Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 hyperimmune globulin (HIG) solution in the treatment of active COVID-19 infection- Findings from a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Centric Trial

Background COVID-19 hyper-immune globulin (HIG) solution is a human plasma-derived, highly-purified, concentrated, virus-inactivated preparation of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against COVID-19. Methods This was a randomized, two-arm, controlled, multi-center trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 HIG in patients who were hospitalized with moderate-severe COVID-19 infection. Results A total of 60 patients were randomized (30 in each arm). Overall, COVID-19 HIG was well-tolerated without any serious treatment-emergent adverse event or tolerability issue. The mean change in ordinal scale by day 8 was 1.7{+/-}1.61 in the test arm vs. 2.0{+/-}1.68 in the control arm (mITT; p=0.367). Early and high NAbs were observed in the test arm compared to the control arm. More patients had negative RT-PCR by day 3 for the test arm vs. the control arm (mITT: 46.67% in test vs. 37.93% in control). The median time to be RT-PCR negative was 5.5 days for the test arm vs. 8.0 days for the control arm for PP population. Patients receiving COVID-19 HIG showed early improvement (reduction) in the biomarkers (CRP, IL-6, and D-dimer). Conclusion COVID-19 HIG was found to be safe and well-tolerated. Early and high NAbs were achieved in COVID-19 HIG recipients qualifying the product as a suitable treatment option, particularly in an immunocompromised state. It should be given early in infection to mitigate progression to severe disease. It should be evaluated for post-exposure prophylaxis as well as for prevention (where a vaccine is not suitable or effective). It should be evaluated in the pediatric population as well.


Introduction
Hyperimmune globulin is prepared from the human plasma with high titers of antibodies against a specific antigen. Some organisms against which hyperimmune globulins are available include hepatitis B, rabies, tetanus toxin, varicella-zoster, etc. 1 Administration of hyperimmune globulin provides neutralization specific for diseases such as toxins, viruses, or bacteria.
A novel coronavirus disease  caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has aroused an outbreak worldwide causing more than 3.3 million deaths. 2 SARS-CoV-2 is highly infectious where most individuals are either asymptomatic or have mild-to-moderate symptoms. However, a substantial proportion has a severe, life-threatening disease course associated with a deleterious host immune response phase. 3 In the absence of established therapeutic options for COVID-19, as a rapid response to the pandemic, convalescent plasma collected from the recovered patients was considered for the treatment to offer passive immunity to the patients. 4 However, the plasma must be collected and processed from convalescent participants and verified to have adequate neutralizing antibodies. Apart from the anti-viral effects of the neutralizing antibodies in the plasma, it may exert an immunomodulatory effect in the hyperinflammatory state and competitively bind the Fcγ receptor to prevent antibody-dependent enhancement triggered by virusantibody immune complexes. 5 Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusion is associated with anti-inflammatory responses, including those from viral infection. A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial in 59 patients with severe COVID-19 infection showed that administration of IVIG could improve their clinical outcome and significantly reduce the mortality rate. 6 IVIG enriched with SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies have also been developed and being investigated for the treatment of COVID-19 infection. 7 Clear demonstration of therapeutic benefit will require well-controlled studies. 8 The use of hyperimmune globulin has proved clear efficacy in the treatment of influenza and SARS-CoV. 9 Infusion of convalescent plasma to COVID-19 patients suggests the potential of hyperimmune globulin as a treatment to halt the progression of infection to severe pulmonary disease. Hyperimmune globulin treatment, besides inhibiting viral replication, can also downregulate pro-inflammatory responses and can reduce disease severity in Covid-19 patients.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21261119 doi: medRxiv preprint High dose antibodies could bind several different inhibitory receptors, including the inhibitory Fc gamma receptor or other receptors to induce the anti-inflammatory response.
Regardless of the mechanism, the presence of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 as well as a high concentration of total antibodies could produce anti-inflammatory rather than the postulated immunopathology enhancement effects in COVID-19 participants to improve the prognosis. 10 Globally, hyperimmune globulins prepared from the convalescent plasma are under clinical development for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection. 11,12 Additionally, recombinant monoclonal antibodies have been developed by some of the manufacturers.
Casirivimab and Imdevimab have been given an emergency use authorization (EUA) by the US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults and pediatric patients. 13 The antibody cocktail was also recently approved by the regulators in India. 14

Methods
This was a prospective, open-label, two-arm, randomized, controlled, multi-centric trial for evaluation of efficacy and safety of COVID-19 HIG solution manufactured by Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India. The trial was conducted in accordance with the applicable ethical standards and Good Clinical Practices guidance at seven sites after obtaining ethics committee approval and registration on the clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2020/09/027903). All the trial participants had signed the informed consent document.
There were 2 days of screening period followed by 28 days of the study period. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio in the test arm (T) and control arm (R). Key eligibility criteria were age between 18 to 65 years, laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection as determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) within <72 hours before randomization, moderate or severe active COVID-19 (Clinical Management of COVID-19 Guidelines of MOHFW Ver. 05), the female participant having a negative pregnancy test.
Participants were excluded who had more than 5 days of COVID-19 specific hospitalization, had symptoms for more than 10 days, required invasive ventilation, or having hemodynamic For the primary outcome of the mean change from day 1 to day 8 in an 8-point ordinal scale, descriptive statistics were calculated and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Secondary endpoints were analyzed as per the protocol. We compared changes in continuous variables such as oxygen requirement, laboratory parameters (biomarker levels, neutralizing . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21261119 doi: medRxiv preprint antibody titers) throughout hospital stay between both arms by using generalized estimating equations. To assess viral clearance, we compared the proportion of participants negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA between the trial arms on days 3 and 7, and 14. A modified intention-to-treat analysis was performed on a subgroup of participants who have received at least one dose of study intervention and had undergone at least one post-dose efficacy evaluation. A post hoc subgroup analysis was conducted for the patients with a history of diabetes mellitus for the primary endpoint.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Results
Out of the 60 eligible patients randomized (30 each in test and control arm), 53 patients (26 in test and 27 in control arm) were considered for the per-protocol set (PP), and 59 patients (30 in test and 29 in control arm) were considered for modified intention to treat (mITT) set.

Figure 1Patient disposition
Both the groups were comparable for the baseline characteristics of the participants ( Table I). . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021.   (Table II).
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021.   . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021.  The improvement of the clinical symptoms was comparable between the groups. Similarly, no major difference was observed in the supplemental oxygen requirements as assessed by the change in SpO2-FiO2 ratio.

SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)
Early and high NAbs were observed in the test arm compared to the control arm. Patients who received COVID-19 HIG had sustained higher neutralizing antibody levels throughout the study duration ( Figure 3). The NAbs on day 3 were three times higher than baseline for the patients who received COVID-19 HIG (percentage change from baseline in mean ± SD was 308.4±510.03 for the test arm and 186.7±331.10 for the control arm). Similarly on day 8 of the treatment, NAbs were raised approx. 7 times in the COVID-19 HIG recipients versus . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21261119 doi: medRxiv preprint approx. 5 times in non-recipients with mean % difference of 253.3 between the arms (Table   IV).  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21261119 doi: medRxiv preprint event for both the SAEs was the severe COVID-19 and the outcome of both the SAEs was death. There were no other deaths or significant AEs during the conduct of the trial. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Discussion
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected millions of lives globally. 16 The evidence and understanding around the COVID-19 infection are still evolving. Two interconnected stages of the disease are generally recognized; an initial viral stage and a subsequent immune response phase with the clinical characteristics of hyper inflammation associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. It has been proposed that the timing of the therapeutics is very important in the management of the COVID-19 disease. 17 Therapies dosed soon after peak viral load when symptoms develop may decrease shedding duration and immune response intensity. 18 The use of passive immunity using convalescent plasma or hyperimmune globulin is well established for many viral infections in the past. 19 Convalescent plasma (CP) is a safe and potentially effective strategy for the treatment of emerging and re-emerging pathogens. The potential antiviral and immunomodulatory effects of CP have been explored for COVID-19 in clinical trials. It has been advised that the high-titer CP should be used as early as possible for the maximum benefit. 20 A potential advantage of COVID-19 HIG over direct administration of single donor plasma or a monoclonal antibody therapy is the diversity of neutralizing antibodies obtained from a pool of convalescent donors. 21 Neutralizing antibody diversity will cover the variants from the local circulation providing a broader range of anti-viral activity by attacking different viral epitopes thereby reducing the risk of promoting the mutations.
Intas manufactured COVID-19 HIG has been prepared from the convalescent plasma of the recovered patients having very high neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 15 Purified and concentrated from pooled CP sourced from recovered patients and could be more beneficial than classical single-donor CP therapy. It can provide more consistent antibody levels in each lot, and units would be easy to store, distribute, and administer to patients. NAb titers observed in the serum microneutralization assay for final purified samples were >1:2,560 to <1:5,120 (1:640 for CP samples). The plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT 90 ) values in the final purified preparation were >1:640 (CP samples had >1:80 to <1:160). 22 Another therapeutic regime introduced recently is the use of a single or cocktail of monoclonal antibodies. These are homogeneous and selective for a specific epitope of the virus which is not suitable for frequently changing RNA viruses. 23 Furthermore, monoclonal antibodies may lead to a relatively higher chance of selection pressure to promote escape-. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21261119 doi: medRxiv preprint mutation. 24 Contrary to this, the polyclonal COVID-19 HIG is more versatile and has better coverage for virus strains.
In line with the expected characteristics of the plasma-derived products, COVID-19 HIG was safe and well-tolerated without any major safety concerns in moderate to severely ill COVID-19 patients. Patients who received HIG had early higher neutralizing antibodies in comparison with the control arm. Moreover, the higher NAbs were maintained throughout the study follow-up of 14 days in these patients.
It is learned that diabetes is an independent risk factor for higher morbidity and mortality in COVID-19. 25  It has been postulated that the early clearance of viruses will improve the outcome. 26 During the trial, we have observed that the patients who received COVID-19 HIG along with standard care were RT-PCR negative by a median of 2.5 days earlier than the control arm.
This would certainly provide clinical benefit by limiting the morbidity and complications. 27 Moreover, a relatively shorter discharge time was observed in the patients receiving COVID-19 HIG means minimum utilization of hospital resources as well as fewer treatment expenses. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21261119 doi: medRxiv preprint groups in comparison with the 60% observed for the control arm. Additionally, reduction of biomarkers was also seen in intervention groups further supporting the possible immunemodulatory role of hyperimmune globulins in the management of COVID-19 infection. This is in line with the recent population-based real-world evidence where the strong inverse correlation between convalescent plasma use and mortality per admission was observed in the USA. 29 The authors concluded that the retreat from convalescent plasma usage might have resulted in as many as 29,000 excess deaths from mid-November 2020 to February 2021 in the ISA. These findings further support the benefit of passive immunity-based therapeutic options in the treatment of COVID-19 infection.
While the product proved to be safe and well-tolerated, we must understand that the lack of clarity in efficacy could be due to the fact that the trial was planned during the early days of the active pandemic when the understanding of the disease, the available infrastructure, and expertise was limited and evolving. However, the hypothesis of the potential benefit of passive immunity is well established for the treatment of viral infections. Although we provided the required training, we have to permit reasonable flexibility amid the pandemic situation in the country.
Further, the standard of care offered to the patients has been continuously evolving.
Considering the ethics of Good Clinical Practices, when there are no established treatments available, we allowed a wide range of potential therapeutic options at the discretion of the investigators including anti-virals, antimalarials, antibiotics, Remdesivir, corticosteroids, etc.
The impact of such variation can not be ruled out. Additionally, this proof of concept trial was conducted in a relatively small group of 60 patients which may not provide reliable confidence for observed outcome. Additionally, COVID-19 HIG should also be evaluated for post-exposure prophylaxis as well . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21261119 doi: medRxiv preprint as for prevention (where a vaccine is not suitable or effective) of COVID-19 infection.
Considering the established safety of plasma-derived products in children, COVID-19 HIG could also be evaluated in the pediatric population.

Acknowledgment
We acknowledge the management of Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Lambda Therapeutics Research Ltd. for providing an opportunity to work on COVID-19 HIG in the fight against the pandemic. Lambda Therapeutics Research Ltd. was a contract research organization for this trial. The sponsor is thankful to all the trial investigators and site staff for their support. The sponsor is thankful to all trial participants for their contribution to the trial.

Declaration of interest
This trial was sponsored and funded by Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India. DP, AC, PP, SR are employees of Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. NS and RP are employees of Lambda Therapeutics Research Ltd. The authors declare no other potential conflicts of interest.

Author's contribution:
All the authors were contributed to the conceptualization, study protocol development, and conduct of the clinical trial. AC and SR were involved in the overall trial management. DP, NS, PP, and RP were involved in the clinical operations, data analysis, and study report preparation. DP has preliminarily drafted the manuscript. SR has revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors have thoroughly reviewed, amended and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 27, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21261119 doi: medRxiv preprint