Abstract
Background Effective communication during consultations is facilitated by clinical empathy and realistic optimism, and can enhance patient satisfaction with care, alleviate symptoms, and improve quality of life. However, primary care systems are under significant strain and changing rapidly, which may affect practitioners’ ability to communicate empathically and convey realistic optimism, with implications for the patient-practitioner relationship and patient outcomes. Understanding patients’ perspectives of healthcare communication in the current clinical context is therefore important. We aimed to explore patients’ experiences and perceptions of communication in UK primary care consultations, focussing on the communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism.
Methods A qualitative interview study was conducted as part of a multi-centre cluster-randomised trial of EMPathicO, a brief e-learning package for Primary Care Practitioners (PCPs) on communicating clinical empathy and realistic optimism. Participants were not aware whether their general practice had access to EMPathicO or not. Interviews were conducted within 7-14 days of participants’ consultations, explored their views and experiences of clinical empathy and realistic optimism, and were transcribed verbatim. Interviews were analysed using Ritchie and Spencer’s Framework Method.
Results We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded qualitative telephone interviews with 71 participants from 29 primary care practices taking part in the EMPathicO trial. Following comprehensive mapping of data to the framework derived following initial analysis, four themes were agreed. Overall, most participants described positive empathic consultations with their PCPs, however, participants’ experiences were shaped by wider systemic and contextual factors. They described a stretched and inefficient primary care system impacting empathy and optimism; the impact of PCP ‘preparedness’ as a marker for empathy; how consultation modality (i.e. in-person or telephone) shaped perceptions of empathy, and how PCPs sharing next steps in participants’ treatment and management could foster realistic optimism.
Conclusions While clinical empathy and realistic optimism may be experienced by patients during consultations with practitioners, the wider contextual challenges of accessing and navigating primary care systems can threaten overall perceptions of feeling cared for. Future primary care policy and workforce training must consider these system pressures to preserve effective communication in consultations and positive patient-practitioner encounters.
Trial registration ISRCTN18010240 registered 15th September 2022.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors declare the following competing interests: RDH (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), ET (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), SP (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), GML (none declared), HAE (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution; is Deputy Academic Capacity Development Lead for the NIHR SPCR and sits on the NIHR SPCR Board and Exec; works clinically as a GP at New Horizons Medical Partnership in Southampton as part of Professor of Primary Care Research post at the University of Southampton; Co-Authors the Oxford Handbook of General Practice published by Oxford University Press), LM (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), HA (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution; other research funding from NIHR, Research Council of Norway, University of Warwick/eConsult Ltd paid to institution; honoraria from Imperial College London, UCL, North West Cancer Research; received support for travel from NIHR, RCGP, University of Birmingham; advisory board member/chair for NIHR159467, NIHR160384, BRACE rapid evaluation centre, HED-LINE study, EPaCCS study; is Vice Chair of the Scientific Foundation Board, Royal College of General Practitioners), JH (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), ID (none declared), SF (none declared), JB (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research), JV (none declared), NC (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), PL (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), CDM (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution; other funding from NIHR, MRC, NHS paid to institution; is the Director of the NIHR SPCR), MJR (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution; other research funding from NIHR SPCR, HTA, and PGfAR paid to institution; NIHR Research Professorship; on TSC/DMC for ERICA, BabyBathe and ASYMPTOMATIC trials), AH (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), MER (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), JN (none declared), TB (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution), KG (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution; ModRUM license holder), BS (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution; other research funding from NIHR paid to institution; member of NIHR HTA Commissioning Panel 15/09/2020 to present), NI (none declared), PHL (none declared), FLB (research grant from NIHR School for Primary Care Research paid to institution; speakers honoraria from Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare and New Scientist).
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN18010240
Clinical Protocols
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/3/e081932
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was given by the South Central Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee (1st July 2022) and the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (6th July 2022) (REC: 22/SC/0145; IRAS ID: 312208). Informed consent was audio recorded and electronically signed prior to interviews.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available on request. Requests for deidentified participant data may be submitted to the University of Southampton data repository, quoting doi: [to be added on acceptance]. Requests would be subject to review by a subgroup of the trial team. Access to anonymised data may be granted following this review, subject to conditions including ethical approval, qualifications, and aims consistent with the original purpose of the study. All data-sharing activities would require a data-sharing agreement.
Abbreviations
- TIP
- Talking in Primary Care
- PCP
- Primary Care Practitioner
- FCP
- First Contact Practitioner
- IMD
- Index of multiple deprivation
Funder Information Declared
