Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Optimizing Mobile Health Clinic Placement via Geospatial Modeling

View ORCID ProfileShakhawat H. Tanim, David White, Brian Witrick, View ORCID ProfileLior Rennert
doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.29.25342286
Shakhawat H. Tanim
1Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Public Health Modeling and Response, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, 503 Edwards Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shakhawat H. Tanim
  • For correspondence: shtanim{at}gmail.com
David White
2Research Assistant Professor, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University, 170 Sirrine Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Witrick
3Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, 503 Edwards Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lior Rennert
4Associate Dean for Health Sciences, Associate Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Director, Center for Public Health Modeling and Response, Clemson University, 503 Edwards Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lior Rennert
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Mobile health clinics (MHCs) provide flexible, community-based care to underserved populations facing geographic and socioeconomic barriers. Maximizing coverage enables MHCs to reach more individuals, improve preventive and continuous care, and reduce health disparities. However, few strategies exist to guide placement and routing decisions. We present a framework to increase MHC utilization by optimizing service coverage.

Study Design This is a retrospective study.

Methods We analyzed MHC deployments for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) screening and treatment from a local health system in South Carolina. We used a location-allocation model to identify potential MHC placement sites that maximized the number of uninsured residents within a 5-minute drive or 10-minute walk. Demand was represented by block centroids weighted by the size of the uninsured population. We compared service area population, defined as the size of the target population within driving or walking distance, for model-proposed sites with coverage from previous MHC deployments. We fit negative binomial mixed effects models to evaluate the association between service area population and MHC utilization.

Results Optimized placements can nearly double population coverage, expanding access to uninsured residents within practical travel distances by 90% for driving and 135% for walking—without requiring additional vehicles or resources. This approach also substantially reduces redundant service areas while shortening average travel times. Results show that small geographic shifts can yield significant improvements. In rural regions, greater geographic coverage is significantly associated with higher MHC utilization for HCV screening (drive p=.0037; walk p=.0095). We applied this framework with local health partners to guide real-world MHC deployment in South Carolina.

Conclusions This framework connects spatial analytics to service delivery, offering a replicable, operationally ready tool adaptable to various travel modes, site types, and disease contexts. It supports strategic placement in high-need locations by reducing travel time and service redundancy and ultimately improving health outcomes in medically underserved populations.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health (R01LM014193), the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health (R33DA059892), and the Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (NU38FT000011). The HCV screening and treatment program was supported by Gilead Sciences, Inc., (IN-US-987-5892) with additional funding specifically for uninsured patients from South Carolina Center for Rural and Primary Healthcare (2015593). The funders had no role in the design, conduct, reporting of the study, or decision to submit for publication. During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI) to improve readability and clarity in parts of the manuscript. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Clemson University (Protocol #IRB2022-0150) and by the Prisma Health institutional review board (IRB Pro 00106348).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Email: shtanim{at}gmail.com Email: whitedl{at}clemson.edu, Email: bwitric{at}clemson.edu, Email: liorr{at}clemson.edu

Data sharing

Community-level data is publicly available and can be accessed through the United States Census Bureau American Community Survey. Due to patient confidentiality, data from Clemson Rural Health’s HCV screening program cannot be shared.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 02, 2026.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optimizing Mobile Health Clinic Placement via Geospatial Modeling
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Optimizing Mobile Health Clinic Placement via Geospatial Modeling
Shakhawat H. Tanim, David White, Brian Witrick, Lior Rennert
medRxiv 2025.12.29.25342286; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.29.25342286
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Optimizing Mobile Health Clinic Placement via Geospatial Modeling
Shakhawat H. Tanim, David White, Brian Witrick, Lior Rennert
medRxiv 2025.12.29.25342286; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.29.25342286

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (629)
  • Allergy and Immunology (914)
  • Anesthesia (343)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (4924)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (488)
  • Dermatology (422)
  • Emergency Medicine (667)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1657)
  • Epidemiology (16123)
  • Forensic Medicine (35)
  • Gastroenterology (1228)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (7174)
  • Geriatric Medicine (740)
  • Health Economics (1081)
  • Health Informatics (5184)
  • Health Policy (1452)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1809)
  • Hematology (596)
  • HIV/AIDS (1363)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16401)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1187)
  • Medical Education (687)
  • Medical Ethics (156)
  • Nephrology (733)
  • Neurology (7443)
  • Nursing (373)
  • Nutrition (1111)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (1274)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (1022)
  • Oncology (3692)
  • Ophthalmology (1077)
  • Orthopedics (400)
  • Otolaryngology (461)
  • Pain Medicine (488)
  • Palliative Medicine (142)
  • Pathology (715)
  • Pediatrics (1837)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (745)
  • Primary Care Research (780)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (6040)
  • Public and Global Health (9887)
  • Radiology and Imaging (2480)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1495)
  • Respiratory Medicine (1258)
  • Rheumatology (655)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (792)
  • Sports Medicine (591)
  • Surgery (794)
  • Toxicology (109)
  • Transplantation (314)
  • Urology (299)