International Journal of Epidemiology peer reviewers: global and gender distribution

The science of epidemiology studies and analyses the patterns, distributions and determinants of health-related entities. Peer review is crucial to the biomedical journal ecosystem. Furthermore, gender inequality persists in science and improving gender representation is a key international goal. For these reasons, we evaluated the geographical location and gender distribution of the International Journal of Epidemiology peer reviewers for 2018. There were 695 peer reviewers hailing from 41 countries. 77% (533) of the reviewers were from 20% (8) of these countries, a classical 80:20 Pareto distrubution. 41% (282) of peer reviewers were female. Although in line with the general underrepresentation of females reported in the literature, this proportion was much closer to parity than in other fields. Our investigation of peer reviewer 'epidemiology' demonstrates geographical and gender inequalities that can be further improved since diversity promotes innovation and a greater possibility for solving complex problems.

*Correspondence: parturitions@gmail.com CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 19, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020 2 Abstract 21 The science of epidemiology studies and analyses the patterns, distributions and determinants 22 of health-related entities. Peer review is crucial to the biomedical journal ecosystem.

23
Furthermore, gender inequality persists in science and improving gender representation is a 24 key international goal. For these reasons, we evaluated the geographical location and gender CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 19, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.14.20101964 doi: medRxiv preprint 3 The science of epidemiology studies and analyses the patterns, distributions and determinants 42 of health-related entities. [1] The International Journal of Epidemiology (IJE) content is a 43 valuable resource that keeps readers abreast of the latest advances in this field. [2] Peer 44 reviewers are vital to the biomedical journal ecosystem. [3] We studied and analysed the 45 'epidemiology' of IJE peer reviewers using 2018 data (Figure 1). [4] 46 47 48 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

61
The greater proportion of referees from high-income countries is determined by availability 62 of more research funding, better access to reliable census and mortality data, more possibilty 63 of protected time to do research and greater facility with the English language. [4] 64 Because gender inequality exists in science, we also considered peer reviewer gender. [6] We 65 used https://gender-api.com/, the largest online resource that determines gender based on first 66 name. This was supplemented by ascertaining gender from internet searches for reviewer 67 biographical and photographic information. We found that 41% (282) of peer reviewers were 68 female. Although in line with the general underrepresentation of females reported in the 69 literature, this proportion was much closer to parity than in other fields. [6] Promoting gender 70 equity is a key aspect of the international Sustainable Development Goals. [7] 71 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 19, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020 It is worth noting that one reviewer could have performed multiple reviews and our analysis 72 did not take this into account. In addition, reviewer numbers were absolute counts and not 73 relative to a country's population.

74
Our concise investigation of IJE peer reviewer 'epidemiology' allows a baseline from which 75 geographical and gender representation can be further improved. Greater diversity promotes 76 innovation and a higher possibility for solving complex problems. [8]