Abstract
Substantial evidence demonstrates that men have a higher prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) and decreased use of TB services compared to women. Gender roles and norms contribute to these disparities by influencing social and structural determinants, as well as individual behaviours. In this analysis, we investigated attitudes towards gender equitable norms and TB testing behaviours amongst Malawian men and women participating in a prevalence survey conducted before a community-based TB active case finding trial in Blantyre. Perceptions of gender norms were captured through a modified version of the Gender Equitable Men Scale (GEMS). Gender inequitable views were prevalent among both men (56.1%) and women (55.8%). The association between a composite GEMS score and TB testing history was modelled using logistic regression, accounting for various sociodemographic covariates (age, sex, wealth quantile, education, and HIV status) (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.88-1.42, p=0.373). Bivariate analysis demonstrated no notable confounding by any covariates and no strong effect modification. While GEMS score had no association with TB testing history among women, men with higher GEMS scores (less gender-equitable views) were more likely to have been tested for TB across age groups. These findings provide a basis for future investigation into the patterns and motives TB behaviours, particularly in older men. Tailored public health strategies may then be implemented to address this important population.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
PM, KCH, and ELC are supported by the UK FCDO (“Leaving no-one behind: transforming gendered pathways to health for TB”). KCH is also supported by the US National Institutes of Health (R-202309-71190). This research has been partially funded by UK aid from the UK government (to PM, KCH, and ELC) however the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official policies. ESN is funded by the Polio Research Committee (WHO).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this secondary analysis of prevalence survey data (reference: 28700) – and for the SCALE Study (reference: 16228) – was obtained through the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine’s Research Ethics Committee. In Malawi, ethics approval was obtained from the Malawian College of Medicine and Research Ethics Committee (COMREC, protocol number: P.12/18/2556). All participants provided written (or witnessed thumbprint, if illiterate) informed consent to participate.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding statement: PM, KCH, and ELC are supported by the UK FCDO (“Leaving no-one behind: transforming gendered pathways to health for TB”). KCH is also supported by the US National Institutes of Health (R-202309-71190). ESN is funded by the Polio Research Committee (WHO).
This research has been partially funded by UK aid from the UK government (to PM, ELC and KCH); however the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official policies.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/GY9JT). Due to ethical restrictions, some data has not been made publicly available.
