Abstract
Adults aged ≥65 years are increasingly using cannabis products. However, controlled pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in this population are sparse, and remain limited to oral/oromucosal formulations. To characterize the acute pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of oral and vaporized THC in healthy adults aged ≥65, we conducted a two-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 20 participants (mean age 70.0, SD: 5.1 years) received oral (placebo, 5 mg, or 10 mg) or vaporized THC (placebo, 2 mg, or 4 mg) across three eight-hour sessions separated by ≥72 hours. Outcomes included plasma pharmacokinetics, subjective drug effects, reinforcement value, cognitive performance, heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and adverse events (AEs). Oral THC was associated with delayed, lower THC exposure (Tmax 60-90 min; Cmax 2.6-6.2 ng/mL), with 11-OH-THC concentrations approximately matching parent-THC; slow-rising subjective effects; no change in reinforcement value; no significant change in HR or BP; and no AEs. Vaporized THC was associated with rapid, THC-dominant exposure (Tmax 3 min; Cmax 24.6-53.8 ng/mL) and minimal 11-OH-THC concentrations; rapid-onset subjective effects; increased reinforcement value at 4 mg; and significant HR elevation peaking within 5 min, without significant BP change. Cognitive performance did not differ from placebo at any oral or vaporized THC dose. At vaporized THC 4 mg, two participants experienced five AEs. Oral and vaporized THC produce route-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in adults aged ≥65, including an increase in reinforcement value only after vaporization, and should therefore not be treated as interchangeable in risk assessment for older adults.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. De Aquino has received research support from Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Ananda Scientific and has served as a paid consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT05906511
Clinical Protocols
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05906511
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States, and by the Institutional Review Board of the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States. Ethical approval was granted by both boards. All participants provided written informed consent before any study procedures were performed.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Funder Information Declared
