Public Awareness of Mask Usage in 29 Countries

This study analyzed the determinants of people wearing masks in 29 countries in 2020 using over 400,000 survey responses. The results showed that there is considerable variance in the awareness of mask usage across countries. People in Asian countries tend to wear masks whereas citizens in Scandinavian countries are less likely to wear them. This study also found that citizens in more democratic and more prosperous countries are less likely to wear masks. Furthermore, females are more likely to wear them. This paper contributes to the literature as it re-examines anecdotes and previous research by using statistical methods to analyze over 400,000 survey responses.


Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic, which is the worst pandemic since the Spanish flu, has dramatically changed the world, with a significant number of people still suffering and dying from the disease. Without vaccination and magic bullet, one of the essential items that can protect people from the disease is a face mask 1 2 . The effectiveness of wearing masks has been reported in the United States 3 , Germany 4 , Hong Kong 5 , and other regions 6 .
Yet, recognition of its importance varies across nations and even within a country. Some studies have also analyzed the characteristics that affect mask-wearing behavior, such as gender 7 , age, the living place 8 , and social norms 9 . However, the studies of the effectiveness and determinants of wearing masks that were based on cross-national data were not thoroughly conducted, except for one 10 . Therefore, this study analyzed which people in which country have a greater awareness of wearing masks by utilizing the crossnational and multilevel data of over 400,000 persons.
To summarize the findings of this study, there is considerable variance in the awareness of mask usage across countries. People in more prosperous and more democratic countries are less likely to wear masks, even after controlling for positive cases, death cases, and other factors. It was also found that females were more likely to wear masks.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)  Figure 1 shows the trends in the awareness of wearing face masks of over 400,000 people in 29 countries in 2020 using data from the Imperial College London YouGov Covid-19

Data
Behaviour Tracker Data Hub 11 . The graphs present each country's monthly average response to the statement "Worn a face mask outside your home (e.g., when on public transport, going to a supermarket, going to a main road)"; the responses ranged from 1 (not at all) to 5 (always). The original order was reversed to aid understanding. The graphs in the figure reveal the following patterns: (1) there was a consistently high level of awareness of wearing masks throughout the year (Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea, and Thailand), (2) there was an increasing level of awareness (Canada, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, the U.K., and the U.S.), and (3) there were consistently low levels of awareness (Norway and Sweden). These patterns support previous research 10 .
It seems that people in Asian countries, in which relatively fewer COVID-19 cases and deaths have been reported, are more likely to wear masks in public spaces. On the other hand, people in Scandinavian countries, where individual freedom is regarded as especially important, are less likely to wear masks. Although the responses may have been affected by social desirability bias, it is certain that they present at least some . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.06.21253037 doi: medRxiv preprint precious knowledge on the issue. However, these trends did not consider the number of positive cases and deaths. In other words, people in less severely affected countries tend to wear masks. In the next section, we analyze the effects of these factors on the awareness of wearing masks.

Figure 1. Trends in Wearing Masks by Country
Note: mask_avg is each country's monthly average response to the statement "Worn a face mask outside your home (e.g., when on public transport, going to a supermarket, going to a main road)"; the responses ranged from 1 (not at all) to 5 (always). The original order was reversed to aid understanding.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.06.21253037 doi: medRxiv preprint 3. Methods

Statistical model
In this section, the determinants of the awareness of wearing masks across countries are explored using statistical methods and considering other factors, such as the political regime, living standards, and population density at the national level. Two models were estimated separately to avoid multicollinearity. The equations were as follows: , where, in Equation 1, _ is the country's monthly average response to the statement "Worn a face mask outside your home (e.g., when on public transport, going to a supermarket, going to a main road)"; the responses ranged from 1 (not at all) to 5 (always). The original order was reversed. and ℎ are the monthly averages of COVID-19 positive cases and death cases, respectively. These data were obtained from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker 12 . represents the country-fixed effects, which are treated as independent variables. is the error term of the regression, i is the country, and t is months. In Equation 2, is the political regime variable that was taken from the Polity Ⅴ project 13 . The Polity 2 variable was . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
, which is the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, was used for living standards, and is the population density, which were  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.   as expected. However, the relationship between the death cases and wearing masks was negative and not statistically significant. Polity 2 was negatively correlated with mask usage at a statistically significant level. This implies that people in democratic countries tend to wear masks less than those in authoritarian countries. GDP per capita was also . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Multilevel analysis
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) In this section, we report a multilevel analysis based on a similar study 15  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.   Figure 3. The coefficient of the confirmed cases had a positive sign, as expected, but that of the death cases was not positive. Age was not correlated with the awareness of mask usage. Males tended to wear masks less frequently than females. Figure 5 shows the results of the analysis that included the employment status. This . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 8, 2021. variable was coded as 1 = full-time employment, 2 = part-time employment, 3 = full-time student, 4 = retired, 5 = unemployed, 6 = not working, and 7 = other. A higher number indicates isolation from society. This inclusion led to there being approximately 100,000 fewer samples for 7 countries due to missing values for the employment question. The coefficient of the variable suggests that people who are isolated from society are less likely to wear masks. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Discussion
This study found clearly different patterns of mask usage awareness, and the data presented in Figures 1 and 2 support a previous cross-national survey analysis 10 . People in Asian countries tend to wear masks whereas citizens in Scandinavian countries are less likely to wear them. This article also reports that citizens in more democratic and more prosperous countries are less likely to wear masks. While this result is anecdotally known, this study confirms it using a statistical method. This study also revealed that confirmed COVID-19 cases and death cases have the opposite effect on mask usage awareness. This finding may imply that people are cautious about the virus when there is a growing number of positive cases. On the other hand, the variable of the death cases may include some time lags. However, a previous study in Spain reported a null result for the effect of positive cases 9 . The research shows a much stronger effect of the average awareness of using masks at both the regional and provincial levels than that of positive cases. Figures   3 and 4 also support the gender effect, which has been found in a previous research study 7 , although another study did not confirm this 9 . The figures do not indicate that there is a consistent effect of age on wearing masks, which previous studies have also reported 8 9 . Figure 4 shows the effect of the employment status.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Conclusion
This study analyzed the determinants of wearing masks in 29 countries in 2020 using over 400,000 survey responses. The results show that there is considerable variance in the awareness of mask usage across the countries. While people in Asian countries tend to wear masks, citizens in Scandinavian countries are less likely to wear them. This article also reports that citizens in more democratic and more prosperous countries are less likely to wear masks. In addition, females are more likely to wear masks. This paper contributes to the literature as it re-examines anecdotes and previous research by using statistical methods to analyze over 400,000 survey responses.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 8, 2021 is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.06.21253037 doi: medRxiv preprint

Response
Tracker. Blavatnik School of Government. Available at . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.06.21253037 doi: medRxiv preprint