ABSTRACT
Objectives This study aimed to examine physiotherapy student’s reaction and learning, following Simulation Based Education (SBE) during a Cardiorespiratory module. A further aim was to see if any learning translated into clinical placement.
Design A mixed methods research design consisting of a questionnaire (Phase1) after the activity which was underpinned by the Kirkpatrick model of evaluation. This was followed by a focus groups (Phase 2) after completion of clinical placement.
Participants 92 final year physiotherapy students at a single institution were eligible to participate in the SBE session with n=81 (88%) students completing the survey, and 8 students participating across 2 focus group sessions.
Results Survey: Over 80% of students strongly agreed on a positive initial reaction to SBE. Learning yielded a 76% and above response of strongly agree in all areas except confidence. Students valued SBE as a preferred learning and teaching strategy and wanted more. They welcomed SBE as a supplement but not substitute for clinical placement. Students felt skills learned could be transferred into all areas of clinical practice,, namely communication and decision making.
Conclusion Students rated SBE positively with development of transferable non-technical skills. Reaction to SBE was high in terms of relevance, engagement and satisfaction. Self-perceived confidence, although positive, was the comparatively lowest scoring of the domains. Students advocated SBE as a supplement rather than a substitute for clinical placement preferring a hybrid approach.
Contribution of the Paper
Adds to the positive body of evidence which already exists towards SBE, especially in the development of non-technical skills.
Suggestions are made that SBE can’t make students feel fully confident in preparation for clinical placement.
While students in this study expressed that they wanted more SBE and earlier, this paper found that students would not advocate SBE replacing clinical placement.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
FCNUR-24-072
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted by a University Nursing and Health Sciences Filter committee (Reference: FCNUR-24-072).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The minimal data set is available at PhysioNet via https://doi.org/10.13026/*****
