Abstract
HIV/AIDS remains a major global public health challenge, and disparities in HIV testing persist. In 2024, an estimated 87% of people living with HIV were aware of their status, with lower testing coverage among children aged 0–14 years (63%), and among men (84%) compared with women (92%). Romania initiated its national AIDS program in 1995 and quickly progressed in addressing the epidemic; however, HIV testing remains largely concentrated in specialized services, with late diagnosis, missed testing opportunities, and stigma continuing to limit timely identification and linkage to care. This study aimed to understand better HIV testing/screening practices among clinicians in eastern Romania and to identify gaps that could be addressed through medical education. We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study among healthcare providers in the eastern region of Romania to assess whether HIV testing is routinely offered to patients, explore gaps in clinical judgment and perceived responsibility, and identify factors that facilitate HIV testing. A 17-question anonymous survey was distributed via WhatsApp to clinician groups between August 1 and September 30, 2023. Respondents included physicians (71.9%), nurses (28.1%), and other healthcare professionals, working in infectious diseases (36.0%), internal medicine (22.3%), primary care (13.7%), and other specialties, such as obstetrics-gynecology and pediatrics (18.0%). Only 38.1% of respondents reported routinely screening all patients aged 18 years and older for HIV, while 61.9% did not offer regular HIV testing. The most cited reasons for not screening were the perception that HIV testing was not their responsibility and that their department did not require testing (18.1% each). Clinicians working in settings with established policies on HIV confidentiality, non-discrimination, testing, and post-exposure prophylaxis were more likely to offer routine testing. Universal HIV screening remains uncommon among clinicians in eastern Romania. Supportive institutional policies appear to facilitate routine testing and may reduce missed opportunities for early diagnosis. Normalizing HIV testing as part of routine clinical care, in line with the Romanian National Health Strategy 2022–2030, is crucial for enhancing early detection and strengthening prevention efforts through coordinated action among clinicians, public institutions, and civil society.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The project was approved by the Research Subjects Review Board at the University of Rochester and the Ethics Committee of the “Sf Paraschiva” Clinical Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Iasi, Romania (decision no. 6/06.26.23). The University of Rochester's Research Subjects Review Board office determined that this project met federal and university criteria for exemption (STUDY00008788). The project was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
