In-person schooling and associated COVID-19 risk in the United States over spring semester 2021

Because of the importance of schools to childhood development, the relationship between in-person schooling and COVID-19 risk has been one of the most important questions of this pandemic. Previous work in the United States during winter 2020–2021 showed that in-person schooling carried some risk for household members and that mitigation measures reduced this risk. Schooling and the COVID-19 landscape changed radically over spring semester 2021. Here, we use data from a massive online survey to characterize changes in in-person schooling behavior and associated risks over that period. We find increases in in-person schooling and reductions in mitigations over time. In-person schooling is associated with increased reporting of COVID-19 outcomes even among vaccinated individuals (although the absolute risk among the vaccinated is greatly reduced). Vaccinated teachers working outside the home were less likely to report COVID-19–related outcomes than unvaccinated teachers working exclusively from home. Adequate mitigation measures appear to eliminate the excess risk associated with in-person schooling.


39
The role of children and in-person schooling in SARS-CoV-2 transmission continues to be a 40 contentious issue. Policies regarding in-person schooling have varied dramatically across 41 school districts in the United States, with a heterogenous mix of in-person and remote learning, 42 as well as varying approaches to mitigation (1). Over the spring semester of the 2020-21 school 43 year many school districts made major updates to their approach to in-person schooling as the 44 winter wave of the COVID-19 pandemic receded. Unfortunately, resurgences related to the 45 Delta variant in the fall of 2021 have meant that, at the time of writing, COVID-19 remains a 46 major health threat in the US and world-wide (2, 3). However, in light of increased vaccine 47 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. Since the 7th wave of the survey, starting on January 12, 2021, the US CTIS has included 119 questions on the respondent's vaccination status and number of doses received (13,14). 120 Overall, 43.1% of 1,082,773 respondents living with school-aged children reported having 121 received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, compared with 50.8% among all 5,273,116 122 survey respondents. Though vaccination among those with school-aged children was lower on 123 average (Fig. S1a), the magnitude of these differences varied by county (Fig. S1b). Vaccination 124 among survey respondents living with school-aged children was strongly correlated with rates 125 reported by the CDC (15) (Pearson's r = 0.83), but rates were higher among survey 126 respondents in most counties (particularly those in New Mexico, South Dakota, and Nebraska) 127 ( Fig. S1c, S1d). 128 129 While in-person schooling increased over the study period, vaccination rates and the prevalence 130 of Alpha and Delta variants increased to a greater extent (Fig. 2, Movie S1). Because of the low 131 proportion of cases from the Delta variant over the study period, we analyze the Alpha and 132 Delta variants together throughout this manuscript. The prevalence of Alpha/Delta variants 133 circulating in the population increased from 1.7% in the week of January 12 to 72.6% in the 134 week ending June 12th (Fig. 2c, Movie S1). At the same time, the percentage of respondents 135 living with school-aged children that reported having received any number of COVID-19 vaccine 136 doses increased from 8.7% to 74.4% (Fig. 2d, Movie S1). Monthly rates of in-person schooling, 137 vaccination, and average number of mitigation measures varied widely across counties, and this 138 variation persisted throughout the spring semester ( Fig. 2a,b,d). 139 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. The percent of respondents living with school-aged children that reported COVID-19-like illness 153 (CLI; defined as fever of at least 100℉, as well as cough, shortness of breath, or difficulty 154 breathing) remained similar across the study period, ranging from 1.83% in January to 1.99% in 155 June (Table S2). The more specific indicators of potential SARS-CoV-2 infection, loss of taste 156 and/or smell and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test with the past 14 days, decreased from 3.65% to 157 2.17% and 3.44% to 0.09% respectively (Table S2). These temporal trends were similar among 158 all survey respondents and among respondents stratified by in-person schooling status; though, 159 respondents living with school-aged children not participating in any in-person schooling saw a 160 decrease in CLI over the study period, from 1.36% to 0.97% (Table S2). 161 162 Overall-from January 12 to June 12, 2021-after adjusting for county-level SARS-CoV-2 163 biweekly attack rates averaged over the past four weeks, COVID-19 vaccination status, and 164 other individual-and county-level factors, living in a household with a child in full-time in-person 165 schooling was associated with increased odds of CLI (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.40), losing 166 taste and/or smell (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.24), and reporting a positive SARS-CoV-2 test 167 (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.38) (Fig. 3). In contrast to our previous analysis (7), we saw no 168 clear trends by grade in any of the COVID-19-related outcomes associated with in-person 169 schooling (Fig. 3, Fig. S2). 170 171 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)  Consistent with our previous study (7), the most commonly reported mitigation measure was 181 student masking, reported by 88% of respondents with in-person schooling in January and 84% 182 in June (Fig. 4a). The second most common measure was teacher masking, at 76% in January 183 and 62% in June (Fig. 4a). Among those with in-person schooling, teacher masking was 184 associated with the greatest risk reduction across all COVID-19-related outcomes, followed by 185 daily symptom screens, student masking and restricted entry (Fig. 4b). These trends were 186 consistent over time, with larger uncertainty in risk estimates in May-June (Fig. S3). These 187 patterns were also consistent for other households and individual level COVID-19-related 188 outcomes (Fig. S4). 189 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 23, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.20.21265293 doi: medRxiv preprint mitigation measures, and risk of a SARS-CoV-2 positive test disappeared with report of seven 201 or more mitigation measures (Fig. 5). Results were consistent for other household and individual 202 level COVID-19-related outcomes (Fig. S5). These patterns were consistent from January to 203 February and March to April (Fig. 5). By May to June, risks of all COVID-19-related outcomes 204 disappeared when four or more mitigation measures were reported (Fig. 5). 205 206 207 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 23, 2021. Over the study period, each ten percent increase in the state-level prevalence of Alpha/Delta 216 variants was associated with increased baseline risk of CLI (aOR 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.07), 217 loss of taste and/or smell (aOR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.03), and reporting a positive SARS-CoV-218 2 test (aOR 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.06), after adjusting for background incidence, vaccination 219 status, and other individual-and county-level characteristics. The rise of Alpha/Delta variants 220 did not change the relative association between in-person schooling and COVID-19-related 221 outcomes (Fig 6). These findings did not change noticeably when we additionally adjusted for 222 cumulative incidence of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 as an indirect indicator of population immunity 223 ( Fig. S6). 224 225 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. We next examined if and how the relationship between respondent vaccination status and living 233 in a household with a child in in-person schooling varied over time (Fig. 7). We found that, by 234 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.  Table S7). Overall, we found a reduction in the odds of COVID-19-related 251 outcomes associated with both no in-person schooling and vaccination, with the latter having 252 the far larger impact (Fig. 8a). Those having received two vaccine doses and not engaged in in-253 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 23, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.20.21265293 doi: medRxiv preprint person schooling had the lowest risk of reporting COVID-19-related outcomes by a large margin 254 (Fig. 8a). In-person schooling did not modify the association between vaccination status and 255 reporting CLI but was, unexpectedly, associated with some variation in the apparent impact of 256 vaccination on loss of taste/smell and reporting a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Fig. 8b). The 257 relative increase in the odds of reporting COVID-19-related outcomes associated with in-person 258 schooling was the same regardless of vaccination status (Fig. 8c). 259 260 261 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. To understand COVID-19-related risk among teachers, we analyzed data from the 116,014 K-272 12 teachers included in the full US CTIS survey, whether or not they lived with a child 273 participating in in-person schooling. We found that 86.0% of K-12 teachers reported work for 274 pay conducted outside of their home in the previous four weeks. The percentage of teachers 275 reporting paid work outside of the home increased from 77.5% in January to 92.4% in June, 276 which was the largest increase in work outside the home for any occupation group (Fig. S7). In 277 comparison, the proportion of office and administrative support professionals that reported 278 working outside of the home increased by a much smaller amount, from 61.5% to 66.9% (Fig.  279   S7). 280 281 Overall, being a K-12 teacher conducting any work outside the home was associated with 282 higher risk of losing taste/smell (aOR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.65) and receiving a positive 283 SARS-CoV-2 test (aOR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.67 to 2.48) compared to K-12 teachers working 284 exclusively from home (Fig. 9). However, we found no differences in the risk of reporting 285 COVID-19-related outcomes between teachers and office and administrative support 286 professionals working outside the home (other professions also had similar risk). These trends 287 held across time periods (Fig. S8; Table S8). Notably, vaccinated teachers working outside the 288 home were less likely to report COVID-19-related outcomes than unvaccinated teachers 289 reporting no work outside the home (Fig. S9). 290 291 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 23, 2021. In-person schooling increased across the US over the spring semester 2021, a period which 302 also saw increasing COVID-19 vaccination rates and the spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants. In 303 this study we show that, despite these changes, associations seen in winter 2020-21 (7) hold: 304 in-person schooling is associated with increased risk of COVID-19-related outcomes in the 305 household, but this risk can be reduced or eliminated with implementation of multiple mitigation 306 measures in schools (Fig. 5, Fig. S5). These findings were consistent across the study period 307 even as vaccination rates increased, emphasizing the importance of layered mitigation 308 measures to reduce the risk of transmission in schools. Such measures remain crucial in light of 309 increased COVID-19 cases due to the Delta variant (3) and the potential for future outbreaks, 310 and are consistent with CDC guidance (16). 311 312 We also found that changes in in-person schooling and mitigation measures varied between 313 states and counties, which has likely contributed to heterogeneity in risk. We found that higher 314 levels of in-person schooling were accompanied by lower levels of mitigation measures (Figs. 315 1,2,7). We also found that from March to April, and even more so from May to June, vaccination 316 rates were positively correlated with mitigation measures and inversely correlated with in-person 317 schooling (Fig. 7). This tendency of communities to eschew both kinds of control may lead to 318 significant increases in overall COVID-19 risk in these areas. 319 320 We found that being unvaccinated and living with a student engaged in in-person schooling was 321 associated with the highest risk of reporting COVID-19-related outcomes, while, unsurprisingly, 322 those reporting two doses of vaccine and no one in the household engaged in in-person 323 schooling had the lowest risk (Fig. 8a). Even among individuals with two vaccine doses, in-324 person schooling was associated with significantly increased risk of COVID-19-related 325 outcomes in household members compared to individuals with no children in in-person 326 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 23, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.20.21265293 doi: medRxiv preprint 21 schooling (Fig. 8c). In other words, our results suggest that even though adult vaccination 327 substantially reduces the overall risk from living with a child engaged in in-person schooling, the 328 relative change in risk due to in-person schooling is similar to that seen in the unvaccinated. 329

330
The proportion of teachers working outside the home increased more than any other 331 professional group over the spring semester 2021 (Fig. S7). Consistent with the in-person 332 schooling results, K-12 teachers working for pay outside the home were at increased risk of 333 COVID-19-related outcomes (Fig. 9), although the additional risk was similar to that in other 334 occupations (Fig. 9). Importantly, vaccinated K-12 teachers working outside the home reported 335 fewer COVID-19-related outcomes than the unvaccinated not working outside their homes. This 336 emphasizes the critical role that vaccination can play in a safe return to the classroom for 337 teachers. 338 339 Furthermore, similar to previous work (7), we found that teacher masking, student masking, 340 restricted entry, and symptom screens were individually associated with the greatest reduction 341 in the risk associated with in-person schooling (Fig. 4). We also found a particularly strong 342 signal for CLI for teacher masking, which may indicate that masks are preventing the spread of 343 other respiratory infections. In addition, we found that some of the less commonly used 344 mitigation measures, such as desk shields and closed playgrounds, were associated with 345 increased risk (Fig. 4). This may reflect reduced utility of these measures and/or a saturation 346 effect since these are often in place alongside other mitigation approaches. Closed 347 extracurricular activities were associated with reduced risk of positive tests in both respondents 348 and family members, but not CLI or loss of taste/smell (Fig. 4, Fig. S4), which could reflect 349 increased testing in households with students in extracurricular activities. 350 351 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 23, 2021. This study has several additional limitations. The survey data that informed the risk estimates 361 were self-reported and subject to recall bias. They were also gathered through the Facebook 362 platform and may not be representative of the underlying populations, though this should be 363 accounted for at least in part through the survey weights (19). We found that vaccination rates 364 were higher in the survey data compared to CDC's reported data (15) (Fig. S1). While CDC's 365 reported vaccination data is known to be under-reported, this could also reflect a bias in the 366 survey data (20). For example, the US CTIS survey may be capturing a more affluent, less rural 367 population, which could explain in part why we found particularly large differences in the survey 368 data compared to CDC data in states with large rural populations (Fig. S1b). 369 370 We were also limited by data available to us in the survey or at the county-level. In our analysis 371 of risk by occupation, we were unable to examine risk by the amount of time spent working 372 outside of the home. In addition, there may be confounding factors that we were not able to 373 adjust for, such as community-level vaccination and immunity. Though, additionally adjusting for 374 cumulative incidence as a proxy for this did not noticeably impact on our results (Fig. S6). We 375 were also not able to evaluate timing of vaccine doses in relation to COVID-19-related 376 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 23, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.20.21265293 doi: medRxiv preprint outcomes. Thus, it is possible that some of the individuals who received two vaccine doses had 377 been infected prior to developing immunity. Finally, out of the seven COVID-related outcomes 378 we measured, none specifically assessed asymptomatic infection. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 test 379 positivity requires seeking out a test, and CLI is not specific for COVID-19. That our findings 380 were largely concordant between these varied outcomes supports our overall conclusions. 381 Some of the differences we did find between CLI and SARS-CoV-2 positive tests could reflect 382 increases in non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infections over the spring semester, as was found in 383 a study in Hong Kong (21). is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) In addition to average 2-week incidence in the past 4 weeks, county-level covariates (obtained 440 from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey using the tidycensus package) included total 441 population, percent of the population that was white, percent of households with income below 442 the poverty threshold, a measure of income inequality, and metropolitan type. Individual-and 443 household-level covariates (obtained from the US CTIS dataset) included gender, age, 444 occupation, educational level, household size, masking behavior, out-of-state travel, vaccination 445 with any number of COVID-19 vaccine doses, and whether they reported a visit to a 446 bar/restaurant/cafe, to an event with more than 10 people, and whether they used public transit. 447 Primary outcomes included COVID-19 like illness, loss of taste and/or smell, and a positive 448 SARS-CoV-2 test results in the past 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included CLI in any 449 household member, contact with a household member who received a positive test result, and a 450 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 23, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.20.21265293 doi: medRxiv preprint