Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparative Effectiveness of TTR Stabilizers for the Treatment of ATTR-CM Using Real-World Evidence: Acoramidis versus Tafamidis

Richard Wright, Trejeeve Martyn, Allison Keshishian, Elizabeth Nagelhout, Bret Zeldow, Margarita Udall, David Lanfear, Daniel P. Judge
doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.24.26351684
Richard Wright
1Pacific Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trejeeve Martyn
2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allison Keshishian
3Genesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ, USA
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Nagelhout
3Genesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bret Zeldow
3Genesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margarita Udall
4BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: margarita.udall{at}bridgebio.com
David Lanfear
5Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel P. Judge
6Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Progression of transthyretin (TTR) amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) can lead to worsening congestion requiring diuretic intensification (DI), heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations (HFH), and death. Tafamidis was the only approved ATTR-CM therapy in the US from 2019 until the 2024 approval of acoramidis, which achieves near-complete (≥90%) TTR stabilization. As head-to-head trials are lacking, real-world comparative effectiveness (CE) data are needed to guide treatment selection.

Objective To evaluate real-world CE of acoramidis versus tafamidis in newly treated patients with ATTR-CM.

Methods Retrospective study using Komodo Healthcare Map® US claims data tokenized to Claritas. Patients newly initiating acoramidis or tafamidis between 12/11/2024 and 04/30/2025 with ≥1 prescription claim (first defined as index date) and ≥6 months of continuous enrollment preindex date were included and followed until disenrollment, death, treatment switch, or study end date (07/31/2025). Outcomes included DI (initiation or dose-equivalent escalation of oral loop diuretics, parenteral loop diuretic use, or addition of thiazide-like diuretic) and a composite of DI, HFH (inpatient admission with a HF-related ICD-10-CM diagnosis code in any position), and mortality. Propensity score weighting balanced baseline characteristics, disease severity, comorbidity burden, and baseline medication use. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using weighted Cox proportional hazards models.

Results After weighting, acoramidis (n=170) and tafamidis (weighted sample size=448) patients were comparable at baseline (mean age, 78.6 vs 78.7 years; male, 80.0% vs 80.2%) with mean follow-up of 139 and 143 days, respectively. DI cumulative incidence curves separated early and remained divergent, with acoramidis significantly reducing the hazard of DI events by 43% compared with tafamidis (11.8% vs 20.5%; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.92; P=0.021). Acoramidis also had a significantly lower risk of composite events, with a 34% reduction in hazard compared with tafamidis (17.6% vs 26.4%; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99; P=0.046).

Conclusions In this first real-world CE study of newly treated patients, acoramidis had significantly lower risk of DI events and composite events of DI, HFH, and mortality than tafamidis, potentially supporting improved clinical stability with acoramidis initiation. Additional evaluation with longer follow-up, larger cohorts, and/or prospective clinical outcomes is warranted.

Competing Interest Statement

Dr Wright has received research funding from BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. and Cytokinetics; speaking fees from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, American Heart Association, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, and Novartis; consultancy fees from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., Cytokinetics, MyoKardia, Novartis, and Providence Health; and advisory board fees from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., Cytokinetics, and Novartis. Dr Martyn has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Edwards Lifesciences, and FIRE1; consultancy fees from Acorai, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., Dyania Health, Ensho Health, FIRE1, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer; and equity from Apricity Robotics and Kilele Health. Ms. Keshishian, Dr Nagelhout, and Dr Zeldow are employees of Genesis Research Group, which received financial compensation from BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., for preparing the research reported in the manuscript. Ms Udall is an employee and stockholder of BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., and stockholder of Pfizer, Inc. Dr Lanfear has received research funding from Akros Pharma Inc. (Shionogi), BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., Illumina, Kardigan, and Pfizer; and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin Heals, Cytokinetics, Illumina, Impulse Dynamics, and RyCarma Therapeutics. Dr Judge has received consultancy fees from Alexion, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Attralus, Bayer, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., Lexeo Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, and Rocket Pharmaceuticals

Funding Statement

The study was funded by BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (San Francisco, CA, USA).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Komodo database complies with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Given the deidentified nature of the data, patient consent and institutional review board approval were not required.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • The title was revised to provide improved clarity.

Data Availability

Qualified academic investigators may submit requests for access to data via MedInfo{at}BridgeBio.com. Requests for access to study data will be evaluated by BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. and access will be provided contingent upon the approval of a research/study proposal and the execution of a data sharing agreement. BridgeBio Pharma will consider requests for access to participant-level data if participant privacy is assured through methods such as data deidentification, pseudonymization, or anonymization (as required by applicable law), and if such disclosures were included in the relevant studys informed consent form or study protocol.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 30, 2026.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative Effectiveness of TTR Stabilizers for the Treatment of ATTR-CM Using Real-World Evidence: Acoramidis versus Tafamidis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparative Effectiveness of TTR Stabilizers for the Treatment of ATTR-CM Using Real-World Evidence: Acoramidis versus Tafamidis
Richard Wright, Trejeeve Martyn, Allison Keshishian, Elizabeth Nagelhout, Bret Zeldow, Margarita Udall, David Lanfear, Daniel P. Judge
medRxiv 2026.04.24.26351684; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.24.26351684
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparative Effectiveness of TTR Stabilizers for the Treatment of ATTR-CM Using Real-World Evidence: Acoramidis versus Tafamidis
Richard Wright, Trejeeve Martyn, Allison Keshishian, Elizabeth Nagelhout, Bret Zeldow, Margarita Udall, David Lanfear, Daniel P. Judge
medRxiv 2026.04.24.26351684; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.24.26351684

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (629)
  • Allergy and Immunology (914)
  • Anesthesia (343)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (4924)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (488)
  • Dermatology (422)
  • Emergency Medicine (667)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1657)
  • Epidemiology (16121)
  • Forensic Medicine (35)
  • Gastroenterology (1228)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (7174)
  • Geriatric Medicine (740)
  • Health Economics (1081)
  • Health Informatics (5184)
  • Health Policy (1452)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1808)
  • Hematology (596)
  • HIV/AIDS (1363)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16401)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1187)
  • Medical Education (686)
  • Medical Ethics (156)
  • Nephrology (733)
  • Neurology (7443)
  • Nursing (373)
  • Nutrition (1111)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (1274)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (1021)
  • Oncology (3692)
  • Ophthalmology (1077)
  • Orthopedics (400)
  • Otolaryngology (461)
  • Pain Medicine (488)
  • Palliative Medicine (142)
  • Pathology (715)
  • Pediatrics (1837)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (745)
  • Primary Care Research (780)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (6039)
  • Public and Global Health (9887)
  • Radiology and Imaging (2480)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1495)
  • Respiratory Medicine (1258)
  • Rheumatology (655)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (792)
  • Sports Medicine (591)
  • Surgery (794)
  • Toxicology (109)
  • Transplantation (314)
  • Urology (299)