Abstract
Background Cancer is a growing public health challenge in Ghana, with 27,385 new cases and 17,944 deaths recorded in 2022. Ghana developed a National Cancer Control Strategy (NCCS) in 2011 to guide prevention, early detection, treatment, and palliative care. The strategy expired in 2016 and has not been formally evaluated or renewed, leaving cancer control efforts without a guiding policy framework for nearly a decade. This study examined how the strategy was implemented, what barriers were encountered and what stakeholders recommend for a strengthened national cancer response.
Methods We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured key informant interviews. Fifteen participants were recruited through purposive sampling, supplemented by snowball referrals, representing three groups: Ministry of Health policymakers, frontline healthcare providers and representatives of cancer-focused non-governmental organisations. Data were collected between June and September 2025 and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis framework, guided deductively by the WHO Health Systems Building Blocks framework
Results Three themes emerged: NCCS interventions and systems implemented, capturing progress in cancer awareness, HPV vaccination and pilot screening programmes alongside persistent geographic and financial inequities in access; barriers to implementation, including inadequate financing, infrastructure and workforce shortages, the absence of a national cancer registry and governance failures, among them the finding that no frontline healthcare provider interviewed had any awareness of the NCCS; and recommended implementation strategies, including co-production of a renewed strategy, establishment of a dedicated National Cancer Control Programme, expanded health insurance coverage and decentralisation of oncology services.
Conclusion The NCCS was not operationally embedded in the health system. The evidence points to failures in policy dissemination as a constraint that precedes resource constraints. Addressing Ghana’s rising cancer burden requires renewed political commitment, co-produced governance structures and accountability mechanisms. These findings have relevance for other low- and middle-income country settings facing similar challenges.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (GHS-ERC: 028/03/25).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The de-identified datasets generated and analysed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
