Sodium intake and high blood pressure among adults on caloric restriction: a multi-year cross-sectional analysis of the U.S. Population, 2007-2018

Aim: Small studies have shown reduced sodium sensitivity of blood pressure in obese adolescents on caloric restriction. However, no study at the population level has studied such an effect. We aimed to explore the association between mean daily sodium intake and prevalent hypertension among a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults on caloric restriction who participated in the National Health Examination and Nutrition Survey over the last twelve years. Methods and Results: We used a design-based regression model to explore the association between sodium intake and prevalent hypertension. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using multiple imputation chained equations and propensity score matching. We also measured the effect of a binary exposure derived from two widely recommended thresholds of sodium intake: 2.3 and 5.0 grams per day. Among 5,756 individuals, we did not detect any significant association between increased sodium and the odds of hypertension (OR: 0.97; CI 95%: 0.90; 1.05). All our sensitivity analyses are consistent with our main findings. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that people on caloric restriction, a component of healthy weight loss, would see no benefit in reducing sodium intake to lower blood pressure. These results highlight the need to explore new population-specific strategies for sodium intake reduction, including new dietary prescription approaches to improve dietary adherence and reduce the risk associated with sodium-deficient diets.


Introduction 1
Hypertension causes more death and disability than any other risk factor globally, ahead of 2 smoking, high glucose, and obesity. Nearly 10.4 million deaths worldwide were attributable to 3 elevated blood pressure in 2017. 1 Ambard and Beaujard theorized a potential association between salt 4 consumption and hypertension as early as 1904. However, contradictory evidence from observational 5 studies using low-salt diets led to an intense debate that lasted more than a century. 2 Only recently, 6 well-designed clinical trials provided reliable answers. The Dietary Approaches to Stop 7 Hypertension-Sodium (DASH-Na) trial concluded that "blood pressure can be lowered … by 8 reducing the sodium intake." 3 Long-term cohort studies support the DASH-Na trial findings. 4 9 The precise mechanisms that cause dietary sodium to modulate blood pressure levels are not 10 well defined, which often translates to uncertainty about who would benefit from such interventions. 11 Past studies have shown the role of specific modifiers like ethnicity, even at the molecular level. 5 12 However, we know much less about the role of energy balance-the equilibrium between calories 13 consumed and calories burned through physical activity 6 -as a modifier of "salt sensitivity" of blood 14 pressure. 15 Energy balance is arguably a more critical modifier than diet or exercise on their own. After 16 all, we reach metabolic tipping points that enable our bodies to regulate blood pressure through the 17 additive interaction of energy intake and energy expenditure. 7,8 Current studies lack this holistic 18 understanding and, as a result, present somehow conflictive evidence. For instance, a reanalysis of the 19 DASH-Na data found less energy intake associated with increased salt sensitivity. 9 Similarly, a 20 community-based study in China found that participants in the highest quartile of physical activity 21 had reduced salt sensitivity compared to the lowest quartile. However, there was not a linear 22 association across quartiles. 10 23 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 4 Caloric restriction and fitness are recommended to prevent or control hypertension. 11,12 The 1 current European and American hypertension guidelines recommend a reduced sodium intake on top 2 of that. 13,14 However, it is not clear if patients would benefit from reducing sodium in their diet once 3 they are on an energy deficit. Caloric restriction-a negative energy balance-reduces blood pressure 4 levels through improved insulin sensitivity, reduced adiposity, and reduced sympathetic activity, 5 independent of reaching an ideal body weight. 15,16 These mechanisms might also play a role in 6 modulating the salt sensitivity of blood pressure. 12,17 Studies that induced weight loss have modified 7 the relationship between sodium and blood pressure. However, they used small samples and are 8 outdated. 16,18 9 In the present work, we used a design-based regression model to explore the association 10 between mean daily sodium intake and prevalent hypertension among U.S. adults on caloric 11 restriction in the National Health Examination and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) from 2007 to 2018. 12 Methods 13 Data source, Design, and Study Population 14 We used publicly available data from NHANES, a cross-sectional four-stage stratified cluster 15 complex survey, representative of the non-institutionalized United States population. NHANES 16 gathers lifestyle and medical information, along with biological samples and a physical examination. 17 Readers can find relevant description design and sampling procedures associated with this survey 18 elsewhere. 19 The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and it is covered by item 7. 10 is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 Analytic sample and study variables 1 We included adults aged 20-79 years from six two-year cycles (2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018) with an energy 2 deficit of at least -350 calories per day. We chose this cut-off to correct potential underreporting from 3 self-reported dietary data. 20 We derived energy balance from its two essential components: energy 4 input (mean daily intake) and energy output (basal metabolic rate plus physical activity). 6 The basal 5 metabolic rate was calculated using the revised Harris-Benedict equations. 21 Self-reported weekly 6 vigorous and moderate physical activity was transformed into daily metabolic equivalents following 7 NHANES' suggested scores. 22 NHANES derives the total daily intake from two 24-hour recall 8 interviews, 3 to 10 days apart, using a validated instrument to reduce recall bias. 23 We did not exclude 9 participants with invalid or missing answers for physical activity; instead, we used their basal 10 metabolic rate as total output. 11 We excluded pregnant women and participants with body mass index (BMI) below 18.5 12 (malnutrition) or an active thyroid pathology due to inherent metabolic differences in these patients. 13 Adults over the age of 80 were excluded because their age is not publicly available due to privacy 14 concerns. We also excluded people who reported a "much less than usual" intake during either 15 interview. 16 The primary outcome was hypertension, a binary variable indicating one of the following: 17 self-reported use of antihypertensive medication or systolic hypertension (mean systolic blood 18 pressure ≥ 130 mmHg) or diastolic hypertension (diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mmHg). 11 Individuals 19 without a second valid measurement for either systolic (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 20 excluded to avoid measurement error. 21 The exposure was self-reported mean consumption of sodium (grams per day) as a continuous 22 measure. Two additional binary variables were derived for our sensitivity analyses (described later). 23 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 Other covariates included demographic data (age, gender, education, income, and ethnicity), pre-1 existing diseases (diabetes and obesity), and smoking. 24 We excluded "Refused," "Don't know," and 2 "Missing" values for demographic variables. However, for diabetes, we required respondents to 3 provide a definitive "Yes." The details of the analytic data creation process are shown in Figure 1. the variables under consideration. Given we already restricted the sample by energy balance, we 7 minimized bias adjusting for age, diabetes, education, ethnicity, gender, energy expenditure, BMI,8 and smoking status based solely on Pearls' backdoor criterion. 25 Serum sodium and the renin-9 angiotensin-aldosterone system (unmeasured) were assumed mediators. Other unmeasured variables 10 include alcohol consumption and fat accumulation. 11 [ Figure 2] 12 Primary Analysis

13
We compared individuals' characteristics by hypertension status (yes/no) using survey-14 featured t-tests for continuous variables and the Rao-Scott F-adjusted χ 2 test for categorical 15 variables. 26 We combined the survey weights from our six cross-sectional subsamples following 16 NHANES recommendations 19 and built our design using all survey features, subsetting only the 17 eligible sample. We estimated the Odds Ratio (OR) and respective confidence intervals (CI 95%) 18 using a design-based multivariate logistic regression (hereafter referred to as the 'outcome model'), 19 adjusting for the variables selected based on Pearls' backdoor criterion as described above. 20 We probed interactions between sodium intake and the other covariates using Bauer's 21 inferential and graphical techniques 27 based on findings from the previous literature. 9 Collinearity was 22 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 assessed via variance inflation factors (VIF) and classified following the recommendations by 1 Belsley. 28 2 The goodness of fit for all models was evaluated using weighted ROC curves and the  Lemeshow test. 29,30 All 95% confidence intervals (CI) and Cox-Snell pseudo-R 2 account for both the 4 survey design and day-to-day dietary intake variations. 19,31,32 5 Sensitivity Analyses 6 Missing data 7 As missing completely at random assumption may not be realistic, we applied the multivariate 8 imputation by chained equation method. 33,34 We imputed 20 datasets under the missing at random 9 assumption using all the variables from our primary analysis model as predictors for the imputation 10 model. Rubin's rules were used to pool the estimates together. 34 11 Binary exposure based on recommended thresholds 12 We transformed the exposure in our outcome model to a binary variable. First, we used the 13 threshold of ≥ 2.3 g/day to classify exposure as "high" or "low," following the maximum sodium 14 intake recommendations in current European and American hypertension guidelines. 13,14 Then, we 15 used a threshold of ≥ 5.0 g/day, the daily sodium intake recommended by the World Health 16 Organization, 35 using the same specifications described below. 17 We performed the analysis with both the complete-case dataset and the imputed datasets, 18 pooling the estimates as described above. We also matched the probability of being exposed to "high" 19 or "low" sodium intake using propensity scores for both thresholds. We performed a 1:1 nearest 20 neighbour match (without replacement) on the propensity score's logit with a 0.2 calliper. 36 We 21 modelled the exposure using our original covariates-cycle and survey features were also covariates 22 following Dugoff's method 37 -to achieve adequate standardized mean difference balance (SMD < 23 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 0.2). The survey-featured outcome model was used to estimate the population average treatment 1 effect from the matched subsample. Again, the exposure was binary ("high" vs. "low"). 2 All statistical analyses were performed using R 4.0.3; 38 the code is available on request. 3 Results 4 Study sample characteristics 5 We evaluated a total of 5,756 individuals, representing a U.S. national population of 6 53,036,129. The weighted prevalence of hypertension in our sample was 42.6%. On average, 7 hypertensive individuals were significantly more likely to be male, older, diabetic, and overweight or 8 obese. Hypertensive and non-hypertensive people also differed significantly in ethnicity and smoking 9 history, but not education or daily total energy expenditure. Sodium intake did not significantly differ 10 by hypertension status (Table 1). 11 [ Table 1] 12 Association between mean daily sodium intake and prevalent hypertension 13 A one-gram increase in daily sodium intake did not significantly correlate with higher odds of 14 hypertension in the U.S. population on caloric restriction. The estimate was imprecise around the null 15 in both the crude (OR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.93; 1.03) and adjusted models (Table 2). We did not find any 16 significant interaction between the exposure and other covariates. Multicollinearity was "near weak" 17 for all independent variables (VIF < 2.5). 18 [ Table 2] 19 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 Sensitivity analysis 1 Multiple imputations for missing data 2 Data for moderate and vigorous physical activity was missing for 30% of the sample. Other 3 sampling variables with lower proportions of missing data were calorie intake (9%), height (8%), and 4 the derived BMI (8%). Model variables with missingness were mean sodium intake (9%) and 5 education (40.8%). Each imputed dataset contained approximately 6,326 observations. The estimate 6 and confidence intervals were equal to that of the primary analysis (OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.90; 1.05) 7 (Table 2). 8 Sodium intake of ≥ 2.3 g/day 9 Consuming 2.3 grams of sodium per day or more was not significantly associated with higher 10 hypertension odds in either the complete-case or imputed data analyses. Although both estimates 11 found a different effect, they were imprecise around the significance threshold. Hence, we failed to 12 find an association (Table 3). 13 The final propensity score for the probability of being exposed to higher amounts of sodium 14 was estimated using age, gender, ethnicity, education, BMI (categorical), history of diabetes, history 15 of smoking, energy expenditure, and survey features. After propensity-score matching, a total of 16 2,808 participants-representing a U.S. population of 24,340,468-were matched. Matching reduced 17 the SMD to < 0.1 for all covariates, except for total daily energy expenditure (SMD = 0.27). Our 18 outcome model corrected any remaining imbalances. The results, again, could not support an 19 association between exposure and outcome (OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.77; 1.27) (Table 3). 20 [ Table 3] 21 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 Sodium intake of ≥ 5.0 g/day 1 When the threshold for "high" sodium intake was 5 grams per day or more, the estimates did 2 not change significantly for either the complete-case or the multiple imputation pool estimated. The 3 lack of association, however, was accompanied by wider confidence intervals (Table 4). 4 We estimated the probability of being exposed to "high" sodium levels using the same model 5 for both thresholds. A total of 926 participants-representing a U.S. population of 9,559,626-were 6 matched by their propensity score. The SMD for all covariates was balanced (< 0.17). The binary 7 outcome model showed no association between exposure and outcome ( Our analysis of a multi-year nationally representative sample of U.S. adults on caloric 12 restriction did not detect any significant association between increased sodium consumption levels 13 and the odds of hypertension (OR: 0.97; CI 95%: 0.90; 1.05). Our survey-featured logistic regression 14 was adjusted by age, gender, ethnicity, education, BMI, diabetes, smoking, and total daily energy 15 expenditure. Several sensitivity analyses yielded similar results, including those that analyzed two 16 widely recommended sodium intake thresholds (≥2.3 and ≥ 5.0 grams per day). These results cement 17 the need to target low-sodium interventions appropriately given its associated risks. 39,40 18 Contextualizing the evidence 19 Very few studies had been able to identify a representative sample of participants on caloric 20 restriction, commonly identified through healthy weight loss. Our findings suggest that people on 21 caloric restriction would see no benefit in reducing sodium in their diet to lower blood pressure. 22 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021.
These findings apply to the general U.S. adults and other populations with similar characteristics. Our 1 findings align with previous reports in obese adolescents, who lost their "sensitivity of blood pressure 2 to sodium" following a 20-week intervention to lose weight (through caloric restriction). 18 3 Caloric restriction lowers blood pressure levels independent of other factors; it decreases body 4 fat and, consequentially, increases insulin sensitivity. 41 Insulin modulates the renal absorption of 5 sodium. As a result, people on caloric restriction excrete more sodium than those in a caloric surplus, 6 which might explain the loss of sodium sensitivity in these patients. 42 Such effects can be seen within 7 hours of fasting and had been recently hypothesized as mechanisms that regulate blood pressure 8 levels in healthy and sick individuals. 17,43,44 While these are acute effects, other cardiometabolic 9 benefits of caloric restriction appear to be long-lasting. 15 We highlight the need for a tailored 10 approach for blood pressure control in this specific subpopulation. Laxer sodium intake 11 recommendations for these patients could help mitigate the potential low adherence to a low sodium 12 diet and its associated adverse effects (e.g. increased risk of death). 39,40,45 They could also reduce the 13 complexity of dietary interventions and increase their palatability, which is paramount to improving 14 adherence and achieving successful weight reduction. 46 15 Strengths and limitations 16 Our study benefited from using a population-level sample, with an adequate representation of 17 people from diverse ethnicities, ages, and socioeconomic characteristics. Our analysis used survey 18 features, which allowed us to generalize our findings to all the non-institutional U.S. adult population 19 going through a healthy weight loss. We restricted our sample to participants on caloric restriction, 20 therefore addressing the ambiguities of metabolically healthy obese patients and lean people who 21 exhibit obese-like characteristics (dyslipidemia, altered inflammatory profile, and increased fat cell 22 size). 47,48 Rarely do hypertension studies account for such ambiguity. Our findings were robust under 23 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 the missing at random assumption and to adjustments to the exposure to recommended intake levels 1 by American and European current guidelines and the World Health Organization guidelines. 2 Our study has several limitations. We used self-reported data for energy intake, prone to 3 measurement bias and underreporting. While our selected threshold 20 for energy balance accounts for 4 such underreporting, this measurement error is not systematic. We further tried to minimize bias by 5 only including the observations marked as reliable by NHANES-providing a detailed description of 6 each food, including the amount, additional ingredients, and eating occasions-and excluding all 7 participants reporting a less than usual intake. NHANES interviewers also double-check to elicit 8 forgotten foods, and the survey weights account for variation between weekends and weekdays. 49 9 We also used self-reported sodium consumption instead of the 24-hour urinary collection 10 (considered by many as the gold standard). We made this decision based on two arguments. Firstly, 11 the Automated Multiple-Pass Method employed by NHANES provides reliable sodium and intake 12 measures. 23 Secondly, the hypothesized underlying mechanism (increased sodium retention) requires 13 us to measure intake and not excretion. 14 Self-reported data for moderate and vigorous activity is not as reliable as objectively measured 15 physical activity. 50 If people reported more than 24 hours of physical and sedentary activity, 16 NHANES analysts set those values to missing. We dealt with this first with two methods. Firstly, we 17 took a conservative sampling (including the BMR as total energy expenditure whenever data was not 18 available meant that participants who reported high activity levels were considered sedentary). 19 Secondly, we used multiple imputations procedures under the assumption that these data, although 20 not missing at random, could be predicted using the available variables. 33 Statistically, there were no 21 significant differences between the estimates obtained by either method. However, the direction of the 22 effect changed with multiple imputations in both thresholds. Such a change of direction might reflect 23 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 the effect of the omitted physical activity in the complete-case sample. Nevertheless, the difference 1 was not statistically significant. Finally, our cross-sectional design did not allow us to establish a 2 temporal relationship between exposure and outcome. It's feasible for people to modify their diet to 3 cope with their disease. 4

Conclusion 5
Our findings showed that sodium intake was not associated with higher odds of hypertension 6 among the U.S. population on caloric restriction. Our results were robust to missing data and different 7 representations of the exposure, disputing a low-salt diet's benefits for people who achieve weight 8 loss and maintain it using caloric restriction. These results highlight the need to explore new 9 population-specific strategies for sodium intake reduction, including new dietary prescription 10 approaches that improve adherence and reduce the risk associated with deficient sodium diets. 11 Disclosure 12 Funding: none declared. 13

Conflict of interest: Dr. Karim reports grants from BC SUPPORT Unit, grants from Michael 14 Smith Foundation for Health Research, grants from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research 15
Council of Canada, personal fees from Biogen Inc., outside the submitted work. 16 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.27.20248919 doi: medRxiv preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021.  ; 1989;321:580-585. 23 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 through a test for signal-to-noise. J Econom 1982;20:211-253. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. Sodium intake, life expectancy, and all-cause mortality. Eur Heart J 2020; 21 46. Åberg G, Edman G, Rössner S. Perceived hunger, palatability, and adherence: A comparison of 22 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020   and elevated blood pressure. Considering our energy balance restriction, age, gender, ethnicity, 6 education, income, and total intake act as confounders. We achieved sufficient adjustment by 7 controlling age, diabetes, education, ethnicity, gender, energy expenditure, body mass index, and 8 smoking status. Fat accumulation, alcohol, and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are 9 unmeasured variables. Serum sodium and RAAS are mediators. The figure was drawn using the web-10 version of DAGitty. 11 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/2020.12.27 1 2 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020  1 2 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 26 Table 3. Survey-featured multivariable logistic regression model for the relationship between "high" and "low" daily 1 sodium intake (threshold: ≥ 2.3 grams per day) and hypertension among U.S. adults in caloric restriction, aged 20-79 2 (National Health andNutrition Examination Survey 2007-2018, complete- * Matched by exposure on 2,808 observations (1:1) using all adjustment variables plus survey features as covariates.
Caloric restriction was defined as an energy balance equal to or below -350 Kcal on an average day. Systolic and diastolic hypertension were defined as mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure values of ≥ 130 mmHg and ≥ 80 mmHg, respectively. Hypertension was defined as either systolic or diastolic hypertension or self-reported use of hypertensive medication. CI: Confidence intervals using sample weights provided by NHANES (account for sampling design and dietary variation), strata, and unit.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020 28 Table 4. Survey-featured multivariable logistic regression model for the relationship between "high" and "low" daily 1 sodium intake (threshold: . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/2020.12.27.20248919 doi: medRxiv preprint 31 Figure 2.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 2, 2021. ; https://doi.org /10.1101/10. /2020