Uptake and feasibility of task-shifting of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra testing from laboratory technicians to nurses to increase access and reduce time to results: a multi-country mixed method research

INTRODUCTION

In 2023, of 10.8 million people estimated to have developed tuberculosis (TB) according to the World Health Organization (WHO), 12% (1.25 million) were children. Only 49% of children with TB were notified to WHO by National TB programs (NTP) mainly due to under diagnosis [1]. Challenges in diagnosing childhood TB include the paucibacilliary nature of pulmonary TB in children resulting in low sensitivity of existing microbiological diagnostic tests and the difficulty of obtaining respiratory samples in young children [2,3]. In addition, the centralisation of childhood TB diagnostic services in several high TB incidence and low and middle income countries (LMIC) reduces access to TB care, and thereby contributes to the gap of childhood TB diagnosis [4].

In 2022, to improve diagnosis and access to treatment for childhood TB, WHO recommended 1) decentralising childhood diagnosis services to low-level peripheral health facilities, and 2) improving the quality of the diagnosis approach and specifically the microbiological testing component, by using the rapid molecular Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Assay (Ultra; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) on stool samples and nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) [5]. The automated GeneXpert platform reduces sample manipulation time and biosafety risks and thereby increases the possibility of using the Xpert assay at low levels of healthcare [6]. The single module GeneXpert Edge (G1), a cheaper, heat and dust resistant, more user-friendly and battery-operated platform could be introduced at primary health centre (PHC) levels where there is a lower number of tests to perform daily [7]. In PHCs without laboratory and thus laboratory technicians, nurses could be trained on how to operate the G1 platform and to perform the Ultra assay. Another use for G1 and reason justifying training of nurses to perform Ultra would be to make the Xpert testing available in paediatric wards, to shorten time to diagnosis for highly vulnerable children outside laboratory opening hours.

Apart for simple point-of-care testing such as urine-lipoarabinomannan (LAM) test, there is no literature on task-shifting of microbiological TB diagnostic tests from laboratory technicians to nurses [8,9]. However, previous experiences in other fields of TB – related health care have shown that task-shifting/sharing from workers in specialised or higher cadres to health care workers (HCW) from a different background could address human resource challenges, address unmet health needs, improve health care quality in terms of service delivery and accessibility after short trainings with support supervisions in health services [10 - 13)].

To address the unmet need to improve access to childhood TB microbiological diagnosis, the TB-Speed Decentralisation study implemented Ultra testing on NPA by either nurses or laboratory technicians in children with presumptive TB at PHC level [14]. Similarly, the TB-Speed Pneumonia study that evaluated systematic TB detection in children admitted for severe pneumonia implemented in-wards Ultra testing on NPA by nurses to reduce time to treatment decision [2].

In this study, we compared the feasibility of Ultra testing on NPA in terms of uptake, performance and turnaround times between nurses and laboratory technicians, and we assessed the nurses’ perception and experience of Ultra testing on NPA within the TB-Speed Decentralisation and Pneumonia studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

In terms of uptake, at PHC level, 253/254 (99.6%) and 895/897 (99.8%) samples were tested by nurses and laboratory technicians respectively, and at referral hospitals, all samples were tested. There was no significant difference of detection yield between nurses and laboratory technicians. Although the proportion of invalid and error results was overall very low (< 5%) it was significantly higher when testing was done by nurses vs laboratory technicians at both PHC and referral hospitals (Table 1).

All PHCs participated in both EQA panels but one due to a missing EQA panel. There were 2/9 (33.3%) PHCs with nurses that had results > 87.5% in all EQA panels vs 9/14 (64.3%) for PHC with laboratory technicians, p=0.487. At referral hospital, 1/4 sites with Ultra testing done by nurse and 3/11 sites with testing done by laboratory technician did not participate in any EQA panel because panels had expired when the sites were randomized to the intervention. Since the TB-Speed pneumonia study had a stepped wedge design, the number of EQA panels per site depended on the time of randomization to the intervention of each site. There were 2/3 (66.7%) sites that had all EQA panel results > 87.5% vs 6/8 (75.0%) in sites with nurses or laboratory technicians (P=0.640), respectively (Figure 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1

External Quality Assurance Panel results Figure 1a: For nurses at Primary Health Centre sites Figure 1b: For laboratory technicians at Primary Health Centre sites Figure 1c: For nurses at referral hospitals Figure 1d: For laboratory technicians at referral hospitals

The median TAT of Ultra testing from sample reception to Ultra results at PHC levels, was 1.13 hour (h) [IQR 1.08; 1.79] for nurses and 1.10h [1.07; 1.45] for laboratory technicians, p < 0.001. The TAT was below 1h30 for 158/252 (62.7%) samples tested by nurses vs 677/893 (75.8%) for samples tested by laboratory technicians, p<0.001. At referral hospitals, the TAT from sample collection to results delivery was 1.95h [1.5; 2.87] for nurses and 2.87h [1.97; 4.81] for laboratory technicians, p <0.001. The TAT was within 3h for 201/258 (77.9%) samples for nurses vs 464/874 (53.1%) for laboratory technicians, p<0.001.

The median performance score results ranged between 4 and 5 out of 5 points for all performance indicators at PHC levels for sites with nurses and laboratory technicians (Table 2).

Difficulties were mostly related to the occurrence of technical errors when running the tests. During interviews, nurses reported that, during the first few weeks, performing Ultra testing was not so easy, but that they had felt more confident with time and practice: “First, the process is difficult, long process for it. For other work process, if we do more and more, we get faster, but for this process, it is related to a lot technical, like computer and typing. It takes time it is difficult” (Cambodia-PHC Nurse). Among the challenges, nurses reported experiencing technical issues with scanning barcode of the cartridge: “Sometimes, scanning barcode doesn’t match with cartridge. So, the cartridge will be broken, and we need to change new one. When scanning doesn’t match, we disconnect the cable from computer and then connect and scan again. Sometime, we put it in machine but computer also errors. It ran for a while then it can run backward. I had met this challenge. Then, I tried to put it again and call to Mr. XXXX and he suggested to put it again” (Cambodia-PHC Nurse); inserting the cartridge in the GeneXpert module: “With the machine, what we often have difficulty with is the last stage where the machine has to open, the part where you put the cassette in, and it often refuses, so you have to start again several times. (…) So that’s the difficulty. Otherwise, when it works, there are no problems” (Cote d’Ivoire PHC Nurse); and using the computer for documentation and navigating the platform: “My dear, we don’t know how to handle computers, that’s our problem (laughs). We don’t know how to handle computers. I myself had to…it’s because I had to force it…force it a little bit, that’s my little worry, technology is not my forte. But as I wanted. I was curious, so I forced it” (Cote d’Ivoire, ward nurse).) Another challenge more specific to PHC nurses was the lack of practice, due to few samples to test each week, “If I did not do it long time, I will forget it again. … I get confused. If I do it more often I will remember it.” (Cambodia-PHC nurse). On the other hand, some nurses reported the issue of increase in workload, especially when they have to re-run a test due to error result: “….it’s an extra activity yeah, …. it’s the lab to run except the RDT, now in this case it me to wait for probably 87 minutes for it to run, if it gives me error then I need to retrieve the bio-banked sample I start preparing, I has given me a work overload” (Zambia, Ward Nurse). Nurses highlighted several experiences of facilitators that included the training and training materials that they could consult after training and the support during supervision visits: “When I take the NPA sample, I mark everything because you have to mark the time of sampling. I go to my laboratory because it’s a small lab there, I go to the lab, the procedure for doing the technique is there, I look at the procedure, I technique the NPA and then I put it into the Xpert and I wait 87 minutes and then the result comes out.” (Cote d’Ivoire PHC Nurse). Nurse explained that the technical challenges could be overcome by contacting laboratory technicians: “Sometimes when we have such errors we usually call for a meeting with the lab so that we help and understand why we are having such errors, so they usually attend.” (Zambia, ward nurse). They appreciated the battery operated equipment: “(…) the machine itself runs on an autonomous battery, and we have up to two batteries. So even if there’s a power cut, we can work”. (Cote d’Ivoire PHC Nurse). Additional results can be found in Supplementary material Table S3.

DISCUSSION

In these two studies, task-shifting of Ultra testing on NPA samples with G1 from laboratory technicians to nurses was feasible and well appreciated irrespective of the level of facility with the support of training, supervision and quality assurance. These findings support the decentralization of childhood TB diagnosis at PHC level to increase access to care [16]. Using Ultra testing by nurses in-ward significantly reduced the time to treatment decision as compared to sites where testing was done in laboratory by laboratory technician.

The uptake of Ultra testing was very high in all facilities with either nurse or laboratory technician with only few invalid or error results. However, the proportion of invalid or error results was higher when testing was done by nurses, which is consistent with the lower EQA results in sites where the testing was done by nurses, especially at PHC level. This highlights the importance of training and supervision, as raised by the nurses during the interviews. The PHC nurses mentioned their challenge with the lack of experience due to the few samples to be tested per week, which can explain the trend of lower performance by PHC nurses than by referral hospital nurses. The number of tests per week might be a criterion to consider before decentralising Ultra testing at PHC level to secure good performance.

Among challenges, nurses mostly reported technical challenges in relation to laboratory practices such as pipetting or to data entry. Increased workload, fear of getting infected from positive samples, and lack of reliable power supply were additional challenges reported by nurses, which are similar to previous xperiences regarding implementation of on-site molecular TB testing in Uganda and Mongolia [17, 18]

Training and close supervision were highlighted as key facilitators by nurses. This is consistent with previous experience on task shifting of TB–HIV co-infection management in Uganda [19].

In as-much-as task-shifting was possible in our study, we need to be weary of the workload of the nurses and to recommend that a content and context-specific approach should be considered for task shifting where applicable to support nurses to effectively adapt to performing new tasks.

Within TB-Speed, Ultra testing was a new experience for nurses and was met with enthusiasm about the positive impact it would have on the quality of childhood TB diagnosis services. The experience of learning something technical and independently executing it after a few days of training and periodic support gave the nurses a sense of confidence, increased their knowledge and autonomy in their capacity to provide reliable and quality health care services in shorter time to the community. This tends to increasing job satisfaction of the HCWs, [18,20]. Nurses at PHC levels perceived that being able to provide such a high level of service which is normally not at their level to provide, will boost their career, increase confidence of the community in them and the visibility of their health facilities and roll-out patient referral, as mentioned in the interviews, thus, increasing population access and coverage, [18, 20–22].

The main study limitation was the potential site selection bias. Sites with Ultra testing done by nurses or laboratory technicians were selected for convenience based on implementation requirements following site assessment. Therefore, sites implementing Ultra by nurses or laboratory technicians were not randomly selected. Therefore, we did not control for the heterogeneity between sites and it is possible that other factors related to the sites independent of the personnel performing the testing could affect the study endpoints. Although it was an operational research done with existing facility staff, the study conditions in terms of support may not reflect what would be available in real life.

In conclusion, the study findings suggest that task-shifting from laboratory technicians to nurses for on-site TB molecular diagnostic testing could contribute to improve access to microbiological TB diagnosis at PHCs and could reduce time to treatment decision. Regardless of the technological advancements and development of molecular testing platforms geared towards increasing accessibility to tests and overcoming infrastructural and environmental limitations, close support supervision and support after training is key in identifying and addressing underlying challenges. This can aid to re-design or develop context and content-specific training programs followed by periodic refresher trainings to build the capacity of the HCW in adopting and performing new tasks [18, 20–22]. Human resource shortage and high mobility are a huge challenge in LMICs and task-shifting could contribute to fill-in this gap.

COMPETING INTEREST

There exist no competing interest to declare

FUNDING STATEMENT

The TB Speed Decentralisation and the TB-Speed pneumonia study were funded by UNITAID (2017-15-UBx-TB-Speed), with a co-funding by the Initiative (Expertise France) for the TB-Speed Pneumonia study. Studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03831906) and (NCT04038623).

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

OM, MB, EW conceived and designed the TB-Speed Decentralisation and Pneumonia studies. JOG coordinated the qualitative component of both studies. OM, MB, and EW led the study at international level. JVT, RM, GB, JMA, LB, CC, CK and EW coordinated the implementation of these studies in the different countries. RK, MN, KK, EM, SY, NEM, TO and JM coordinated laboratory activities at country level in the different countries. BB and BJ coordinated on site qualitative data collection. ML and NEM coordinated laboratory activities at the international level. NEM as part of here PHD project collected data, performed analyses and wrote the first draft of the manuscript with support from JOG, MB, BB and BJ. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.