COVID-19 and HIV co-infection: a living systematic evidence map of 1 current research 2

21 The world currently faces two ongoing devastating pandemics. These are the new severe 22 acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2/coronavirus disease 2019 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-23 19) and the prior human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome 24 (HIV/AIDS) pandemics. The literature regarding the confluence of these global plagues 25 expands at pace. A systematic search of the literature considering COVID-19 and HIV co-26 infection was performed. 27 After five months, from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were at least thirty-28 five studies reported from thirteen countries. These ranged from individual case reports and 29 series to cohort studies. Based on studies that could be extrapolated to the general population, 30 co-infected individuals with suppressed HIV viral loads did not have disproportionate 31 COVID-19 sickness and death. At least four patients, newly diagnosed with HIV recovered 32 from COVID-19. Current evidence suggests that co-infected patients should be treated like 33 the general population. 34 This ongoing living systematic evidence map of contemporary primary SARS-CoV-2 and 35 HIV co-infection research provides a platform for researchers, policy makers, clinicians and 36 others to more quickly discover and build relevant insights.


Introduction
The confluence of the ongoing new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2/coronavirus disease 2019 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) and prior human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) pandemics presents profound challenges for public health.[1,2] On 31 December 2019, a pneumonia cluster of unknown cause was reported to the World Health Organization.[3] This report foreshadowed the emergence of a new pandemic.Due to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, scientific research has been growing very fast.[4] We thus sought to provide an updated systematic curation and key insights from literature on co-infection with the pandemic viruses.

Methods
Two independent reviewers (GM and WM) searched the following databases: PubMed (via the PubMed/MEDLINE interface), the Scientific Electronic Library Online, Scopus (via the EBSCO interface), African Journals OnLine, and the pre-print server MedRxiv (using key words).
The Boolean search approach, for 2020 literature, (COVID* OR SARS-CoV-2 OR severe acute respiratory syndrome OR coronavirus OR corona virus) AND (HIV OR AIDS OR human immunodeficiency virus), was used for each database (PubMed search strategy).The last online database searches were on 3rd June 2020.Searches were supplemented by a hand search of references and by use of the 'cited by' feature of Google Scholar.Inclusion criteria included primary studies reporting individuals with co-infection.Exclusion criteria included editorials, commentaries and reviews.
All records that were identified from the searches were collated into EndNote software.
Duplicates were removed.The screening of titles, abstracts and full-texts were performed, .guided by the criteria described earlier.An HIV clinician (DSvZ) acted as the third reviewer and provided domain specific insights.

Discussion
This brief evidence map provides an up-to-date overview of the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS co-infection literature.Its strengths include the use of explicit search criteria and the provision of a supplementary appendix providing key summaries of the studies on the topic.Although there was no search language restriction, only English language studies were retrieved, which raises the possibility of bias.
The finding that darunavir is likely to be ineffective at preventing COVID-19 in people living with HIV is in keeping with the finding that lopinavir-ritonavir did not provide benefit in the treatment of COVID-19.[41] This suggests that existing HIV therapy regimens should not be switched in patients with SARS-CoV-2 co-infection to protease inhibitor based medication.
It is interesting to note that reports emerged from countries in a similar temporal sequence in concert with how the COVID-19 pandemic epicentre moved from Asia, then to Europe and then to the Americas.The current global burden of COVID-19 approximates, to an extent, the amount of co-infection literature from the respective continents.To the best of our knowledge, there are no reported cases of co-infection from Oceania, which has the lowest number of COVID-19 cases.Africa which has a substantial burden of HIV/AIDS, but a relatively low COVID-19 burden has reports of two patients.[1,34,36] The interaction with opportunistic infections like tuberculosis and pneumocystis jirovecii merits further consideration.[12] As therapies for COVID-19 emerge, drug interactions mandate exploration.Along with mental health aspects associated with co-infection.Pregnant women represent a special population.[42] As far as we know, no co-infection case has been reported during pregnancy.Because literature is expanding at pace, this synthesis is envisaged to be living and will be updated regularly and with more detail.Due to the rapidly .expanding literature [4] such brief evidence synthesis pieces provide a platform for researchers, policy makers, clinicians and others to quickly discover and build relevant insights.

Conclusion
Based on studies that could be extrapolated to the general population, co-infected individuals with suppressed HIV viral loads did not have disproportionate COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.At least four patients, newly diagnosed with HIV survived COVID-19.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Monthly number of papers reporting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus