Evaluation of the Knowledge of University Students in the Health Area About Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Cross-Sectional Study

IntroductionSexually transmitted infections (STI) have consequences that negatively affect the populations quality of life and health. Young adults are susceptible to low access to preventive measures and a greater risk behavior risk. The objective was to evaluate and compare STI Knowledge in university students from health courses, a public institution, and a private institution of higher education in Brazil.

Methodsa cross-sectional study conducted in 2019 in Brazil at the FEMA School of Medicine in Assis-SP and the University of the State of Sao Paulo (UNESP) in Marilia in the courses of Physiotherapy, Speech Therapy, and Occupational Therapy, in undergraduate students, over 18 years of age, through a self-applied questionnaire translated and adapted to the Brazilian Portuguese from the STD-KQ - Transmitted Disease Knowledge Questionnaire.

Results462/700 students participated (66.66%) 18-46 years of age (mean 21.46 years, +/- 3.61), 99 men and 363 women. In the private institution, 262/340 (77.06%), and in the public institution, 200/360 (55.55%). The mean age was 22.21 (+/- 4.21) years among men and 21.25 (+/- 3.41) years among women. The mean percentage of the 28 test questions correct answers was 52.07%. The average number of correct responses per student was 17.49 out of 28 possible, 62% (+/- 4.97). The distribution between the groups was normal. In the multiple linear regression model for the percentage of correct answers, adjusted for the confounding variables, the intercept was 55.2. The students of the private institution answered 19,655 questions more than the public one (P<.001), and for each semester of graduation, the students answered 1,628 more questions (P<.001). There were no relevant differences regarding the gender and age of the students.

Conclusionthere are gaps in STI knowledge among university students in the health area. The students of the first semesters of the courses, and, in particular, students from a public educational institution, had a significantly lower performance of the right in the questionnaire applied. Thus, actions to promote STI knowledge and preventive attitudes are necessary among university students.


INTRODUCTION
Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) have a significant impact on sexual and reproductive health worldwide, especially among young people, and are considered a significant public health problem. They produce harmful effects in the short and long term, such as an increased risk of contracting other diseases, infertility, malformations, and deaths (1,2).
The vulnerability of young people is high. However, the perception of risk is significantly low. The low adherence to preventive measures and the early initiation of sexual life make adolescents and young adults more susceptible to these infections (3). Educational actions and counseling adapted to vulnerable populations' needs are recommended for better preventive and therapeutic STI control (4).
In this sense, assessing young people's knowledge about STI allows identifying knowledge gaps that may predispose them to greater vulnerability since experience is the basis for people's attitudes and practices. This assessment provides relevant support for the formulation and implementation of actions that encourage and support conscious preventive behaviors. (1-3)

Primary objective
To evaluate the Knowledge of STD students in the health area about STI.

Secondary objectives
To investigate preferential distributions according to gender, age, and the semester in which the students are in their courses.
To compare results between a public education institution and a private institution.

HYPOTHESES
remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, The copyright holder has placed this this version posted February 13, 2021. There are knowledge gaps in the STI theme among higher education courses in the health area.  (6). An item about lambskin condom was removed from the instrument since this material is not found in Brazil. short period. In a single day, the taking part students received the classroom questionnaire in a brown envelope, without identification. After filling anonymously, the envelopes were returned, sealed, and collected for later analysis and tabulation.

This
The students' knowledge was obtained by adding the correct answers, with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 28 for each participant.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria
remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, The copyright holder has placed this this version posted February 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.11.21250842 doi: medRxiv preprint Inclusion criteria: students regularly enrolled in the medical course of the Educational Foundation of the Municipality of Assis and the Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech Therapy courses at Universidade Estadual Paulista; age equal to or over 18 years old; non-participants as author or co-author of the study.
Exclusion criteria: illegible questionnaires, erasures, not filled in correctly, or returned outside the sealed envelope.

Sample size
A minimum representative sample size of 162 adolescents and 269 adults was calculated from the equation for a nonprobabilistic sample for an infinite populationbased on a proportion of 12% of 10-19-year-old and 50% of adults in São Paulo state. A confidence interval of 95% and an error size of 5% were used.

Data analysis methodology
We analyzed the data using SPSS software version 24 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences-IBM). We presented descriptive results in tabular form. The level of statistical significance was determined as p <.05. It described the Age variable in years and calculated the Average Age and Standard Deviation. It described variable Educational Institution as private (FEMA) and public (UNESP), and we divided the graduation stages into semesters studied. We have described the gender in Male and Female. The outcome comprised 28 multiple-choice questions, containing three answers: yes, no, and I don't know. Only one answer in each question was considered correct. Each valid question received a score of 1 point. Incorrect answers or "I don't know" or unanswered received a score of zero points. The average sum of the 28 questions was calculated as a percentage of correct answers compared with the study variables, age, sex, institution, and the semester of the course.
Statistical analysis used parametric and non-parametric tests for compare groups, and the multiple linear regression model for the percentage of right answers, adjusting potential confounders. Through this analysis, for the variables public institution, semester, age, and male gender, the beta coefficient (β), the power of remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, The copyright holder has placed this this version posted February 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.11.21250842 doi: medRxiv preprint significance (p), and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated, and the variance inflation factors (VIF).

RESULTS
The total number of participants was 464 students, 2 of whom it excluded from the survey for inadequate questionnaire filling. The 462 students' age ranged between 18-46 years (mean age 21.46 years, +/-3.61), with 99 men and 363 women. The study's overall participation rate was 54.28% (360/700). At FEMA, 77.06% (262/340), and at UNESP, 55.55% (200/360) . In stratification by sex, the mean age was 22.21 (+/-4.21) years for men and 21.25 (+/-3.41) years for women. There was no refusal to take part in the study. The enrolled students who did not participate were absent from academic activities because we administered the questionnaire at each institution.
At FEMA, of the 262 students who took part, 182 were women and 80 men.  Table 1 shows the number of students taking part in each stage/semester of the courses. Table 2 shows the multiple linear regression model for the percentage of correct answers, adjusted by the confounding variables.
The Post-hoc Power analysis was 98.1%, based on the percentage of correct answers between the institutions and the type 1 error percentage of 5%.

DISCUSSION
remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, The copyright holder has placed this this version posted February 13, 2021. ; The study results, demonstrated by a global average of correct answers per student of 62% (+/-4.97), denoted gaps in knowledge among university students from public and private institutions in the health area regarding the theme IST.
It is noteworthy that many questions had a low rate of correct answers. In the percentage analysis of correct answers for each question, we had eight questions with a global index of correct answers below 50%. Thus, the possibility of the studied group being exposed to risk practices and attitudes concerning STI' contagion and transmission.
When analyzing the percentage of correct answers applied, using a multiple linear regression model, adjusting the confounding variables, it is observed that the intercept was 55.204 (95% CI 46.950-63.458), statistically relevant (p <.001).
Concerning students from private institutions, the Beta coefficient was -19.655 (95% CI -22.563 -16.747), a significantly relevant value (p <.001). Students from the public institution answered 19.65% fewer questions on average than those from the private institution. As for the stage/semester of the course, the Beta coefficient was 1.628 (95% CI, 990 -2.266), a significant value (p <.001). Each semester attended, it is estimated an increase of 1.628 percentage points of correctness, which is significant.
As for the age and sex variables, there were no significant changes. There were only two exclusions from the study because of the lack of filling in the questionnaire, delivered with no answers. No student refused to participate in the survey during recruitment at the institutions. The acceptance rate for participating in recruitment and appliance was 100% at both institutions.
The study recruited university students from two medium-sized cities, Assis and Marília, in the interior of the State of São Paulo, Brazil, covering courses in the areas of Medicine, Speech Therapy, Physiotherapy, and Occupational Therapy, in public and private institutions. It is also noteworthy that we applied the questionnaire only to university students in the health area, so it was estimated that they achieved more knowledge about the STI theme. Thus, it is believed that the results found can be generalized and extrapolated to the population of university students in the country, regardless of the discipline or area of Knowledge studied. remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, Therefore, different interpretations of the statement and the answers to each question may generate inaccuracies. Another rule is that the questionnaire was applied to students of the private institution's medical course. In contrast, the questionnaire was used in the public institution to students in Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech Therapy courses. There are differences in these courses' curriculum, causing potential bias, depending on subjects that may have previously addressed the IST theme or taking part in classes and institutions. Despite this, we consider that the questionnaire assesses students' prior knowledge about STI. This evaluation is essential for recognizing potential needs and developing strategies to understand infections better.
Samkange-Zeeb et al. (7)  questions on the topics. Regarding experience, 40% answered that they did not consider condom use as a restorative measure to prevent STI or pregnancy.
Regarding attitude, 40% believed that there is no longer a need to use condoms in a stable relationship. Less than 10% of respondents, sexually active, had sought a health service in the past 12 months to consult prevention. In conclusion, young Brazilian adults have shown insufficient knowledge and ineffective STI attitudes.
Research developed by Castro et al. (8) by the University of Campinas aimed to quantify and generate self-perception about STI and to test students' interest in creating a discipline on the subject. The data collection instrument was the questionnaire sent electronically to undergraduate students at the end of 2011 and newly enrolled students in 2012. 99% of sexually active students used the condom, but less than 20% used it correctly. About 80% were unaware that the condom does remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, The copyright holder has placed this this version posted February 13, 2021. Multiple linear regression showed that knowledge about sexual health was associated with age and sexual orientation. The results showed a low or inadequate understanding of students about STI, findings that supposedly would put them in situations of vulnerability.
In a cross-sectional study in 2018, Provenzano et al. (12) assessed sexual and reproductive risk behavior among Italian university students using an online questionnaire. Among the 539 students who took part, the average age was 22.65 (+/-2.95) years. They reported that it associated the risk of having casual unprotected sex with the following circumstances: homosexuality and bisexuality, male gender, age at sexarche under 17, and a history of having STI previously. They concluded in their analysis that it is necessary to implement sex education programs and that university students decrease precautions about STI.
In 2018, Santangelo et al. (13) assessed STI and sexual risk behavior among Italian health students. Then, 1022 respondents were analyzed, most women and aged between 18 and 22 years. In the multivariate analysis, men were at greater risk of not knowing about the HPV vaccine; the age group between 18 and 22 years had a higher chance of not being sufficiently informed about how to avoid contagion, of remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, The copyright holder has placed this this version posted February 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.11.21250842 doi: medRxiv preprint never having had serological tests, of not knowing the HPV vaccine, and not knowing that they can use the HPV vaccine in men. The authors concluded that it is necessary to implement programs to increase knowledge about STI and promote health, including young adults who have not entered universities.

CONCLUSIONS:
There are knowledge gaps in adolescents and young adult university students in the health area about STI. Besides, students from the first semesters of the courses and, in particular, students from a public educational institution, had an inferior performance in the applied questionnaire. As for age and gender, there were no significant changes. These findings are essential for schools and graduation institutions to develop educational and awareness strategies to mitigate STI risks among students. Thus, the discussion on addressing the theme of Sexually Transmitted Infections in the curriculum, especially in the first stages of the courses, is mandatory.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, The copyright holder has placed this this version posted February 13, 2021. ; O V  E  R  A  L  L  N  U  M  B  E  R  A  N  D  P  E  R  C  E  N  T  I  L  E  O  F  C  O  R  R  E  C  T  A  N  S  W  E  R  S  P  E  R  Q  U  E  S  T  I  O  N  N  =  4   remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, The copyright holder has placed this this version posted February 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.11.21250842 doi: medRxiv preprint