ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the rate, timing, and predictors of additional therapy among women with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) following initial minimally invasive treatments (MIT).
Study Design Retrospective single center cohort study of women with idiopathic OAB treated between 2012 and 2021. Using ICD and procedural codes, we identified women who underwent posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), sacral neuromodulation (SNM), or intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX). The primary outcome was receipt of additional OAB treatments,OAB medication initiation or a different MIT. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated time to additional therapies; Cox proportional hazards and random survival forest models identified predictors.
Results 1,007 women were included (PTNS: 459; SNM: 192; BTX: 356). At three years, 75% of PTNS patients, 58% of BTX patients, and 40% of SNM women required additional therapies with most patients choosing additional pharmacotherapy rather than crossover to a different MIT. Median time to additional treatments was 10 months (PTNS), 19 months (BTX), and 53 months (SNM). Higher BMI was associated with increased risk of further treatment after SNM (HR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-4.2), while recurrent urinary tract infections were associated with needing additional therapies in the BTX cohort (HR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-3.2). Random survival forest models resulted in poor model performance.
Conclusions Following initial MIT for idiopathic OAB, many women required additional treatment within three years, many choosing pharmacotherapy rather than transition to another MIT.
Why This Matters Overactive bladder (OAB) affects over 20% of women in the United States, and current AUA/SUFU guidelines have shifted from traditional stepwise therapy toward shared decision-making and multimodal treatment. While minimally invasive therapies (MIT) are effective options for OAB, real-world data on patient trajectories after MIT initiation, including rates of treatment augmentation, crossover, or return to pharmacotherapy, remain limited.
This retrospective cohort of 1,007 women with idiopathic OAB provides novel data on post-MIT care-seeking, with 40–75% of patients requiring additional therapy within three years. SNM demonstrated the longest interval before additional therapy and the lowest rate of subsequent care-seeking. Notably, most women who required additional treatment chose pharmacotherapy rather than crossing over to a different MIT. Modifiable risk factors associated with additional care-seeking included higher BMI after SNM and recurrent urinary tract infections after BTX, though whether addressing these factors would reduce the need for additional therapy remains unclear.
These findings reinforce that OAB management is a dynamic, ongoing process rather than a one-time intervention, and that multimodal therapy is often necessary for optimal improvement. Clinicians can use these data to set realistic expectations during counseling, framing additional therapy as a common and anticipated part of the treatment trajectory rather than a treatment failure.
Competing Interest Statement
JQC, non-active Medtronic consultant; DS research support Medtronic, Boston Scientific; Consulting Fee Caldera Medical; Equity CollaMedix
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by IRB at University of Michigan (HUM00202983)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors





