Abstract
Background Post-abortion care (PAC) encompasses emergency treatment, counselling, contraceptive services, and referral linkages. Emergency post-abortion care (EPAC), the life- saving component of PAC, addresses acute abortion-related complications, including haemorrhage, sepsis, retained products of conception, and severe pain. In Uganda, where abortion is legally restricted and socially stigmatised, women’s care experiences are shaped by clinical urgency, fear, moral vulnerability, provider interactions, and structural health system constraints. Despite EPAC’s centrality to maternal survival, qualitative evidence on how women interpret and evaluate their care experiences in referral hospital settings in Uganda remains limited. This study explored women’s experiences of EPAC at Kawempe National Referral Hospital (KNRH) and identified the factors that shaped those experiences.
Methods A qualitative phenomenological design was employed. Sixteen in-depth interview transcripts from women who received EPAC at KNRH in March–April 2026 were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. The Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) was applied as an interpretive framework.
Results Six themes were identified: (1) survival and physical relief as the immediate measure of good care; (2) pain, fear, and emotional distress during treatment; (3) reassurance and support as buffers against vulnerability; (4) dignity under pressure: communication and privacy in EPAC; (5) structural barriers across the pathway of care; and (6) experiences beyond discharge: incomplete recovery and uncertainty. Care was frequently evaluated through the lens of survival, yet these accounts co-existed with intense procedural pain, compromised privacy, delays, financial burden, and inadequate post-discharge support. EPAC at KNRH was experienced as a complex encounter shaped by bodily vulnerability, interpersonal dynamics, and system-level constraints.
Conclusions Strengthening EPAC requires patient-centred approaches that integrate clinical effectiveness with respectful communication, pain management, improved triage, and structured post-discharge support.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Makerere University School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (SOMREC; approval reference: Mak-SOMREC-2025-913) and by Kawempe National Referral Hospital. All participants provided written informed consent before the interview. Participants were assigned anonymised codes; no identifying information was included in transcripts or analysis. Participation was voluntary, and participants could withdraw at any time without consequence.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
