Abstract
Community Health Promoters (CHPs) connect households with formal health services. In maternal nutrition, they provide counselling, follow-up and referrals. However, pregnant women experiencing poverty, food insecurity, and socio-cultural issues in resource-constrained settings may be unable to act on nutritional advice. While social protection could alleviate such socioeconomic issues, maternal nutrition and social safety nets operate in institutional silos, creating gaps that systematically exclude vulnerable mothers from essential relief. This qualitative study examines how CHPs navigate these gaps across three underserved Kenyan settings. We analysed semi-structured interviews of 12 purposively selected CHPs from a broader study of 75 stakeholders, using the Braun and Clarke thematic analysis framework. CHPs described recurrent gaps between household needs and resources available through formal maternal health, nutrition, and social protection systems. CHPs stepped in; extending follow-up care, brokering information, negotiating access, and spending personal resources with inadequate formal mechanisms. They experienced emotional and relational pressure from community mistrust, cultural limitations, administrative gatekeeping, digital-system failures, heavy workloads, and performance targets tied to unreliable pay. These insights reveal that CHPs act as invisible safety nets for fragmented services, taking on burdens that official programs overlook. We describe this as workforce cost absorption. Recognising this hidden contribution is important for workforce planning and for designing integrated maternal nutrition and social protection programs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of South Africa IRB (Ref: 2025_SBL_DBL_036_FA_7345) and the Strathmore University Institutional Scientific Ethics Review Committee (SU-ISERC) (Ref: SU-ISERC3058/25). Subsequently, a formal research permit was issued by the National Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation (NACOSTI) in Kenya, License No: NACOSTI-P-25-4181418. All participants provided informed consent before data collection, with the consent presented in both English and Swahili for the non-English-speaking participants. Participation was voluntary, and data was anonymised to ensure stakeholder confidentiality.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the sensitive nature of the interviews, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request
