Italy, so 234 we preferred to investigate the factor structure of the GCB after translation and back-translation 235 procedure. In CFA we compared fit indices of two competing factor structures: the uni-dimensional 236 GCB and the five first-order correlated factors. Contrary to our expectation, the uni-dimensional 237 factor structure performed better (χ 2 (90) = 108.43, p = .090; RMSEA = .021, RMSEA 90% 238 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. the higher the score the higher the tendency to endorse preventive health behaviors. 263 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022.  with GCB, that the GCB is positively associated with the Overconfidence about the Risk of Covid-308 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022.  showed that no significant differences emerged between any couple of indirect effects. Hence all the 339 three longest indirect effects have equal impact on Preventive Health Behaviors. 340 Worth to note, the total effects of the three populist attitudes (table 3), i.e., the algebraic sum of 341 direct and indirect effects (or the effect of populist attitudes on preventive health behaviors when 342 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022. s.e.

Lower Upper
Indirect effects AEA:  The goal of our study was to investigate whether populism and beliefs in conspiracy theories, two 359 attitudes sharing a deep distrust toward political and economic elite and experts, may affect the 360 adoption of preventive health behaviors. In particular, in the present study we hypothesized that 361 both populism and conspiracy beliefs may inflate overconfidence about perceived health risk and 362 that this overconfidence may be responsible for the undermining of preventive health behaviors. To 363 verify our hypotheses, we ran an online survey during quarantine and at the beginning of the 364 vaccine release on a national basis and asked participants about their willingness to comply with 365 preventive behaviors against the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Results showed that a populist attitude is 366 associated with a lower compliance with preventive rules. This finding is coherent with previous 367 studies: it has been seen, for example, how the rise of populism was associated with specific 368 attitudes regarding certain preventive behaviors, such as an increase in hesitation to get vaccinated 369 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022. 15]. One of the reasons why this happens could be due to a decrease in the perceived severity of the 385 disease, which would lead people to underestimate the risk it can represent for themselves and for 386 others. Indeed, confirming what has been argued so far, our study has shown that the tendency to 387 believe in conspiracy theories is negatively associated with perceived severity, i.e. the belief in 388 conspiracy theories induces an overconfidence about perceived severity of the disease, and this is 389 also coherent with previous works [11,16]. 390 Overall, therefore, a populist attitude seems to lead to a lower compliance with preventive behaviors 391 (and sometimes to an active and hostile rejection of them) by inflating conspiracy beliefs and the 392 overconfidence about the risk of Covid-19. 393 Limitations 394 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.30.22269992 doi: medRxiv preprint Even though the results discussed in our study support our hypotheses and show how political 395 leaders embracing populist themes may affect people overconfidence in the perceived risk for their 396 own health, we would stress the fact that our results are correlational in nature and lack the basis for 397 a causal interpretation of the relationships considered. For this reason, it would be interesting to 398 further explore the results we obtained in a future follow-up and find out whether they can be 399 generalized to other contexts where both populism and conspiracy beliefs may exert their grip. 400 A further theme that needs to be deepened in future studies is related to the relationship between 401 populism and conspiracy beliefs. Literature and results of our study have shown that undoubtedly 402 the two constructs are empirically associated. In our study we placed populism as an antecedent of 403 beliefs in conspiracy beliefs, as we believe that in the Covid-19 epidemic populist leaders have 404 played a crucial role in boosting conspiracist themes to undermine scientific experts. The 405 endorsement of conspiracist themes by populist leaders has inevitably reinforced conspiracy beliefs 406 in populist people. However, the two constructs, populism and conspiracy beliefs, are clearly 407 distinct and it is not excluded that in other contexts the direction of the relationship may be different. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.30.22269992 doi: medRxiv preprint . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 31, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.30.22269992 doi: medRxiv preprint