Early evaluation of the Wuhan City travel restrictions in response to the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak

8 1 State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, College of Global Change and Earth System 9 Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China 10 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 11 3 Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA 12 4 Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 13 5 Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California Davis, CA, USA 14 6 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System 15 Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China 16 7 Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China 17 8 State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and 18 Epidemiology, Beijing, China 19 9 Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 20 10 Department of Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, 21 Peking University, China 22 11 Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, 23 University Park, Pennsylvania, USA 24 12 Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 25 University Park, Pennsylvania, USA 26 13 Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, 27 National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 28 14 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. 29 30 *These authors contributed equally to this work. 31 †Corresponding author. Email: tianhuaiyu@gmail.com (H.Y.T.); christopher.dye@zoo.ac.uk 32 (C.D.); grenfell@princeton.edu (B.G.); oliver.pybus@zoo.ox.ac.uk (O.G.P.); 33 ruifuyang@gmail.com (R.F.Y.); 34 35 Author contributions: H.T., P.Z., R.F.Y., O.G.P., B.G., C.D. designed the study. B.C. and Y.M.S. 36 collected and processed the Tencent’s LBS data. Y.H.L., B.Y.L., B.X., Q.Q.Y., P.Y., Y.J.C., Q.Y.W. 37 collected the statistical data. H.Y.T. and J.C. conducted the analyses. M.K., O.B., R.F.Y., O.G.P., 38 B.G., and C.D. edited the manuscript. H.T. and Y.D.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and 39 approved the manuscript. 40

In order to quantify the effect of the Wuhan travel shutdown on nCoV epidemic spread we 8 7 analyzed the arrival time of nCoV from Wuhan to each city as a function of geographic distance 8 8 (between city centers) and of human movement by air, train, and road (as recorded by Tencent's 8 9 location-based services database). Spatial spread of 2019-nCoV ( Fig. 1A) was rapid, with 262 9 0 cities reporting cases within only 28 days (for comparison, the 2009-H1N1pdm took 132 days to 9 1 reach the current extent of nCoV-2019 in China). Most cities with early arrival dates were in 9 2 southeast China and tend to exhibit greater mobility and higher population density. The rate at 9 3 which cities first reported nCoV peaked on 23 January (the day of the Wuhan travel ban), with 60 9 4 reports, after which the spatial dissemination of nCoV slowed. 9 5 9 6 Table 1 shows that the Wuhan travel intervention significantly slowed disease spread. As expected, 9 7 the time it took nCoV to arrive in each city increased with distance from Wuhan City, and 9 8 decreased with passenger flow from Wuhan. Thus the epidemic arrived sooner in those cities that 9 9 had larger population and had more travelers from Wuhan. On average, the Wuhan shutdown   Our analysis evaluates a unique intervention against an emerging infectious disease -the cessation 1 0 5 of travel from a large, well-connected city in an industrialized country (Fig. 1D). We find that this 1 0 6 intervention was effective in slowing nCoV invasion of new locations. However, other measures 1 0 7 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 2, 2020.  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 2, 2020.    . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 2, 2020.  where TotalFlow j represents the average passenger volume from Wuhan City to city j by airplane,   CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 2, 2020. 2 0 0 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 2, 2020. . https://doi.org/10. 1101/2020