Abstract
Adolescents and young adults with HIV are reported to be at high risk for common mental health disorders (CMD), but studies in India are limited. The risks may be greater among adolescents and young adults with perinatally acquired HIV (APHIV), as they face lifelong medical challenges, higher levels of stigma, and stressors related to disclosure, adherence, and transition to adult care. We screened for depression and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and explored psychosocial experiences among a cohort of APHIV in southern India to inform development of tailored CMD interventions. Between March-June 2023, we administered a cross-sectional survey to participants in the I’mPossible Fellowship, a peer-led mentorship program for APHIV in southern India. Survey design and administration incorporated participatory research principles, wherein trained peer mentors (youth investigators) administered screening tools for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9: PHQ-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7: GAD-7), resilience (Child Youth Resilience Measure-Revised – CYRM-R), and an abbreviated HIV stigma Scale. Subsequently we conducted focus group discussions with selected participants to explore perspectives on mental health, stigma and perceived pathways towards improved health outcomes. We used multivariable regression to identify correlates of positive CMD screens and inductively analyzed focus group transcripts. Among 185 APHIV survey participants, mean age was 18.6 years (SD 3.5 years); 63.2% were male. Most (91.9%) had lost one or both parents, and 43.2% lived in child care institutions (CCIs). The majority (90.4%) were virally suppressed (VL<150 copies/mL). PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores in the severity category of mild or above were defined as positive. A high proportion screened positive for at least one CMD (62.7%), depression alone (25.9%), GAD alone (7%), or both (29.7%). Externalized stigma was high (74.6%), reinforcing disclosure concerns (81.1%). Loss of both parents was associated with increased odds of anxiety (aOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.07-4.09). Exploration of anxiety and depression-related factors among APHIV revealed themes across the socioecological model (SEM) constructs that included uncertainty about transitioning to adult care, ART adherence challenges, and maladaptive coping mechanisms. Family support, disclosure fears, school pressures, stigma, and evolving societal attitudes also shaped participants’ mental health experiences. The significant burden of positive screens for CMD among APHIV requires HIV programs in India to prioritize youth-tailored stigma-informed mental health interventions alongside strategies for successful adult care transition and long-term viral suppression.
Introduction
As of 2022, 1.65 million adolescents aged 10-19 years and 3.1 million young people aged 15-24 years were living with HIV worldwide.1,2 Collectively, adolescents and young adults (defined as those between the ages 10-24 years, referred to as ‘youth’ in this paper) constitute at least a third of all new HIV infections globally.2,3,4 Adolescence is a distinct developmental phase characterized by significant physical, psychological, and social changes, marking a critical transition from childhood to adulthood.5,6 This period is associated with both opportunities for social and emotional growth, as well as a myriad of social, emotional, and behavioral challenges.7 Approximately 50% of mental health disorders are estimated to have onset during adolescence,8,9 and they contribute to suicide, a leading cause of death among adolescents in all regions of the world.10–12 Multiple studies indicate that young people with HIV, particularly adolescents and young adults with perinatally acquired HIV (APHIV) have a high prevalence of common mental health disorders (CMD) such as depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).13–16 Systematic reviews estimate that 26.1% of youth with HIV have depression,15 while 45.6% have anxiety.17 The burden of CMD is higher among this population compared to youth without HIV and is influenced by distinct physiological and psychosocial vulnerabilities, including the physiological effects of HIV and treatment regimens, the burden of managing a chronic illness,18 and psychosocial stressors such as pervasive stigma and discrimination.19–22
CMD have a significant impact on HIV treatment outcomes; co-existing unaddressed depression and/or anxiety disorders are associated with decreased antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, increased sexual risk behaviors, lower viral suppression, higher attrition across the HIV treatment cascade, and increased mortality rates.23–26 While ART has contributed to decreased HIV-related mortality overall,27–29 this double burden of the HIV epidemic and CMD predominantly affects low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where approximately 90% of APHIV live.30,31 Studies evaluating CMD among APHIV in LMICs have primarily focused on countries in sub-Saharan Africa and to a lesser extent, in Southeast Asia. Such research is limited in India32,33 although a substantially large APHIV population live in India, with numbers comparable to countries in sub-Saharan Africa.34–36
Globally there is a paucity of youth-tailored evidence-based mental health interventions for CMD among APHIV.37 More recently interventions spanning family-based psychosocial and economic interventions, as well as group and community-based interventions have been developed in pilot studies and randomized controlled trials among youth with HIV.37,38 Some of these interventions include elements of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness, problem-solving therapy, and other evidence-based mental health interventions.39–42 In India’s context, the lack of well-studied mental health interventions specifically tailored for APHIV is stark. There is a great need for interventions for preventing and addressing CMD to be integrated into public sector HIV treatment programs, where most APHIV seek care.
In 2021, we established the I’mPossible Fellowship, an 18-month program in which young adults living with HIV, termed ‘fellows’ receive training and supervision to provide support related to ART adherence, education, and psychosocial needs to children and adolescents with HIV, termed ‘peers’, through one-on-one mentorship. While peer support can enhance HIV and broader psychosocial outcomes,39–42 addressing specific CMD necessitates data-informed contextual evidence-based interventions. In this study, we aimed to screen for CMD among APHIV participants of the I’mPossible Fellowship in India, explore their psychosocial experiences, and understand structural and social determinants of CMD to inform the development of youth-tailored mental health interventions.
Methods
Participants and study setting
The I’mPossible Fellowship program was established in the southern states of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu through collaborative efforts with community-based organizations providing integral support, such as safe residential care, medical treatment, education, and psychosocial assistance, to children and APHIV. Eligible participants in this study were between ages 15-24 years, received a diagnosis of HIV prior to 10 years of age, were resident in child care institutions (CCIs) or in family-based care. Interventions integral to the I’mPossible Fellowship program are described in detail elsewhere.43 In addition to the regular structured interventions within the program, CCI supervisors were available to provide oversight and facilitate referrals to state welfare schemes, pediatric specialists, psychiatrists, and other mental health professionals. Although it provides well-rounded support to APHIV, the I’mPossible program in its current form does not incorporate evidence-based interventions to address CMD among peers, and higher level needs such as treatment of CMD are primarily addressed through referrals. Exploring CMD and psychosocial experiences in this study was a crucial step towards developing targeted interventions addressing mental health in this population.
We conducted the study between 17 April 2023 and 24 November 2023. Participants included peers from the first cohort of the I’mPossible Fellowship that comprised 257 peers. Those with ages 13 years and above were included in this study. All had a diagnosis of HIV prior to age 10 years (definition of perinatally-acquired HIV) and were aware of their HIV status. For participants with age ≥18 years oral, informed consent was obtained by trained research staff, and for participants <18 years, oral permission from a parent or legal guardian followed by oral assent from the minor participant was obtained.
Youth investigators and community-based participatory research
For survey development, adaptation, and administration, we incorporated a community-based participatory approach by including 5 fellows from the second cohort and 4 fellows from third cohort of the I’mPossible Fellowship (who had not directly provided mentorship to study participants).44 These ‘youth investigators’ actively shaped the research process by culturally adapting the English, Tamil, and Kannada versions of CMD screening instruments utilized in the survey through iterative discussions with experts, while simultaneously drawing on their own perspectives as APHIV. Prior to conducting study assessments, they also underwent certification in human subjects’ protection, training in survey administration techniques, and mental health screening, including recognizing when peer participants needed referrals to counselors or mental health professionals for further evaluation and care.
Mental Health Surveys
The comprehensive mental health survey comprised a general questionnaire and specific instruments to measure CMD, resilience, and stigma; each of these components were previously validated in several low- and-middle income countries, including India.45–48 The survey components are described below:
(i) The general questionnaire collected the following data: sociodemographic characteristics, such as age, gender, place of residence; education characteristics, including current school enrollment status, reasons for school discontinuation; employment characteristics, including current employment status and workplace challenges; and HIV treatment characteristics, such as self-reported ART adherence, and viral load measurements taken within the past year.
(ii) The Child and Youth Resilience Measurement (CYRM-R).49 This screening tool was designed to identify strengths and resources possessed by participants, assessing the quality of peer participants’ relationships with family and caregivers, and inner strengths, such as emotional regulation and problem-solving skills.49,50
(iii) The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Questionnaire.48,51 To screen for depression among peer participants, we administered the PHQ-9, a 9-item questionnaire using a Likert scale scoring system to categorize depressive symptoms over the past two weeks into five severity levels: none/minimal (score 0-4), mild (score 5-9), moderate (score 10-14), moderately severe (score 15-19), and severe (score 20-27).
(iv) The General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Questionnaire:48,52 We also administered the 7-item GAD-7 questionnaire categorizing symptoms of GAD over the past two weeks into four severity levels: minimal (score 0-4), mild (score 5-9), moderate (score 10-14), and severe (score 15-21).
(v) HIV Stigma Questionnaire: To assess peer participants’ perceptions of HIV-related stigma, we created an abbreviated 4-item version of a 12-item HIV Stigma Survey,53 which was previously validated among adolescents with HIV in India,54 and itself adapted from Berger’s validated 40-item stigma questionnaire.55,56 The abbreviated version was intended to obtain initial insights of HIV-related stigma and comprised four statements, representing constructs of internal stigma (personalized stigma, and negative self-image), and external stigma (concerns about disclosure, and concerns regarding public attitudes towards individuals with HIV) (Supplementary Table 1).54,56, 57
Focus group discussions
We conducted three FGDs, each consisting of six participants (n=18), recruited across three sites, Belgaum, Bangalore, and Krishnagiri. Aiming to explore peers’ psychosocial experiences, we used purposive recruitment strategies to include equal representation from adolescents <18 years of age and young adults between ages 18-24 years of both genders, and from APHIV living in child care institutions and those living in family-based care. The discussion guide for the focus group discussions was developed by the research team with significant input from current and former fellows and informed by the socioecological model which recognizes the multifaceted and dynamic inter-relatedness between individual and environmental factors including family, school, community and policies/governmental agencies that impact health and behavior.58 Within this framework, questions were formulated to assess factors contributing to overall mental health, such as peer participants’ personal and interpersonal psychosocial experiences, including experiences within and perceptions regarding their community and the larger society, existing supports, and coping behaviors. FGDs were facilitated by a trained fellow from the third cohort, with the participation of a study investigator (with MD or PhD training) who had experience facilitating focus groups. They were conducted in a private space and had an average duration of 1 hour. Focus groups for female adolescents and young adults were conducted separately from focus groups for male adolescents and young adults. Facilitators were gender concordant with focus groups. Data saturation was reached for all major topics. The discussions’ audios were recorded and translated from Kannada/Tamil to English to allow for qualitative coding of the translated transcripts. Additionally, we conducted member checking of transcripts to ensure the accuracy of the findings by reviewing them with the peer participants.
Data Definitions
The following data definitions were established for this study: for the resilience measure, we divided scores into quartiles such that a total CYRM-R score of ≤25th percentile was defined as ‘low resilience’. For sensitivity analysis, we assessed ≤15th, ≤33rd and ≤50th percentile of the total CYRM-R score, to determine if a change in threshold materially impacted the results. The presence of a positive screen for depression was defined as a severity of mild and above (score of ≥5) according to the PHQ-9,51 and presence of a positive screen for GAD was defined as a severity of mild and above (score of ≥5) based on the GAD-7.59 A detectable viral load was defined as ≥150 copies/mL, consistent with established literature.60,61 Self-reported ART adherence in the past month was categorized as optimal (0-<7 days of medications missed) or suboptimal (≥7 days of medications missed).
Data Analysis
Quantitative
We characterized the study cohort using summary statistics and generated multivariable logistic regression models to determine correlates of a positive screen for (1) depression alone, (2) GAD alone, and (3) at least one CMD (i.e., depression and/or anxiety). Variables included (a) sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, place of residence); (b) education and employment characteristics (school discontinuation and employment status); (c) HIV treatment characteristics (duration on ART and viral suppression); (d) psychosocial factors (low resilience and parental deceased status). Variables assessed in univariable analysis were included in the multivariable model based on prior evidence of likely association with CMD.8,62–72 Analyses were performed using SPSS version 29.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York).
Qualitative
Analysis of the FGDs’ transcripts entailed inductive and deductive approaches for thematic analysis. Initially, a coding scheme was developed through collective team discussion and insights from comparable studies. Subsequently, focus group discussions transcripts were independently coded using Dedoose software by two researchers (AAS and AK), who then convened to identify emerging themes, address discrepancies, and finalize the coding scheme. A third researcher (EN) evaluated the transcripts, overseeing the reconciliation process and ensuring consistent application of codes.
Ethics Statement
This study obtained approval from the Institutional Review Boards of the Y.R. Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education (YRGCARE), Chennai, India and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. Due to the combination of in-person and virtual data collection, informed consent, assent, and parental permission for this study were obtained orally and recorded through researcher-signed documentation. Written consent, assent, and permission could not be acquired due to participants’ lack of access to printers and scanners for signing forms. Institutional Review Boards approved the use of oral consent, assent, and parental permission and reviewed the forms to ensure that participants received a clear explanation of the study’s purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits
Results
Survey findings
General characteristics of participants
Among 216 age-eligible peers who were contacted for the mental health survey administration, 185 peer participants responded (12 could not be contacted, 19 cited lack of time or interest for declining). Survey participants had a mean age of 18.6 years (SD 3.5 years) and 63.2% were male, 50.3% reported that both parents were deceased, 54.6% lived in rural areas, and 43.2% lived in child care institutions (CCIs). Among those who lived in family-based care, 44.7% lived in one-parent households. Educational discontinuation was reported by 29.7%, the primary reasons being financial constraints (44.6%) and challenges in keeping up with schoolwork (23.1%). With regard to employment, 40.0% of the participants were currently working but reported facing challenges, including insufficient income (28.8%) and fears of HIV disclosure in the workplace (5.5%) (Table 1).
HIV treatment characteristics
Participants’ mean duration on ART was 9.7 years (SD 4.0 years) (Table 1). Viral suppression (viral load <150 copies/mL in the past 12 months since study recruitment) was high at 90.4%. Optimal adherence was seen among 83.0% of participants who reported <7 days of missed doses in the past month.
Resilience measures
Total resilience score and subscale scores were high among the peer participants (Table 1). Low resilience (CYRM-R score of ≤25th percentile) was observed in 51 participants.
Stigma survey
The majority of peer participants, 74.6%, reported that people with HIV face rejection when their status is disclosed, reflecting concerns about public attitudes toward individuals with HIV. Similarly, 81.1% reported making considerable efforts to keep their HIV status, or that of their parents, a secret, highlighting deep concerns about external disclosure. Nearly half, 48.4%, reported being shunned by people who became aware of their HIV status or that of their parents. However, perceptions of negative self-image were comparatively low, with 18.9% of peer participants reporting such feelings.
Screening for depression and generalized anxiety among APHIV
Among participants, 55.7% had a positive screen for any category of depression, and 14.6% for depression of moderate and above severity. With regard to screening results for generalized anxiety, 36.8% had a positive screen for any category of GAD and 9.8% for GAD of moderate and above severity (Table 2). Nearly two-thirds (62.7%) of participants had positive screens for either mild and above depression and/or mild and above GAD.
In multivariable analysis of a positive screen for GAD (severity of mild and above; GAD-7 score of ≥ 5), double orphan status emerged as a significant correlate (aOR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.07-4.09, p=0.030) associated with a two-fold increase in the odds of having a positive screen for GAD (Table 3). Although other correlates were not statistically significant in both univariable and multivariable models, the directionality of odds ratios suggested that female gender, school discontinuation, and current employment status could be associated with increased odds of having a positive screen for GAD. In the univariable and multivariable analysis of a positive screen for depression, no correlates showed statistically significant associations. (Table 3). However, the directionality of odds ratios in these models suggested that female gender, double orphan status, lack of viral suppression, and low resilience could be associated with increased odds of having a positive screen for depression. When at least one CMD (depression and/or GAD) was considered, none of the correlates were statistically significant in their association with having a positive screen for at least one CMD. However, the directionality of odds ratios in these models suggested that female gender, double orphan status, school discontinuation, and low resilience could be associated with increased odds of having a positive screen for at least one CMD. Low resilience (using thresholds of ≤ 15th, ≤ 33rd, and ≤ 50th percentiles) in separate models did not materially change these findings.
Insights from focus group discussions
Among the 18 FGD participants mean age was 16.7 years (SD = 1.5), 12 were male adolescents or young adults, 15 resided in childcare institutions, and all were studying or employed. Among the 12 FGD participants who had also completed the mental health survey, 6, 4 and 7 screened positive for depression, GAD and at least one CMD, respectively, highlighting mental health vulnerabilities within this group. Several themes emerged across the socioecological model (SEM) constructs that FGD participants identified as potential contributors or alleviators of symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Narratives of stigma crossed multiple domains of the SEM. (Figure 1 and Table 5).
Individual factors
Uncertainty with transitioning into adult care
Participants’ concerns spanned across education, employment, ART adherence challenges, and future support after transitioning out of known care systems. (Table 5). APHIV who lived in childcare institutions expressed worries about navigating the health system after they left these institutions and in general described being underprepared for transition.
HIV treatment adherence challenges
While participants generally had high ART adherence, they identified situations where taking daily medications was challenging (for example, when at work, or when traveling), and found taking medications to be a stressful experience due to persistent concerns around inadvertent disclosure.
Individual coping mechanisms
Participants relied in part on individual coping mechanisms, such as distraction through hobbies and self-care activities. However, particularly among young adults who had transitioned from CCIs to independent living, participants described maladaptive coping mechanisms with substance use in order to deal with structural and psychosocial vulnerabilities including financial and housing insecurity, and poor social support.
Interpersonal factors
Relationships with friends and families
Family support played a significant role as a protective interpersonal factor, whereas lack of family support was a contributor to symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. There were notable differences in family support between APHIV living in CCIs and those living in the community; the former were often double orphans and primarily relied on a sibling or other peers in the CCIs for support. They perceived their extended family members as lacking understanding, whereas APHIV living in the community received support from a parent (usually of shared HIV status) that they could easily confide in.
Disclosure concerns
Personalized stigma (a community factor) intersected with disclosure concerns (an interpersonal factor). Several participants expressed fears around others avoiding them or not wanting to talk to them or interact with them because of their HIV status. As a result, participants generally avoided disclosing their status to even people who knew them well.
Interpersonal resilience
Participants identified family and friends as key sources of emotional support, providing a comfortable space for sharing their feelings. Among family members, siblings, both with and without HIV, were often mentioned as individuals with whom participants spoke to and supported them the most. Some participants noted that family members that do not have HIV often struggle to understand their stress. Conversely, some participants expressed distrust towards their friends, fearing loss of confidentiality.
Resonance with HIV status
When discussing fellows who shared their HIV status, participants expressed that they felt no hesitation in sharing their challenges and mutual understanding. They often mentioned that it was easier to talk to someone who understood their situation compared to someone who did not. In particular, when it came to issues related to HIV health, such as hospital visits and obtaining ART, fellows proved to be vital sources of support.
Community factors
School challenges
School was identified as a significant source of distress, stemming from various factors, including academic pressure, fear of others discovering their status, and lack of support to continue their education. Schools were also primary spaces where participants interacted with others without HIV, where they often faced challenges when their status was known, including having to move schools. Sources of anxiety included daily studies and exams, and financial support needed to continue their studies.
Personalized and enacted stigma
Participants expressed a strong belief that they would face rejection, isolation, or negative treatment from others due to their HIV status, leading to increased anxiety. This concern was particularly evident when discussing social interactions and general societal attitudes where participants feared that disclosure of their status could lead to social distancing or exclusion from events. These anxieties impacted their participation in activities and school attendance.
Societal factors
Societal norms influencing attitudes towards people with HIV
Participants had more nuanced perceptions about societal and public attitudes towards people with HIV. While they observed a broader climate of stigma and negative views, they recognized that not all individuals embraced these attitudes. For example, one participant noted how, despite some community members avoiding them due to HIV status, others began to engage more positively as awareness about HIV transmission increased leading to greater acceptance. These experiences reflect that societal attitudes do not permeate monolithically into personal interactions, leading to more individualized perceptions of acceptance or rejection.
Discussion
Within a contemporary context of widespread ART availability and accessibility in India, our study highlights unmet mental health vulnerabilities among APHIV despite achievement of treatment success with high rates of viral suppression. We identified these vulnerabilities within a peer support program, suggesting the need for tailored evidence-based interventions for APHIV that extend beyond viral suppression alone and address broader factors related to mental health and optimal transition into adult care and independent living.
Our estimates of prevalence of positive screens for CMD among APHIV have implications for youth in India regardless of achievement of HIV treatment success. Despite more than 90% of APHIV in our study being virally suppressed, more than half had positive screens for mild or greater severity of CMD. The prevalence of positive moderate and severe depression (14.6%) and moderate and severe anxiety (9.8%) in our cohort is comparable to studies among similar populations in other settings with high levels of viral suppression.73–75 For example, in a recent study in Thailand among a cohort of 100 young people with HIV, of whom 81.0% had undetectable viral loads, approximately 20% experienced positive screens for significant depression or anxiety.75 In particular, 7.0% had isolated depression, defined by a modified PHQ-9 for adolescents score of ≥10 (moderate severity or higher); 2% had isolated anxiety, defined by a Child Anxiety Related Disorder (SCARED) score of ≥25, thus indicating the presence of an anxiety disorder; 8% experienced comorbid anxiety and depression.75
Our study’s screening estimates are significant in that they signal the presence of a high burden of both mild and more severe CMD among APHIV who are highly engaged in HIV care. We found that double orphan status was significantly associated with increased odds of positive screens for anxiety, while other structural and psychosocial vulnerabilities, including school discontinuation and low resilience demonstrated directionality towards increased odds of positive screens for anxiety, depression, or at least one CMD. These vulnerabilities and other structural and psychosocial factors such as school exclusion, bereavement, and poverty have been significantly associated with CMD in other global studies among young people with HIV.76–81 Notably, studies across several settings suggest that structural and psychosocial vulnerabilities concentrate among young people with HIV who have not achieved viral suppression,82–84 lending support for a potentially higher burden of significant CMD in this group. One may anticipate that APHIV experiencing challenges with viral suppression and engagement in HIV care will have an even higher burden of moderate and above CMD severity.
Our study offers insights into distinct psychosocial factors related to mental health among sub-groups of APHIV, particularly those who live in CCIs and in family-based care. A substantial proportion of our participants lived in CCIs, with the rest living with a parent and/or extended families. In multivariable models, although there was no significant difference in association of positive screens for CMD between CCI-based APHIV versus others possibly owing to small sample sizes, qualitative exploration yielded narratives that highlight divergence around mental health stressors in these sub-groups. Family support, a well-known protective factor for CMD, was often lacking in APHIV living in CCIs compared to those living with a parent and/or extended family.85–87 Consistent with other studies,88 APHIV in CCIs received minimal family support and described strained relationships with extended family members as a source of stress, whereas for APHIV living with families, a parent with a shared HIV status, as well as other family members were sources of support, in addition to peers. Notably, the prospect of graduation from institutional care at age 18 years (a legal stipulation in India) and needing to navigate multiple transitions simultaneously, including transition to emerging adulthood and independent living with minimal preparation and supports, was a distinct stressor for adolescents under the age of 18 years living in CCIs.
Stigma narratives were consistent with other studies,89,90 with APHIV being highly concerned about societal and public attitudes towards people with HIV. Narratives around school discontinuation, a risk factor for CMD among youth, also centered around anticipatory and enacted stigma with examples of actual experiences of forced school exclusion due to inadvertent disclosure of HIV status. Strikingly, in our study, public attitudes, disclosure concerns, and anticipatory and enacted stigma did not necessarily translate to negative self-image among APHIV, indicating that external stigma was much more significant than internal stigma in this population. This may in part be related to receiving peer support that incorporates regular group discussions on shared experiences of stigma and related coping mechanisms.
The findings of our study underscore the need to develop and implement evidence-based and stigma-informed interventions for preventing and addressing CMD among APHIV that are also differentiated to address the unique vulnerabilities of sub-groups, such as orphans and those growing up in CCIs. Onset of significant CMD in adolescence, in particular depression and anxiety, confers a higher risk of recurrence in adulthood.91–94 For APHIV, addressing CMD early needs to be a priority as this has the potential to impact the trajectories of two independent, yet intersecting causes of ill-health and death–HIV and mental health disorders– across the life course in this population.
A significant health system gap to address CMD exists in India and other LMICs due to suboptimal availability of mental health professionals.95 Task-shifted stepped-care approaches for lay-person delivery of evidence-based interventions for CMD among adolescents have been successful in school-settings in India.96–98 However, as found in our study and others,20,99,100 youth with HIV encounter unique challenges in school settings and work settings, including school exclusion and significant concerns around disclosure. Therefore, spaces which these youth perceive as being “safe” may be better suited for task-shifted delivery of evidence-based interventions for CMD. Task-shifted approaches include leveraging existing ART counselors in public sector ART centers to screen for CMD and deliver evidence-based interventions. While high client volume at public sector ART centers may pose challenges to integrating task-shifted roles for mental health care delivery, youth-friendly models of HIV care led by trained youth and community members show promise globally, 101–104 and in Indian settings105 in addressing CMD among APHIV.
One consistent finding across studies, including ours, is the natural resonance around HIV status and lived experiences among APHIV, and consequently the preference for communication about challenges to peers. In various countries, peer supporters are part of national HIV programs, such as community treatment supporters for youth with HIV in Zimbabwe.106,107 Recent studies indicate that peer-delivered evidence-based mental health interventions, such as problem-solving therapy, can be integrated into peer support models to address CMD.38,108,109 Our study serves as a proof-of-concept that with partnership and investment, APHIV can not only provide peer support but also be trained to conduct screening for CMD among their peers. As the next step, peer-delivered interventions for CMD should be a focus of further development and research in India. Finally, developing and incorporating differentiated interventions that include additional components such as addressing externalized stigma, evidence-based ART adherence interventions,110–112 and evidence-based transition readiness tools for APHIV living in CCIs needs to be a key consideration for delivery of CMD interventions to AYPHIV.113,114
Our study has a few limitations. First, all participants in the cross-sectional survey were recipients of the I’mPossible peer mentorship intervention, which may have mitigated CMD risk while positively influencing self-image and viral suppression. However it is less likely that peer support alone would have improved significant CMD, since no CMD-specific interventions are presently incorporated in the I’mPossible Fellowship. Second, APHIV in this study were generally highly engaged in HIV care, and we were limited in assessing CMD among those who were under-engaged in HIV care or lost to follow up, suggesting that our findings may be an underestimation of the actual prevalence among all APHIV. Moreover, since our population included only those with perinatally acquired HIV, CMD patterns may be different in youth with behaviorally acquired HIV. Additional studies utilizing population-level sampling strategies are needed to estimate true prevalence of CMD among youth with HIV across regions in India. Third, our qualitative exploration did not thoroughly explore the association of gender with CMD. In general, women in India tend to have a higher prevalence of CMD influenced by gender-specific risk factors such as gender-based violence, socioeconomic inequality, and caregiving burdens, that are likely to be compounded for young women with HIV in India101,102 Fourth, the small sample size in our survey likely limited determination of statistical significance of correlates of CMD.
Our study also has several strengths. Few studies in India have utilized validated screening instruments such as the PHQ-9 or GAD-7115 to screen for CMD among APHIV; most studies thus far involve qualitative exploration or assess broader psychosocial outcomes such as quality of life.32,33,116–119 Our approach of a cross-sectional survey followed by a qualitative research approach provides a more rounded understanding of CMD and their determinants among APHIV. Additionally, participatory approaches involving trained APHIV as youth investigators engaged in this research is a distinct strength, and our study is among the first in India utilizing this approach.44 Responses to peer-delivered screening instruments are also less likely to be prone to social desirability bias, yielding more reliable estimates of positive screens for CMD.
Conclusions
We conclude that the high burden of positive screens for CMD among APHIV despite achievement of HIV treatment success necessitates immediate and long-term investment to integrate mental health screening and intervention implementation across the pediatric-to-adult HIV care continuum for all adolescents with HIV. Implementation research that incorporates community-based participatory research principles is needed to inform both screening and delivery of evidence-based interventions for CMD among APHIV. Such investments need to be a high priority as they have the potential to not only shape HIV care outcomes but also yield lasting benefits beyond HIV across the life-course for young people with HIV.
Data Availability
De-identified data used in this study may be accessed upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Acknowledgements
We thank our partner non-governmental organizations without whom our research would not have been possible.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- 32.↵
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
- 35.
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.
- 41.
- 42.↵
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.↵
- 46.
- 47.
- 48.↵
- 49.↵
- 50.↵
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.↵
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.
- 64.
- 65.
- 66.
- 67.
- 68.
- 69.
- 70.
- 71.
- 72.↵
- 73.↵
- 74.
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.
- 78.
- 79.
- 80.
- 81.↵
- 82.↵
- 83.
- 84.↵
- 85.↵
- 86.
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.↵
- 90.↵
- 91.↵
- 92.
- 93.
- 94.↵
- 95.↵
- 96.↵
- 97.
- 98.↵
- 99.↵
- 100.↵
- 101.↵
- 102.↵
- 103.
- 104.↵
- 105.↵
- 106.↵
- 107.↵
- 108.↵
- 109.↵
- 110.↵
- 111.
- 112.↵
- 113.↵
- 114.↵
- 115.↵
- 116.↵
- 117.
- 118.
- 119.↵