Abstract
Prosthesis non-use and abandonment remain common among people with lower-limb amputation, yet current outcome measures capture only limited aspects of how prostheses are used in everyday life. Clinical assessments are typically conducted in controlled settings and rely on self-report or aggregate activity counts, which do not adequately represent functional performance, physiological effort, or lived experience during real-world prosthesis use. Wearable and ambient sensing offer a means of addressing this gap, but existing approaches tend to measure single dimensions in isolation and are rarely validated against laboratory reference standards before free-living deployment. This protocol describes an integrated multimodal framework for assessing real-world lower-limb prosthesis use across three complementary domains: classification of activities of daily living, estimation of energy expenditure, and assessment of emotional state. Approximately 40 adults with unilateral transfemoral or transtibial amputation complete a two-phase protocol. In the laboratory phase, wearable inertial, physiological, and ambient sensing are validated against established reference standards, including video annotation and indirect calorimetry. In the free-living phase, validated models are applied during a single seven-day home monitoring period, unifying all three domains within one deployment. A defined data harmonisation and quality-control procedure aligns heterogeneous sensor streams and preserves traceability between laboratory calibration and free-living measurement, enabling reproducible interpretation of functional behaviour, metabolic cost, and momentary emotional experience in relation to established clinical outcome domains. By integrating multimodal sensing at the level of study design rather than post-hoc analysis, the framework provides a validated, reproducible methodology for characterising prosthesis use beyond the capacity of conventional instruments, offering a transferable approach for real-world monitoring in rehabilitation research.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the School of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Ethics Committee at Heriot-Watt University (reference 2025-12121-16250).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. Upon study completion, de-identified data will be deposited in the Open Science Framework and made available, subject to the governance and consent conditions approved by the ethics committee and the data-sharing agreements between the participating institutions.
