The findings of Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Bangladesh (2016-2020)

Antimicrobial resistance is a global problem. Surveillance is one of the effective tools to address this multifaceted problem. In Bangladesh a countrywide antimicrobial resistance surveillance is ongoing since 2016-2020. The main objective of the surveillance is to know the sensitivity pattern of some common bacteria which will eventually help to formulate a standard treatment guideline for the clinician and to know the gravity of the AMR problem in Bangladesh. It is a case based surveillance conducted by Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control & Research (IEDCR) in nine sentinel sites where five types of clinical cases were selected according to case definition, tested in the microbiological department of the sites and ten types of bacteria were identified from six types of preselected specimens and their sensitivity test were done. All the laboratory works were done following the same standard operative procedure supplied by the AMR surveillance Reference laboratory at IEDCR. Total 19,263 samples were processed during the period of March 2017- March 2020 among which wound swab yielded highest growth (57%). E.coli was the highest (1717) isolated organism among the ten priority pathogens which showed highest sensitivity (91%) to Imipenem. Imipenem also showed higher sensitivity to other organisms like K. pneumoniae (77%), Salmonella species (100%), P. aeruginosa (53%) and Acb complex (29%). Third generation cephalosporin like ceftriaxone was found less than 50% sensitive to E.coli (37%) and K.pneumoniae (28%) although Salmonella spp. showed higher sensitivity (97%) to it. ACB complex, mostly isolated from ICU patients showed alarming resistance to all of the antibiotics and was less than 50% sensitive to even the highest sensitive antibiotic Imipenem (29%). Salmonella spp. isolated from blood showed higher susceptibility to most of the antibiotics except ciprofloxacin (7%). The result of the surveillance representing whole country is surely alarming as most of the bacteria are highly resistant to the commonly used as well some of the reserve group of antibiotics. So concerted effort should be taken from all concerned to curb the problem immediately.


Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most complex and multifaceted health challenges facing the global community today. Excessive and inappropriate antibiotic usage is the main cause of the emergence of resistant organisms. Antimicrobial resistance is regarded as the single biggest threat facing the world in the area of infectious diseases. Drug-resistant infections already contribute to at least 700,000 deaths a year (WHO, 2019). In Brazil, Indonesia and Russia, 40 to 60% of infections are already caused by drug-resistant bacteria, compared to an average of 17% in OECD countries (OECD). Given the current trajectory, drug resistance could lead to 10 million deaths annually and plunge 24 million people into extreme poverty by 2050 (WHO, 2019). Left unchecked, AMR is likely to become one of the world's largest health threats, surpassing many other major conditions, such as diabetes and cancer; in scale have a severe effect on economies around the world.
Bangladesh, a developing country of Southeast Asia with a high degree of AMR, poses a regional and global threat. In a study performed in Chittagong in 2003, typhoid patients were found to be unresponsive to second-line therapy (ciprofloxacin). First-line therapy was not even attempted because of existing resistance (Asna et al., 2003). Therapeutic failures like this are not rare at all. Furthermore, concerning this, multiple studies have demonstrated irrational antibiotic prescribing by physicians, a habit of self-medication among patients, and the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in agriculture and farming in different parts of the country (Shamsuzzaman and Biswas, 2012).
Even though many studies have been performed on the prevalence of AMR in Bangladesh, no attempts have yet been made to systematically unify them.
World Health Organization (WHO) acknowledged AMR as a global public health problem in 1998 and urged member states to take measures to encourage appropriate use of antimicrobials. In May . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 2015, World Health Assembly adopted the Global Action Plan on AMR. All countries are required to develop their national action plan based on the GAP. One of the five strategic objectives of the Global Plan is to strengthen the evidence base through surveillance and research. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) to support the implementation of the Global Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance (AMR). GLASS promotes and supports standardized antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance worldwide.
In concordance with the global and WHO activities on Antimicrobial Resistance Containment . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021

Materials and Methods
The AMR surveillance in Bangladesh is a 'case-based surveillance', one of the three surveillance is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 Surveillance sites were selected on the basis of geographical representation, ability of the hospital to enroll cases and availability of a nearby microbiology laboratory with capacity to perform culture and sensitivity. Capacity building of the sites included hands-on training (both basic & refresher), providing of laboratory SOPs, providing of instruments, logistics and technical support through the laboratory networking system. Surveillance activities included collection and testing of samples and compiling of the epidemiological data. The entire laboratory testing including the Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing (AST), was done at the sentinel sites. Laboratory works have been performed by strictly following the SOPs provided by the AMR Reference Laboratory of IEDCR. All the relevant epidemiological as well as laboratory data were compiled in a software and the hard copy was maintained. The data were cleansed and analyzed using WHONET software at IEDCR. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 Internal and external quality control were ensured. For external quality control, a number of positive samples have been retested at the reference laboratory as well as at a third party laboratory.
The reference laboratory as well as the sentinel sites participated in Proficiency Testing (PT) by the College of American Pathologists (CAP).
Five different cases of infectious conditions were enrolled from the hospitals by the surveillance physicians following case definitions and specific samples were collected from them according to the protocol which included urine, stool, wound swab, blood, sputum and endotracheal aspirate.
In the laboratories, 10 pathogens were identified by biochemical methods from the samples following laboratory SOP and their sensitivity test was done by Kirby-Baur disc diffusion method following CLSI and also, the zone diameter was noted. The organisms identified were-Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus spp., Vibrio cholerae, Shigella spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex. These 10 pathogens were called the priority pathogens.

Ethical Issue
Patients were selected according to protocol and before taking sample and epi-data informed written as well as verbal consent were taken and other ethical issues are strictly taken into consideration. The protocol was approved by the lnstitutional Review Board (lRB) of lnstitute of Epidemiology Disease Control and Research (IEDCR).
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. Except stool and sputum, the other 4 samples were mostly collected from the patients between the age group of 10-29 years. The highest number of stool samples were collected from the age group 0-9 years and the highest number of sputum samples were collected from the age group 60-69 years. As per the sex distribution, there was no significance difference between male and female patients.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
Here, the growth of E. coli in stool sample was not included as the pathogenicity test for the isolates was not done.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.12.21251710 doi: medRxiv preprint  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021.
Among the 10 priority pathogens, E. coli showed the highest growth (60%) in the urine sample. In the wound swab, Enterococcus spp. was the most abundant (76%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (45%). Vibrio cholera was most abundant in stool sample (53%). In the sputum and endotracheal aspirate, Klebsiella pneumoniae showed the highest growth (46% and 35% respectively). Acb (Acinetobacter) complex was the second highest organism identified from the endotracheal aspirate (26%). In blood, Salmonella spp. showed the highest abundance (58%).

Non typhoid-al Salmonella
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.12.21251710 doi: medRxiv preprint *Less than 30 isolates tested. Salmonella spp. showed high susceptibility to almost all other antibiotics. Among the 10 priority pathogens, P. aeruginosa and Acb complex showed low sensitivity to almost all the antibiotics.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2021 Other than Imipenem, P. aeruginosa showed less than 40% sensitivity to other antibiotics and Acb complex showed less than 30% sensitivity to all the antibiotics The susceptibility pattern of vancomycin and Linezolid is not mentioned here as the susceptibility tests could not be confirmed by MIC testing.
CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.12.21251710 doi: medRxiv preprint *Less than 30 isolates tested. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.12.21251710 doi: medRxiv preprint Oxacillin --25% -. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam
*Less than 30 isolates tested.  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

10% -
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
Gentamycin showed the highest sensitivity to S. aureus. S. pneumoniae was not included in the table as the number of the isolates was less than 30. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim 12% -15%
Tetracycline 14% --*Less than 30 isolates tested. Table 7 demonstrates the antibiogram of endotracheal aspirate pathogens Endotracheal aspirate was taken from the ICU patients and all the antibiotics showed low sensitivity to the identified pathogens from this sample (less than 40%). Imipenem showed only 37% sensitivity to K. pneumoniae, which was the highest and only 25% sensitivity to P.
aeruginosa. After Imipenem, Amikacin showed the second highest susceptibility to K.
pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa (28% and 25% respectively). All the antibiotics showed below 20% sensitivity to Acb complex. Cefepime, a Reserve drug, showed less than 10% sensitivity to all the 3 pathogens.

Amoxicillin-Clavulanate
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
Among the identified pathogens from the blood sample, Salmonella was found to be the most abundant. Other than Salmonella and E. coli, the growth of other pathogens in blood was poor.
Almost all the antibiotics showed above 70% sensitivity to Salmonella species other than Ciprofloxacin, which showed only 7% sensitivity. Imipenem was found to be 100% sensitive to Salmonella. Imipenem also showed the highest sensitivity to E. coli (89%). Doxycycline showed the highest sensitivity to S. aureus (80%). Amikacin showed above 50% sensitivity to the identified pathogens.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Discussion
Like other LMICs, Bangladesh is also facing the problem of AMR and the extent of this is not clear due to the lack of adequate data. The AMR surveillance in Bangladesh 2016-2020 is the first of its kind including all geographical areas in Bangladesh to find out the resistance pattern of ten important bacterial pathogens from six types of samples collected from patients attending outdoors and indoors presented with five clinical syndromes.
Total 19,263 samples were processed. Other than stool and sputum, most of the samples were collected from the age group of 10-29 years. Stool sample was mostly taken form the pediatric department (the age group was between 0 and 9 years). Some of the stool samples were also collected from the Infectious Disease Hospital and ORT unit of Medical college hospitals. Sputum was mostly collected from the age group of 60-69 years. The male and female distribution showed no significant variation in terms of collection of samples. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2021 The lowest growth in culture was yielded by stool (9%). This may be due to exclusion of growth of E. coli as its pathogenicity test could not be done. Wound swab and ETA yielded the highest growth, the percentage being 57% and 48% respectively.
E.coli yielded highest growth (60%) in urine which is in line with other studies like one conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh where E. coli (58.18%) was the most prevalent bacteria isolated from positive urine samples ' (Biswas et al., 2014) and also E. coli showed mostly resistant to penicillins and cephalosporins. Fluoroquinolones and other protein synthesis inhibitors also showed less susceptibility pattern. In UTI, nitrofurantoin is the only oral drug showed better (80%) susceptibility profile. Imipenem showed the most effective (95%) against E. coli followed by Amikacin (86%). E. coli isolated from the wound swab showed most resistant profile than other samples. In Indian surveillance system, they found colistin, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin and gentamycin as effective drugs which has a concordance with the present study (Veeraraghavan and Walia, 2019). They also found combination like piperacillin-tazobactum and cefperazonesulbactam as effective drugs, which could not be evaluated in our setup. The Indian studies found ESBL producing E. coli were the responsible for such resistance pattern for penicillin and cephalosporin (Bora et al., 2014, Ranjan et al., 2016. Pseudomonas species showed the second highest growth following E. coli. It is the highest isolated pathogen in wound swab (45%). The samples were collected mainly from the surgery ward followed by burn unit and medicine unit. A study in Nigeria showed similar result where Pseudomonas aeruginosa was highest (33.3%) isolated pathogen in post-operative patients . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The overall susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas showed very poor profile. Pseudomonas were highest susceptible (53%) to Imipenem followed by Piperacillin-Tazobactam (38%) and Amikacin (35%). Only Piperacillin showed 38% sensitivity to Pseudomonas. All other antibiotic showed sensitivity below 30%. Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ETA were the most resistant.
Klebsiella pneumoniae mostly grew from sputum (46%) and ETA (35%). A study done at Nigeria also found K. pneumoniae as the highest isolated pathogen followed by H. influenzae and then Staph. aureus (Egbe et al., 2011). Another study done in a tertiary care hospital, Bali, Indonesia found K. pneumoniae the highest isolated pathogen followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (Budayanti et al., 2019).
In this study ETA was cultured from ventilated patient's sample at ICU and K. pneumoniae was found to be the highest pathogen followed by Acinetobacter complex. Most of the bacteria isolated were gram negative bacilli (86% . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 were the predominant Gram-negative bacteria associated with VAP, and Staphylococcus aureus (14.9%) was the most common Gram-positive bacterium among patients with VAP (Joseph et al., 2010) The overall susceptibility pattern showed below 50% for most of the antibiotics except Imipenem (77%), Amikacin (63%) and gentamicin (57%). Isolates from ETA showed the most resistant profile than others. Susceptibility showed diversity in India with high rates of ESBL producing.
Susceptibility to carbapenems showed diverse range from 44 to 72%, amikacin showed 65% while gentamicin susceptibility was 55% (Gandra et al., 2016. More than half (58%) of the isolates from blood were Salmonella species. Isolates from blood showed excellent sensitivity pattern except ciprofloxacin (7%) and ampicillin (74%). In India, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and Paratyphi was predominant blood isolates. In S. Typhi and paratyphi, they found nalidixic acid as the most resistant drug with a variable finding of ciprofloxacin (0-81%). Other drugs had better susceptibility pattern. Stool constituted 20% by Salmonella species. Isolates from stool samples here showed very different scenario with a highest sensitivity (70%) to ceftriaxone assuming that they might be non typhoidal salmonellosis (NTS).
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
Though Acinetobacter baumannii (ACB) complex comprises only 4% of total, it constituted 26% of ETA isolates. Susceptibility profile is worst as expected showed most sensitive to Imipenem by 29%. But studies from India got better susceptibility patterns for imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, tobramycin, netilmicin and colistin compared to our surveillance reports (Pragasam et al., 2017, Shrivastava et al., 2013, Tripathi et al., 2014. Among the gram positive organisms, Staphylococcus aureus was the most (10%) prevalent followed by Enterococcus species and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Staphylococcus aureus isolates were mostly found in respiratory samples followed by wound swab, blood and urine. The overall susceptibility pattern showed the most effective drug was Rifampicin (69%) and the least was Penicillin-G (11%). Only 36% isolates showed sensitivity towards Cefoxitin indicates the high MRSA burden in the region. It is still need to differentiate the hospital acquired and community acquired infections to identify the actual magnitude of the MRSA in these settings. In India, S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is reported separately. They found almost 40% isolates as MRSA. For MRSA, poor susceptibility to gentamicin (28-44%), . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
Vancomycin resistance was reported around 20% (Praharaj et al., 2013, Sachan et al., 2017, Singh et al., 2014. Only 06 Streptococcus pneumoniae could be isolated from respiratory samples and blood. The fastidious nature of this organism could be underestimated the actual. Very few isolates are not conclusive to evaluate the antibiogram as it is below 30 in number.

Limitations of the study
As the participatory laboratories were not capable of performing MIC testing, some of the important resistant pattern could not be confirmed which required it according to CLSI.
Furthermore, toxigenicity test of stool samples yielding E.coli could not be performed so that one of the important diarrheagenic pathogen had to exclude from the susceptibility list.

Conclusion
AMR Surveillance is an essential tool for getting necessary information to develop and monitor therapy guidelines, antibiotic stewardship programmes, public health interventions and infection control policies. It enables early detection of resistant strains of public health importance, and supports the prompt notification and investigation of outbreaks and ultimately guides to policy recommendations.
Running a standard and reliable surveillance is extremely important as well as challenging especially in resource poor country like Bangladesh. The ongoing AMR surveillance program, . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2021 with all its limitations and challenges is unique for its countrywide expansion and coordinated approach of hospital physicians, nurses of medical college hospitals and laboratory personnel of microbiology departments of the medical colleges. The susceptibility pattern of different microorganisms as revealed by the surveillance is indeed alarming. Except Imipenem most of the commonly used antibiotics showed ineffective for most of the bacteria. ACB complex, most of which organism has been found from ICU patient's specimen showed less than 50% sensitivity to all of the used antibiotics. Vibrio cholerae isolated from stool samples showed similar sensitivity to ciprofloxacin (84%) and azithromycin (83%) whereas Shigella spp. showed only 53% sensitivity to azithromycin while ceftriaxone (89%) showed highest sensitivity. Salmonella spp.
from blood showed high sensitivity (70-100%) to most of the antibiotics except ciprofloxacin (7%). Staph. aureus is only 36% sensitive to cefoxitin which indicates the possibility to a very high number of MRSA. Antibiotics like ampicillin, sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim and tetracycline which was previously used commonly does not seem to be effective to most of the bacteria except salmonella spp. It is high time all relevant stakeholders should come forward to curb the upcoming threat.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2021