Abstract
Background Diabetes is a major global public health challenge, associated with substantial medical, economic, and social burden worldwide. As clinicians working at the intersection of medicine and nutrition, we observed that despite advances in pharmacologic therapy, many individuals—particularly those living in underserved urban communities—continue to experience suboptimal diabetes control due to persistent barriers related to food insecurity, cultural food practices, and limited access to practical nutrition education. In response, we implemented a community-based pilot study in an underserved urban area that focused on dietitian-led nutrition education grounded in “Food Is Medicine” principles.
Aims The intervention emphasized culturally responsive, cost-conscious, and client-centred approaches designed to make healthy eating simple and intuitive, with the goal of complementing standard diabetic medical therapy.
Methods We used conventional diabetic marker responses, fasting blood sugar (FBS), HgbA1c (percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin, subsequently documented as A1c), and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) in a dual cohort design study measuring whether groups receiving dietitian-led nutrition education in addition to conventional therapy would show improvements in diabetic markers relative to groups receiving conventional therapy alone.
Summary Our pilot study summed over both cohorts support the hypothesis that additional dietitian-led nutrition education synergizes with conventional pharmaceutical therapy to improve diabetic control as gauged by improved FBS, A1c and UACR, implying a significant role for this combined approach to community based diabetic health care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of Intrepid Health gave full ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵1 Footnotes: Professor Emeritus, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto;
↵2 Registered Dietitian & Consultant; Member, College of Dietitians of Ontario; email: samira.zarghami{at}gmail.com
Funding This study was supported entirely from local funds within the medical clinic, and by personal financing for publication by RMG.
Availability of data and materials: All data will be freely available on request
Conflict of Interest: Both authors confirm there are no conflicts of interest to declare
Consent for publication: All participating subjects (Ss) approved consented to publication with anonymity ensured.
Ethical Approval: The study was approved by a local ethics review board. All participating Subjects signed an informed consent form (appendix to manuscript).
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
