COVID-19 Vaccine: Newspaper Coverage of the side effects of the vaccine in Nigeria

Abstract Background: COVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy is increasing globally, and this threatens the world ability to bring the pandemic under control. The way the media reports on the vaccine may influence or affect how the population perceive the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. Methods: The aim of this study was to determine how newspapers in Nigeria report stories about the vaccine and the side effects of the vaccine amidst the growing fear on the safety of the vaccine. A total of 4 national daily newspapers were randomly selected for the study. These are Leadership, Guardian, Nation and Punch newspapers. The study was anchored on agenda setting theory. Quantitative content analysis research was used for the study. The duration of the study was the day the vaccine was introduced in Nigeria: March 1st,2021 to July 31st, 2021. An Excel sheet served as the instrument for data collection and analysis done using SPSS version 25 with the level of significance predetermined at a p-value less than 0.05. Results: Key findings from this research were: Government officials and technical experts were predominantly used by the newspapers as the source of their information. There was a mixed reporting of vaccine side effects with a significant difference between those newspaper publications that reported vaccine side effects and those that did not. Amongst those that reported side effects, there was also a significant difference between those that communicated how and where to report the side effects as against those that did not. Conclusion: As part of the effort to curtail vaccine hesitancy, a continuous improvement in communicating the vaccine efficacy and safety is needed. Keywords: coverage; side-effects; newspaper, COVID-19; vaccine Nigeria;


COVID-19, Nigeria and Covid-19 Vaccines
Corona viruses are part of a large family of viruses that are known to cause illnesses ranging from mild common cold to a more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory  CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 4, 2021

Media: COVID-19 related news and vaccine coverage
The role of the media in reporting health related information especially during pandemic is very important not only in keeping the general population informed but also helping to allay fears that usually hover around during pandemics 10,11 . Extensive media coverage during pandemics help curtail the panic and spread of rumor that are often associated with disease outbreaks especially a pandemic such as COVID-19. In a study carried out by Olapegba et.al in Nigeria to assess the knowledge of the populace on COVID-19 12 , the mass media (Television, radio and Newspaper) provided the most source of 'go-to' for information. In another study carried out to assess the knowledge and perceptions and attitude of Egyptians towards COVID-19 13 , knowledge, majority of the respondents had good general knowledge about the mode of transmission and prevention of the disease with a strong influence of their awareness due to a massive media-driven campaign on Mass media and Social media. Level of knowledge among rural dwellers was lower when compared with Urban dwellers showing the level of penetration of the media.
Vaccine hesitancy and uptake remains a global challenge, but worse hit is in developing countries. Vaccine refusal can lead to disease outbreaks with a typical example seen during the Polio outbreaks in Northern Nigeria in 2003 leading to a significant rise in Polio incidence in the country 14 . This refusal was sparked by rumors that vaccines were unsafe and aimed at controlling the sterility of a religious sect as well as spreading HIV.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 4, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.02.21264454 doi: medRxiv preprint  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 4, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.02.21264454 doi: medRxiv preprint tenderness, headaches, myalgia, malaise as well as fever to be the most common side effects while thrombocytopenia is also said to be common. 17 . The bleeding tendency following the vaccine administration has pose a significant challenge as the information about the safety of the vaccines begins to unfold.
Reporting adverse events (Side effects) of a medication including vaccines help in the postmarketing surveillance for the pharmaceutical companies as well as the Drug regulatory bodies. In Nigeria the National Agency for Food and Drug Control established in October 1992 is saddled with regulation and control for those manufacturing, importing, exporting, distributing, and those selling and consuming Drugs, medical devices as well as vaccines 18 .
NAFDAC has a Med Safety App 19 where adverse events for drugs and including the COVID-19 vaccines can be reported by the general populace. The question is how much of this information is available to the public and how much has the mass media helped in projecting this information aside the media mention of the side effects of the vaccines which might contribute to the vaccine hesitancy in Nigeria This study is needed to look at how newspaper report the side effects of COVID-19 Vaccines as a way of improving the vaccine uptake and allaying the fears among Nigerians.

Objectives of the Study
The main objective of this study was to determine how the media report COVID-19 Vaccine and related side effects in Nigeria. The specific objectives of the study are: 1.
To determine the sources cited in newspaper coverage on COVID-19 Vaccine.

2.
To determine if newspaper talk on COVID-19 vaccine side effects.

3.
To determine the story type which the newspapers use to report stories concerning the Vaccine side effects.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

4.
To ascertain if newspaper stories make suggestions regarding how to report the side effects of the vaccines . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

METHODS
This is a descriptive quantitative content analysis carried out by sampling recognised newspapers with online presence and wide coverage in Nigeria with study period starting from March 2 nd , 2021 when Nigeria received the first batch of the vaccine to July 2021 when the first phase of immunization cycle was stopped. News mentioning COVID-19 Vaccines with side effects but from other countries News mentioning only COVID-19 without the vaccines were excluded Articles with inadequate data related to the topic were also excluded

Unit of Analysis and Coding
The following highlighted how the information were coded and analysed 473 articles related to COVID-19 Vaccines accessed 196 articles excluded because they included stories from other countries 33 articles excluded due to insufficient data Total of 244 Data articles from different newspaper included in the study . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Article type
The articles were classified based on the newspaper categorisation of the article into: News, Editorials, Opinion, Columns, Features and Others (Those without a classification heading)

Sources
The sources of information were classified under the following headings:

Side effects of vaccines mentioned
The side effects the vaccine mentioned were coded as follows: i. None mentioned ii. Fever . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) Those that did not mention where to report represented as NO

Data Capture and Analysis
Data captured on Microsoft excel sheet and analysis done with SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics involving frequencies and percentages were run to describe article characteristics as well as to give a good understandable view of the information. Chi-square analysis with pvalue set at 0.05 significance were done to analyse the relevance of the data.

RESULTS
Below shows the results of the frequency distribution and analysis of the data . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.       (n=32) and July 14.3%(n=35). It is imperative to note that reporting in July was higher than reporting in June and this might be due to more noise around winding up of the first phase of the vaccination. The major source of information for the newspapers were Government Officials accounting for 39.8% (n=97) and Technical experts 34.0% (n=83). About 4.5% (n=11) of the information came from people who did receive the vaccines.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 4, 2021. We also did look at the total number of articles that talked about the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines as against those that did not mention the side effects including the various types of the side effects mentioned across the newspapers   Majority of the newspaper 77.5% (n=189%) did not mention anything related to the side effects of the vaccine with just 22.5% (n=55). Of the number that mentioned the side effects,74.5% (n=41%) were mixed symptoms (a combination of 2 or more symptoms) while 16.4% (n=9) accounts for bleeding and 7.3%(n=4) for pain.  Table 6: Comparing newspaper that mentioned side effect of covid-19 vaccine and those who talked on where to report the side effects . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 4, 2021. to report the side effects as against those who mentioned side effects but not where to report the side effects with a significant level of association related to reporting the side effects.

Discussion
Our al 21 findings in the role the media can play in curtailing the disease spread in relation to setting an agenda and the frame to which they report the disease outbreak During a disease outbreak, the source of information is of high importance and the information must not only be factual, reliable but also accurate with no elements of deceit. Most times, the journalist approach the technical experts to hear their views in other for them to come up with a fact -backed up story. 22 In our study, Political office holders were the predominant major source of information accounting for 39.8% (n=970 followed by Technical Experts accounting for 34.0%(n=83). This could be as a result of the government talking more to the media as a way of trying to instil confidence in the people to take the vaccine as well as trying to be seen working hard in curtailing the spread of the disease in the country. Few information did come from those that had received the vaccines 4.5% (n=11) and we strongly feel this could have been looked more into as their first-hand experience could help sway the increase in uptake of the vaccine 23 .
While 22.5%(n=55) of the total story did talk about the side effects of the vaccines, the reported the side effects in a mixed way and not as individual entities (More than 1 side effects accounts for 74.5% of the total n=55) while bleeding was reported most of the single entity accounting for 16.4% of the side effects mentioned. This is not so as the very common side effects listed in the prescribing information leaflet of AstraZeneca where injection site pain, fever, headache and myalgia were listed as the commonest side effects 24 One reason that could explain why lots of the emphasis on the bleeding tendency could be on the attention that this side effect of the vaccine got on a global scale necessitating some countries withholding the administration of the vaccine as well as some countries switching to other type of the vaccines 25 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) Talking about where to report the side effects of the vaccines to people who have had the vaccine administered would not only help capture the data on the side effects but would also serve as a booster for them showing some level of care. Our study showed a statistical significance between the articles that mentioned the side effects and where the people are to report the side effects (p-value ˂0.001).
This study to the best of our knowledge and search is the only one which has focused entirely on this topic in the country and it further buttresses the need for continuous campaign about the role of the media in helping to promote the benefits as well as the risk of the COVID-19 vaccine in the country including pointing he citizenry in the right direction if they need to report any side effects following administration of the vaccine.

Conclusions
Our conclusion is that coverage of the COVID-19 vaccine administration including the side effects in the country by the print media is still inadequate considering the hesitancy and the palpable fears among people about the vaccine. The source of the information used by the newspaper are good however they can also focus more on the perspective of recipients of the vaccines and the various outcomes they experienced after taking the vaccine. While side effects are not reported in the newspaper and the regulatory bodies had provided information on where to report the side effects for anyone who took the vaccines, the print media did not provide much information on where to report the side effects and how to report it.
We strongly believe that as part of the strategies to help increase the uptake of the vaccines across the country, the media has a significant role in preaching the right message to the wider community. Future research might want to expand the scope of this research as well as expand the timeline to see if the situation has changed. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 4, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.02.21264454 doi: medRxiv preprint

Limitations
Only 4 national newspapers were sampled out of the over 30 national newspapers in the country and we might have inadvertently excluded some with wider coverage of the topic. We also recognised that some other form of media such as television, radio and billboards might cover this topic in a more extensive way than the print media.

Conflict of Interest
While SKV and EOA work for pharmaceutical companies, the study is a personal work not related to the organisation they work for. COO is a public health physician with nil affiliation to any pharmaceutical company. We received no funding for this work.
We declare no conflict of Interest

Availability of Data and Materials
The data used and or analysed in this study is available on request from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References
1. Baron S., Galveston; Structure and classification of viruses. Medical microbiology 4th edition . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 4, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.02.21264454 doi: medRxiv preprint