ABSTRACT
Background Avacopan, an oral complement C5a receptor inhibitor, has been shown to help patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) achieve and sustain remission with reduced glucocorticoid exposure and associated toxicity. As of January 20, 2026, estimated global post-marketing exposure exceeded 25,000 patient-years. Hepatic adverse events (AEs), predominantly liver enzyme elevations observed during clinical development, remain an important post approval safety risk. Since approval, vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS), a rare but serious complication of drug induced liver injury (DILI) has been reported with avacopan use. This analysis evaluated Amgen’s global safety database data to characterize hepatic adverse event reports associated with avacopan, including VBDS.
Methods We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis of hepatic AEs recorded in the Amgen global safety database.
Results As of 20 January 2026, serious hepatic AEs were reported at approximately 31 events/1,000 patient-years. The majority of hepatic events comprised laboratory abnormalities that resolved following avacopan discontinuation. Thirty-one VBDS cases were reported and, of those, 27 originated from Japan. Fatal VBDS cases were reported predominantly from Japan and occurred in patients >65 years.
Conclusions Hepatotoxicity remains an important avacopan-specific safety risk. Post-marketing data indicate that most hepatic events are reversible laboratory abnormalities; however, serious liver injury and VBDS, including fatal outcomes, have been reported, predominantly from Japan. No new safety risks have emerged from the ongoing Japanese post-marketing study. Further investigation is warranted to understand potential mechanisms underlying the disproportionate occurrence of serious VBDS events in Japanese patients and inform optimized risk-mitigation strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors are employees of, and hold stock in, Amgen, Inc.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The report involves post-marketing safety data obtained from Amgen's Global Safety Database and therefore, Ethics committee/IRB approval is not required for this retrospective safety analysis. The data that is provided to us from the database is de-identified.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
DATA AVAILABILITY
Data underlying post-marketing pharmacovigilance summaries are derived from safety databases and regulatory sources and may not be publicly available because of privacy, pharmacovigilance, and regulatory constraints. Public regulatory documents and literature sources are listed in the References. Qualified researchers may request data from Amgen clinical studies. Complete details are available at http://www.amgen.com/datasharing





