The Impact for Implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review

Aims: This systematic review aims to assess the impact of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) implementation at Health Care Organizations (HCOs) on Health Care Workers' (HCWs') satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and financial performance. Up to now, no previous systematic reviews have performed a comprehensive and rigorous methodological approach to figure out the impact of BSC implementation in HCOs. Methods: This systematic review was prepared according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases, as well as Google search engine, were inspected to find all BSC implementations at HCOs until 20 September 2020. Then the resulted articles were screened to find the implementations which measured the impact of BSC on HCWs' satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and financial performance. Quality assessment was performed using the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies: (StaRI) checklist. Results: Out of 4031 records, 20 articles were finally included for measuring one or more of the three impact types. 17 measured the impact of BSC on patient satisfaction, 7 on HCWs' satisfaction, and 12 on financial performance. Studies with higher quality had a higher positive impact. Conclusion: This paper offers evidence to HCOs and policymakers on the benefits of implementing BSC. BSC implementations showed a positive impact on patient satisfaction and financial performance in HCOs. However, less impact was found on HCWs' satisfaction, which should be given better consideration in future BSC implementations. High and medium-quality BSC studies were associated with higher positive impacts than low ones. BSC can be utilized as an effective tool to improve HCOs' performance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 University's health system strategic map [14]. Since then, many hospitals around the world 67 have implemented this tool to evaluate and develop their performance. However, the impact 68 or the effect of BSC implementations has not yet been systematically assessed. This might be 69 because of the varied impact types, which makes the comparison challenging [15]. The selection of eligible studies was independently performed by FA and SH. In case of 114 disagreements, discussion after each step was made or, if necessary, SL and HK were consulted 115 for arbitration. In the initial step of study selection, the titles and abstracts of the articles were 116 examined to eliminate irrelevant papers. In the second step, the full texts of all potentially 117 relevant records were carefully examined to make a final decision on in-or exclusion based on 118 the above-mentioned criteria. Authors of studies with no available full texts or unclear impact 119 duration were contacted to obtain further details and clarification. The following data were extracted from the final eligible studies: 1) author/s, year of 122 publication, 2) country, 3) type of study, 4) duration of data collection 5) setting, 6) the number 123 of health facilities, 7) the number of participants, 8) data collection tool or data sources, and 9) 124 outcome (impact on patient satisfaction, HCWs' satisfaction, and financial performance). Data 125 extraction was done between January and March 2021 by FA and SH independently. The 126 impact was either extracted directly from the studies or calculated by subtracting before and 127 after implementation values to calculate the change; based on how each study presented its 128 results. After that, the unification of units was performed. Next, charts plotting for each 129 outcome were performed by FA, then reviewed by FA and SH separately. Authors were 130 contacted if the impact measuring unit was not reported. Finally, a comparison was made to 131 discuss the differences. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 To assess the quality of the final included papers a quality assessment was performed by FA Regarding the location of the implementations, 9 were implemented in North America, 2 in 150 Europe, 1 in Africa, 7 in Asia, and 1 did not specify the location. 14 studies were performed in 151 high-income countries, 2 in upper-middle-income countries, 1 in the lower middle, and only 2 152 in low-income countries. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 Out of the 20 resulted final papers, 16 were performed in hospitals or hospitals' departments, 155 and 4 in health facilities or clinics, see Table ( is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2021 Resulted studies used different versions of BSC. 1st generation's aspects; explanation and 178 definition of perspectives and indicators, and how to measure each indicator was performed 179 only in 7 papers [30,34,36,37,[40][41][42], and partially in 1 paper where only customer and patient 180 satisfaction were explained with how they were measured [43]. Also, only 5 papers specified 181 the source for each perspective/indicator [30,35,36,41,42] eligible 20 studies, 17 measured the impact of BSC on patient satisfaction [13,29,39-194 41,43,44,46,30-36,38], 7 on HCWs' satisfaction [28,31,32,36,41,42,47], and 12 on the 195 financial performance [13,28,47,48,30,36,38,[41][42][43]45,46]. However, the measured variables is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021.
varied from internal customer satisfaction to job satisfaction or superiors' satisfaction.

203
However, the financial variable had the greatest variation; from the reduction in costs, is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.05.21261666 doi: medRxiv preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ;  not available in all. However, in our analysis, the magnitude of percentage change was taken 254 into consideration.  Table (2), the authors decided that conducting a meta-analysis would not 263 lead to meaningful results, and a comparison of the impact was performed using the bar charts, 264 see (Figs 4-7). The impacts in the 02 included studies were specified as the following:  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021.   ). But, for the remaining four currency measures presented in three studies [13,41,46], 283 the available information was only for the final value, so it was impossible to calculate the 284 percentage for them. As a result, 2 graphs of the financial impact were designed. (Fig 6) shows 285 the impact in percentage, 11 studies were applicable to it, with 26 measures. While (Fig 7) 286 shows the monetary impact in currency, where 9 studies were applicable, with 23 measures.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.05.21261666 doi: medRxiv preprint 4.1.1. Impact on patient satisfaction 296 It was noticed that the studies which contained high negative impact had a low-quality 297 assessment, except for 1 study which had a high-quality assessment and high negative impact 298 [41], but the authors of this study explained that patient feedback revealed that patient 299 satisfaction became lower in the 18th month due to the technical work and rearrangement of 300 clinics noise. This explanation can be re-assured by noticing that the same impact at this study 301 was positive (18% higher) in the first year, then it started to deteriorate in the following 6 302 months. However, studies that had either medium quality or high quality generally had a 303 positive impact on patient satisfaction. Another study that had the highest quality score  It was noticed that 4 out of the 5 negative measures of impact were mildly negative or close to 310 zero, and were referred to in 1 study [35]. This can be referred due to the unavailability of 311 objectives that suit the organization's strategy, causal effects, or action plans in this study. This 312 deficiency may have imposed a drastic effect on the final results. However, the fifth negative 313 measure was found in a high-quality study [36]. In which, employee satisfaction with 314 relationships with colleagues decreased by 25.7% after 7 years of BSC implementation. But, 315 the same study found another 2 positive impacts for BSC implementation: employee 316 satisfaction with relationship with patients, and employee satisfaction with professional 317 fulfillment. These measures increased by 21% and 14.5%, respectively. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint built on for the responsibility and accountability. As a result, this may lead to cooperation 353 resistance by the HCWs, and will also lead to lowering their satisfaction rate. However, future 354 researchers should be considering when applying BSC on how to increase the HCWs' 355 satisfaction rate. One study revealed that employees did not have incentives or motives to 356 participate in BSC since they were permanent employees, also the HCWs above 40 negatively 357 influenced creativity and productivity upon BSC implementation [41]. This challenge was also 358 referred to by other researchers who mentioned that in some health settings, there were major 359 deficiencies of qualified personnel and significant issues with health care HCWs' aging [50]. 360 However, they have suggested that highly-ranking HCWs' qualifications in the learning and 361 growth perspective, will eventually generate motivation for HCWs and will resolve this issue. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 skeptical because of concerns about its impact on the quality of health care services and its 369 cost. They suggested that health care professionals, especially physicians, have to be educated 370 on the potential benefits of accreditation. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.05.21261666 doi: medRxiv preprint holistic idea. Finally, due to the difference of currency used among studies, the currency was 418 converted to USD. However, for studies that did not specify the rate at the time of the study, 419 the current rate was used in calculations. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.05.21261666 doi: medRxiv preprint 6. References 441 of COVID-19 crisis: a convergent parallel mixed-method study. BMC Public Health. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 29. Mutale W,Stringer J,Chintu N,Chilengi R,Mwanamwenge MT,Kasese N,et al. 530 Application of balanced scorecard in the evaluation of a complex health system is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted August 7, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.05.21261666 doi: medRxiv preprint -Gross change/ difference after less than one year -One-time measurement with no comparability.
No limitation was set in the search strategy, studies that measured BSC impact within less than one year of implementation were excluded after carefully examining the full texts.

Outcome
-Impact on financial indicators: profitability/loss, change in total revenues, change in total cost, ROI, ROA either in currency or in percentage.
-Or: Impact on the patient satisfaction rate -Or: Impact on the HCWs' satisfaction rate -The impact should be objective and measured/ quantitative.
-Impact on other indicators.