Effectiveness of educational intervention on breast cancer knowledge and breast self-examination among female university students in Bangladesh: a pre-post quasi-experimental one group study

Background: Breast cancer is a global health issue and a leading cause of death among women. Early detection through increased awareness and knowledge on breast cancer and breast cancer screening is thus crucial. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of educational intervention program on breast cancer knowledge and practice of breast self-examination among young female students of a university in Bangladesh. Methods: A quasi-experimental one group (pre-post) study design was conducted at Jahangirnagar University in Bangladesh. Educational information on breast cancer and breast self-examination (BSE), demonstration of BSE procedure and leaflets were distributed among 400 female students in common room setting in dormitories after obtaining written informed consent. The stepwise procedures of BSE performance were demonstrated with images. Pre-intervention and 15 days post-intervention assessments were conducted to assess the changes in knowledge on breast cancer and practices of BSE. Mc-Nemars tests and paired sampled t-tests were performed to investigate the differences between pre- and post-test stages. Results: Significant changes were found in knowledge and awareness about breast cancer and BSE practices after the educational session. The significant differences were measures in the mean scores of pre-test vs. post-test: breast cancer symptoms (2.99[plusmn]1.05 vs. 6.35[plusmn]1.15; p<0.001), risk factors (3.35{+/-}1.19 vs. 7.56[plusmn]1.04; p<0.001), treatment (1.79[plusmn]0.90 vs. 4.63[plusmn]0.84; p<0.001), prevention (3.82[plusmn]1.32 vs. 7.14[plusmn]1.03; p<0.001), screening of breast cancer (1.82[plusmn]0.55 vs. 3.98[plusmn]0.71; p<0.001) and process of breast self-examination (1.57[plusmn]1.86 vs. 3.94[plusmn]0.93; p<0.001). Likewise, a significate percentage of change in BSE practices was obtained between pre-test and post-test (21.3% vs. 33.8%; p<0.001) Conclusions: This study findings confirm that the study population had poor awareness and knowledge at baseline that was improved significantly after educational session. A nationwide reach-out with community-based interventions is recommended for female population in both rural and urban areas.

obtained between pre-test and post-test (21.3% vs. 33.8%; p<0.001) 48 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 Introduction 54 Breast cancer is considered as worldwide health concern and one of the prominent 55 causes of mortality among women. In 2018, approximately 2 million new cancer cases were 56 detected that is projected as 23% of all cancers, the most occurring cancer among women [1]. 57 In Bangladesh, breast cancer is ranked as the second most leading cancer after cervical 58 carcinoma and in females, these two cancers constitute 38% of all cancers [2]. This 59 continuously rising burden has been a matter of concern for a long time now, especially for 60 limited resourced countries like Bangladesh [3]. As curative treatment for any cancer is yet not 61 available, several approaches have been advocated towards increasing awareness that may lead 62 to early detection of cancers including breast cancer [4]. Breast cancer education and awareness 63 in limited resourced countries can be a key to initiate the early detection of breast cancer and 64 subsequently increase the survival rate [5]. Breast abnormalities can be detected by own in 65 many cases as it occurs in a visible organ, and enables to seek medical assistance as soon as 66 possible. For this, women must know how their own breast should look and feel normally and 67 also be aware of all the danger signs, as suggested by the American Cancer Society [6]. 68 Nemours findings suggest that educating the community about assessment of 69 asymptomatic women has the potential to increase the proportion of breast cancer detected at 70 an early stage. Studies conducted on female students of Turkey, Malaysia, Ahmedabad have 71 showed significantly improved knowledge and awareness on breast cancer after educational 72 session using various health educational tools such as group discussion sessions, video 73 demonstration, pamphlet, etc. [7][8][9]. Findings from a pilot mobile intervention program in 74 Bangladesh has reported that in comparison with control group, the women who attended to an 75 educational intervention were more likely to visit to clinics for a follow-up to check for  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 Recommended screening methods like Mammogram, clinical visit for clinical breast 79 examination, ultrasound and MRI are expensive for a large population group in low-income 80 socioeconomic setup and whole nationwide screening program is not feasible. Moreover, lack 81 of knowledge and awareness about breast cancer has been reported from some studies 82 conducted on females of Bangladesh that may contribute to less adherences of women to 83 receive recommended screening [11][12][13][14]. Therefore, creating breast cancer awareness through 84 educational intervention among females can be a feasible solution to early detection. This is 85 only possible, if we know the present level of knowledge, attitude and practices of the female 86 population towards breast cancer. The currently available data is limited to some sections of 87 the society and related to few aspects of the disease. This study was planned to assess the 88 knowledge and practice level of breast cancer and breast self-examination (BSE) among female 89 respondents (pre-test) and to note the changes after educational session in knowledge of women 90 about 'risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment modalities of breast cancer, and to know 91 about practice of BSE (pre-test vs. post-test) in females and to find out the effectiveness of the 92 educational session on the respondents. The young female university students aged from 18-93 26 are already passing their reproductive age and are the future mothers. Also, the study 94 population of our study is considered to be the most educated segment of the population. The  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint A one-group pre-post quasi-experimental interventional study was conducted among 106 female university students residing in dormitories of Jahanginagar University in Dhaka,

107
Bangladesh from December 2019 to March 2020. Jahanginagar University is the largest and 108 only one fully residential university in Bangladesh.

109
Participants and procedures 110 The study was conducted in 400 female respondents of aged 18-26 years corresponding 111 to Honors 1 st year to master's students. Inclusion criteria included: being female students 112 residing in the university's dormitories and being aged from 18-26 years old. Exclusion 113 criterion was being female students who didn't reside within residential dormitories. The 114 proportionate stratified random sampling technique was conducted to calculate the study 115 sample from each dormitory. In this approach, each stratum sample size was directly 116 proportional to the population size of the entire population of strata. The study was carried out 117 in three phases: first phase (pre intervention phase), second phase (intervention phase) and third 118 phase (post intervention phase).

119
First phase (pre-test phase) 120 A pre-designed structured interview questionnaire was used to collect the following 121 data from the respondents: socio-demographic data, respondent's knowledge, attitude and 122 practice regarding breast cancer, screening, and BSE.

Second phase (the intervention phase)
124 Materials (e.g., lecture/discussions, brain storming, leaflet where the stepwise process is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.20.21265265 doi: medRxiv preprint 7 so that the educational intervention could be clearly understood by the participants. Each 129 session took 45-60 minutes. After the pre-test session, the participants were given a short break 130 to rearrange themselves into divided groups and get prepared for the educational session. Both 131 pre-test and intervention sessions were conducted on the same day. Each participant was 132 assigned a unique ID number so that they could be traced back for the post-test session. To 133 ensure that the respondents could understand the educational materials, in every session one or 134 two respondents from each group were encouraged to demonstrate and share what they had 135 learned. This was also chosen randomly among the participants who were willing to perform.

136
Third phase (post-test phase) 137 After 15 days of the conduction of the health education program, participants were 138 traced back according to their IDs. The participants could be traced back successfully and 100% 139 response rate was obtained. This was understandable because all the respondents of this study 140 were the residential students of the university who were residing at their own dormitories 141 during the full period of study. Also, the participants were enough liable to their commitment 142 to fulfill the study while giving consent in the first place. Still, some participants were not 143 present for the post-test session. To trace them back we had to contact them via their contact 144 numbers personally which was obtained from them with their full informed consent by assuring 145 the confidentiality and thus got the post-test data from all of the participants. During third-146 phase or post-test phase, they were exposed to the same preliminary questions in the pre-test 147 questionnaire to assess the changes in knowledge level and evaluation of the effectiveness of 148 the developed educational program was made.

Study instruments 150
A pre-tested and semi-structured questionnaire including informed consent, socio-151 demographic information and questions related to knowledge towards breast cancer, and BSE 152 practices, was prepared for the study through extensive literature review [15][16][17][18]. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.20.21265265 doi: medRxiv preprint 9 tests, each question was transformed into dichotomous (i.e., correct answer and wrong answer).

179
A p-value less than 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant.
180 Ethical consideration 181 The study was conducted in accordance with the Institutional Research Ethics 182 guidelines and ethical principle involving human participation (i.e., Helsinki Declaration).

183
Formal ethics approval was granted by the Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Ethical Clearance 184 Committee, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh. At first, all participants 185 were informed about the purpose and objectives of the study. Participants were informed that 186 it was a three-phase study, and also about the duration of the study and the approximate time 187 that would be taken from them. Then, written informed consents were taken from each of them 188 who agreed to participate in the study. All information related to participants were kept 189 confidential.

191
General characteristics of participants 192 The sample comprised of a total of 400 female university students aged between 18-26 193 years. Of them, majority were 18-21 years old (35.3%), students of 2 nd year (23.5%), and most 194 were unmarried (86%) ( Table 1). In terms of a family history of breast cancer, 18.3% 195 participants reported that someone in their family had been diagnosed with the disease which 196 included mother (11.6%), sister/cousin (24.6%), aunt (40.6%), and grandmother (23.2%). The 197 remaining 81.2% had no family history of breast cancer. 199  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  knowledge score for correct risk factors and correct screening methods were increased to 3.65 221 ± 2.86 to 9.37 ± 3.10 (total score 12) and 5.45 ± 1.98 to 8.10 ± 1.19 (total score 6), respectively is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Effectiveness of intervention on breast cancer knowledge and BSE
The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 segments of breast cancer in the post-test from the pre-test.

229
In the present study, the knowledge of BSE also increased significantly. The mean 230 difference in the knowledge about process of BSE (total score=5) was 2.37±2.00 (p<0.001).  (Table 3). Similarly, plethora of studies has revealed similar result with 243 this study. In a study in Yazd University, Iran, it was found that before training 62.86% of the 244 women did not perform BSE but, after training this decreased to 33.57% (p < 0.001) [24]. 245 Similarly, Ozturk et al. have revealed in his study the ratio of subjects who regularly performed 246 BSE in the study group had increased from 19.0% to 61.3% while the same ratio was found 247 39.7% in the control group [25]. The differences between two groups and in the same group 248 before and after training were statistically significant [25]. Also, 70.0% did not practice BSE 249 in pre-test compared to 75.0% practicing it in post-test after the intervention, mean practice 250 score was significant (t = 9.84, p < 0.001) was found in a study by Aziz et al. [19]. All these 251 findings align with this study where the changes in the practice of BSE were significantly 252 increased after the educational session. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2021 Given the fact that, this study was conducted on university students whose educational 254 level were from 1 st year of under graduation to post graduation in combination with an efficient, 255 flexible and attractive educational session, this is justifiable that they understood the importance 256 of the information provided at educational session on breast cancer and practice of BSE easily.

257
Thus, all the positive changes in the knowledge and practice of breast cancer and BSE was 258 significantly higher from pre-test to post-test indicating the successful outcome of the 259 educational session that was conducted in this study. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 13 practice of BSE were very inadequate in the baseline. Hence, this educational intervention used 279 discussion, brain storming and leaflet providing clear, precise and required information about 280 breast cancer and steps for performing BSE had been found to be useful. The results of the 281 post-test of this study suggest that women's knowledge was significantly increased. However,   is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2021 14 Consent for publication 304 Not applicable. 306 The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the 307 corresponding author on reasonable request.

308
Competing interests 309 The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest in the publication of   is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2021  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted October 24, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.20.21265265 doi: medRxiv preprint 20