The challenge of limited vaccine supplies: impact of prior infection on anti-spike IgG antibody trajectories after a single COVID-19 vaccination

Given high SARS-CoV-2 incidence, coupled with slow and inequitable vaccine roll-out, there is an urgent need for evidence to underpin optimum vaccine deployment, aiming to maximise global population immunity at speed. We evaluate whether a single vaccination in previously infected individuals generates similar initial and subsequent antibody responses to two vaccinations in those without prior infection. We compared anti-spike IgG antibody responses after a single dose of ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, or mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the COVID-19 Infection Survey in the UK general population. In 100,849 adults who received at least one vaccination, 13,404 (13.3%) had serological and/or PCR evidence of prior infection. Prior infection significantly boosted antibody responses for all three vaccines, producing a higher peak level and longer half-life, and a response comparable to those without prior infection receiving two vaccinations. In those with prior infection, median time above the positivity threshold was estimated to last for >1 year after the first dose. Single-dose vaccination targeted to those previously infected may provide protection in populations with high rates of previous infection faced with limited vaccine supply, as an interim measure while vaccine campaigns are scaled up.

infection 7,8 . However, prior infection rates vary widely, with high seroprevalences estimates in South Africa (48.5%), Ecuador (44.8%) and Peru (43.5%) versus 0.71% in Australia and New Zealand at various stages of the pandemic 9 . Optimising global immunity and protection against infection is an urgent priority, to minimise deaths, morbidity, and socio-economic losses. While major initiatives seek to address inequalities in vaccine availability, including the COVAX Advance Market Commitment programme 10 , marked variation in global access persists. The WHO roadmap for prioritizing COVID-19 vaccine use in the context of limited access is appropriately focused on scale-up of equitable vaccine delivery, but does not take into account prior infection 11 . Modelling studies suggest that prioritisation based on seropositivity substantially improves efficiency where seroprevalence is high 12 . Given this, a singledose vaccine strategy for individuals with prior infection has already been adopted in some settings (e.g. Netherlands 13 , France, Italy, Germany 14 ).
Understanding the extent to which prior infection influences antibody responses to vaccinations would inform a more consistent global approach to short-term interventions to optimise population immunity while vaccine deployment scales up. If a single vaccination invokes effective protection among those with prior infection, changing vaccine prioritisation as an interim measure may deliver higher population-level immunity faster, and may also make vaccination programs more affordable.
Existing studies have focused on how prior infection affects initial peak antibody responses 15 or responses after two doses of vaccine 16 , showing prior infection significantly boosts vaccine-mediated antibody levels [17][18][19][20] . However, the durability of antibody response after a single vaccination is still unclear; whether a single dose can provide sustained effective protection for individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection requires further investigation, particularly in terms of antibody waning after . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint one dose of vaccination with prior infection versus two doses of vaccine without previous infection, which we have previously described 16 .
We used data from the United Kingdom's national COVID-19 Infection Survey (ISRCTN21086382), to investigate the impact of prior infection on anti-trimeric spike IgG antibody responses following a single dose of ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, or mRNA-1273 vaccine, and compared the duration of protection for previously infected people receiving a single vaccination to previously uninfected people receiving two vaccinations. We included participants with at least one antibody We modelled antibody trajectories using measurements from 21 days post-first dose for participants <60 years, and 28 days for participants ≥60 years (approximate peak levels for each age group, Figure S1, S2). We excluded participants who did not mount an anti-S antibody response to first vaccination (defined as all antibody measurements <28 ng/ml, including ≥1 measurement ≥21 days after the first dose [similar to our previous studies 15,16  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  16 . Those receiving one ChAdOx1 vaccination without prior infection had significantly lower peak levels, 150 ng/ml (148-152), and shorter half-lives, 105 days (100-111) (Figure 1a, Table S2).  16 . Similar to ChAdOx1, non-white ethnicity was associated with a higher peak level . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  Figure S2). Those with one vaccination but no prior infection had lower peak levels (306 ng/ml [300-311]) and shorter half-lives (46 days [44-48]) (Figure 1b, Table S2).
We estimated the duration of antibody positivity from first vaccination to levels falling to the antibody positivity threshold (42 ng/ml, see Methods). For those with prior infection, the estimated median durations were 500-670 days for ChAdOx1 and 600-1,300 days for BNT162b2 following one vaccination. For mRNA-1273, although antibody levels for some groups were not estimated to decline and the upper credible intervals could not be defined for all groups due to smaller sample size, based on the posterior median estimates, the durations were 450-1,400 days for 60-year-olds and longer for younger participants (Figure 2). Females and those without long-term health conditions had longer estimated durations of seropositivity following all three vaccines. Conditional on seroconverting after one dose as described above, older participants had longer durations of seropositivity than younger participants following ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 due to slightly longer half-lives despite lower peak levels ( Table S2). In our previous analysis of responses post-second . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 8, 2021. ; vaccination, the time from the second dose to antibody levels falling to 42 ng/ml was estimated to be around 250 days for those without prior infection who received two ChAdOx1 doses 16 , i.e., much shorter than those with prior infection receiving a single dose, regardless of age. For two BNT162b2 doses without prior infection, the estimated duration of seropositivity post second vaccination decreased with increasing age, from 500-800 days for 20-year-olds to 300-400 days for 80-year-olds.
In this analysis, with previous infection and one vaccination, estimates were similar for 20-year-olds (570-730 days) but higher for 80-year-olds (700-1300 days).
We previously reported antibody levels correlating with protection from infection, providing context to the observed antibody levels; post-vaccine levels of 191 ng/ml for ChAdOx1 and 169 ng/ml for BNT162b2 are associated with 67% protection against new infection in those without prior infection, compared with 59 ng/ml in those unvaccinated with prior infection 16 . Data were insufficient to estimate correlates of protection for those with prior infection 16 , but, since levels associated with the same degree of protection were lower for unvaccinated individuals, if we conservatively assume the threshold levels are similar post any vaccination, the duration providing >67% protection is estimated to be around 200-450 days for a single ChAdOX1 or BNT162b2 vaccination in those with prior infection. Since the duration providing >67% protection in unvaccinated individuals with natural infection was estimated to be 1-2 years 16,22 , it is highly likely that the duration of protection is >1 year for those with prior infection receiving a single vaccination. In those without prior infection, using these thresholds, a single ChAdOx1 vaccination would not reach the required antibody level, while a single BNT162b2 vaccination would provide 50-100 days of protection for younger people (Figure S3).
Higher antibody levels post SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in previously infected individuals have been reported [17][18][19][20] , but these studies did not estimate the trajectory of antibody response. We found that . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.08.21267353 doi: medRxiv preprint in those with prior infection, not only were antibody peak levels higher, by 100-400 ng/ml, but the subsequent waning was also slower, with antibody half-lives longer by 60-500 days, supporting sustained protection from a single dose in previously infected individuals. The combination of prior infection with a single vaccination resulted in similar antibody levels regardless of vaccine type (Figure 1), despite single ChAdOx1 vaccination resulting in lower peak levels than BNT162b2 in those without prior infection.
Our results could help inform and optimise global immunisation strategies, deploying limited resources in the most effective way to deliver maximum population immunity at speed during a period when incidence remains high and vaccine access is not yet universal. Given the low percentage of vaccinated individuals and high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in some settings [23][24][25] , assuming widespread prior infection, a single vaccination could optimise population-level protection as a short-term measure.
However, such a blanket approach does result in infection-naive individuals initially receiving one vaccination only, which provides suboptimal protection 8 . To reduce this risk, where previous infection is expected to be high, another option would be to stratify individual vaccination based on an affordable and rapid lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for antibody detection, and information on previous PCR positivity. An extensive comparison of different fingerprick-based LFIA antibody tests reported high specificity (98.8-99.8%) 26 , meaning that there would be few false positives in a high prevalence setting. Sensitivity was lower (69%-86%) 26 , which would reduce efficiency, but not vaccine programme effectiveness. Although exact prices will vary by manufacturer and may be negotiated, the cost can be as low as US$1-2 per test. In comparison, a ChAdOx1 vaccine costs around $4 per dose excluding delivery and storage costs 27 . is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint For an unvaccinated population of 10 million individuals willing to be vaccinated with a true seroprevalence of 50%, a LFIA with 99% specificity and 80% sensitivity costing $1.5 per test, and a cost of $5 per vaccination (including delivery costs and storage), an LFIA test performed at the first vaccination visit would correctly identify 4,050,000 individuals as having antibodies and eligible for a one-dose schedule -of which 50,000 would be incorrectly identified as having antibodies -the remaining 5,950,000 being invited for a second vaccination according to the agreed dosing interval.
This would result in 4.05 million fewer vaccinations needed in the short-term to produce equivalent population immunity to a universal two-dose campaign. This approach delivers a cost saving of $5.25 million which could be re-invested in securing robust long-term vaccine access (for results with other settings regarding LFIA test sensitivity and specificity, population size, true antibody prevalence, costs per vaccination and LFIA, see https://herc.shinyapps.io/Serology_vaccine_prioritisation/).
Study limitations include that we did not measure other immune responses, such as T cell or innate immune responses. We were also unable to fully estimate rates of waning following mRNA-1273, reflecting the fact that many antibody levels were near the upper limit of quantification for our assay and sample size was relatively small. We only measured anti-spike IgG antibody levels using a single assay; however, calibration to a monoclonal antibody enables comparison with other studies 28 ; assay results have been previously shown to correlate closely with neutralising activity 16 . Most of our participants reported white ethnicity (92.6%), so wider generalizability to non-white ethnic groups is less well defined and our data were insufficient to model other ethnic groups separately. However, estimated durations of protection for non-white participants were broadly as long or longer than for white participants, with non-white ethnicity associated with higher peak levels after a single ChAdOX1 or BNT162b2 vaccination. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.08.21267353 doi: medRxiv preprint Data are still awaited to determine the impact of the recent emergence of the Omicron variant, and the relationship between prior infection/vaccination and immunological protection from this and other new variants. For this reason, all approaches to vaccine scheduling will need to remain under intense scrutiny, and the international focus must remain firmly on assuring equitable access to full vaccination in all population settings, which will also mitigate the potential for further variants of concern to emerge.
In summary, prior infection significantly boosts antibody responses after a single ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, or mRNA-1273 vaccination, producing higher peak levels and longer half-lives, comparable or even better to that obtained from two vaccinations in those without prior infection. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.08.21267353 doi: medRxiv preprint

Population and survey
The UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS) COVID-19 Infection Survey (CIS) (ISRCTN21086382) randomly and continuously recruited private households to provide a representative sample across its four countries (England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland). At the first visit, participants were asked for consent for optional follow-up visits every week for the next month, then monthly for 12 months or to April 2022. Written informed consent was taken from individuals ≥2 years (children aged <2 years were not eligible for the study). For those 2-15 years this consent was obtained from parents/carers, while those 10-15 years also provided written assent.
Socio-demographic characteristics, behaviours, and vaccination data were collected. Combined nose and throat swabs were taken from all consenting participants for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. Blood samples were taken from individuals ≥16 years from 10-20% randomly selected households monthly for serological testing, and participants who tested swab positive and their household members were also invited to provide blood samples at follow-up visits. Details on the sampling design are provided elsewhere 29 . From April 2021, additional participants were invited to provide blood samples monthly to assess vaccine responses. The study protocol is available at https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/covid-19/covid-19-infection-survey/protocol-and-information-sheets.
The study received ethical approval from the South Central Berkshire B Research Ethics Committee (20/SC/0195).

Vaccination data
Self-reported vaccinations were obtained from participants at visits, including vaccination type, number of doses, and vaccination dates. Participants from England were also linked to the National Immunisation Management Service (NIMS), which contains all individuals' vaccination data in the English National Health Service COVID-19 vaccination programme. There was good agreement between self-reported and administrative vaccination data (98% on type and 95% on date 30 ). We is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 8, 2021. ; used vaccination data from NIMS where available for participants from England, and otherwise data from the survey.

Laboratory testing
Combined nose and throat swabs were tested at high-throughput national "Lighthouse" laboratories in Glasgow (from 16 August 2020 to present) and Milton Keynes (from 26 April 2020 to 8 February 2021). PCR outputs were analysed using UgenTec Fast Finder 3.300.5 (TaqMan 2019-nCoV Assay Kit V2 UK NHS ABI 7500 v2.1; UgenTec), with an assay-specific algorithm and decision mechanism that allows conversion of amplification assay raw data into test results with minimal manual intervention.
Positive samples are defined as having at least a single N and/or ORF1ab gene detected, and PCR traces exhibited an appropriate morphology. The S gene alone is not considered to be positive 29 .

Statistical analysis
For the current study, participants aged ≥16 years who received at least a single vaccination with ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 with antibody measurements from 8 th December 2020 until 18 th October 2021 were included. Participants with prior infection (before vaccination) were defined as 1) having a positive PCR swab test in the survey or the linked English national testing programme; 2) having a positive anti-spike IgG result (≥42 ng/ml) before vaccination; 3) having two consecutive positive anti-nucleocapsid IgG results (≥30 ng/ml); or 4) self-reporting a positive swab test in the survey. The infection date was defined as the earliest recorded date from the above definitions. Age was truncated at 85 years to reduce the influence of outliers.
To estimate antibody waning, we excluded a small number of participants who were considered as non-responders after the first dose, defined as all antibody measurements being <28 ng/ml and having at least one antibody measurement 21 days after the first dose (N=5,087 excluded for ChAdOx1, N=1,672 excluded for BNT162b2, N=18 excluded for mRNA-1273).
Bayesian linear mixed interval-censored models were used to estimate changes in antibody levels after the first vaccination with ChAdOX1, BNT162b2, or mRNA-1273. Antibody measurements taken after the second vaccination or after infection that happened post-first dose were excluded. We included antibody measurements from 21 days post-first dose to reflect the peak level for participants <60 years. Given older individuals' levels rose more slowly after vaccination, based on antibody mean levels by time and age, we used 28 days post-first dose as the peak level for participants ≥60 years with ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 (as the vast majority of those receiving mRNA-1273 were <60 years). We excluded measurements taken after the 90 th percentile of the observed time points to avoid outlier influence (76, 74, and 67 days post-first dose for ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273). is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint We used a multivariable model to examine the association between peak levels and antibody halflives with continuous age (16-85 years), sex, ethnicity (white vs non-white), reporting having a longterm health condition, reporting working in patient-facing healthcare, deprivation percentile, and prior infection status. We assumed an exponential fall in antibody levels over time, i.e., a linear decline on a log2 scale 16 . Population-level fixed effects, individual-level random effects for intercept and slope, and correlation between random effects were included in the models. The outcome was right-censored at 800 ng/ml reflecting truncation of IgG values at the upper limit of quantification.
For each model, weakly informative priors were used. Four chains were run per model with 4,000 iterations and a warm-up period of 2,000 iterations to ensure convergence, which was confirmed visually and by ensuring the Gelman-Rubin statistic was <1.05. 95% credible intervals were calculated using highest posterior density intervals.
All analyses were performed in R 4.1 using the following packages: tidyverse (version 1. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Author Contributions
The study was designed and planned by ASW, JF, JB, JN, ID and KBP, and is being conducted by ASW,

Code availability
A copy of the analysis code is available at https://github.com/jiaweioxford/COVID19_antibody_response_first_dose. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 8, 2021. ; Figure 1. Posterior predicted trajectories of anti-spike IgG levels from 21 days post-first dose by prior infection status. a, 62,142 participants who received at least a single ChAdOx1 vaccination. b, 36,064 participants who received at least a single BNT162b2 vaccination. c, 2,688 participants who received at least a single mRNA-1273 vaccination. Plotted at reference categories: 50 years, female, white ethnicity, not reporting a long-term health condition, not a healthcare worker, and deprivation percentile=60. Peak levels for participants ≥60 years with single ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccination were at 28 days. Orange dotted lines in panel a and b were predicted trajectories post-second dose for 92,584 and 51,034 participants who received two ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 vaccination without prior infection reproduced from our previous analysis, plotted at the same reference categories 16 .
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.08.21267353 doi: medRxiv preprint

Figure 2. Posterior predicted days (95% credible interval) from the first vaccination to the positivity threshold of 42 ng/ml in those with evidence of prior infection (panel a) and without evidence of prior infection (panel b).
Estimates were separated by age, sex, ethnicity, long-term health condition (LTHC), and vaccine type. The yaxis is truncated at 3,000 days (panel a) for visualisation. For ChAdOx1, the 20-year-old group is not plotted because the vast majority of those receiving ChAdOx1 were ≥40 years. For mRNA-1273, the 80-year-old is not plotted because the vast majority of those receiving mRNA-1273 were ≤60 years. In panel a, 20 and 40-year-old white female without LTHC is not plotted in mRNA-1273 because their antibody levels were not estimated to decline so no duration could be estimated. Equivalent estimates after second vaccination are provided in 16 .