Experimental investigation to verify if excessive plastic sheeting shielding produce micro clusters of SARS-CoV-2

We experimentally investigated indoor air ventilation using the CO2 tracer technique to verify the infection cluster of SARS-CoV-2 that erupted at an office space. Multi-placed observations revealed extremely low air change rates (0.1/h) at the site. The local infection clusters were observed several meters away from a door that is the only ventilation in the office, which suggests a negative effect of plastic sheeting shielding. The thermo-fluid simulation showed that the plastic sheet blocked the airflow and trapped the exhaled air in each partition cell. As risk suppression methods, improving air ventilation by opening windows and using fans were verified, and significant improvements (10-28/h) were observed for each partition cells.


Introduction
SARS-CoV-2, and maintaining social distancing will prevent transmission. 48 Simultaneously, evidence for COVID-19 transmission via aerosols has been 49 reported in the past few months [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . The aerosol contains particles with diameters 50 of less than 5 um that can float in the air for minutes to hours. Therefore, 51 transmission is much easier and rapid indoors than outdoors. 52 Recently, a plastic sheeting shielding (PSS) that forms the small 53 compartments is often being installed in offices to suppress the risk of infection. 54 However, the architectonical effect of the compartments is still unclear as a 55 preventive method for further spread of infection. The compartments will 56 contribute to blocking aerosol transportation. Contrastingly, the concentration of 57 the aerosol in a compartment where SARS-CoV-2 positive people stay will 58 significantly increase and may cause a small-sized infection cluster. 59 In this study, we investigated the negative effect of the PSSs at the site of an  CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 27, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 at the same air-conditioned office room in Miyagi, Japan. The index case-patient 74 experienced fever and cough and went to the hospital. Three others had become 75 positive with COVID-19 in the following 3 days. After that, a total of seven people 76 had become positive. The office is an air-conditioned three-floor building. The 77 third-floor office area occupies 180 m 2 (6 × 30 m 2 ), and one side of the wall which 78 faces the outside has windows. However, as the winter cold had set in, the 79 windows were not opened to let in fresh air. 80 Some PSS had been installed in this office, and the indoor space was 81 compartmentalized to five areas (A, B, C, D and E). Seven or eight desks had 82 been arranged back-to-back in the compartments, as shown in Fig. 1   These facts support the latter assumption and suggest a necessity of government 100 guideline revision.

101
For the verification of the latter assumption, we investigated local indoor air 102 ventilation experimentally. Indoor airflows were observed by using the CO2 tracer 103 technique. As CO2 concentration can be accounted as an alternative to exhaled 104 air amount, local infection risk could be evaluated indirectly. In this study, dry ice 105 was used for CO2 emission, and several different types of CO2 sensors were used 106 to detect the change of local CO2 concentration in the compartments. One wind 107 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 27, 2021. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2021 sensor that can detect the direction and amount of wind was used to check the 108 airflow in a compartment.

109
Two types of non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) gas sensors applied in an 110 environmental field are used as CO2 sensors (Fig. 2). The TR-76Ui; T&D 111 Corporation products, can detect CO2 concentration ranging from 0 to 9,999 ppm 112 with ± 50 ppm ± 5% accuracy of measurement. The Pocket CO2 Sensor; 113 YAGUCHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION products, can also detect CO2 114 concentration ranging from 400 to 10,000 ppm with ±30 ppm ±3% accuracy of 115 measurement. Four TR-76Ui and two Pocket CO2 sensors were set up in the 116 compartments as shown in Fig. 1. The symbols of S1, S3, S5, and S6 indicate 117 TR-76Ui, and S2 and S4 indicate Pocket CO2 sensor. We developed our own 118 wind sensor by combining a unidirectional airflow sensor OMRON D6F-W with a 119 stepping motor. The wind sensor operates minutely while spinning in 360 degrees.

120
The maximum wind volume and its direction are recorded. It was set up in the 121 compartment of the index case-patient. The data from each sensor were collected 122 in the database as soon as it was measured, which resulted in some 123 disadvantages, such as the lack of periodicity and the necessity for data 124 completion. In this study, we used PI System™ (OSIsoft) for data management, 125 that is, to prepare the acquired data and convert it into tidy data 10) in which each 126 variable is a column, each observation is a row, and each type of observational 127 unit is a table with time synchronization. 128 We use CO2 not only as a risk proxy but also as a ventilation tracer.
where ! is a concentration of indoor pollutants at the time , " is a 146 concentration in the absence of pollutant sources, is a volume of the room, 147 is the time when CO2 emission is stopped, and is the number of pollutants 148 generated. In the state of no generation of pollutants, eq. (2) can be transforms 149 to: This equation suggests that a decrease in the normalized concentration of

178
Temporal coincidence and similarity of pattern is discussed on a scatter chart 179 in Fig. 6. Sensors that were installed in the same compartment (S1 and S2, S2

204
The comparisons of estimated air change rates of each condition are 205 indicated in Fig. 9 with a 95% confidence interval. In condition 1, area A shows a 206 shallow air change rate around 0.1 /h, implying poor ventilation. Area B shows an 207 air change rate at around 0.8/h, which is significantly higher than that of condition 208 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 27, 2021.
1. However, the value is not enough to prevent aerosol infection spread as 209 reported for tuberculosis infection 18,19) . Area D that is located near the entrance 210 and area E, which is the largest, show an air change rate from 1.6 /h to 2.6 /h.

211
In condition 2, the air change rate improves from 5.1 to 8.4 by ensuring 212 ventilation routes through windows. Additionally, the difference in the air change 213 rate is small, and it suggests opening windows uniformly improves the ventilation 214 of each compartment. It is enhanced by the added fans as indicated by the air 215 change rate value from 10 to 28 in condition 3. 216 Improvement in wind volume is correlated to the change in the air change 217 rate, as shown in Fig. 10. The wind volume in condition 1 (Fig. 10(a)) is less as 218 compared to those of conditions 2 and 3. The wind direction to windows is 219 improved in condition 2 ( Fig. 10(b)). The addition of fans in condition 3 enhances 220 the airflow route ( Fig. 10(c)), which seems to be related to the entrance as an air 221 intake (see Fig. 1 , 2017, 75, pp. 191-197. 308 309 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 27, 2021.    In the same compartment (S1&S2, S3&S4) Two adjacent compartments (S1&S3, S1&S4, S2&S3, S2&S4) More distant