ABSTRACT
Background Three San Francisco health system emergency departments have developed Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) models of care programs supporting and providing care for emergency department (ED) patients at risk for or living with dementia. Each system recognized: 1) the high proportion of older adult ED patients and those at risk for dementia, 2) the need to identify cognitive impairment in older adult ED patients, 3) the importance of developing approaches to connect older adult ED patients and their care partners with resources and diagnostic specialty services.
Methods We describe how each hospital adopted and implemented pragmatic GED models of care to support and improve care for ED patients at risk or living with dementia. We also report the proportion of ED encounters made by patients with dementia histories and the number of these reached by GED programs.
Results Three San Francisco hospitals (a tertiary care, critical access, and large integrated health system-community ED) independently implemented GED programs to support and enhance emergency care for patients living with dementia. Each uses screening and assessment tools to identify patients at risk for cognitive impairment. Each captures screening and assessment data to facilitate care and resources for post-discharge care, ensuring coordinated transitions and support for older adults. Programs varied by target patient population age and staff and resource allocation to support program goals. Site-specific pathways differed by location, patient populations, and support from geriatrics, emergency medicine, palliative medicine, neurology, psychiatry, pharmacy, referral processes, and/or pastoral care.
Conclusions Developing GED care interventions that facilitate care for patients at risk of or living with dementia is possible and sustainable when the pathway aligns with health system leadership goals through persistent value demonstration, communication, and promotion. Ultimately, developing and disseminating models of GED care is designed to address geriatric syndromes inclusive of dementia care through continuous quality improvement.
KEY POINTS
This paper demonstrates the feasibility of implementing Geriatric ED programs with targeted support for people living with or at risk for dementia across three distinct health systems in San Francisco. We describe the reach and implementation processes of each program including commonalities, differences, challenges faced, and opportunities for future improvement.
Creating unique care pathways for older adults and those with cognitive impairment in the emergency department (ED) is often guided by health system resources.
Assessing cognition and identifying potential dementia is feasible during an ED visit.
An interprofessional approach to geriatric ED care is essential to sustainability and success.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://edrive.ucsf.edu/geriatrics
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
KP: Ethics committee/IRB of Kaiser Permanente gave ethical approval for this work (IRB #00014882) UCSF: Ethics committee/IRB of University of California San Francisco gave ethical approval for this work (IRB #13-12500) ZSFG: Ethics committee/IRB of University of California San Francisco gave ethical approval for this work (IRB #21-35849)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
karen.a.hauser{at}kp.org, eric.isaacs{at}ucsf.edu, marlena.tang{at}kp.org, jeremy.m.swartzberg{at}kp.org, vasili.x.panopulos{at}kp.org, ann.m.martin{at}kp.org, vincent.x.liu{at}kp.org, david.schlessinger{at}kp.org, nasrin.a.samady{at}kp.org, rohan.x.malhotra{at}kp.org, colleen.plimier{at}kp.org, azi.x.hadadianpour{at}kp.org, mitchel.erickson{at}ucsf.edu, todd.james{at}ucsf.edu, stephanie.rogers{at}ucsf.edu, julia.adler-milstein{at}ucsf.edu, robert.thombley{at}ucsf.edu, sarah.rosenthal{at}ucsf.edu, anna.harris{at}ucsf.edu, maria.raven{at}ucsf.edu, malini.singh{at}ucsf.edu, candace.kim{at}ucsf.edu, rachel.perry{at}sfdph.org, elizabeth.clevenger{at}sfdph.org, cecilia.carvajal{at}sfdph.org, donell.babino{at}sfdph.org, alicia.gray{at}sfdph.org, melina.shapiro{at}ucsf.edu, tiffany.chan5{at}ucsf.edu, heather.allore{at}yale.edu, daniella.meeker{at}yale.edu, debra.tomasino{at}nyulangone.org, elyssa.grogan{at}nyulangone.org, anna.pepper{at}nyulangone.org, madelynn.wellons{at}nyulangone.org
↵* Indicates joint first author status.
Data Availability
KP: All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. UCSF: All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. ZSFG: All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
Funder Information Declared
