ABSTRACT
Background Digital legacy (the digital information available about someone following their death) has increasing societal importance as personal assets and interactions become increasingly digitized. Healthcare professionals often have a limited understanding of how to address digital legacy in practice, and there is a lack of interdisciplinary networks to improve education, research, and professional development in digital legacy.
Objective This paper describes the development of an interdisciplinary initiative designed to build research capacity and develop consensus-based recommendations for integrating digital legacy into palliative care.
Method Over 12-months, we conducted interdisciplinary engagement activities with diverse stakeholders, including clinicians, designers, and sociologists. We used a modified World Café method to facilitate dialogue and capture feedback on how memories are digitally curated, the management of digital estates, and intergenerational perspectives on digital legacy.
Results We identified eight core recommendations for research and policy, including promoting digital legacy education, supporting policy development, and broadening the scope of interdisciplinary research. Our discussions highlighted the complexity of modern digital estates and the need for legal and ethical frameworks to protect individual rights.
Conclusions The Network demonstrates that interdisciplinary collaboratives can address important issues relating to digital legacy, which provides a foundation to conduct collaborative research that improves the management of digital legacies in society.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This project reviewed by the UK Medical Research Council and NHS Health Research Authority research service, and the project was classified as a service-evaluation and quality-improvement project and did not constitute clinical research. Therefore, formal institutional ethics committee approval was not required.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Funder Information Declared
