NON-WHITE ETHNICITY, MALE SEX, AND HIGHER BODY MASS INDEX, BUT NOT MEDICATIONS ACTING ON THE RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM ARE ASSOCIATED WITH CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) HOSPITALISATION: REVIEW OF THE FIRST 669 CASES FROM THE UK BIOBANK

Background: Cardiometabolic morbidity and medications, specifically Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs), have been linked with adverse outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aims to investigate factors associated with COVID-19 positivity for the first 669 UK Biobank participants; compared with individuals who tested negative, and with the untested, presumed negative, rest of the population. Methods: We studied 1,474 participants from the UK Biobank who had been tested for COVID-19. Given UK testing policy, this implies a hospital setting, suggesting at least moderate to severe symptoms. We considered the following exposures: age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, ACEi/ARB use, prior myocardial infarction (MI), and smoking. We undertook comparisons between: 1) COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 tested negative participants; and 2) COVID-19 tested positive and the remaining participants (tested negative plus untested, n=501,837). Logistic regression models were used to investigate univariate and mutually adjusted associations. Results: Among participants tested for COVID-19, non-white ethnicity, male sex, and greater BMI were independently associated with COVID-19 positive result. Non-white ethnicity, male sex, greater BMI, diabetes, hypertension, prior MI, and smoking were independently associated with COVID-19 positivity compared to the remining cohort (test negatives plus untested). However, similar associations were observed when comparing those who tested negative for COVID-19 with the untested cohort; suggesting that these factors associate with general hospitalisation rather than specifically with COVID-19. Conclusions: Among participants tested for COVID-19 with presumed moderate to severe symptoms in a hospital setting, non-white ethnicity, male sex, and higher BMI are associated with a positive result. Other cardiometabolic morbidities confer increased risk of hospitalisation, without specificity for COVID-19. Notably, ACE/ARB use did not associate with COVID-19 status.


INTRODUCTION
Coronavirus disease 2019 , the clinical illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has reached pandemic levels 1 . There has been growing recognition that patients with underlying cardiometabolic morbidities may be suffering higher rates of infection and a more severe disease course than the general population [2][3][4] . Debate has ensued regarding whether these observations relate to the conditions themselves or the medications with which they are treated. In particular, some have suggested a mechanistic role for Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) 5 . However, recent reports have not produced convincing evidence for the specific association of ACEi/ARBs with poorer outcomes [5][6][7] .
Cardiometabolic diseases are common and ACEi/ARBs are used by many vulnerable patients. It is therefore important to better understand the augmented risk associated with cardiometabolic factors and ACEi/ARB use with COVID-19, to inform clinical practice, and guidance to patients.
The UK Biobank (UKB) is a large cohort study comprising data from 500,000 participants from across the UK, characterised in detail at baseline (2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010), and with linkages to Hospital Episode Statistic (HES) data enabling prospective tracking of health outcomes. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the UKB facilitated rapid release of data on COVID-19 testing for its participants, providing a unique opportunity to study the effects of many well-defined exposures on COVID-19 status. Given the contemporary UK government policy that limits COVID-19 testing to those presenting to hospital with symptoms suspicious of COVID-19, this is presumed to imply symptomatology severe enough to warrant admission to, and testing in, hospital.
The aim of this study is to examine the first-released data from the UKB to establish the association between COVID-19 positivity and demographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity), cardiometabolic factors [body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, prior myocardial infarction (MI), smoking], and ACEi/ARB use.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020

Setting and study population
UKB is a nation-wide prospective cohort study including >500,000 participants from across the UK.
Individuals aged 40-69 years old identified via National Health Service (NHS) registers were recruited over a four-year period between 2006-2010. Participants underwent detailed baseline assessment including characterisation of socio-demographics, lifestyle, medical history, and a series of physical measures. The protocol is publicly available 8 . Linkages with HES data permit longitudinal tracking of health outcomes for all participants with conditions recorded according to international classification of disease (ICD) codes. In addition, UKB has produced algorithmically defined outcome data for incidence of key illness, such as MI, through integration of data from multiple sources 9 . The latest update of the COVID-19 data includes test results from 16/03/2020 to 14/04/2020. During this time period, the UK had moved away from community testing and was almost exclusively testing for COVID-19 in hospital settings. Thus, the UKB COVID-19 cohort in this time period comprises participants who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 whilst admitted to hospital, and therefore are likely to have a relatively severe presentation.  The cardiometabolic and demographic   factors were selected based on existing reports of their potential association with COVID-19 outcomes 4,10,11 . ACEi/ARBs were considered due to reports of potential mechanistic role of these medications in the clinical course of COVID-19 5 . We used age, sex, and ethnicity (white Caucasian vs non-white Caucasian) as recorded at baseline. BMI was calculated from height and weight recorded at baseline. Smoking status was based on self-report. Hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolaemia were defined through cross-checking across self-report and HES data. A list of ICD codes used is available in Supplementary Table 1. Information on prior MI was obtained from the UKB algorithmically defined health outcomes. ACEi/ARB use was determined from self-report (Supplementary Table 2). We created three cohorts: positives (test positive), confirmed negatives (test negative), and the remaining untested cohort ( Figure 1). We firstly compared the COVID-19 positive cohort with the combined cohort of COVID-19 test negative and the untested UKB population. In order to investigate possible bias relating to hospitalisation status, we also considered the importance of these exposure variables in two further comparisons: test positives vs test negatives and test negatives vs untested population. We used logistic regression models to elucidate univariate and then multivariate associations. There was no evidence of multicollinearity with inflation factor (VIF) <2.0 for all covariates. We present odds ratio (OR) for each exposure with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value.

Baseline characteristics
The 1,474 UKB participants that had been tested for COVID-19 in the first release of UKB COVID-19 data are included in this analysis (Table 1). Among those who were tested, 669 tested positive and 805 tested negative. There was no record of testing for the remainder of the UKB cohort (n=501,032); this untested population was therefore presumed negative ( Figure 1).
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020. In comparison to the untested cohort, the COVID-19 positive cohort were older, predominantly male (56.5%), and had a greater proportion of individuals with non-white ethnicities (14.6% vs 5.4%). They had an all-round poorer cardiometabolic profile, with higher BMI, and higher rates of smoking, prior MI, diabetes, hypertension and high cholesterol. They also reported greater use of ACEi/ARB agents (21.8% vs 14.2%). However, comparing the COVID-19 positive cohort with the tested negative cohort (n=805), the differences were much less pronounced, for the tested negative cohort also had a greater proportion of older individuals with a globally poorer cardiometabolic profile than the untested cohort.

COVID-19 positive vs not COVID-19 positive (tested negative cohort plus untested cohort)
We first tested whether there were univariate associations between exposures and COVID-19 positives (n=669) vs COVID-19 negatives (including both the tested negative cohort and the untested cohort, n=501,837). Univariate associations were significant for all covariates considered. In multivariate models, the independent predictors of COVID-19 positivity were older age, male sex, non-white ethnicity, greater BMI, diabetes, hypertension, prior MI, and smoking (Table 2, Figure 2).

COVID-19 positive vs COVID-19 tested negative
We next considered associations between exposures and COVID-19 positives (n=669) vs tested negative cohort (n=805). Within this sample, the univariate predictors of positivity were male sex, nonwhite ethnicity, and greater BMI. These variables remained statistically significant in the multivariate model with adjustment for all other covariates (Table 2, Figure 2 Figure 2). . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

COVID-19 tested negatives vs untested population
Finally, we investigated associations between the exposures and tested negatives (n=805) vs untested UKB population (n=501,032). There were significant univariate associations for all covariates considered. In the multivariate model, non-white ethnicity, higher BMI, hypertension, previous MI, and smoking were significant predictors of a having a negative test, and therefore of presenting to hospital, perhaps with respiratory symptoms, compared to not being tested (Table 2, Figure 2).

Summary of findings
In this analysis of the first release of 1,474 COVID-19 test results from the UKB, non-white ethnicity, male sex, greater BMI, diabetes, hypertension, prior MI and smoking were independently associated with COVID-19 positive test in comparison to rest of the cohort (tested negatives plus untested).
However, within the tested cohort, a positive result was more likely for men, those of non-white ethnicity, and with greater BMI. Indeed, when compared with the background population, the pattern of associations between exposures and COVID-19 positive was similar to that for COVID-19 test negative. These findings suggest that non-white ethnicity, male sex, and higher BMI have specific relevance to COVID-19, whilst the associations between COVID-19 positive and the remainder of the population reflect morbidities associated with general requirement for hospitalisation, without specificity to COVID-19. Furthermore, as testing was almost fully limited to hospitalised patients at this time, these associations relate specifically to the more severe end of the COVID-19 disease manifestations, requiring hospitalisation. Notably, ACEi/ARB usage was not associated with COVID-19 status.

Comparison with existing literature
With the rapid global spread of COVID-19, understanding the determinants of infection risk and severity is a priority. Differences in ethnic background are known to contribute to differences in patterns . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.10.20096925 doi: medRxiv preprint of a number of diseases, including influenza 12 , due to different genetic susceptibilities and environmental exposures 13 . In global surveillance data, disparities in COVID-19 mortality rates across different countries are striking, but the interpretation of this data is limited by widely differing testing policies, healthcare systems, resources, and infection control policies. In the UK, national audit data demonstrates as many as one-third of COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care are from black and minority ethnic backgrounds (BME); a rate which is disproportionate to BME's representation among the general UK population 14 . In our study, ethnicity appeared to have specific association with COVID-19 positive status that appeared independent from the often-quoted confounders of cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity that are known to be higher in prevalence in BME cohorts 15 . Having accounted for cardiometabolic morbidity, the possible explanations for this association remain numerous 16 , gravitating around both genetic and social factors: behavioural, cultural, and socioeconomic differences, including health-seeking behaviour and intergenerational cohabitation are all likely to play a role in the strong disparity observed in our study, providing key targets for both further research and public health policy.
Since the first reports emerging from China at the beginning of the outbreak, it has been widely recognized that males suffer higher rates of infection and poorer outcomes compared to females; with reported distributions of approximately three-fifths men and two-fifths women 17,18 . The reasons for this are unclear. Animal studies demonstrate, that in mice infected with SARS-CoV, oestrogen-deplete status either due to male gender or ovariectomy is associated with higher risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), indicating a possible protective role of oestrogen signalling 19 . Men are known to have higher burden of cardiovascular disease than women up to the perimenopausal years; and thus, lower cardiometabolic morbidity among women in the younger cohort has been postulated to contribute to better outcomes. However, we demonstrate that in our study population, the association between male sex and higher infection rates was independent of cardiometabolic disease. Furthermore, male sex appears significant in our sample comprising an older cohort with almost all women being post-menopause, indicating that sex-differential disparities in COVID-19 disease severity relate to . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.10.20096925 doi: medRxiv preprint factors other than immediate-term oestrogen exposure. Thus, our findings suggest that the higher risk of COVID-19 in men is not sufficiently explained by the oestrogen pathway or greater burden of cardiometabolic disease.
Obesity is a global health issue, rising in prevalence and public health burden in both developed and developing countries. Patients who suffer from obesity are known to be at increased risk of a number of conditions, including cardiometabolic and respiratory disease, contributing to a poor physiological reserve. It is already known that patients with obesity have worse outcomes from influenza infection 20,21 .
With the wealth of emerging research on COVID-19, concern has grown over the association between obesity and poor outcomes of infection 22 ; with studies consistently demonstrating higher rates of critical or intensive care requirement among individuals with higher BMI 23-25 . Similar to ethnicity, the relationship between obesity and severe infection must be isolated from the confounding of obesityrelated comorbidity. In our study, we demonstrate the distinct role of obesity from that of associated cardiometabolic diseases; with the major finding that obesity, and not its comorbidities, had independent and specific association with COVID-19 positivity. This is of important relevance, as mechanistic understanding of the reason behind this association may provide therapeutic insight. For example, obesity enhances risk of thrombosis, which has been a recent focus of interest given concern over a possible association between COVID-19 and prothrombotic intravascular coagulation 26 . The results of our study provide useful information for risk stratification of patients, highlight important avenues for further research, and emphasise the public health-level importance of continued targeting of obesity.
Several reports hypothesise potential mechanistic links between ACEi/ARB usage and adverse outcomes from COVID-19 5 . SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to exhibit specific tropism for the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor; by which means it enters the cells and establishes itself in the host 27 . The expression of ACE2 receptors in epithelial cells of the lung, intestine, kidney and endothelium may be increased in those treated with ACEi/ARBs, thereby facilitating entry and . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.10.20096925 doi: medRxiv preprint multisystem manifestations of COVID-19 28,29 . The relationship between COVID19 infection risk and use of ACEi/ARBs has been a matter of debate since the early days of the outbreak, but recent studies have revealed a lack of independent association when morbidity variables, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure and cardiometabolic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension were accounted for 5,6 . Findings from our sample are consistent with these later reports, demonstrating a univariate association with ACEi/ARB use which becomes non-significant after adjustment for cardiometabolic and demographic factors.

Strengths and Limitations
The UK Biobank is a comprehensive data source, incorporating a large sample with linkages to prospectively tracked health outcomes recorded in a standardised manner using ICD codes, enabling reliable and up-to-date definition of morbidities. The rapid release of COVID-19 testing data provides a huge opportunity to examine association of a large number of exposures with COVID-19 status and outcomes. As this was the very first release of this data, the COVID-19 positive caseload was low; this dataset is continuously updated and there may be opportunity in the future to consider a wider range of exposures in larger samples. The low number of COVID-19 cases reflects both the UK national testing policy, in accordance with which individuals not requiring hospital admission were not tested, and the novelty of the disease that precludes any sources of long-term data collection. Due to the observational study design, we cannot comment on causal relationships from the results, however, the prospective nature of the study ensures confident temporal separation of exposure and outcome. Finally, the aforementioned testing policy in act during the time of data collection presents a further limitation to the study. Individuals who were infected with COVID-19 will only have been tested if they were unwell enough to present to hospital; the 'positive' cohort thus mostly represents cases of moderate or high severity. Therefore, whilst this selective approach to testing allow inferences regarding associations with more severe manifestations of the disease, the results of the study may not be generalisable to asymptomatic, or only mildly symptomatic patients.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020

Conclusions
This work highlights specific associations of non-white ethnicity, male sex, and higher body mass index with COVID-19 positive status, which were independent of other demographic or cardiometabolic factors. More detailed characterisation of these associations in larger and more diverse cohorts is warranted, particularly with regards ethnicity. Investigation of potential biological pathways underlying these observed associations may provide insight into the mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 causes disease enabling more informed pursuit of potential therapeutic targets. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.10.20096925 doi: medRxiv preprint . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020.  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020.   . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 15, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.10.20096925 doi: medRxiv preprint