Abstract
Background Palliative care is recommended by clinical practice guidelines for patients with advanced heart failure (aHF), yet specialty palliative care (SPC) remains substantially underutilized in this population. We sought to quantify between-facility variation in SPC receipt among people with aHF and determine how much variation is explained by patient case mix and facility structural characteristics versus residual unmeasured factors.
Methods This retrospective cohort study included 23,991 Veterans with prevalent aHF identified through administrative data across 133 VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) with ≥20 aHF cases, from January 2022 to December 2023. Variation was assessed using multilevel logistic regression with facility random intercepts, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the adjusted median odds ratio (aMOR). Facility-specific risk-standardized SPC rates were used to estimate SPC encounters attributable to facility performance better or worse than the national rate.
Results Of the sample, the mean patient age was 72.3 years (SD = 10.0), and 97.6% were male. The national observed rate of SPC was 17.5%, with risk-adjusted rates varying approximately 14-fold across facilities (3.3% to 45.6%). The adjusted ICC was 11.5%, and aMOR was 1.87 (95% Confidence Intervals 1.70-2.06). Measured patient case-mix and facility structural characteristics explained only 18.9% of between-facility variation (proportional reduction in the ICC, fully adjusted vs. null model). Facilities performing better than the national rate delivered 791 more SPC encounters than expected (17.8%), while those performing worse than the national rate delivered 480 fewer encounters than expected (10.8%).
Conclusions In the context of a national mean rate of SPC that reflects substantial underuse, delivery varied 14-fold across VAMCs, with most variation unexplained by patient complexity or measured facility resources. These findings suggest that potentially modifiable organizational factors, beyond patient preferences or facility structures alone, may contribute to current utilization gaps and represent actionable targets for quality improvement.
What is new?In this national cohort of 23,991 people with advanced heart failure cared for at 133 VA Medical Centers, risk-adjusted rates of specialist palliative care delivery varied 14-fold across facilities (median odds ratio 1.87). Measured patient case-mix and facility structural characteristics explained only 18.9% of the between-facility variation.
Clinical implications?Substantial variation in palliative care delivery across VAMCs is not accounted for by differences in patient complexity or facility resources, suggesting that institutional processes and referral practices are key drivers and represent actionable targets for quality improvement.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRBs of Yale University and the West Haven Connecticut, Department of Veterans Affairs gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Sources of Funding: SLF received funding from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute from R56HL166523 and R01HL172840 and LH from the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30AG021342).
Sponsor’s Role: The analysis described here is based on work supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the Yale Center for Implementation Science, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, which had no role in the design, methods, participant recruitment, data collection, analysis, or preparation of this article or in the decision to submit this article for publication. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
Data Sharing Statement: Due to US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regulations and our ethics agreements, the analytic data sets used for this study are not permitted to leave the VA firewall without a Data Use Agreement. However, VA data are made freely available to researchers with an approved VA study protocol. For more information, please visit https://www.virec.research.va.gov.
Data Availability
Data are not available at this time.
Funder Information Declared
