A comparison of pain registration by Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale – a cross-sectional study of primary triage registration

Pain is a subjective sensation; self-reporting is important for quantifying pain intensity. There are several different validated tools for this, such as Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale. In the clinic, these terms are often used as equivalent. The objective of this study was to examine correlation and agreement between the pain registration tools in triage in an emergency department.The study was performed in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Haukeland University Hospital in the period June-August 2019. We registered the pain score with two tools in 200 unselected patients in emergency admission with pain. In addition, we registrered gender, age, triage and general department affiliation.We found a strong correlation between the pain registration tools by Spearmans correlation test (rho=0,930, p<0,001). There were no significant difference between the pain registration tools within the subgroups. Bland-Altman analysis show agreement between the two pain registration tools.In an Emergency Department triage is it acceptable to use Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale as equivalent, as long as the correct terminology is used.


4
The objective of this study was to examine correlation and agreement between 5 5 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted November 4, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.03.20225367 doi: medRxiv preprint 3 VAS and NRS score in patients admitted with pain to an emergency department in 5 6 Norway.

9
We performed a cross-sectional study of pain in primary triage registration at the nurse had finished the triage, the patients were asked to participate in a study. After 6 5 oral approval, the patient was again scored with VAS. We used a horizontal VAS-6 6 ruler (0-100 mm) with the endpoints "no pain" to the left and "worst thinkable pain" to the right. The patient graded their pain with a moveable plastic marker to 6 8 their pain level. We transcribed the value in mm and converted to the closest 6 9 integer (0-10). The following variables were registered on paper: VAS, NRS, 7 0 gender, age, triage and general department affiliation.

1
The target population were patients with pain in triage in the Emergency

2
Department. We made a general estimation in advance on the number of patients to 7 3 include, based on presumed sufficient material and a general achivable number. were excluded. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 years, lack of competence to 7 6 consent, cognitive failure as well as lack of lingual or motor skills.

7
The study included patients after informed oral consent. We have in our study 7 8 design refrained from written informed consent to reduce the amount of registered 7 9 personal information. The patient information was anonymized immediately after . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted November 4, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.03.20225367 doi: medRxiv preprint 4 We predefined a null hypothesis of no significant difference between VAS and used for the subgroup analyses between VAS and NRS for gender (female/male),  (rho = 0,93) show strong correlation between VAS and NRS value (p < 0,001).  The strength of this study is that pain was reported by VAS short time after NRS 1 0 3 by standardized questions in such a way that the information to the patient group 1 0 4 was the same. The data collection was in daytime and evening in an un-selected 1 0 5 patient group to ensure a more representative material. The study has some limitations. Presenting VAS short time after NRS may fact that this is a study, with risk of patients attempting to answer the same. All patients were presented to NRS before VAS, where the triage nurse collected NRS- value while the VAS-value was collected by two medical students. We do only 1 1 1 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted November 4, 2020. easier to perform than VAS (2,9). The results of this study do not establish that the correlation between VAS and NRS (10, 11).

8
There are conflicting studies on the agreement between NRS and VAS (1, 5, 6, 7, interchangeable. NRS being noted as VAS will not cause errors in the clinic but we 1 2 4 would advocate the use of proper terminology. The study shows a strong statistical correlation and a good agreement for reported 1 2 8 scores between VAS and NRS. In an Emergency Department triage is it acceptable 1 2 9 to use Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale as equivalent, as long as the 1 3 0 correct terminology is used. Ethics approval and consent to participate 1 3 8 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted November 4, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2020 The study was approved by the Data Protection Officer of the Hospital and the 1 3 9 Regional Ethics Board of Western Norway, approval REK Vest (2019/484). Patients were included by oral consent to limit registered personal information in 1 4 2 accordance with the Data Protection Officer and the Regional Ethics Committee. The data in anonymized form is included as supplementary data. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The article costs is funded by University of Bergen grants to MB.    . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted November 4, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10. 1101/2020