Homebrew reagents for low cost RT-LAMP

RT-LAMP (reverse transcription - Loop-mediated isothermal amplification) has gained popularity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The high specificity, sensitivity, simple protocols and potential to deliver results without the use of expensive equipment has made it an attractive alternative to RT-PCR. However, the high cost per reaction, the centralized manufacturing of required reagents and their distribution under cold chain shipping limits RT-LAMP’s applicability in low-income settings. The preparation of assays using homebrew enzymes and buffers has emerged worldwide as a response to these limitations and potential shortages. Here, we describe the production of Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) Reverse Transcriptase and BstLF DNA polymerase for the local implementation of RT-LAMP reactions at low cost. These reagents compared favorably to commercial kits and optimum concentrations were defined in order to reduce time to threshold, increase ON/OFF range and minimize enzyme quantities per reaction. As a validation, we tested the performance of these reagents in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from RNA extracted from clinical nasopharyngeal samples, obtaining high agreement between RT-LAMP and RT-PCR clinical results. The in-house preparation of these reactions results in an order of magnitude reduction in costs, and thus we provide protocols and DNA to enable the replication of these tests at other locations. These results contribute to the global effort of developing open and low cost diagnostics that enable technological autonomy and distributed capacities in viral surveillance.

Although qRT-PCR is the gold standard method for nucleic acid detection 5,6 , this technique requires sophisticated equipment and skilled personnel that has led to centralized strategies of COVID-19 diagnosis with high turnaround times. These limitations have encouraged the search for alternative techniques for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 7 . Among them, LAMP (Loop mediated isothermal amplification) has gained popularity due to its high specificity, sensitivity, simple protocols, more tolerance to inhibitors and potential to deliver results without the use of expensive instruments [8][9][10] . These advantages make it ideal for decentralized testing and surveillance of human pathogenic agents (e.g. Dengue 11 , MERS 11 , and HIV 12,13 ).
LAMP relies on DNA polymerases with strand displacement capability, primarily the large fragment (exo-) pol I from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (formerly Bacillus stearothermophilus), called BstLF 14 . For RT-LAMP, the reaction is coupled with a reverse transcription step by adding a reverse transcriptase (e.g. HIV 15 or RTx 16 ) or utilizes a single enzyme with both activities (e.g. Bst3.0 17 ).
Despite these advantages, the high cost of enzymes can pose significant challenges to deployment in low-resourced areas. Enzymes are usually manufactured in a few centralized facilities located in the global north and distributed worldwide under cold chain shipping, which cannot be always maintained. Although there are no indications of RT-LAMP reagent shortages, centralized production models are prone to the global supply chain disruptions that have affected access to other diagnostic resources during the COVID-19 pandemic 18,19 , further limiting the testing capacity in many countries of the global south. In response to these limitations, many groups have described the successful implementation of homemade . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256891 doi: medRxiv preprint 5 RT-PCR and RT-LAMP protocols based on homebrewed enzymes. 15,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Here, we describe the in-house production of RT-LAMP reactions for SARS-CoV-2 from homebrewed Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) reverse transcriptase and Bst Large Fragment (BstLF) polymerase. We compare their performance to commercial reactions and tested their ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 from RNA extracted from clinical nasopharyngeal samples.

Expression and purification of M-MLV and BstLF
The M-MLV gene was synthesized as a Gblock from IDT and cloned into at pET-19b vector with N-terminal 10x His-tag. BstLF DNA sequence from the OpenEnzyme collection was cloned into pET15b with a 6x His-tag at its N-terminus. The BstLF sequence in the Open Enzyme collection was obtained from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (GenBank U23149, UniProt P52026). The large fragment (LF) was selected between the amino acids 298-876 of the full length protein. The wild type BstLF sequence was then codon optimized for E. coli through the OPTIMIZER 29 web server, using the E. coli codon usage from the HEG database and a guided random method. Sequences were verified by Sanger sequencing services from Eton Bio and full sequence files are provided here 30,31 . Both DNAs can be obtained from the Open Bioeconomy Lab and/or FreeGenes collection 32 . M-MLV and BstLF were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) and C41 respectively and purified following two open access protocols described in detail on the protocols.io Reagent Collaboration Network (ReClone) collection 33,34 . Briefly, protein production was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 16 hours at 18 ºC at 200 rpm after plasmid-containing E. coli cells grown in ampicillin-supplemented LB media reached OD 600 = 0.8. Centrifugation-harvested cells were suspended in lysis buffer and disrupted first enzymatically using lysozyme and then with sonication on ice, using gentle . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256891 doi: medRxiv preprint cycles. Since BstLF is a thermostable protein, we added a thermolabile protein denaturation step by incubating the lysate at 65 ºC for 25 min. Lysates were then centrifuged at high speed to pellet cell debris and the supernatants were recovered and purified on Ni-NTA prepackaged columns (HisTrap column, GE Healthcare). To remove imidazole, BstLF was buffer exchanged using Amicon Ultra-15 concentrators (Merck Millipore), whereas a second purification step using a HiTrap Heparin column (GE Healthcare) was employed for M-MLV. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay, using BSA as standard.

RT-LAMP reaction setup
Buffers and reactions were prepared according to these online protocols promoter and terminator to the amplicon. In vitro transcription was next performed from this linear DNA using the Hi-Scribe kit from NEB (catalogue E2040S) and treated with DNAse I (M0303S) for 15 minutes at 37°C before purification with Qiagen RNeasy kit, and serially . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The calculation of optimum enzyme concentrations was performed by maximizing an objective function which uses normalized functions for the amount of enzymes and the interpolation functions of normalized threshold time (nTt) and amplification step size (nSs).
A higher weighting was assigned to nTt and nSs to compute the optimal enzyme values.

Data and materials availability
All raw data is provided in a Zenodo repository (https://zenodo.org/record/4540817#.YCnTO1NKj8o). DNAs can be obtained upon request and also from the FreeGenes collection 32 .

Expression and purification of M-MLV and BstLF
The M-MLV gene was commercially synthesised from a design that contains point . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256891 doi: medRxiv preprint 8 mutations D200N, L603W, T330P, L139P and E607K shown to increase thermostability and processivity 39 . The large fragment (LF) was synthesized from a sequence design that was codon optimized for E. coli from amino acids 298 to 876 of the wild type BstLF sequence from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (GenBank U23149, UniProt P52026).
BstLF and M-MLV were produced from IPTG inducible plasmids pET15b BstLF and pET-19b_MMLV-RT bearing 6x and 10x His-tags at the N-terminus, respectively, and

RT-LAMP reactions with homebrewed enzymes
To test the performance of the homebrewed enzymes, we compared RT-LAMP Contrary to what was found in Aleeksenko et al., 2020 22 , we found that the IA buffer . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256891 doi: medRxiv preprint containing 50 mM KCl worked better than 100 and 150 mM (details in the online protocol).
Mean time to threshold was 27.7 min for 50 mM of KCl, 43.5 min for 100 mM of KCl, and non-detectable for 150 mM of KCl. Therefore, homemade IA buffers containing 50 mM of KCl were used for the following assays.
Next, we studied the effect of different concentrations of enzymes on time to threshold (Tt) and ON/OFF range (step) constrained by using as minimum amount of enzymes as possible in order to increase the number of reactions per purification (Fig. 1B). is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
A variety of isothermal DNA amplification techniques have recently been developed and present themselves as highly versatile molecular biology tools to enable simple, in-thefield screening assays or point of care clinical diagnostics. Unlike traditional PCR, these reactions can be carried out at a constant temperature; eliminating the need for a thermocycler. Among these approaches is RT-LAMP, which has emerged as a promising and simple diagnostic tool for identifying SARS-CoV-2 9 . Advances on detection methods for LAMP reactions have described a series of alternatives with different degrees of equipmentdependency (or none), such as turbidity, gel electrophoresis, calcein, colorimetric indicators, pH-sensitive dyes, and DNA-intercalating fluorescent dyes (e.g. SYBR Green, SYTO dyes, EvaGreen) 44 . Our implemented protocol relies on the use of intercalating dye EvaGreen, as it has been shown to perform better than SYBR green 45,46 . A potential limitation of our proof of concept method is that the use of intercalating dyes can make target-specific real-time detection challenging 44 , and could pose as a barrier for use in resource limited areas. Future lower resource implementations of our method could substitute EvaGreen for 100-200 µM halochromic dyes, like Cresol Red, in pH 8.8 buffered reaction mix to cause detectable colorimetric change when amplification products have been produced 47 . Alternatively more advanced detection methods utilizing sequence specific methods based on the use of probes (e.g. LAMP-BEAC 23 , OSD 48 , DARQ 49 and QUASR 50 ) could also be utilized as end-point detection methods, and remain to be tested in future work. Such methods would be advantageous as they could be multiplexed for different targets in the same reaction.
QUASR, for instance, has been shown to allow single step and close-tube multiplexing 50 .
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256891 doi: medRxiv preprint . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256891 doi: medRxiv preprint . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021 https://international.neb.com/products/b9004-thermopol-reaction-buffer#Product %20Information.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256891 doi: medRxiv preprint . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.