The importance of the timing of quarantine measures before symptom onset to prevent COVID-19 outbreaks - illustrated by Hong Kong's intervention model

Background: The rapid expansion of the current COVID-19 outbreak has caused a global pandemic but how quarantine-based measures can prevent or suppress an outbreak without other more intrusive interventions has not yet been determined. Hong Kong had a massive influx of travellers from mainland China, where the outbreak began, during the early expansion period coinciding with the Lunar New Year festival; however, the spread of the virus has been relatively limited even without imposing severe control measures, such as a full city lockdown. Understanding how quarantine measures in Hong Kong were effective in limiting community spread can provide us with valuable insights into how to suppress an outbreak. However, challenges exist in evaluating the effects of quarantine on COVID-19 transmission dynamics in Hong Kong due to the fact that the effects of border control have to be also taken into account. Methods: We have developed a two-layered susceptible-exposed-infectious-quarantined-recovered (SEIQR) meta-population model which can estimate the effects of quarantine on virus transmissibility after stratifying infections into imported and subsequent community infections, in a region closely connected to the outbreak's source. We fitted the model to both imported and local confirmed case data with symptom onset from 18 January to 29 February 2020 in Hong Kong, together with daily transportation data and the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 from Wuhan and mainland China. After model fitting, epidemiological parameters and the timing of the start of quarantine for infected cases were estimated. Results: The model estimated that the reproduction number of COVID-19 in Hong Kong was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.86), achieved through quarantining infected cases -0.57 days (95% CI, -4.21 - 3.88) relative to symptom onset, with an estimated incubation time of 5.43 days (95% CI, 1.30 - 9.47). However, if delaying the quarantine start by more than 1.43 days, the reproduction number would be greater than one, making community spread more likely. The model also determined the timing of the start of quarantine necessary in order to suppress an outbreak in the presence of population immunity. Conclusion: The results suggest that the early quarantine for infected cases before symptom onset is a key factor to prevent COVID-19 outbreak.

Introduction response level in Hong Kong, all infected individuals under quarantine will eventually be identified and isolated 32 in a hospital, and reported as confirmed cases, unless they show very mild or no symptoms, or test negative for 33 . How Hong Kong successfully prevented a community outbreak through quarantine measures while 34 avoiding a city lockdown thus offers us a useful perspective on determining intervention strategies for other 35 countries/regions. 36 37 Community acquired infections in Hong Kong were first detected immediately after infected travellers entered 38 Hong Kong from mainland China at the beginning of the Lunar New Year festival, which lasts for 7 days from 24 39 January to January 30 in 2020, and transmitted the disease. During the festival, more than one million travellers 40 (including Hong Kong residents) arrived in Hong Kong from mainland China in a single week [20,21]. As 41 in most other countries, border control and quarantine policies were implemented in order to stop the initial 42 spread of COVID-19 from Wuhan to Hong Kong. Up until 4 February 2020, when most of the border crossings 43 were closed, infected cases with a travel history from Wuhan or mainland China were reported almost daily and 44 community acquired infections were subsequently detected as well. [22]. Due to the increasing number of the 45 imported cases, starting on 28 January, travellers from mainland China meeting certain criteria were required to 46 undergo 14 days self-quarantine. Compulsory quarantine was applied to all travellers from mainland China from 47 8 February. Surprisingly, up until the end of February, the total number of confirmed cases remained quite low 48 without the exponential growth seen in many other countries, while public services such as public transportation 49 were still running and businesses, shops and restaurants remained open. Kong. First, the information on which proportion of COVID-19 infected cases were quarantined and the timing 56 of their quarantine start is generally not available, not only because these data may not be fully recorded but also 57 because the true size of the infected population is not known. Therefore, these quantities have to be estimated 58 using a modelling approach. However, due to the fact that many confirmed cases were imported cases from 59 the epidemic regions rather than all cases being acquired locally, simple traditional transmission models, such 60 as a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered (SEIR) model, were not sufficient to characterize the COVID-19 61 transmission dynamics properly in Hong Kong as these models treat all infections the same without considering 62 5 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089482 doi: medRxiv preprint their origins. To obtain the reproduction number, an indicator of the transmissibility of the virus, the average 63 number of secondary infections of a given infected individual, needs to be estimated. If the proportion of im-64 ported cases is high, the changes in the total number of confirmed cases are not exclusively caused by those 65 secondary infections acquired locally. As a result, the reproduction number cannot be estimated accurately using 66 the simple SEIR model. Second, the number of imported cases can be greatly affected by the number of travellers 67 entering Hong Kong and by border control measures. The number of travellers from mainland China to Hong 68 Kong reduced substantially after most of the border crossings were closed on 4 February 2020 [22]. Hence, it is 69 necessary to incorporate the effects of border control measures affecting transportation from mainland China to 70 Hong Kong into the model. In order to identify the critical components of the quarantine measures which were effective in controlling 73 the spread of COVID-19 in Hong Kong, we aimed to develop a two-layered susceptible-exposed-infected-74 quarantined-recovered (SEIQR) meta-population model, embedded with passenger data from mainland China, 75 that can stratify imported and local (community-acquired) cases to consider the effects of border control mea-76 sures on the number of imported cases. This model can capture the transmission dynamics of both imported and 77 local infections by estimating important epidemiological parameters including the reproduction number and the 78 timing of the start of quarantine of an infected case relative to symptom onset. Furthermore, we will show how 79 the model can be used to identify the timing of the start of quarantine which is necessary in order to suppress an 80 outbreak in the presence of population immunity. 81 6 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. Wuhan or mainland China (excluding Wuhan)), the daily number of exposed imported cases before symptom 93 onset at a different location j (e.g. Hong Kong) can be calculated using our meta-population framework with 94 a mobility matrix M . The model first generated the transmission dynamics in mainland China and used the 95 transmission dynamics together with transportation data to estimate the number of exposed imported cases in 96 Hong Kong. We assumed that patients could only cross the border to Hong Kong before their symptom onset 97 and then became exposed imported cases. We modified a simple SIR model to generate the number of newly 98 infected cases that would reproduce the similar cumulative numbers of confirmed cases as observed in Wuhan 99 and mainland China (excluding Wuhan) ( Figure S1 and Figure S2). Please see the supplementary methods for 100 the detailed descriptions.

101
The mobility matrix element M ji represents the mobility rate from source i to target j, which is calculated by 102 dividing the daily number of passengers from an epidemic source region to a target region by the population size 103 in the respective source region (Table S1). The proportion of passengers from Wuhan amongst all passengers 104 from mainland China during the study period can be calculated using the International Air Transport Association 105 (IATA) database [25]. We estimated that 2.92% of all passengers from mainland China to Hong Kong were from 106 Wuhan. The detailed steps to calculate daily numbers of newly exposed imported cases are described in the 107 section Two-layered SEIQR model.

108
Two-layered SEIQR model where S, E, I, Q, R represent the statuses of an individual: susceptible, exposed, infectious, quarantined, and 119 recovered, subscripts imp and loc indicate imported and local cases, β is the transmission rate, τ is the latent 120 period, γ is the recovery rate and t qr is the time interval between becoming infectious and the start of quarantine 121 of an infected case and q is the ratio of the contact rates of quarantined to unquarantined patients. Note that, here 122 the quarantined cases are infectious but are under quarantine. To avoid confusion, infectious cases only refer to 123 infected individuals who are infectious but are not under quarantine. Also, we refer to all individuals, except 124 susceptible, generated by our model as cases. Please see Table 1 and Table 2 for detailed variable and parameter 125 definitions.

126
Our two-layered SEIQR meta-population model is embedded with daily passenger data from Wuhan and main-127 land China (excluding Wuhan). E + impW and E + impC are the daily numbers of newly exposed imported cases from 128 Wuhan (denoted by W ) and mainland China (excluding Wuhan) (denoted by C) and are determined by the daily 129 passenger numbers and incubation time: 8 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020.
where M ji is the mobility rate from i to j, and subscripts H, W where β c is the transmission rate in mainland China, η(inc) is a function to calculate the number of infected 134 cases prior to symptom onset (referred to the incubation time inc) [26] and R pt is the reporting ratio in mainland 135 China, defined as the percentage of infected cases that are reported. where ∆I imp (σ) = 1 τ E imp ∆T +σ , and ∆T +σ is a one day time step at a time delay between becoming infectious 150 and symptom onset σ, referring to the pre-symptomatic transmission period.
detection rate of imported cases, which was defined as the proportion of the quarantined imported cases out 152 of the quarantined imported and infectious imported cases ( Figure 1A). This approach allowed the detection 153 rate to be estimated. The same approach was used to determine the expected value of the mean of the Poisson 154 distribution for the detected local cases as ∆I loc (σ)D, where ∆I loc = 1 τ E loc . The effective reproduction number, R e , was calculated using the next-generation matrix approach after obtaining 158 the posterior distributions of the model parameters [27]. Please see the supplementary methods for the detailed 159 9 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . infections, was implicitly assumed to be the sum of the infectious and latent periods of an infected case in the 171 model [28,29]. The prior of the generation time was normally distributed with a mean of 7.95 days, the average 172 from two previous studies [30,31], and standard deviation of 0.25. The prior of the ratio of the contact rates 173 q also followed a normal distribution with a mean of 12% and a standard deviation of 0.05. A recent study by 174

Parameter estimation
Kwok et al. estimated that each individual can contact an average of 12.5 persons during a day [32]. Assuming 175 many home-quarantined individuals are likely to have contact with individuals in their own household (expected 176 number of 1.5 persons on average), the mean ratio of the contact rates of quarantined to unquarantined patients 177 in the prior distribution can thus be estimated as q = 1. 5 12.5 = 12%.

10
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. .

181
Our meta-population model was able to accurately reproduce the COVID-19 transmission dynamics of both 182 imported and local infections in Hong Kong. The cumulative number of imported cases in Hong Kong increased 183 rapidly after the first imported case was detected at the beginning of the Lunar New Year festival with the 184 symptom onset day reported as 18 January 2020 ( Figure 2A). Soon after, community-acquired infections started 185 to occur. The risk of community spread was highlighted by the fact that the curve representing the number of 186 local cases crossed above the curve of the imported cases. The model captured the cumulative numbers of local 187 and imported cases, including the crossover of the curves ( Figure 2B) and their transient dynamics (Figure 3). 188 The predicted number of imported cases reached a peak on 26 January and soon reduced to near zero after 4 189 February due to border closures and a reduction in the number of outbreaks in mainland China ( Figure 3A). 190 These early imported cases immediately caused a wave of local infections. The daily number of newly detected 191 local cases continued to increase and reached a peak after two weeks and community spread was suppressed soon 192 afterwards ( Figure 3B). During this period, prevention policies based on quarantine measures were implemented 193 (Table S2).  The timing of the start of the quarantine of infected cases before their symptom onset is an important factor in 208 stopping community spread. The time interval between symptom onset and quarantine start T q was obtained by 209 subtracting the estimated time between becoming infectious and symptom onset (i.e. pre-symptomatic transmis-210 11 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089482 doi: medRxiv preprint sion period) from the estimated time between becoming infectious and the start of quarantine ( Figure 1B). The 211 time interval was used to represent the quarantine start time (relative to symptom onset) of an infected case. The 212 estimated T q was -0.57 days (95% CI, -4.21 -3.88) (Table 2, Figure 4A), indicating that the low R e estimate was 213 achieved through quarantining infected cases about half a day before their symptom onset. However, if T q was 214 delayed by 1.43 days to 0.86 (95% CI, -2.78 -5.31) days, i.e., less than one day after symptom onset, R e became 215 greater than one, resulting in an increased risk of community spread. If no infected cases were quarantined, the 216 reproduction number was calculated to be 2.32 (95% CI, 1. 19 -4.42), which was about 3-fold larger than the 217 R e estimate in Hong Kong. This number was used as R 0 in our study as R 0 , the basic reproduction number, is 218 defined as the reproduction number in the absence of quarantine measures or population immunity. Furthermore, 219 the ratio of the contact rates of quarantined to unquarantined patients q also affected the value of R e . The ratio q 220 was estimated at 10.26% (95%CI, 5.32 − 17.80). If q changed to 25.27% (95%CI, 20.33 − 32.81), about two 221 and a half fold increase, R e became greater than one resulting in potential community spread ( Figure 4B). These 222 results indicate that quarantining infected persons before symptom onset effectively can significantly reduce the 223 risk of community spread. 224 We further studied the timing of the start of the quarantine which was critical for the suppression of the COVID-225 19 outbreaks in the presence of some level of population immunity under different social distancing scenarios. 226 This critical timing was defined as the maximum difference in time between symptom onset and quarantine 227 start that is able to reduce the reproduction number to one, which was used to represent the timing of the start 228 of quarantine necessary in order to suppress an outbreak. We used R 0 , the basic reproduction number in a 229 population without quarantine or population immunity to simulate various social distancing measures. Weak 230 social distancing, as during the initial period in Wuhan, was assigned a high R 0 of 3 ( [35,36]). Strong social 231 distancing was represented by a low R 0 of 2.32, adopted from our Hong Kong estimate when a large proportion 232 of the population was vigilant about social distancing. Assuming a population immunity level of 30%, under 233 weak social distancing the critical timing of the start of quarantine increased from 0.54 days before symptom 234 onset to 1.72 days after symptom onset ( Figure 5A), whereas under strong social distancing the average critical 235 timing increased from 0.86 day to 5.85 days after symptom onset. If the quarantine started at the same time as 236 the estimated timing in Hong Kong, the outbreak would be suppressed whether the social distancing is weak or 237 strong ( Figure 5B). CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. showed that the detection rates reached stable values after three weeks from initially low values both for imported 242 and local cases ( Figure 6AB). Overall, the detection rates of the local cases were lower than those of the imported 243 cases because the number of local infected cases increased faster than quarantined cases. Our model estimated 244 that 71%(43 − 90) of local cases and 88% (58 -99) of imported cases were detected at the end of the study 245 period. However, a delay in starting quarantine of one day reduced the daily detection rate for local infections 246 to 59%(38 − 74) ( Figure 6B). Only 31%(20 − 40) of cases could be detected if quarantine was delayed by 6 247 days. The results showed that not only can early quarantine reduce the chance of transmission, but it also has the 248 benefit of increasing the overall detection rate. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . Figure 1 Model schema for transmission dynamics in Hong Kong with quarantine and border control measures. (A) Two-layered susceptible-exposed-infected-quarantined-recovered meta-population model. First layer (blue): Imported cases arrive with exposed (E) status before symptom onset to cross the border. Imported cases then become, sequentially, Infectious (I), Quarantined (Q) and Recovered (R). β c η(inc) 1 Rpt M is the rate at which imported cases are produced from an epidemic source region (see Materials & Methods for the details). Second layer (red): Both imported and local infectious cases are able to infect susceptible individuals (S) and cause local (community) transmission. However, cases that are quarantined have a lower transmission rate than unquarantined cases, defined by the ratio of the contact rates of quarantined to unquarantined patients q. t qr is the time interval between becoming infectious and the start of quarantine. ∆I imp (σ)D represents the number of newly detected imported cases, where D is the detection rate and σ is the pre-symptomatic transmission period, indicating the delay in time between becoming infectious and symptom onset. Similarly, ∆I loc (σ)D represents the number of newly detected local cases. For the definitions of epidemiological parameters, please refer to Materials & Methods. (B) Illustration of model parameters for an infected case. The house symbol indicates the start of quarantine. The red arrow refers to the time interval between symptom onset and quarantine start, which can be calculated as T q = t qr − σ. T q can be a negative value if the quarantine starts before symptom onset.
14 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. .

15
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . 16 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . Figure 3 Observed and predicted numbers of detected imported and local cases. (A) Number of observed imported (red dots) and predicted detected imported cases. The solid blue line represents the mean model estimate, and the dark and light shading represent 50% and 95% credible intervals, respectively. The predicted detected cases are the daily newly detected cases with symptom onset that are quarantined or will eventually become quarantined, and have been confirmed positive. (B) Number of observed local (red dots) and predicted number of detected local cases. The solid blue line represents the mean model estimate, and the dark and light shading represent 50% and 95% credible intervals, respectively. The definition of the detected local cases is the same as in (A) but for local infections.

17
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . 18 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . Figure 6 Detection rates of imported and local cases over time for different quarantine start times T q . (A) Detection rates of imported cases. Blue, the detection rate estimated using the estimate of the quarantine start time T q . Red, the detection rate estimated using the estimate of T q with one day delay. Green, the detection rate estimated using the estimate of T q with six days delay. The shaded areas represent the 95% credible intervals. (B) Detection rates of local cases. Same definition as for (A) are used for the estimates of local infections.

20
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. .  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. This is the first study to illustrate how Hong Kong can be a good model to learn how to prevent the community 252 spread of COVID-19 through timely quarantine measures averting the need to adopt more intensive control ef-253 forts. By characterizing the disease transmission dynamics in Hong Kong during the early period of the global 254 spread of the virus [10,[37][38][39], our results demonstrated that an early quarantine of infected cases before symp-255 tom onset is a critical key factor in the suppression of COVID-19 community spread. After investigating Hong 256 Kong's intervention policies against community spread using our model, we propose time-sensitive quarantine 257 measures based on the critical timing of the start of quarantine relative to symptom onset of infected cases to 258 suppress the current or prevent future recurrent COVID-19 outbreaks, avoiding the significant socio-economic 259 impact of more severe control measures as a consequence. intervention policies, such as transportation restriction or complete city lockdown, to suppress an outbreak of 264 COVID-19 has been proposed and implemented in various locations [5,10,11]. These stringent policies can exert 265 enormous socio-economic pressures with long-term consequences, not only now but also in future if recurrent 266 outbreaks continue. One critical concern is that after the outbreak is suppressed, unless effective vaccines are 267 available or a sufficient level of population immunity is achieved, an outbreak can reoccur after a short period of 268 time and strict intervention policies will need to be reimplemented [12,40]. On the other hand, our model demon-269 strated that Hong Kong's intervention policies can be used as a good example for achieving the suppression of 270 community spread (defined by a reproduction number of less than one) or preventing any future recurrences 271 through time-sensitive quarantine measures preempting the need for more restrictive control policies.

273
These time-sensitive quarantine measures represent an achievable way to suppress or prevent a COVID-19 out-274 break. Ideally, quarantining every exposed person before they contact and potentially infect others can suppress 275 the outbreak, but this strategy is not practically feasible since it either demands a lot of resources for tracing 276 all possible contacts or may result in a de facto city lockdown situation as a large proportion of the population 277 is quarantined. Another solution may be provided by implementation of a policy that aimed to time the start 278 of quarantine for contacts of infected cases so that, the maximum difference in time between symptom onset 279 and quanrantine start that is still able to reduce R 0 to below one is achieved. This can be achieved by using 280 contact tracing with modern technology for close contacts [7] and medical surveillance for persons who have 281

22
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089482 doi: medRxiv preprint potentially been exposed but are not classified as close contacts, as was done in Taiwan or Hong Kong. As the 282 level of population immunity increases, the critical timing of the start of quarantine can be relaxed. Compliance 283 with social distancing rules tends to weaken once the incidence of local cases is reduced, however, the proposed 284 time-sensitive quarantine measures are adaptive to changes in population immunity level and social distancing 285 compliance, which can provide public health authorities with an achievable and measurable target. without symptoms for about three days during the latent period. This result confirms the similar pre-symptomatic 290 transmission periods found by several recent studies which were using contact tracing and enhanced investigation 291 of clusters of confirmed cases [14][15][16][17] and gives reason to support an early quarantine for any persons who have 292 been exposed but remain asymptomatic. Thus, it may be essential to expand the current definition of close 293 contacts to include any contact with a confirmed case starting from 3-4 days before symptom onset [41]. with recent studies [30,33,34]. Another important reason for obtaining accurate estimates of many parameters 303 in our model is that we assumed that only quarantined or isolated infected cases would be detected in Hong 304 Kong. This assumption was made because, first, many infected cases were identified during quarantine and most 305 infected cases were eventually isolated in hospital in Hong Kong; second, persons who had had contact with a 306 case were requested to quarantine; third, mild or asymptomatic cases that were not quarantined were not likely 307 to be detected. This assumption allows the model to fit symptom onset data of daily newly confirmed cases in 308 Hong Kong well and to obtain the values for the timing of the start of quarantine and detection rate as well as 309 other parameters. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089482 doi: medRxiv preprint of schools and universities and the avoidance of unnecessary visits in elderly centres [22]. In addition, the pro-313 portion of healthy persons (including asymptomatic infected) wearing masks was high in Hong Kong during this 314 period [42]. Although these interventions are not included specifically, our model results did not exclude the ef-315 fects of these strategies. An estimated R 0 of 2.32, which is lower than the value of R 0 estimated during the initial 316 periods of COVID-19 in mainland China [35,36], can reflect the overall effects of these intervention policies. 317 Since these effects aimed at reducing either transmission rates or contact rates, a lower R 0 will be calculated 318 without affecting other parameters. Our results suggest that adopting the quarantine measures implemented in 319 Hong Kong can successfully limit community spread in the presence of other interventions. The study illustrates the importance of quarantining exposed individuals early, about half a day before symptom 322 onset to prevent or suppress a current COVID-19 outbreak without profound socio-economic impacts. Com-323 paring the current timings of the start of quarantine of COVID-19 infected cases with the critical timing the 324 model produced allows an assessment of the effectiveness of the quarantine measures. How to shorten the time 325 from an individual becoming infectious to the the start of quarantine, so it leads to a substantial reduction of the 326 reproduction number becomes the next challenge in working towards prevention and control of the current and 327 future COVID-19 outbreaks.

Dynamics in source regions
To obtain the number of imported cases, the model has to generate the transmission dynamics in the source regions to seed the target region (Hong Kong). We modified an SIR model to construct number of newly infected cases that were close to the observed confirmed numbers in Wuhan and Mainland China (outside Wuhan):

Effective reproductive number calculation
The effective reproductive number , was calculated using the next-generation matrix approach after obtaining the posterior distributions of model parameters, following the same notation as in the study by Diekmann et al [2]. We obtained the transmission matrix and the transition matrix . The elements in represent the average number of newly infected cases in the exposed group (E) caused by a single infected individual from the infectious (I) or quarantined group (Q), which can be calculated as or .
can be calculated as the first eigenvector of −( −1 ) with the following formulas: . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020.  CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020.  CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089482 doi: medRxiv preprint Figure S4 Trajectories of MCMC output.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020.  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 6, 2020. . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089482 doi: medRxiv preprint