Prenatal smoking, alcohol and caffeine exposure and ADHD risk in childhood: parental comparisons and polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses

Background and aims: Several studies have indicated that maternal prenatal substance use may be associated with offspring ADHD via intrauterine effects. We investigated associations between maternal prenatal smoking, alcohol and caffeine consumption with childhood ADHD risk accounting for shared familial factors. Design: First, we used a negative control design comparing maternal and paternal substance use. Three models were used for negative control analyses: unadjusted (without confounders); adjusted (including confounders) and mutually adjusted (including confounders and partners substance use). The results were meta-analysed across the cohorts. Second, we used polygenic risk scores (PRS) as proxies for exposures. Maternal PRS for genetic variants of smoking, alcohol and coffee consumption were regressed against ADHD risk. We triangulated the results across the two approaches to infer causality. Setting: We used data from three longitudinal pregnancy cohorts: Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the UK, Generation R study (GenR) in the Netherlands and Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort study (MoBa) in Norway. Participants: Phenotype data available for children was: N(ALSPAC)=7,850; N(GENR)=3,849 and N(MOBA)=43,512. Genotype data available for mothers was: N(ALSPAC)=7,074 and N(MOBA)=14,583. Measurements: Offspring ADHD risk around age 7-8 was derived by dichotomising symptom scores from multiple questionnaires and parental self-reported substance use was measured at the 2nd pregnancy trimester. Findings: The pooled estimate for maternal prenatal substance use showed an association with ADHD risk (OR_SMOKING=1.11, 95%CI 1.00-1.23; OR_ALCOHOL=1.27, 95%CI 1.08-1.49; OR_CAFFEINE=1.05, 95%CI 1.00-1.11), while not for fathers (OR_SMOKING=1.03, 95%CI 0.95-1.13; OR_ALCOHOL=0.83, 95%CI 0.47-1.48; OR_CAFFEINE=1.02, 95%CI 0.97-1.07). However, maternal associations did not persist in sensitivity analyses (substance use before pregnancy, adjustment for maternal ADHD in MoBa). The PRS analyses did not show evidence of association in ALSPAC or MoBa. Conclusions: Our results do not provide support for a causal intrauterine effect of maternal prenatal substance use on offspring attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder risk.


Introduction
Many observational studies have shown that symptoms and diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are associated with maternal prenatal smoking (1,2) and mixed findings have been reported for association with prenatal alcohol and caffeine exposure (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8).
However, inferring causality from associations between maternal prenatal substance use and offspring ADHD is challenging because the association could be affected by unmeasured shared familial factors that contribute to both maternal prenatal substance use and offspring ADHD. Several studies have shown genetic overlap between substance use and ADHD (9), and maternal genetic risk for ADHD has been associated with smoking during pregnancy (10).
Negative control designs (i.e. parental and sibling comparison) have been used to investigate potential causal intrauterine effects for a range of outcomes (11,12). The main principle of the negative control approach is to compare the association of interest with another related association which is not biologically plausible (11). For example, in a parental comparison, if the maternal exposure-child outcome association is stronger, compared with the paternal exposure-child outcome association, this would suggest a potentially causal intrauterine effect. In contrast, if the magnitude of association is similar, this would argue against a causal intrauterine effect, and instead suggest the association is due to confounding.
Negative control designs have been used in the context of maternal prenatal substance use and offspring ADHD. A study based on the Danish National Birth Cohort using parental comparison found evidence for a potential causal association between maternal prenatal smoking and offspring ADHD (13). However, several other studies using negative control and other genetically sensitive designs have concluded that the association between maternal prenatal smoking and offspring ADHD is likely not causal (14,15). Sibling comparison studies on alcohol exposure based on the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) have found little evidence for a causal association with ADHD diagnosis (16,17) although a sibling control analysis (16) suggested some evidence for a potential causal association with ADHD symptoms as measured by the Conner's Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R).
To our knowledge no negative control studies have been published on prenatal caffeine exposure and offspring ADHD.
Although published negative control studies investigating intrauterine effects have improved our knowledge of causal effects, they may still be biased because of unmeasured and residual . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted March 26, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03. 25.21254087 doi: medRxiv preprint confounding. Using genetic variants in Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses is an alternative approach that can strengthen causal inference when using observational data. Genetic variants are randomly and independently assigned at conception and should therefore not be associated with factors that normally confound the exposure-outcome relationship. They can therefore provide stronger support for a potential causal association (18). However, studies using genetic variants (i.e polygenic risk score (PRS)) and MR rely on three main assumptions: (1) relevance -the genetic variant must be robustly associated with the exposure of interest; (2) independence -the genetic variant is not confounded with the outcome or related through selection bias and (3) exclusion restriction -the genetic variant is not associated with the outcome by any other path than through the exposure of interest (19). Assumptions 2 and 3 cannot be tested and, therefore, problems with horizontal pleiotropy -where the same genetic variant is directly associated with many phenotypesconfounding of genetic variant's relationship with the outcome or selection bias cannot be ruled out (18).
Combining multiple methodological approaches that rely on different assumptions and are subject to different sources of bias -known as triangulation -can strengthen causal inference (20). If results from multiple approaches provide convergent results, it is more likely that the observed association reflects a causal effect (21). In the present study we combined the conventional multivariable regression approach, a negative control design using paternal prenatal substance use as a negative control for the intrauterine exposure, and genetic analyses using PRS as a proxy for the exposures of interest. Our aim was to investigate whether there is a causal effect of maternal prenatal substance use on offspring ADHD outcomes at age 7-8 ( Figure 1), using data from three large prospective birth cohorts.
Insert Figure 1 here.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint Detailed information about the genotyping is presented in the Supplementary Material.

Exposures
We used data assessed in the 2 nd pregnancy trimester where information for both maternal and paternal substance use was available. Briefly, mothers and fathers were asked about their average number of cigarettes smoked per day if they were smokers, average amount and frequency of alcohol consumption, and how many cups of caffeinated drinks (coffee, tea, cans of cola) per day on average they consumed during the first pregnancy trimester and mothers also before pregnancy.
Overall, exposure assessment was similar across the cohorts, but there were some exceptions in GenR (Supplementary Table S1).
Parental prenatal smoking, alcohol and caffeine consumption (from coffee and tea) were categorized to examine dose-dependent relationships. Smoking was categorized: No smoking; 1-4 cigarettes; 5-9 cigarettes and >10 cigarettes per day. Alcohol consumption was categorized: No drinking; <1 drink a week and 1-6 drinks a week. Only a small number of mothers drank daily, therefore these were combined with the group of weekly drinkers. Furthermore, because the measure of alcohol unit was different in each cohort, meta-analysis across the cohorts was conducted comparing drinkers and non-drinkers. However, in ALSPAC and MoBa we were able to harmonise weekly alcohol consumption from units to grams to create a continuous measure of alcohol consumption . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  Table S1). Caffeine consumption from coffee and tea was transformed and summed to total caffeine consumption in milligrams per day and categorized: 0-49mg; 50-199mg; 200-299mg and >300mg.
Outcome ADHD symptoms were measured using different questionnaires around age 7-8 years in each cohort.
Given that some studies have found that maternal prenatal substance use can have a distinct effect on hyperactivity and inattention symptom domains (27,28), in each cohort we used questionnaires that measured total ADHD symptoms, as well as hyperactivity and inattention symptom domains.
As the continuous score of ADHD symptoms was either zero-inflated or skewed, a binary variable was derived for total ADHD, hyperactivity and inattention symptoms using the 85 th percentile threshold to indicate a high risk of ADHD symptoms (29). Up to 4 missing items were allowed depending on number of items in the questionnaire. More details are shown in Supplementary Table S2.

Primary outcome measures:
The psychometric scales used for the main outcome measure were: maternal report of the Development And Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) questionnaire in ALSPAC; maternal report of the

Secondary outcome measures:
There is evidence of measurement differences of maternal and teacher reported ADHD symptoms in children (30), and some studies have found conflicting results depending on the questionnaire used (16). We therefore included additional questionnaires: teacher report of the DAWBA questionnaire and maternal and teacher report of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) hyperactivity subscale in ALSPAC; and maternal and teacher report of the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) attention problems subscale in GenR.
Polygenic risk scores PRS for mothers in ALSPAC and MoBa were calculated using genome-wide hits (p<5x10 -8 ) and weighted by effect estimates as reported in recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of tobacco, alcohol (31) and coffee consumption (32)  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint in MoBa and the sample was restricted to mothers who drank during pregnancy. PRS for caffeine consumption was calculated with 8 SNPs available in ALSPAC and 7 SNPs available in MoBa. There was some overlap between the SNPs included in the PRS for alcohol and caffeine, but no overlap between PRS for smoking and alcohol or caffeine. The correlation between these PRS were low (Supplementary Table S4).

Statistical analyses
All analyses were performed using Stata (v15: ALSPAC, GenR; v16: MoBa), (33, 34). Analyses were performed as described in our pre-registered protocol (35). Analyses were conducted separately in each cohort and results from primary outcome measure (maternal reported ADHD symptoms) were meta-analysed across the cohorts using a random effects model. This model takes into account the variance in the exposure and outcome assessment across the cohorts. The sample in each cohort was restricted to singletons in ALSPAC and GenR, whereas in MoBa a robust cluster variance estimator was used to account for the presence of siblings. In ALSPAC and GenR paternal analyses were restricted to individuals who were reported as biological fathers. An overview of the analysis sample is shown in Table 1.

Negative control analyses:
Associations between maternal and paternal (negative control) exposures and offspring ADHD risk were tested using logistic regression analyses. We used three models: unadjusted (without including potential confounders); adjusted (for confounders identified based on previous studies (36-40): child's gender, ethnicity, parental age, education, depression and anxiety problems, financial difficulties, marital status and smoking, alcohol and caffeine use) and mutually adjusted (adjusted for confounders and for partner's substance use). Mutually adjusted models account for assortative mating, and there is evidence of this for health behaviours such as smoking and alcohol use (12,(41)(42)(43). In MoBa, because of the longer recruitment period, analyses were additionally adjusted for birth year.

PRS analyses:
We investigated the association between: 1) maternal PRS and maternal exposure phenotypes to validate the PRS during pregnancy; 2) with offspring ADHD risk. PRS analyses in ALSPAC and MoBa is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint were performed with adjustment for 10 ancestry-informative principal components. In MoBa, PRS analyses were additionally adjusted for birth year and genotyping batch. To explore potential pleiotropic effects, we also tested the association between the PRS and each confounder included in the negative control analysis.

Negative control analyses:
If an association was observed between maternal prenatal substance use and offspring ADHD risk, we further tested our hypothesis of a potential intrauterine effect by comparing maternal prenatal substance use with substance use before pregnancy. Given that ADHD is highly heritable, it is plausible that any observed associations between maternal PRS and offspring ADHD risk could be explained by genetic transmission. In MoBa, a measure of maternal ADHD symptoms was available, enabling us to test whether maternal ADHD symptoms could explain the observed associations between maternal substance use and offspring ADHD risk. Finally, we also performed analyses with complete cases by restricting unadjusted and adjusted analyses to the sample in the mutually adjusted model for each exposure.

PRS analyses:
Unweighted PRS were calculated to test the association with each exposure phenotype, given that SNPs selected based only on the genome-wide significance level may be biased upwards (the socalled Winner's Curse) (44). In addition to the PRS for smoking heaviness, we included a PRS for lifetime smoking, which captures smoking initiation, duration, heaviness and cessation, and can be used without stratifying samples on smoking status (45). The GWAS of lifetime smoking identified 126 independent SNPs at the genome-wide level of significance (p<5x10 -8 ), of which 123 were available in ALSPAC and 121 in MoBa. Finally, given that longitudinal studies may be subject to selection bias (46), we tested associations between PRS for smoking, alcohol and caffeine use and whether mothers returned the questionnaire at child age 7-8 in ALSPAC and MoBa. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Results
Overall, the negative control analyses comparing maternal and paternal substance use associations with offspring ADHD risk showed mixed results across the cohorts. Stronger maternal associations were observed in MoBa, where mothers had lower prenatal smoking, alcohol and caffeine consumption compared to mothers in ALSPAC and GenR. The results of the meta-analysis are shown in Figure 2. In contrast to the negative control analyses, our PRS analyses in ALSPAC and MoBa did not provide clear evidence for a causal effect of maternal prenatal substance use on offspring ADHD risk. Furthermore, PRS analyses for lifetime smoking indicated pleiotropic associations with sociodemographic and mental health traits, as well as with returning questionnaires.
Insert Figure 2 here.

Negative control analyses
The pooled estimate for maternal smoking in the mutually adjusted model provided weak evidence of an association with high risk of ADHD total and inattention symptoms (ORADHD=1. showing the dose-dependent relationship using non-smoking as baseline across unadjusted, adjusted and mutually adjusted models in each cohort are shown in Supplementary Tables S5-S7.

Sensitivity analyses
In MoBa, additional adjustment for maternal ADHD symptoms attenuated the association with high risk of offspring ADHD inattention symptoms, but there remained evidence of an association with high risk of ADHD total and hyperactivity symptoms (Supplementary Table S8). Furthermore, there was evidence of an association between maternal smoking before pregnancy and high risk of hyperactivity symptoms (Supplementary Table S9), but the estimates were stronger with smoking during pregnancy.
Analyses using teacher report of DAWBA and SDQ scales in ALSPAC and TRF in GenR found no strong evidence of an association between maternal prenatal smoking and offspring ADHD risk (Supplementary Table S10). In contrast, in GenR there was evidence of an association between . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  Table S11). Results were similar in the analyses with complete cases in each cohort (Supplementary Tables S12-S14).

PRS analyses:
In each of the PRS analyses we report the results based on the assumptions described in the introduction.
First, the weighted and unweighted PRS for smoking heaviness and lifetime smoking were associated with smoking behaviour in pregnancy in ALSPAC and MoBa (all p<0.01). These PRS explained 1-3% of variance in smoking phenotypes in ALSPAC and MoBa (Supplementary Tables S15-S18).
Second, in ALSPAC, we did not find any strong evidence for an association between PRS for smoking heaviness and confounders included in the negative control analyses (Supplementary Table S19).
However, in MoBa, we found evidence of an association between the PRS for smoking heaviness and lower parity (=-0.41 95%CI -0.732, -0.092; Supplementary Third, in ALSPAC, we did not find strong evidence of an association between the PRS for smoking heaviness and high risk of maternal or teacher reported offspring ADHD symptoms (Supplementary is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  Table   S28).

Negative control analyses
The pooled estimate of maternal alcohol consumption in the mutually adjusted model showed some evidence of an association with high risk of ADHD total and inattention symptoms (ORADHD=1.27,

Sensitivity analyses
In MoBa, due to the low number of cases, we were not able to report dose-dependent results of the association between maternal prenatal alcohol consumption and high risk of maternal reported offspring ADHD symptoms after adjustment for maternal ADHD (Supplementary Table S32).
Additional sensitivity analyses (alcohol use before pregnancy and weekly alcohol use in grams) in ALSPAC and MoBa, and secondary outcome measures in ALSPAC did not find strong evidence for an association between maternal prenatal alcohol use and offspring ADHD risk (Supplementary Tables   S33-S37). The results were similar for the analyses of complete cases in each cohort (Supplementary   Tables S38-S40).

PRS analyses
First, in ALSPAC, the PRS for alcohol consumption was associated with prenatal alcohol consumption (Supplementary Table S15  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  Table S41). However, no evidence for an association between the PRS for alcohol consumption and confounders was found in MoBa (Supplementary   Table S42).
Third, we found no evidence of an association between maternal PRS for alcohol consumption and either high risk of maternal or teacher reported offspring ADHD symptoms in ALSPAC, or with maternal reported ADHD symptoms in MoBa (Supplementary Tables S43-S45).

Negative control analyses
The pooled estimate of maternal caffeine consumption in the adjusted model showed some evidence of an association only with high risk of offspring ADHD total symptoms (ORADHD=1.05, 95%CI 1.00,

Sensitivity analyses
Sensitivity analyses in ALSPAC and MoBa did not find strong evidence for an association between maternal prenatal caffeine consumption and offspring ADHD risk (Supplementary Tables S48-S51).
The results were similar in the analyses with complete cases in each cohort (Supplementary Tables   S52-S54).

PRS analyses
First, both the weighted and unweighted PRS for caffeine consumption were associated with total caffeine consumption derived from coffee and tea in ALSPAC and MoBa. The caffeine PRS explained 0.3-0.4% of variance in caffeine phenotype in ALSPAC and MoBa (Supplementary Tables S15-S18).
Second, we found no strong evidence of an association between the PRS for caffeine consumption and the confounders in ALSPAC or MoBa (Supplementary Tables S55-S56).
Third, we found no strong evidence of an association between maternal PRS for caffeine consumption and either high risk of maternal or teacher reported offspring's ADHD symptoms in ALSPAC or with maternal reported ADHD symptoms in MoBa (Supplementary Tables S57-S59). is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint Associations between PRS for substance use and participation at age 8 years.
We found evidence of an association between the PRS for lifetime smoking and lower likelihood of is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Discussion
We investigated whether maternal smoking, alcohol and caffeine use during pregnancy are likely to be causally associated with offspring ADHD risk. We applied a triangulation approach using negative control and PRS analyses in three longitudinal birth cohorts. Overall, the results did not provide evidence for a potential causal effect between maternal prenatal substance use and offspring ADHD risk although some inconsistencies were observed across the cohorts and instrument used for ADHD assessment.
Our smoking results did not show robust evidence for a causal effect, which is in line with previous findings (39,(47)(48)(49). Although in GenR and MoBa, we found suggestive evidence for a causal association of maternal prenatal smoking on high risk of maternal reported ADHD symptoms, but when comparing the findings across the cohorts, reporters and questionnaires, the evidence was weak and inconsistent. Additionally, our PRS analyses with lifetime smoking PRS in ALSPAC and MoBa indicated pleiotropic associations which are consistent with recent findings in ALSPAC (50). There is also a large body of evidence showing pleiotropy between smoking, impulsivity and sensationseeking type of personality (51,52) which could confound observed phenotype associations in the present study.
Similarly, our findings on prenatal alcohol and caffeine exposure do not show evidence of a causal effect on offspring ADHD risk. Although a previous study in MoBa found some evidence for a potential causal association of maternal prenatal alcohol consumption when ADHD symptoms were measured with CPRS-R (16), other studies suggest that observed associations between maternal moderate prenatal alcohol consumption and offspring ADHD symptoms may not reflect causal effects (3,53). Our results on caffeine exposure are in line with previous studies which have concluded that there is likely no causal effect of prenatal caffeine consumption on offspring ADHD risk (6,54,55).
Several studies have reported low to moderate parent-teacher agreement on ADHD symptoms assessment (30,56). It has been suggested that parents and teachers may measure different aspects of child's behaviour as ADHD symptoms may be more visible at school which is a more structured environment (30). Furthermore, it has been proposed that parent-teacher ratings may differ because of the informant's perception and individual characteristics (57). It has been shown that mothers with mental health problems or more harsh parenting behaviour overestimate their child's mental health problems (58,59). Given that we observed more associations with maternal report than with . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted March 26, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.25.21254087 doi: medRxiv preprint teacher report, it is possible that observed associations may be confounded by maternal characteristics.
Besides reporter-related discrepancies, we observed different findings depending on the scales used for ADHD assessment. Previous studies investigating the association between maternal prenatal substance use and offspring ADHD have reported Inconsistent findings depending on which scale was used for ADHD symptoms assessment. For example, a study using the SDQ scale reported association between maternal prenatal smoking and ADHD symptoms in children regardless of the reporter (60).
Another study using maternal and teacher reported CPRS-R, CBCL, TRF and combined score of CBCL/TRF found some evidence for a potential causal association between maternal prenatal smoking and ADHD symptoms only with maternal reported CPRS-R (61). Similarly, a study on prenatal alcohol exposure found some evidence for a causal association when ADHD symptoms were assessed with maternal reported CPRS-R but not with CBCL (16). Although all the scales for our main outcome measure (DAWBA, CPRS-R, RS-DBD) are based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD, we observed inconsistent associations between maternal prenatal substance use and ADHD risk across different scales. It is possible that different scales capture somewhat different aspects of the construct of ADHD.

Strengths and limitations
The major strength of the current study is the triangulation approach using both observational and genetic analyses, as well as including multiple questionnaires reported by mother and teacher. Using data from three large longitudinal birth cohorts strengthens evidence towards causal interpretation.
However, our study has also limitations. First, outcome assessment varied across the cohorts which may contribute to noise and inconsistent findings. Although all the questionnaires have good psychometric properties, there still may be a risk of measurement error. Second, maternal prenatal substance use was based on self-reports, which most likely lead to underreporting of substance use.
Third, our PRS for smoking heaviness and alcohol consumption were calculated based on summary statistics from the latest GWAS which included ALSPAC. However, the contribution of ALSPAC (~1%) was small and the risk of bias because of the sample overlap is likely to be minimal (62). Fourth, our PRS analyses were likely underpowered. Compared to the variance explained by each PRS reported in GWAS (smoking heaviness PRS ~4%; alcohol PRS ~2.5%; caffeine PRS 1.3%), in our sample it was much smaller. Fifth, the sample size in our fully adjusted models were reduced due to missing data in the included confounders which could introduce bias into our estimates. However, we repeated all analyses restricting to individuals in our mutually adjusted models and effect estimates remained is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint consistent. Sixth, longitudinal cohort studies may suffer from selection bias as socioeconomic and individual characteristics may affect initial and continued participation in the study (63,64). A study in MoBa found that bias due to self-selection and loss to follow-up can influence exposure-outcome associations (65). Another study in ALSPAC showed that common genetic variants of various phenotypes are associated with participation in the study and these associations differ in the sample with full genetic data and more selected subsamples (46). Given that attrition in our study samples was around 50% and we also observed association between PRS for lifetime smoking and decreased likelihood returning the questionnaire at child's age 7-8 years, it is plausible that our results may be subject to selection bias.

Conclusion
Combining both observational and genetic analyses from three longitudinal birth cohorts our study did not find support for a causal effect of maternal smoking, alcohol and caffeine consumption during pregnancy on offspring ADHD risk.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint