Abstract
Purpose Quantitative metrics obtained from retinal fundus images (such as vessel length, tortuosity and other scale-dependent measures) are increasingly used as potential biomarkers for systemic diseases, including cardio- and neurovascular conditions. However, with the increasing prevalence of myopia and related axial growth, this study evaluated whether axial length scaling alters inferred biomarkers compared with measurements obtained without axial length scaling and whether these effects can be corrected.
Methods 2,309 clinic visits from patients aged ≤21 years were analysed for axial-length scaling analysis (range20 to 28 mm). The retinal fundus photographs were automatically segmented using AutoMorph to extract vascular metrics. The parameters were corrected for axial length using correction factors based on the Bennett–Littmann formula and true axial length.
Results Axial length significantly influenced biometric parameters (vessel metrics) derived from fundus photography. The magnitude of error in diameter and length of blood vessels was approximately 4-5% for each 1 mm deviation from the reference axial length of 24 mm, whereas the error in vessel area was approximately 9-10% per 1 mm, consistent with the geometric expectation that area scales with the square of linear dimensions. The scaling corrections for different axial lengths are presented.
Conclusions Axial-length-related magnification introduces systematic bias into retinal vascular metrics from fundus photographs. Bennett–Littmann correction using true axial length reduces these errors and should be adopted in quantitative fundus imaging and AI biomarker development.
Translational Relevance Accounting for axial-length-related magnification may improve the comparability and accuracy of quantitative retinal vascular biomarkers derived from fundus photographs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional ethics committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China (approval number: HSEARS20250407001)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We have updated the following: 1. Added more information about the study cohort eg age range, refractive error, gender etc 2. Discussion on the relationship always linear - especially at higher and lower axial lengths? 3. Rationale and impact of considering 24mm as reference for Emmetropic children who have smaller eyes 4. Explanation of what representative comparisons means would be useful in Fig 3 5. Explanation on errors are linked to vessel diameter, length and area needs to be given more prominence. 6. Axial length is not always measured in databases with fundus images but refractive error being more ubiquitous. Discussion related to the likely impact of refractive error on these measures. 7. References for statements like "widely used for AI biomarkers" etc 8. More detailed figure legends
Data Availability
All data directly produced in the current study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
