Vitamins D2 and D3 have overlapping but different effects on human gene expression revealed through analysis of blood transcriptomes in a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled food-fortification trial

For the first time, we report the influence of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 on genome-wide gene expression in whole blood from healthy women representing two ethnic groups, white European and South Asian. In this randomised placebo-controlled trial, participants were given daily physiological doses (15 g) of either vitamin D2 or D3 for 12 weeks and changes in the transcriptome were compared relative to the transcriptome at baseline. While there was some overlap in the repertoire of differentially expressed genes after supplementation with each vitamin D source, most changes were specific to either vitamin D3 or vitamin D2, suggesting that each form of the vitamin may have different effects on human physiology. Notably, following vitamin D3 supplementation, the majority of changes in gene expression reflected a down-regulation in the activity of genes, many encoding components of the innate and adaptive immune systems. These are consistent with the emerging concept that vitamin D orchestrates a shift in the immune system towards a more tolerogenic status. The profound differences in gene expression after supplementation with vitamin D2 compared with vitamin D3 warrant a more intensive investigation of the biological effects of the two forms of vitamin D on human physiology.


Introduction
that serum 25(OH)D3 concentration was reduced over the 12-week intervention in participants given vitamin D2, compared with the average 12-week concentration in participants given placebo ((Tripkovic et al., 2017), see Fig. 1C, for example). The implications of such reciprocal depletion remain to be explored.
There is limited understanding of the effects of vitamin D supplementation on gene expression in vivo in humans because of the diversity of experimental designs used.
This includes: (i) diverse sampling intervals, ranging from hours to years following vitamin D supplementation (Berlanga-Taylor et al., 2018, Neme et al., 2019; (ii) use of substantially different doses ranging from physiological (moderate) to supraphysiological doses; and (iii) relatively small numbers of participants were recruited so that most studies were considerably underpowered (Neme et al., 2019, Hosseinnezhad et al., 2013. Currently, there is no robust evidence, from in vivo human genome-wide expression analysis, about which specific cellular pathways are influenced by vitamin D supplementation. Moreover, the influence of vitamin D2, as distinct from vitamin D3, on gene expression in humans has not yet been evaluated, even though vitamin D2 is used widely as a supplement and food fortificant. We have addressed this gap in knowledge by investigating gene expression in a relatively large cohort of healthy white European and South Asian women who participated in a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial that compared the relative efficacy of vitamins D2 and D3 in raising serum 25(OH)D concentration. The study concluded that vitamin D3 was superior to vitamin D2 in raising serum 25(OH)D concentration (Tripkovic et al., 2017). As an integral part of the original study design, we also investigated gene expression in the participants over the 12-week trial period. This allowed us to examine the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the transcriptome and to determine whether these effects might differ depending on supplementation with vitamin D2 compared with vitamin D3. We therefore sampled blood at the beginning, middle and end of the 12-week intervention and quantified changes in the whole blood transcriptome. Surprisingly, we observed that the two vitamins exerted overlapping but different effects on the human blood transcriptome.
Our findings support the hypothesis that the biological effects of vitamin D2 and D3 may differ in humans and suggest that a more comprehensive analysis of the biological effects of the two forms of vitamin D on human physiology is warranted. In . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020 and higher total 25(OH)D in both treatment groups (Fig. 1c). In the vitamin D3 treatment groups the mean 25(OH)D3 serum levels rose by 59% (WE) and 116% (SA) over the 12-week intervention. Conversely, mean serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations fell across the 12 weeks of the study in the placebo groups who did not receive additional vitamin D; 25(OH)D3 baseline vitamin D levels in the SA ethnic group tended to be lower than for the WE group and dropped, respectively, by 23% and 29% relative to baseline V1 ( Fig. 1c; Supplementary Data File 1). It is notable that, in the vitamin D2 treatment group, serum 25(OH)D3 concentration decreased to a greater extent over the 12-week period, by 52% (SA) and 53% (WE); the implications of this are considered further in the Discussion. Serum 25(OH)D2 was low in the absence of specific supplementation, typically less than 5 nmol/L (152/162 samples analysed). Serum calcium concentration, appropriately adjusted for serum albumin concentration, was maintained within a normal clinical range across all sample groups, while the concentration of parathyroid hormone (PTH) was stable between V1 and V3 only within the SA placebo group, the WE vitamin D2 and WE vitamin D3 intervention groups. PTH concentrations showed an increase at V3 compared with V1 in the WE placebo group, but a decrease in both the vitamin D2 and D3 intervention groups in the SA ethnic cohort.

Effects of supplementation with either vitamin D2 or D3 on global gene expression
Filtering of the normalised microarray data to select for probes showing signals at least 10% above background in at least 41 (~20%) of the arrays yielded transcript abundance data from 20,662 probes corresponding to 17,588 different genomic features (12,436 of which were annotated with an ENTREZ gene identifier). Using the filtered data, we identified significant differences in the transcriptional responses occurring across the 12-week V1 to V3 period of the study between the vitamin D2, vitamin D3 and placebo treatment groups for each ethnic cohort and, in a separate analysis, to determine significant changes within each group between the V3 and V1 sampling points ( Fig. 2; Supplementary Data File 2). The former was tested in a 'difference-in-difference' analysis according to the generalised null hypothesis  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020 No significant changes in probe signals (adj.P.Val<=0.05) were identified in the 'difference-in-difference' analysis for the data for the WE ethnic group, but five were found in the corresponding analysis of the SA cohort (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, difference-in-difference analysis of the entire study data, ignoring ethnicity, did not yield statistically significant changes between the D2 or D3 treatment groups and the placebo control (data not shown). We note that another 'difference-in-difference' study on the influence of vitamin D on gene expression (the BEST-D trial) failed to identify any significant changes in gene expression following long-term vitamin D treatment in a Caucasian cohort (Berlanga-Taylor et al., 2018). The observed log2 fold-change (log2FC) in signal abundances between V3 and V1 in the study typically fall well within +/-1, and in such a context it is likely that the sample sizes used within the study restrict our ability to reliably identify individual gene expression responses using this highly conservative approach. We consider that inter-individual differences in human populations are likely to hinder detection of small statistically significant gene expression changes across treatment groups from microarrayderived data; however, statistically significant differences are detected when evaluating gene expression changes within an individual across time (as described below where we examine paired observations with two time points per subject). The five significant changes that were identified as occurring in response to treatment of the SA ethnic group with vitamin D3, relative to the placebo, are summarised in Supplementary Fig. 1. These are driven primarily by the marked changes in the placebo group between the V1 and V3 sampling points, and may be associated with the sustained low serum 25(OH)D3, or high PTH, concentrations observed in this group of subjects. One of these differentially expressed genes encodes the cAMP response element binding protein CREB1 (Fig. 2b) which is part of the cAMP-PKA-CREB signaling pathway in bone cells which contributes to the regulation of skeletal metabolism in response to PTH concentrations (Zhang et al., 2011).
In contrast to the difference-in-difference analysis, the direct within-group comparisons of transcript abundance measurements at V3 versus V1 per subject identified large numbers of significant changes in gene expression, most notably in the WE D2, WE D3 and WE placebo groups ( Fig. 2a and c, Supplementary Data File 2). These significant gene expression changes in the WE ethnic cohort arising in . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020 the vitamin D treatment groups are considered in more detail below. While there is some overlap in the groups of differentially expressed genes, only 13% of downregulated differentially expressed genes (102 of 774) were common between the two vitamin D treatment groups, while 28% (216 of 774) and 59% (456 of 774) were uniquely down-regulated by D2 and D3, respectively (excluding those additionally down-regulated in the placebo group over the equivalent 12-week intervention)( Fig   2c). As previously noted above, the serum 25(OH)D3 concentration fell over the 12week intervention period in the vitamin D2-treated group; thus, changes in gene expression observed in this group could a priori either be due to the influence of vitamin D2 itself, or could be attributable to the depletion of the endogenous 25(OH)D3 reserves. It was therefore important to have included comparative transcriptomic analysis of the placebo group in this study to distinguish gene expression changes resulting from vitamin D2 per se from those changes arising due to the depletion of 25(OH)D3 levels in this vitamin D2 treatment group.
It is notable that expression of a large number of genes was altered between the first and last visits (V1 to V3) in the non-treated placebo group. While some of these changes will be attributable to the effects of the vitamin D depletion observed in this group over the course of the study, there is significant over-representation of genes known to exhibit seasonal differences in gene expression (Dopico et al., 2015) ( Supplementary Fig. 2). There is however no unique association of seasonally expressed genes with the data for the WE placebo group; a similar significant enrichment is also observed for the significant changes in gene expression identified in the WE D2 and WE D3 treatment groups (Supplementary Fig. 2) and therefore it is unlikely that this apparent seasonal effect exclusively reflects vitamin D-specific effects. There was no overlap between genes significantly down-regulated exclusively in the placebo group and those significantly up-regulated exclusively in the vitamin D treatment groups (or vice versa). Consistent with the 12-week period of the study, seasonal changes in gene expression are therefore a background feature of all the data collected, and is therefore a factor that needs to be considered when undertaking such time course studies.
In the group of probe signals with significantly reduced abundance in the V3 samples compared with V1 in the data for the vitamin D2 and D3 supplemented participants, . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint but not in the placebo participants, Probe A_33_P3275751, detecting SEC14L1 gene transcription showed the largest decrease in response to both forms of vitamin D ( Fig. 2d). This probe was originally designed to detect 'transcript variant 7' and hybridizes to a location at the 3' end of the SEC14L1 locus, detecting several splice variants. High expression of SEC14L1 is significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer patients, where transcript abundance correlates positively with higher grade lymph node metastasis, and poor prognostic outcome (Sonbul et al., 2018). Its overexpression is also frequent in prostate cancer where SEC14L1 has been identified as a potential biomarker of aggressive progression of the disease (Agell et al., 2012, Burdelski et al., 2015.

Genes significantly down-regulated by both D2 and D3, but not placebo, are enriched for functions associated with immune responses
Given the relatively small sample sizes used in this study it is considered more appropriate to examine enrichment of cellular pathways among differentially expressed genes rather than focusing on changes in individual genes. Functional is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020 A similar analysis of the probes specifically induced by D2 and D3 (red points in Fig.   2d) produced a significant (p = 4.99E-09) protein-protein interaction network enriched primarily for mitochondrial and ribosomal proteins, but also involving two subunits of histone H4 and SNRPD2, a core component of the SMN-Sm complex that mediates spliceosomal snRNP assembly (Fig. 3b).
Comparative functional enrichment analysis supports roles for vitamins D2 and D3 in the suppression of immunity, and in chromatin modification and spliceosome function As a complementary approach to the functional enrichment analysis of specific subsets of genes whose expression is altered by supplementation with vitamin D2 and D3 but not by placebo treatment, a comparative functional enrichment analysis of all significant changes in each treatment group was performed (see Methods).
This aimed to identify functional categories that are more extensively affected by vitamin D2, or by vitamin D3, or by both vitamins D2 and D3, than by the placebo, and took into consideration the changes occurring in the placebo treatment group across the 12 weeks of the study (Figs. 4 and 5; Supplementary Data File 4). Consistent with the earlier analysis, functional categories associated with immunity and immune response pathways are prominent among those genes repressed by vitamin D supplementation (Fig. 4), while mitochondrial, ribosomal and spliceosomal functions are prominent in the induced genes (Fig. 5). Although the two vitamin treatments share many common categories identified from this analysis, the results also highlight some differences between the respective effects of D2 or D3 supplementation. For example, 'histone exchange' is significant only in the vitamin D2 up-regulated genes, and 'chromatin modifying enzymes' are significant only in the D3 down-regulated genes.
Overall, the observed differences in gene expression from the blood transcriptome presented in this study suggest that the physiological effects of vitamin D3 and D2 may be dissimilar. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint

Weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) identifies modules of co-expressed genes that significantly correlate with serum markers of vitamin D supplementation in the WE and SA ethnic groups
WGCNA quantifies both the correlations between individual pairs of genes or probes across a data set, and also the extent to which these probes share the same neighbours (Langfelder and Horvath, 2008). The WGCNA process creates a dendrogram that clusters similarly abundant probes into discrete branches, and subsequent cutting of the dendrogram yields separate co-expression modules, representing putatively co-regulated sets of genes. The first principal component of the expression matrix of each module defines the expression profile of the eigengene for the module, and this can then be correlated with experimental metadata. By allowing phenotypic traits to be associated with relatively small numbers (tens) of module eigengenes, instead of thousands of individual variables (i.e. gene probes), WGCNA both alleviates the multiple testing problem associated with standard differential expression analysis and also directly relates experimental traits to gene expression data in an unsupervised way that is agnostic of the experimental design.
WGCNA was used to construct separate signed co-expression networks for the WE and SA ethnic groups as described in the Methods, and Pearson correlations between expression of the module eigengenes and serum 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3, total 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations were calculated ( Fig.   6 and Supplementary data files 6 -8). These results therefore ignore whether the data originates from the vitamins D2, D3 or placebo treatment groups and focus solely on the relationship between the serum metabolite concentrations and gene expression. A significant negative correlation was observed between 25(OH)D2 concentration and expression modules in the WE co-expression network that are enriched for immune-associated functions (midnight blue and pink modules in Fig.   6a). This is consistent with the results from the different analytical approaches is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint mRNA processing (Supplementary Data File 6). No significant correlations with serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations were detected in the WE cohort.
Interestingly, stronger and more numerous correlations were observed in the coexpression network for the SA cohort (Fig. 6b). In agreement with the WE network, an expression module significantly associated with the ribosome (black module in indicate that PTH status has an influence on the outcome and may reflect physiological differences resulting from the low baseline vitamin D status in SA women. In this context we observed that PTH concentrations at the V1 sampling point in the SA cohort were elevated compared with those in the WE cohort (Fig. 1c).

Vitamin D intake down-regulates expression of many genes including those encoding multiple pathways involved in innate and adaptive immunity
In the present study we shed light on the physiological effects of the two forms of vitamin D commonly used as food-fortificants or vitamin supplements. Using data from the same intervention study, previously we reported that vitamin D3 supplementation is more effective than supplementation with vitamin D2 in raising serum 25(OH)D concentration (Tripkovic et al., 2017). However, other studies have reported that the two forms of vitamin D are equally effective in raising serum 25(OH)D concentration (Holick et al., 2008, Zittermann et al., 2020. In the present study we examined gene expression changes in vivo following supplementation with either vitamin D2 or D3 (or placebo) in healthy women from the South East of the UK. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint genome transcriptome analysis in 97 of the original cohort of 335 women from two ethnic backgrounds, South Asian (SA) and white European (WE). We characterised gene expression changes in the human blood transcriptome in response to vitamin D2 or D3 supplementation over a 12-week treatment intervention over the winter months; the randomised groups were provided with physiological (15 µg) daily doses of vitamin D2 or vitamin D3 fortified foods, or identical foods without added vitamin D (placebo). We found extensive changes in gene expression in all three treatment groups, some of which were unique to the vitamin D2-treated or D3-treated groups, with the majority exhibiting downregulation of transcription over the 12-week intervention period. Our success in detecting statistically significant differential gene expression in this study stems partly from the longitudinal design where it was possible to evaluate statistical differences in transcript levels within each group (from baseline to 12-week measurement). This approach partly circumvents the problems with inter-individual differences in human studies which make it difficult to detect robust changes between different groups of individuals. Furthermore, the statistical analysis approach examined pairwise differences in gene expression from the V1 and V3 samples, which helps to reduce the impact of inter-individual differences on statistical significance.
This in vivo human transcriptome study has demonstrated long-term effects on gene expression. The majority of differentially expressed genes identified in this study were suppressed by vitamin D supplementation, and many of these encoded pathways were involved in immunity. Many of these observed gene expression changes are consistent with vitamin D exerting a modulating effect on the immune system, leading towards a more tolerogenic state, a concept reviewed by (Prietl et al., 2013). The findings from this study are based on an analysis of 97 individuals divided equally between the three treatment groups. Our ability to detect differences in the effects of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 may have been negatively impacted by the inclusion of two different ethnic groups among the 97 participants, since the transcriptome results from the two ethnic groups are clearly different. It will be very important to independently replicate this study using a much larger cohort in order to verify, or otherwise, the key findings from this study. From power calculations it is considered that for a whole human microarray-based gene expression study of this nature, and with gene expression changes of the magnitude we observe, at least . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint 400 participants of each ethnic group should be recruited for each treatment, giving a total cohort size of 2,400. The biological interpretation of our findings in the present study should be considered as preliminary in this context, requiring independent verification.
It is difficult to compare the findings of the present study with other reported in vivo studies because of the considerable differences in experimental design, including the use of supra-physiological vitamin D doses (up to 2,000 µg single bolus doses), different population types and small sample sizes which make statistical analysis not feasible (e.g. (Hossein-nezhad et al., 2013, Neme et al., 2019). Furthermore, our study is unique in that it compared gene expression in participants given either of the two commonly used forms of vitamin D, vitamin D2 and vitamin D3. Intriguing, this revealed that there were considerable differences in the gene expression profiles following each nutritional treatment. For example, excluding genes that were also differentially expressed over the 12-week intervention in the placebo group, only 13% of down-regulated differentially expressed genes were common between the two treatment groups while 28% and 59% were uniquely down-regulated by vitamins D2 and D3, respectively ( Figure 2c).
It is questionable whether it is useful to extrapolate the results from single high dose bolus and in vitro studies such as those described by (Koivisto et al., 2020) with this sustained dietary intake in vivo study. In the former study 15 'vitamin D-responsive' genes were identified as important mediators of innate and adaptive immunity. Five of these 15 genes are also identified as differentially expressed in our present study (CD93, CEBPB, THBD, THEMIS2 and TREM1). However, in the present study these five genes were down-regulated by vitamin D intake (Supplementary Data File 2) whereas they are reported to be up-regulated in the studies reported by (Koivisto et al., 2020). These contrasting results highlight the difficulties with comparing data from different experimental designs. As argued previously, because of the relatively small sample sizes investigated and the small effect sizes, this study has focussed on identification of statistically significant pathway enrichment following sustained vitamin D supplementation, rather than a gene-focussed analysis. Nevertheless, we consider it useful to consider the respective roles of these five specific gene products . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint since their down-regulation by vitamin D would make sense from a biological perspective. In our study the gene encoding thymocyte selection-associated family member 2 (THEMIS2) is down-regulated after vitamin D2 supplementation, the CD93-encoding gene is down-regulated following D2 and D3 supplementation, while the genes encoding thrombomodulin (THBD) and the CCAAT enhancer-binding protein beta (CEBPB) are down-regulated following D3 supplementation. Another cellular function that is affected by vitamin D2 and D3 supplementation is chromatin modification and remodelling. The EP300 gene is down-regulated by both vitamins, but unaffected in the placebo group. EP300 encodes a histone acetylase that regulates transcription by chromatin remodelling, in particular histone acetylation of H3 at lysine-27, representing an epigenetic modification which activates transcription (Hatzi et al., 2013). Importantly, EP300 is also a coactivator of VDR.
Functional categories of genes enriched among the upregulated genes, following supplementation with either vitamin D2 or D3, include translation, mitochondrial and spliceosome function (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Data File 4); statistically enriched biological cellular component terms in these functional categories are ribosomal proteins, components of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, two subunits of the histone H4 and snRNP Sm protein components of the spliceosome assembly. It is established that, in addition to influencing transcription, vitamin D can also influence post-transcriptional events by recruiting co-regulators. In this context it is relevant . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint that components of the spliceosome such as snRNP Sm proteins that mediate both transcriptional control and splicing decisions, leading to alternatively spliced transcripts (Zhou et al., 2015), were upregulated by vitamin D supplementation in this study. These statistically significant gene expression changes were detected as temporal differences within each treatment group (differences at baseline (V1) versus 12 weeks after the intervention (V3) within single individuals). Differences in gene expression across treatment groups were only found in the South Asian group (Fig. 2a, b). The SA treatment group that received supplementation with vitamin D3, revealed three genes significantly upregulated and two down-regulated after the 12- week intervention relative to the placebo group ( Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. 1). We note that the gene encoding cAMP-responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1) is one of the three upregulated genes. It encodes a transcription factor that binds as a homodimer to the cAMP-responsive element.

Vitamins D2 and D3 do not influence expression of the same genes
Our results indicate that the cellular responses to the two forms of vitamin D supplementation have some commonalities but also show some clear differences is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020.

Influence of vitamin D on expression of genes encoding immune pathways
In common to both the D2 and D3 treatment groups, but not the placebo group, we found that many different pathways of the immune system are differentially We have also found some differences in response to vitamin D in relation to ethnicity (with the caveat that the sample size of the SA group was smaller than the WE group). Ethnic differences in response are suggested from the weighted gene . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint correlation network analysis (WGCNA). A direct correlation between the stimulation of the immune response with an increase in serum 25(OH)D3 concentration (and a corresponding negative correlation with the serum concentration of PTH) was evident in the SA group only. This is the opposite of that observed in the WE group where the effect of vitamin D supplementation was to suppress immune pathways.

Conclusions
The transcriptome results from this study differ from those of previous in vivo studies which used supra-physiological doses of vitamin D over a short time-frame, or used in vitro cultured cells. Indeed, where there is overlap in the identity of the differentially expressed genes identified in the respective studies vitamin D appears to exert the opposite effect relative to our longer-term repeated physiological dose study. Short-term responses to large boluses are relatively simple to do, and less prone to noise, but their effect on gene expression does not seem to be consistent with that observed with longer term repeated physiological dose studies like the present study and therefore may not represent the real-world effects of repeated  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020 The transcriptome results differ considerably between the two different ethnic groups. While some of the differences may be attributable to differences in sample sizes studied between the two groups it is also possible that some of the differences represent genuine differences in the respective physiological responses of the two ethnic groups. Alternatively, the differences may reflect the starting physiological status of the SA participant group, who were found to have considerably lower baseline vitamin D concentrations (and higher PTH concentrations) than the WE group. The importance of clarifying these different responses is given particular impetus by the emerging evidence for the interplay between ethnicity, skin tone, vitamin D status and susceptibility to viral infection, COVID-19 being of particular current relevance here (Lanham-New et al., 2020, Kohlmeier, 2020, Kmietowicz, 2020, Weir et al., 2020. The transcriptomic data presented in this study might provide a useful context for further studies aimed at understanding the role of vitamin D in influencing the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in relation to severe COVID-19. In summary our results indicate that whilst the two forms of vitamin D (D2 and D3) exert some overlapping roles in human physiology, each form may elicit different molecular responses, findings which warrant a more detailed consideration of the system-wide effects of these two forms vitamin D. Clearly, this type of study requires replication, using a much larger independent cohort, with balanced representation from different ethnic groups. This is perhaps of particular importance to at-risk ethnic groups, including black and South Asian populations who reside in northern latitudes. The studies would need to be time course-based (temporal) to track gene expression changes within individuals from baseline activity to defined sampling times and would need in-built control to account for seasonal gene expression changes. They would need to be designed specifically to answer whether different ethnicity or different vitamin D baseline levels give rise to different responses to vitamin D supplementation.
Since some pathways appear to be regulated specifically by vitamin D3, future studies should investigate whether vitamin D2 supplementation might counteract some of the benefits of vitamin D3 on human health. This possibility is prompted by the findings from this cohort that the circulating concentration of 25(OH)D3 within . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020 vitamin D2-treated participants was significantly lower after the 12-week intervention than in the placebo group who received no vitamin D supplements -suggesting that the former might be depleted by the latter. The results from this study suggest that guidelines on food fortification and supplementation with specific forms of vitamin D may need revisiting.

Blood Transcriptome analysis
The recruitment of individuals as part of the BBSRC D2-D3 Study was described previously (Tripkovic et al., 2017). This study received ethical approval from the South-East Coast (Surrey) National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (11/LO/0708) and the University of Surrey Ethics Committee (EC/2011/97/FHMS).

All of the participants gave written informed consent in agreement with the Helsinki
Declaration before commencing study activities. Briefly, 335 women of both South Asian (SA) and white European (WE) descent were randomised to one of three intervention groups for 12-weeks and provided with daily doses of vitamin D within fortified foods: placebo, 15 μg/d vitamin D2 or 15μg/d vitamin D3. Of the 335 participants, 97 were selected for transcriptome analysis (32 were WE, 32 were A and 33 were selected at random from both ethnic groups to form a balanced placebo group). High responders (>50% increase in 25OHD concentrations) and low responders (<50% increase in 25OHD concentrations) were included within both vitamin D2 and D3 supplementation groups to maximize the chance of observing differences in gene expression among subjects. The selected time points for transcriptome analysis were V1 representing the baseline and V3, 12 weeks after treatment commenced.
Whole peripheral blood (2.5 ml) was collected using PAXgene Blood RNA tubes (Becton Dickinson). PAXgene Blood RNA Tubes were inverted ten times immediately after drawing blood, stored upright at 15-25°C for 24 hours, followed by a -20°C freezer for 24 hours and then into a -80°C freezer for long-term storage.
Transcriptomic analysis was conducted essentially as described in previous studies (Archer et al., 2014, Moller-Levet et al., 2013. Total RNA was isolated using the . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020 PAXgene Blood RNA Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturers recommendations.
cRNA was synthesised and fluorescently labelled with Cy3-CTP from 200 ng of total RNA using the Low Input QuickAmp Labelling Kit, One Color (Agilent Technology).
Labelled cRNA was hybridised on a Sure Print G3 Human Gene Expression 8 x 60K v2 microarray slide (Agilent Technologies). Standard manufacturer's instructions for one colour gene-expression analysis were followed for labelling, hybridsation and washing steps. Extracted RNA was quantified using NanoDrop ND2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). RNA quality and integrity was evaluated using either the Bioanalyzer 2100 or the TapeStation 4200 (Agilent Technologies).
Only RNA samples with an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) of >7.0 were subjected to DNA microarray analysis. Microarrays were hybridised at 65°C for 17 hours in an Agilent Hybridization Oven on a rotisserie at 10 rpm. The washed microarrays were scanned using an Agilent Microarray Scanner with a resolution of 2 μm.
Transcriptome data processing and differential expression analysis.
Raw scanned microarray images were processed using Agilent Feature Extraction software (v11.5.1.1) with the Agilent 039494_D_F_20140326_human_8x60K_v2 grid, and then imported into R for normalization and analysis using the LIMMA package (Ritchie et al., 2015). Microarray data were background-corrected using the 'normexp' method (with an offset of 50) and quantile normalised, producing expression values in the log base 2 scale. The processed data were then filtered to remove probes exhibiting low signals across the arrays, retaining non-control probes that are at least 10% brighter than negative control probe signals on at least 41 arrays (~20% of the arrays in the analysis). Data from identical replicate probes were then averaged to produce expression values at the unique probe level. Initial data exploration identified one sample (participant 0017, V3 time point) with array data that was a notable outlier from the group and therefore both the V1 and V3 microarrays for this subject were excluded from all subsequent analysis, reprocessing the data as above in their absence before proceeding.
Tests for differential expression were performed using LIMMA, applying appropriate linear model designs to identify: (i) significant differences in the transcriptional responses occurring across the 12-week V1 to V3 period of the study between the treatment and placebo groups for each ethnic cohort (example contrasts tested, in . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint the format ethnicity_treatment_time: (WE_D2_V3 -WE_D2_V1) -(WE_P_V3-WE_P_V1) = 0 , and (WE_D3_V3 -WE_D3_V1) -(WE_P_V3 -WE_P_V1) = 0); and ii) to determine significant changes for each ethnic cohort within each treatment group between the V3 and V1 sampling points, blocking on subject identity (example contrasts tested: WE_D2_V3 -WE_D2_V1 = 0, WE_D3_V3 -WE_D3_V1 = 0).
Blocking on subject identity was used to control for inter-subject variability.
Significance p-values were corrected for multiplicity using the Benjamini and Hochberg method, obtaining adjusted p-values (adj.P.Val). Normalised data for all participants (V3 -V1) was assessed by principal component analysis to screen for any batch effects (Supplementary Figure 3).

Functional enrichment and network analysis
Functional enrichment analysis of lists of genes of interest possessing valid ENTREZ gene identifiers was performed using the R package clusterProfiler (Yu et al., 2012) The software produces adjusted p-values (p.adjust) using the Benjamini and Hochberg correction method. Construction and analysis of protein-protein interaction networks from sets of genes was undertaken in Cytoscape (Shannon et al., 2003) using the STRING plugin (Szklarczyk et al., 2017a). Cytoscape was also used to construct and visualise commonality in the functional categories identified as being significantly enriched in the genes responding to the experimental treatments. To visualise categories identified from the D2 or D3 treatment groups but not from the placebo (e.g. Figs. 4 and 5) significantly enriched categories (p.adjust < 0.01) from all groups were imported such that treatment group nodes (D2, D3 and placebo (P)) are linked to functional category nodes by edges assigned the corresponding p.adjust values. All nodes with an edge connection to the placebo treatment node were then removed and the resulting networks further filtered to retain only those nodes with at least one edge connection with p.adjust<=0.001.
Weighted gene co-expression network analysis was performed in R using the WGCNA (Langfelder and Horvath, 2008) and CoExpNets (Botia, 2019) packages. A normalised expression data matrix generated by filtering to retain probes with signals more markedly above background (30% brighter than negative control probe signals on at least 41 arrays) was used as input, consisting of 12,169 unique probes. Signed scale-free networks were constructed separately for the data for the SA and WE . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020 ethnic groups using 50 iterations of the k-means clustering option in the CoExpNets

Declaration of interests
All authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020    is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020    is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint Significant differences in the transcriptional responses occurring across the 12-week V1 to V3 period of the study between the vitamin D2, vitamin D3 and placebo treatment groups for each ethnic cohort, and significant changes within each group between the V3 and V1 sampling points (see Fig. 2).

Supplementary Data File 3
Functional analysis of the genes represented by the probes specifically repressed by D2 and D3 in the white European cohort (blue data points in Fig. 2d) or induced by D2 and D3 in the white European cohort (red data points in Fig. 2d).

Supplementary Data File 4
Comparative functional enrichment analysis of all significant changes in each treatment group in the white European cohort ( Fig. 2c; and see Figs 4 and 5).

Supplementary Data File 5
Networks illustrating all the functional categories significantly enriched (p.adjust < 0.01) in analysis of the gene products represented by the probes significantly up-or down-regulated (adj.P.Val < 0.05) in the white European cohort treatment groups (from data presented in Supplementary Data File 4).

Supplementary Data File 6
Module membership for the modules of genes identified in the WGCNA analysis of the data from the South Asian and white European cohorts, as presented in Fig. 6.

Supplementary Data File 7
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ;https://doi.org/10.1101https://doi.org/10. /2020 Gene ontology functional enrichment analysis results for the modules of genes identified in the WGCNA analysis of the data from the white European cohort.

Supplementary Data File 8
Gene ontology functional enrichment analysis results for the modules of genes identified in the WGCNA analysis of the data from the South Asian cohort.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.20247700 doi: medRxiv preprint . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a perpetuity.
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint Significant functional enrichment (FDR<0.05) Immune system process

Innate immune system
Transcription factor complex Neutrophil degranulation Leukocyte activation a) Significantly down-regulated by D 2 and D 3 , but not placebo (blue points in Fig. 2d) b) Significantly up-regulated by D 2 and D 3 , but not placebo (red points in Fig. 2d Fig. 3.

a)
Significant GO BP functional categories associated with down-regulated probes in the D2 or D3 treatment groups, but not the placebo b) Significant Reactome PA categories associated with down-regulated probes in the D2 or D3 treatment groups, but not the placebo Fig. 4.

a)
Significant GO CC functional categories associated with up-regulated probes in the D2 or D3 treatment groups, but not the placebo b) Significant GO BP functional categories associated with up-regulated probes in the D2 or D3 treatment groups, but not the placebo