SARS-CoV-2 transmission in intercollegiate athletics not fully mitigated with daily antigen testing

Background High frequency, rapid turnaround SARS-CoV-2 testing continues to be proposed as a way of efficiently identifying and mitigating transmission in congregate settings. However, two SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks occurred among intercollegiate university athletic programs during the fall 2020 semester despite mandatory directly observed daily antigen testing. Methods During the fall 2020 semester, athletes and staff in both programs were tested daily using Quidel’s Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA), with positive antigen results requiring confirmatory testing with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We used genomic sequencing to investigate transmission dynamics in these two outbreaks. Results In Outbreak 1, 32 confirmed cases occurred within a university athletics program after the index patient attended a meeting while infectious despite a negative antigen test on the day of the meeting. Among isolates sequenced from Outbreak 1, 24 (92%) of 26 were closely related, suggesting sustained transmission following an initial introduction event. In Outbreak 2, 12 confirmed cases occurred among athletes from two university programs that faced each other in an athletic competition despite receiving negative antigen test results on the day of the competition. Sequences from both teams were closely related and unique from strains circulating in the community, suggesting transmission during intercollegiate competition. Conclusions These findings suggest that antigen testing alone, even when mandated and directly observed, may not be sufficient as an intervention to prevent SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in congregate settings, and highlights the importance of supplementing serial antigen testing with appropriate mitigation strategies to prevent SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in congregate settings.


Background 26
High frequency, rapid turnaround SARS-CoV-2 testing continues to be proposed as a way of 27 efficiently identifying and mitigating transmission in congregate settings. However, two SARS-28 CoV-2 outbreaks occurred among intercollegiate university athletic programs during the fall 29 2020 semester despite mandatory directly observed daily antigen testing. 30 Methods 31 During the fall 2020 semester, athletes and staff in both programs were tested daily using 32 Quidel's Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA), with positive antigen results 33 requiring confirmatory testing with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction 34 (RT-PCR). We used genomic sequencing to investigate transmission dynamics in these two 35 outbreaks. 36 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 6, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.03.21252838 doi: medRxiv preprint Introduction 51 Timely reporting of SARS-CoV-2 test results is critical for controlling transmission through 52 prompt public health action, yet at times during 2020, turnaround times for SARS-CoV-2 test 53 results in the United States have averaged 4 days, with some individuals waiting 10 days or 54 more [1]. While turnaround times in early 2021 have improved, the lag between specimen 55 collection and receipt of a test result continues to represent a window in which the risk of viral 56 spread from SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals is high. Rapid antigen tests, like Abbott's 57 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 6, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.03.21252838 doi: medRxiv preprint BinaxNow COVID-19 Ag Card and Quidel's Sofia SARS Antigen FIA, can reduce this lag 58 between testing and results reporting [2][3][4][5]. Because of these qualities, high-frequency, rapid 59 turnaround SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing has been proposed as a prevention strategy in many 60 congregate settings where SARS-CoV-2 infection risk is elevated [6][7][8] The two outbreaks occurred among athletes and staff affiliated with a university's intercollegiate 78 athletics programs despite daily SARS-CoV-2 testing with Quidel's Sofia SARS Antigen FIA. 79 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 6, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.03.21252838 doi: medRxiv preprint Both sports involved in the outbreaks were considered "high-risk" by the national collegiate 80 athletics association (NCAA) due to frequent contact and collision between athletes during play. 81 Students and staff affiliated with the two athletics programs began daily antigen testing for 82 SARS-CoV-2 in September 2020. Daily antigen testing was not required for persons with a RT-83 PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the past 3 months, and persons experiencing 84 symptoms consistent with COVID-19, as symptomatic persons received RT-PCR testing without 85 initial antigen testing. For remaining asymptomatic students and staff, antigen testing was 86 conducted using anterior nasal swabs that were self-collected each morning under the direct 87 supervision of a nurse. Antigen test results were provided to athletics department medical staff 88 who coordinated exclusion from team activities and confirmatory testing, but were not reported 89 back to students and staff. Close contacts of RT-PCR-confirmed students or staff were required to self-quarantine for 14 98 days from the date of last contact per public health guidance [17]. Importantly, contact tracing 99 for student athletes did not include contacts that occurred during practices, competitions, 100 meetings, or other team activities, but could include contacts that occurred during social 101 activities or at home (e.g., roommates). In addition to daily antigen testing, the athletic 102 programs implemented a physical distancing policy requiring all students and staff to be at least 103 six feet apart during meetings, and mandatory mask use during team activities. 104 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. The names of universities, the specific sports, and relevant dates have been removed from the 114 report to protect the privacy of the students and staff involved. We used identifiers (Athletics-##) 115 to denote individuals associated with these outbreaks. Dates are encoded as X-day-YY, 'X' 116 indicates the outbreak investigated, and 'YY' indicates the day of that outbreak. The first notable 117 event for each outbreak is "day 0" -in Outbreak 1, this was a negative antigen test for the index 118 case (who later tested positive by RT-PCR), and in Outbreak 2, this was the date of the first 119 competition between the two teams. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted in a 120 manner consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy 1 . 121 Laboratory Methods

122
We obtained a waiver of HIPAA Authorization and were approved to obtain the clinical samples 123 along with a Limited Data Set by the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB #1-1290953-1). 124 Sequences for this study were derived from 36 total nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples 125 collected from Outbreak 1 (n=32) and Outbreak 2 hosting team (n=5), as well as the visiting 126 team's samples in Outbreak 2 (n=5). 127 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. were built using the standard Nextstrain tools and scripts [18,19]. We used custom python 165 scripts to filter and clean metadata. Sequences names were coded as OB#-T#-A#. Where OB 166 signifies the outbreak, T represents the team that the sequence came from, and A is the athlete 167 from which the sample that the sequence was derived originated. 168 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. were confirmed with RT-PCR and 7 (64%) received negative RT-PCR results. 188 Overall, during Outbreak 1, 32 individuals (22 students and 10 staff) from the program had 189 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 6, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.03.21252838 doi: medRxiv preprint and day-1). No testing was conducted on day-2. On day-3, an athlete from Team 2 received a 213 positive antigen test result, which was confirmed by RT-PCR. No athletes or staff on either team 214 were quarantined from contact with the index athlete that occurred during competition on day-0 215 and day-1. During day-5 through day-10, multiple athletes on both teams developed symptoms 216 and received positive antigen and RT-PCR results. On day-6, all athletes on Team 1 were 217 tested by RT-PCR and in-person team activities were suspended. Overall, 12 athletes (seven 218 from Team 1 and five from Team 2) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections during this outbreak 219 (Figure 4). 220 To determine whether the source of these infections could be linked to competition despite 221 negative antigen results on the day of competition, we generated eight consensus sequences 222 from ten available samples. All eight virus sequences (four from each team) clustered tightly in 223 the 20G clade on a time-resolved tree and were separated by 0-2 fixed consensus nucleotide 224 differences (Figure 4). Given the known epidemiological associations between these teams, 225 this likely represented a single transmission cluster [20][21][22]. 226 The genetic sequences of the viruses infecting the individuals in Outbreak 2 were distinct from 227 the viruses circulating within the community where Outbreak 2 occurred. Moreover, sampling of 228 individuals in Outbreak 2 revealed a unique mutation, encoding Spike P26Y, that was present in 229 viral sequences from the samples from both teams but was not otherwise seen in the larger 230 community where Team 1 was located. Given the depth of surveillance community sequencing 231 in Team 1's community available during the outbreak period (~4.7% of test-positive cases), it is 232 unlikely that this unique signature arose independently in the community where Team 1 is 233 located. 234 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 6, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.03.21252838 doi: medRxiv preprint Discussion 235 The SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy of daily, directly observed, rapid antigen testing implemented 236 by intercollegiate athletics programs nationwide has been resource-intensive, yet its impact on 237 SARS-CoV-2 transmission in this setting has not been evaluated. In this report, we described 238 two outbreaks within intercollegiate athletics programs in which daily antigen testing was unable 239 to interrupt SARS-CoV-2 transmission. In Outbreak 1, the index athlete received a positive RT-240 PCR results with a low Ct value less than 24 hours after testing negative by the Sofia SARS 241 Antigen FIA. This individual was likely infectious on the date of the negative antigen test, as four 242 other individuals in the day-0 meeting contracted SARS-CoV-2 over the ensuing week. 243 Sustained transmission within the program followed when additional exposures from 244 presymptomatic and undetected SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred -at least 13 of the 32 245 outbreak-associated cases attended team meetings with individuals who had received negative 246 antigen results yet were in their infectious period. 247 Transmission within the program was not interrupted until the program implemented serial RT-248 PCR testing, a strategy that led to identification of 21 new confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, 249 18 of which were negative on contemporaneous antigen tests. Our findings suggest that serial 250 antigen testing as a control strategy may have limited sensitivity for detecting early 251 asymptomatic infections, and that prevention of future outbreaks in these settings may require a 252 combination of more sensitive molecular tests (e.g., RT-PCR) and improved mitigation 253 measures. 254 Contact tracing during Outbreak 1 identified interactions between individuals that may have 255 contributed to at least 21 (66%) of the 32 confirmed cases (Figure 2b). These interactions 256 represent multiple breaches of the university's mitigation strategy and combined with the 257 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. The potential for inter-collegiate transmission during an athletic competition has important 278 implications for SARS-CoV-2 serial testing strategies and in-competition mitigation protocols. 279 First, antigen testing on the competition dates failed to identify the index case, who may have 280 been infectious and exposed other athletes. Like Outbreak 1, more sensitive molecular tests 281 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 6, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.03.21252838 doi: medRxiv preprint may have identified the source case and allowed for exclusion from the competition. Second, 282 this investigation shows that athletic competition may pose a risk for SARS-CoV-2 transmission, 283 particularly in sports where direct physical contact occurs. This outbreak occurred during an 284 athletic competition that included contact and collision, and is considered "high-risk" by NCAA. 285 Despite the short duration of contact between athletes , transmission risk can be exacerbated 286 by heavy breathing and shouting without masking, which regularly occurs in this sport and has 287 been associated with SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in other athletics competitions [30]. 288 The findings in this report are subject to several limitations. First, we were not able to perform 289 genomic sequencing on all positive samples from these outbreaks (34 of 44 samples were 290 sequenced) either because of high Ct values on RT-PCR or lack of sample availability. Second, 291 contemporaneous antigen and RT-PCR samples in Outbreak 1 were not collected as "paired" 292 swabs (simultaneous swabbing of two nares) and may not be comparable to other antigen test 293 evaluations. Similarly, the performance of antigen tests in this context of daily serial testing 294 measured their ability to identify early presymptomatic infections, and may not be generalizable 295 to antigen test performance in other settings. Third, our ability to determine the source of 296 infections in these outbreaks was limited by incomplete contact tracing data. Undocumented 297 exposures between athletes and staff may have occurred outside of organized team activities 298 that could have caused infections that were attributed to team meetings or in-competition 299 transmission; although the strength of genomic clustering and epidemiologic evidence from 300 these investigations suggests that such occurrences were rare. 301 Among athletics programs and other congregate settings where outbreaks may spread rapidly 302 after introduction of SARS-CoV-2, serial antigen testing alone may not be sufficient to prevent 303 outbreaks. A robust testing strategy should be supplemented with multilayered prevention 304 strategies that includes correct and consistent mask use, physical distancing, increased hand 305 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 6, 2021. Nextstrain phylogenetic tools publicly available and for their commitment to tracking the global 318 spread of SARS-CoV-2. We also acknowledge the GISAID team for maintaining the largest 319 public repository of SARS-CoV-2 sequence-and metadata. 320