ABSTRACT
PURPOSE Prognostic biomarkers that estimate residual recurrence risk after standard adjuvant therapy to guide further treatment escalation are an unmet clinical need. This study used Ataraxis Breast CTX, a causal multi-modal AI model integrating clinical variables and histopathology, to stratify residual risk in clinically defined high-risk patients. We aimed to identify patients who have excellent outcomes on standard-of-care chemoendocrine therapy and patients who may benefit from additional therapies such as everolimus or CDK4/6 inhibitors.
METHODS CTX combines clinical variables with image features from H&E images to produce estimates of recurrence risk (CTX-prognostic) and chemotherapy benefit (CTX-benefit). Prospective-retrospective validation was performed in the phase III UNIRAD trial to assess CTX-prognostic’s performance in the subset of patients who had not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, who had received adjuvant chemotherapy, and who had H&E slides available (n = 556). The primary endpoint in this study was disease-free survival (DFS). As an exploratory analysis, we evaluated CTX-benefit’s ability to predict benefit from adjuvant everolimus.
RESULTS CTX-prognostic effectively stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups. Across all patients, 5-year DFS was significantly higher in the low-risk group (93%) than in the high-risk group (80%). Additionally, treatment benefit from everolimus differed significantly by CTX-benefit score in an exploratory multivariable analysis adjusting for age, tumor size, nodal status, grade, and menopausal status (interaction p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION CTX identified patients with good outcomes under chemoendocrine therapy alone and patients with residual risk who may benefit from treatment escalation. Additionally, CTX was found to be predictive of everolimus benefit. These results suggest that CTX may effectively stratify clinically high-risk HR+/HER2− patients by residual risk and may inform selection of adjuvant escalation strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
LP, CT, DB, KZ, KJG, and JW are equity holders of Ataraxis AI. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Clinical Trial
NCT01805271
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UNIRAD trial (NCT01805271) was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice principles, the Declaration of Helsinki, and all local regulations. All patients provided written informed consent to participate in the trial and for data use. The trial was approved by the French medicines agency (ANSM-Agence National de Securite du medicament des produits de sante), by an ethics committee (Comite de Protection des Personnes Sud-Est IV-Lyon) in September 2012, and by institutional review boards of each participating center. A steering committee supervised the trial, and an independent data monitoring committee met every year and was responsible for monitoring safety and efficacy in the trial participants. As this re-analysis of the UNIRAD trial is retrospective in nature, no further informed consent was required.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes





